Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Hepatol ; 29(3): 101489, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403068

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Different patterns of liver injury have been reported in association with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The aim of this study was to describe a nationwide cohort of patients with SARS CoV-2 vaccine-induced liver injury, focusing on treatment and the evolution after further booster administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: multicentre, retrospective-prospective study, including subjects who developed abnormal liver tests within 90 days after administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. RESULTS: 47 cases were collected: 17 after prime dose and 30 after booster. Age was 57 years, 30 (63.8 %) were female, and 7 (14.9 %) had a history of prior autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Most cases were non-severe, though 9 (19.1 %) developed acute liver injury or failure (ALF). Liver injury tended to be more severe in those presenting after a booster (p=0.084). Pattern of liver injury was hepatocellular (80.9 %), mixed (12.8 %) and 3 (6.4 %) cholestatic. Liver biopsy was performed on 33 patients; 29 showed findings of AIH. Forty-one (87.2 %) patients received immunosuppressants, mostly corticosteroids (35/41). One required liver transplantation and another died due to ALF. Immunosuppression was discontinued in 6/41 patients without later rebound. Twenty-five subjects received at least one booster and 7 (28.0 %) relapsed from the liver injury, but all were non-severe. Recurrence was less frequent among patients on immunosuppressants at booster administration (28.6 % vs. 88.9 %, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: SARS CoV-2 vaccine-induced liver injury is heterogeneous but mostly immune-mediated. Relapse of liver injury after re-exposure to vaccine is frequent (28.0 %) but mild. Immunosuppression at booster administration is associated with a lower risk of liver injury.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Recidiva , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Idoso , Adulto , Imunização Secundária , Fatores de Risco , Transplante de Fígado , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos
2.
Ann. hepatol ; Ann. hepatol;16(2): 312-317, Mar.-Apr. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-887238

RESUMO

ABSTRACT The addition of the new protease inhibitors (PIs) to peg-interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), approved for chronic hepatitis C, has clearly improved sustained virological response (SVR) rates although several adverse events have been reported with this regimens, including mild hematological toxicity. Moreover, severe pancytopenia and aplastic anemia during triple therapy with telaprevir has recently been described in seven patients. We report here two cases of severe agranulocytosis/aplastic anemia using boceprevir or simeprevir in interferon-based combination and 2 additional cases of severe myelosupression in IFN-free therapy with sofosbuvir and simeprevir plus RBV. Our observations suggest that PIs could have a sort of class-effect in developing severe hematologic toxicity or, at least, an additive interaction with other potentially myelotoxic agents such as IFN or RBV that are used in the classical regimens against HCV. Unfortunately, the mechanisms behind this phenomenon are currently unknown. In conclusion, given the lifethreatening character of these complications, close monitoring is mandatory in patients under PIs based therapy to promptly detect serious hematological toxicities and to carefully evaluate treatment discontinuation. Prospective studies assessing the usefulness of RBV in the era of new IFN-free combinations are needed.


Assuntos
Humanos , Inibidores de Proteases/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Medula Óssea/induzido quimicamente , Doenças da Medula Óssea/terapia , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Simeprevir/efeitos adversos , Anemia Aplástica/induzido quimicamente , Anemia Aplástica/terapia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Exame de Medula Óssea , Prolina/efeitos adversos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Evolução Fatal , Quimioterapia Combinada
3.
Ann Hepatol ; 16(2): 312-317, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28233734

RESUMO

The addition of the new protease inhibitors (PIs) to peg-interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV), approved for chronic hepatitis C, has clearly improved sustained virological response (SVR) rates although several adverse events have been reported with this regimens, including mild hematological toxicity. Moreover, severe pancytopenia and aplastic anemia during triple therapy with telaprevir has recently been described in seven patients. We report here two cases of severe agranulocytosis/aplastic anemia using boceprevir or simeprevir in interferon-based combination and 2 additional cases of severe myelosupression in IFN-free therapy with sofosbuvir and simeprevir plus RBV. Our observations suggest that PIs could have a sort of class-effect in developing severe hematologic toxicity or, at least, an additive interaction with other potentially myelotoxic agents such as IFN or RBV that are used in the classical regimens against HCV. Unfortunately, the mechanisms behind this phenomenon are currently unknown. In conclusion, given the lifethreatening character of these complications, close monitoring is mandatory in patients under PIs based therapy to promptly detect serious hematological toxicities and to carefully evaluate treatment discontinuation. Prospective studies assessing the usefulness of RBV in the era of new IFN-free combinations are needed.


Assuntos
Anemia Aplástica/induzido quimicamente , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Medula Óssea/induzido quimicamente , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Inibidores de Proteases/efeitos adversos , Simeprevir/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Anemia Aplástica/diagnóstico , Anemia Aplástica/terapia , Doenças da Medula Óssea/diagnóstico , Doenças da Medula Óssea/terapia , Exame de Medula Óssea , Quimioterapia Combinada , Evolução Fatal , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prolina/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
CES med ; 11(2)jul.-dic. 1997. graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-495577

RESUMO

Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, descriptivo con el objetivo de evaluar la eficacia de la conización cervical con radiofrecuencia en pacientes con neoplasia intraepitelial cervical III que consultaron a Profamilia en Medellín, Colombia entre Julio 1996 y Mayo 1997. Se ingresaron un total de 60 pacientes, en quienes la biopsia guiada por colposcopia mostró este diagnóstico. El promedio de edad fue de 31.5 años. El factor de riesgo más encontrado fue el inicio temprano de las relaciones sexuales en 31.6 por ciento. El 51.7 por ciento de las pacientes no presentaron dolor, el 78.3 por ciento no tuvieron sangrado o este fue leve. La concordancia entre la biopsia y el cono para hacer el diagnóstico de NIC III fue del 96.5 por ciento y la asociación entre NIC III y PVH fue del 36.7 por ciento. El 96.7 por ciento por ciento de las pacientes que cumplieron con el criterio de seguimiento presentaron curación y solo el 3.3 por ciento tuvieron complicaciones tardías (estenosis).En conclusión, la conización es una técnica eficaz para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del NIC III...


Assuntos
Feminino , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Colposcopia , Conização , Radiação não Ionizante , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA