Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (6): 24-30, 2005.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16044122

RESUMO

Short-term results of treatment and cost-effect rates were analyzed in three groups of patients undergone traditional cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and cholecystectomy through minilaparotomy. It was demonstrated that frequency of complications was less after operations through laparoscopy and minilaparotomy. Traditional approach had the most costs due to more number of postoperative complications, hospital stay after surgery and more number of analgesics. Cholecystectomy through minilaparotomy is most cost-effective due to high clinical effectiveness, short hospital stay and rare complications. This procedure does not require expensive devices and can be performed with regional anesthesia only. It is concluded that minimally invasive methods of cholecystectomy must be used more widely.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia/economia , Colecistectomia/métodos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/economia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Colelitíase/tratamento farmacológico , Colelitíase/economia , Colelitíase/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tratamento Farmacológico/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Federação Russa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA