Incidence of sexually transmitted infections before and after preexposure prophylaxis for HIV.

OBJECTIVE: Use of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV raises concerns about sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence because of decreased condom use among MSM. This study examines whether PrEP is associated with STIs in the 12 months following PrEP prescription relative to the 12 months prior to PrEP and if STI rates are higher among PrEP users relative to individuals receiving postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study including PrEP users with more than 12 months of follow-up before PrEP prescription and individuals receiving PEP from 2010 to 2015 at Clinique l'Actuel (Montréal, Canada). METHODS: Incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and hepatitis C virus over 12 months was compared before and after PrEP; and for PrEP versus PEP users using Poisson models to generate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and adjusted IRRs (aIRRs) controlling for frequency of STI-screening visits. Models comparing PrEP and PEP users were further adjusted for age and education. RESULTS: One hundred and nine PrEP and 86 PEP users were included. Increased rates of STIs were observed in the 12 months after PrEP relative to the 12 months prior (IRR: 1.72, CI: 1.22-2.41; aIRR: 1.39, CI 0.98-1.96). PrEP users were also at higher STI risk relative to PEP users (IRR: 2.18, CI: 1.46-3.24; aIRR: 1.76, CI: 1.14-2.71). CONCLUSION: Increased rates of STIs among individuals after initiation of PrEP may suggest greater risk behaviours during the first year on PrEP. Further studies are needed to measure long-term trends in STI acquisition following PrEP initiation.

Adherence to Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) and Incidence of HIV Seroconversion in a Major North American Cohort.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on the efficacy of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for sexual exposures. We sought to determine the factors associated with adherence to treatment and describe the incidence of PEP failures in a Montreal clinic. METHODS: We prospectively assessed all patients consulting for PEP following sexual exposures from October 2000 to July 2014. Patients were followed at 4 and 16 weeks after starting PEP. Treatment adherence was determined by self-report at week 4. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the factors predicting adherence to treatment. RESULTS: 3547 PEP consults were included. Patients were mainly male (92%), MSM (83%) and sought PEP for anal intercourse (72%). Seventy-eight percent (n = 2772) of patients received a prescription for PEP, consisting of Tenofovir/Emtracitabine (TVD) + Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV) in 74% of cases, followed by Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) + LPV (10%) and TVD + Raltegravir (RAL) (8%). Seventy percent of patients were adherent to treatment. Compared to TVD+LPV, patients taking CBV+LPV were less likely to adhere to treatment (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.75), while no difference was observed for patients taking TVD+RAL (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.83-1.59). First-time PEP consults, older and male patients were also more adherent to treatment. Ten treated patients seroconverted (0.37%) during the study period, yet only 1 case can be attributed to PEP failure (failure rate = 0.04%). CONCLUSION: PEP regimen was associated with treatment adherence. Patients were more likely to be adherent to TVD-based regimens. Ten patients seroconverted after taking PEP; however, only 1 case was a PEP failure as the remaining patients continued to engage in high-risk behavior during follow-up. One month PEP is an effective preventive measure to avoid HIV infection.

Removing inactive NRTIs in a salvage regimen is safe, maintains virological suppression and reduces treatment costs: results from the VERITAS study (TMC114HIV4054).

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefit of maintaining inactive Nucleotide/side reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in salvage regimens, they are associated with increased toxicity and treatment costs. Current evidence suggests that NRTI-sparing regimens in patients failing ART are non-inferior to NRTI-including regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of removing at least one inactive NRTI on virologic, safety, and financial outcomes. METHODS: Drug-resistant, virologically suppressed patients with CD4 >250 cells/ml on a stable regimen of four or more antiretrovirals (ARVs) were enrolled in a 48-week prospective, open-label pilot trial. One inactive NRTI was removed at baseline. Patients taking over five ARVs had a second inactive NRTI removed at 24 weeks. Viral load, CD4 count, and adverse events were assessed at baseline, 24, and 48 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-one male patients participated. Twenty-nine (94%) patients had lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) removed and four patients had an additional NRTI removed. One patient was excluded at week 26 for discontinuing an active NRTI. All patients maintained undetectable viral loads at weeks 24 (100%) and 48 [PP = 100%; Intent-to-treat (ITT) = 97%]. At 48 weeks, patients had a median gain of 20 CD4 (IQR: - 50, +133; mean +39) compared to baseline. Three patients exhibited Grade III bilirubin elevation (two Grade II and one Grade III at baseline), which returned to baseline levels. No serious adverse events were observed. Removal of one or two ARVs equated to a mean annual savings of $3319 CDN (11%) and $8630 CDN (24%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Removing inactive NRTIs in patients with a controlled viral load appears to be safe, maintains virological suppression, and reduces treatment costs.

Tolerability is more important than simplicity for treatment durability.

INTRODUCTION: Many studies have shown the superiority of single tablet regimens (STRs) of antiretrovirals for the treatment of HIV in terms of efficacy, adherence and rate of hospitalisation as they offer a low pill burden and once daily dosing. Our objective was to compare the duration of first-line STRs to multi-tablet regimens. METHODS: From our clinical database, we selected patients initiating any of the major first-line regimens between 2007 and 2013. Two STRs, Atripla (ATP) and Complera (CPLR), were compared to three non-STRs: two NRTIs and raltegravir (RAL), atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) or darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r). The primary outcome was time to discontinuation of the first-line regimen. The association between regimen type and duration was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, baseline CD4, baseline viral load, risk factor, site and year of treatment initiation. RESULTS: A total of 743 patients (281 on STRs and 462 on non-STRs) were included. 693 (93%) were male and median age was 43 years. Median length of follow-up was 3.2 years. 56% of patients were MSM, 6% IDU and 6% from endemic countries. Patients on an STR were less likely to be IDU (p<0.024) and have a baseline HIV-RNA ≥100,000 copies/mL (p<0.011). Overall, 321 (43%) patients discontinued their regimen during the study period. The rate of discontinuation one year after starting ARV depends on the regimen: 29% for patients on 2NRTIs+DRV/r, 26% on ATP, 25% on 2NRTIs+ATV/r, 17% on 2NRTIs+RAL and 10% on CPLR (p<0.001). In the adjusted model, durability for STR and non-STR was equivalent (aHR=0.83, p=0.108). Compared to patients on ATP, patients on CPLR were less likely to discontinue (HR=0.58, p=0.070). No difference between ATP and the other regimens was observed: HR for 2NRTIs+RAL=0.92 (p=0.66), 2NRTIs+ DRV/r=1.16 (p=0.36), 2NRTIs+ATV/r=1.11 (p=0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that STRs do not necessarily result in a more durable treatment. Even with a higher pill burden and/or twice daily dosing, patients initiating therapy with RAL or boosted-PI based regimens were not more likely to discontinue the first-line regimen compared to patients on an STR. Among the STR subgroups, the regimen with better known tolerability conferred more durable treatment. Limitations included our inability to adjust for the patient's adherence to a given regimen.

Removing inactive NRTIs in a salvage regimen is safe, maintains virological suppression and reduces treatment costs: 96 weeks post VERITAS study.

INTRODUCTION: In HIV+ patients exhibiting multidrug resistance (MDR), NRTIs often have little activity, increased toxicity, drug interactions and add unnecessary treatment costs. The 48 week VERITAS study demonstrated that these patients can have a safe and effective simplification of salvage regimen by removing inactive NRTIs as determined by genotypic data. Virological, immunological, clinical and financial outcomes were evaluated at an additional 96 weeks of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MDR patients with an undetectable viral load (VL) on a stable regimen containing at least four ARVs (including one inactive NRTI) were enrolled in an open-label, prospective simplification trial, where one inactive NRTI was removed at baseline (BL). A second NRTI could be removed at week 24 if the regimen contained at least five ARVs at enrolment. RESULTS: 31 male patients participated. The mean length of treatment was 14 years, with a median CD4 count of 525. The BL regimen consisted of 4 ARVs in 22 patients (71%) and 5 ARVs in 9 patients (29%). 3TC or FTC was removed in 29 patients (94%), and either AZT or TDF was interrupted in 2 others. Four patients had a second NRTI stopped. One patient was removed at W26 as an active NRTI was removed for creatinine elevation. 30 well-controlled patients continued follow-up after W48. At W144, six patients had additional changes in their ARV regimen. Half were due to toxicity (jaundice, neuropathy and nephrotoxicity) while the other half were the result of treatment simplification. None of the patients exhibited virologic failure at the time of treatment change and maintained undetectable VLs throughout the entire follow-up. These six patients had a mean gain of 79 CD4 (p=0.17) compared to baseline. 22 of the 24 patients (92%) with no changes in ARV therapy after W48 had undetectable VLs. The other two had confirmed virologic failure, one with genotypic resistance. All 24 had elevated CD4 counts (mean +118 CD4, p<0.0001). No deaths or serious adverse events were observed. One or two ARV removals translated to a mean annual saving of $3319 CDN (11%) and $8630 (24%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Final results indicate that removing one or two inactive NRTIs from a regimen in patients taking four or more ARVs with controlled VL appears to be safe, maintains virological suppression through 144 weeks and significantly reduces treatment costs.

Abacavir/lamivudine fixed-dose combination with ritonavir-boosted darunavir: a safe and efficacious regimen for HIV therapy.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment guidelines recommend the use of tenofovir (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) along with a third agent to treat HIV-positive adults. However, other treatment options, including the use of abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) when used with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r), have rarely been studied. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the coformulation of ABC/3TC administered with DRV/r in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. METHODS: HIV-infected adults who received an open-label combination of ABC/3TC/ DRV/r were followed in a community clinic in Montréal. Patients had no resistance to any of the compounds in their regimen. Viral load (VL), CD4 cell count, AST, ALT, and creatinine levels were examined throughout the 48 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with a mean age of 45 years were enrolled. Two did not return for follow-up and were excluded. Thirty-five (52%) were treatment- experienced and the remaining were treatment-naïve. HLA-B*5701 test results were available for 56 patients and none were positive. At baseline, mean VL was 4.8 log for treatment-naïve and 2.3 log for experienced patients. Twelve patients discontinued the study regimen prior to reaching the endpoint. At week 48, 79% had a VL <50. Median CD4 cell gain was higher among treatment-naïve patients (273 cells) than among treatment-experienced patients (102 cells) (P = .002). No patient experienced any grade 2 or higher liver enzyme elevation throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: The new combination of ABC/3TC/DRV/r demonstrates a high rate of antiviral activity with no major toxicity. The drug combination appears to be generally safe and well tolerated.

Functional T cell subsets contribute differentially to HIV peptide-specific responses within infected individuals: correlation of these functional T cell subsets with markers of disease progression.

Using a dual color ELISPOT assay able to detect HIV-specific IFN-gamma, IL-2 and dual IFN-gamma/IL-2 secreting lymphocytes we screened for HIV peptide-specific responses directed against the entire HIV proteome in two groups of untreated HIV-infected individuals, slow progressors (SP) and progressors. We found that the three functional lymphocyte subsets contributed differentially to individual HIV peptide-specific responses within a study subject. Among the identified stimulatory peptides, a higher proportion induced dual IFN-gamma/IL-2 secretion in SP than progressors. While the magnitude of single IFN-gamma secreting lymphocytes is similar between groups, the magnitude of peptide-specific dual IFN-gamma/IL-2 secreting lymphocytes is significantly more intense in SP. Neither single nor total IFN-gamma secreting cell magnitude and breadth measurements correlated with CD4 cell count or viral load whereas both parameters of dual IFN-gamma/IL-2 secreting responses correlated positively with CD4 counts and negatively with viremia.