Causes of genome instability: the effect of low dose chemical exposures in modern society.

Genome instability is a prerequisite for the development of cancer. It occurs when genome maintenance systems fail to safeguard the genome's integrity, whether as a consequence of inherited defects or induced via exposure to environmental agents (chemicals, biological agents and radiation). Thus, genome instability can be defined as an enhanced tendency for the genome to acquire mutations; ranging from changes to the nucleotide sequence to chromosomal gain, rearrangements or loss. This review raises the hypothesis that in addition to known human carcinogens, exposure to low dose of other chemicals present in our modern society could contribute to carcinogenesis by indirectly affecting genome stability. The selected chemicals with their mechanisms of action proposed to indirectly contribute to genome instability are: heavy metals (DNA repair, epigenetic modification, DNA damage signaling, telomere length), acrylamide (DNA repair, chromosome segregation), bisphenol A (epigenetic modification, DNA damage signaling, mitochondrial function, chromosome segregation), benomyl (chromosome segregation), quinones (epigenetic modification) and nano-sized particles (epigenetic pathways, mitochondrial function, chromosome segregation, telomere length). The purpose of this review is to describe the crucial aspects of genome instability, to outline the ways in which environmental chemicals can affect this cancer hallmark and to identify candidate chemicals for further study. The overall aim is to make scientists aware of the increasing need to unravel the underlying mechanisms via which chemicals at low doses can induce genome instability and thus promote carcinogenesis.

Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: the challenge ahead.

Lifestyle factors are responsible for a considerable portion of cancer incidence worldwide, but credible estimates from the World Health Organization and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) suggest that the fraction of cancers attributable to toxic environmental exposures is between 7% and 19%. To explore the hypothesis that low-dose exposures to mixtures of chemicals in the environment may be combining to contribute to environmental carcinogenesis, we reviewed 11 hallmark phenotypes of cancer, multiple priority target sites for disruption in each area and prototypical chemical disruptors for all targets, this included dose-response characterizations, evidence of low-dose effects and cross-hallmark effects for all targets and chemicals. In total, 85 examples of chemicals were reviewed for actions on key pathways/mechanisms related to carcinogenesis. Only 15% (13/85) were found to have evidence of a dose-response threshold, whereas 59% (50/85) exerted low-dose effects. No dose-response information was found for the remaining 26% (22/85). Our analysis suggests that the cumulative effects of individual (non-carcinogenic) chemicals acting on different pathways, and a variety of related systems, organs, tissues and cells could plausibly conspire to produce carcinogenic synergies. Additional basic research on carcinogenesis and research focused on low-dose effects of chemical mixtures needs to be rigorously pursued before the merits of this hypothesis can be further advanced. However, the structure of the World Health Organization International Programme on Chemical Safety 'Mode of Action' framework should be revisited as it has inherent weaknesses that are not fully aligned with our current understanding of cancer biology.

Measurement and analysis of the chemotherapy-induced genetic instability in pediatric cancer patients.

Bleomycin sensitivity has been proven to be a useful biomarker for environmental carcinogenesis and tumor genetic instability. We have previously reported a significant increase in the chromosomal aberrations induced by chemotherapy regimens. This study aimed to test whether there is an inherent increased genetic instability in cancer patients at diagnosis, to determine the increase and time course of the chemotherapy-induced instability and to test whether bleomycin sensitivity can be used as a predictor of tumor evolution or relapse. The analysis included 99 pediatric cancer patients with four different tumor types (Ewing's sarcoma, osteosarcoma, lymphoma and CNS tumors) and 25 controls. Blood samples (n = 171) were obtained before and at the end of treatment, during clinical remission and at relapse and bleomycin tests on lymphocyte cultures were performed. We detected a significant increase (P = 0.004) in mutagen sensitivity in patients at the end of treatment compared with untreated patients, regardless of the tumor type. In both the longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses maximal and similar values of mutagen sensitivity were found in patients during treatment (1.84 +/- 0.82) and at relapse (1.78 +/- 0.52); minimum and similar values were found in controls (0.93 +/- 0.23), untreated patients (1.15 +/- 0.65) and in those who had fulfilled the chemotherapy protocols for at least 2 years before their sample was collected (1.09 +/- 0.53). From this preliminary data we can conclude that cytostatic drugs induce a transient increase in chromosomal instability in pediatric cancer patients that can be monitored by bleomycin-induced sensitivity tests and that the genetic instability indices should be further investigated as predictors of relapse.