RESUMO
AIM: To assess the effect of establishing a genetic database on the provision of genetic counselling to individuals and families with structural chromosomal abnormalities. METHOD: For the four year period 1997-2000, we compared all cytogenetics laboratory records with entries on the database to determine its completeness. We assessed the extent to which families had been followed up, compared these findings with a previous four year period (1977-1980) and sought to discover why some families were not followed up. RESULTS: Of 215 probands identified during 1997-2000, 19 (9%) were not recorded on the register. Approximately one third of families were followed up completely, one third were partially followed up and one third had had no follow-up, for a variety of reasons. In this last group, there was evidence that some had received inadequate or incorrect genetic advice. There was no evidence that the database improved follow-up in families with structural chromosome abnormalities. Over 20 years, there has been a downward trend in the proportion of cases referred to the genetic clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Our register can be used to monitor trends in clinical practice but has had no direct effect on the service provided to patients and their families.
