Assessing effectiveness of heart rate variability biofeedback to mitigate mental health symptoms: a pilot study.

Introduction: The increasing burden on mental health has become a worldwide concern especially due to its substantial negative social and economic impact. The implementation of prevention actions and psychological interventions is crucial to mitigate these consequences, and evidence supporting its effectiveness would facilitate a more assertive response. Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BF) has been proposed as a potential intervention to improve mental wellbeing through mechanisms in autonomic functioning. The aim of this study is to propose and evaluate the validity of an objective procedure to assess the effectiveness of a HRV-BF protocol in mitigating mental health symptoms in a sample of frontline HCWs (healthcare workers) who worked in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A prospective experimental study applying a HRV-BF protocol was conducted with 21 frontline healthcare workers in 5 weekly sessions. For PRE-POST intervention comparisons, two different approaches were used to evaluate mental health status: applying (a) gold-standard psychometric questionnaires and (b) electrophysiological multiparametric models for chronic and acute stress assessment. Results: After HRV-BF intervention, psychometric questionnaires showed a reduction in mental health symptoms and stress perception. The electrophysiological multiparametric also showed a reduction in chronic stress levels, while the acute stress levels were similar in PRE and POST conditions. A significant reduction in respiratory rate and an increase in some heart rate variability parameters, such as SDNN, LFn, and LF/HF ratio, were also observed after intervention. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a 5-session HRV-BF protocol is an effective intervention for reducing stress and other mental health symptoms among frontline HCWs who worked during the COVID-19 pandemic. The electrophysiological multiparametric models provide relevant information about the current mental health state, being useful for objectively evaluating the effectiveness of stress-reducing interventions. Further research could replicate the proposed procedure to confirm its feasibility for different samples and specific interventions.

Mental health assessment of Spanish frontline healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Background and objectiveThe Covid-19 pandemic continues challenging health systems globally, exposing healthcare workers to constant physical and psychological stressors. To date, several studies have already shown the catastrophic impact on the mental health of medical personnel during the early period of the pandemic. Nevertheless, literature evidences the dearth of works that evaluate the effect over time, understanding the pandemic as a sustained extreme stressor. The present study examines the effect of the pandemic on the mental health of Covid-19 frontline healthcare workers at six months follow-up.Material and methodsA total of 141 frontline healthcare workers from two tertiary hospitals were recruited between July and November 2020. Healthcare workers were evaluated psychologically at baseline and six months follow-up (January to May 2021) using psychometric tests for the assessment of acute stress (VASS, PSS-10, PCL-5), anxiety (STAI) and depression (PHQ-2)ResultsOverall, there was a general worsening of the mental health between the two psychological assessments, especially regarding depression and predisposition to perceiving the situations as a threat. Nurses and nurse aides showed poorer mental health while physicians improved over time. Reduced working hours and higher physical exercise resulted in better mental health among healthcare workers. Women and nursing staff were the most affected by psychological distress at baseline and six months follow-up.ConclusionReduced working hours, adequate resting periods, physical exercise, and efficient intervention strategies are of utmost importance in preventing, controlling, and reducing psychological distress among healthcare workers when coping with critical scenarios such as the current pandemic. (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivoLa pandemia Covid-19 sigue desafiando a los sistemas sanitarios, exponiendo al personal asistencial a estresores físicos y psicológicos. Actualmente, varios estudios han demostrado el impacto catastrófico en la salud mental del personal asistencial durante la primera etapa de la pandemia, pero pocos han considerado el seguimiento de los síntomas. El presente estudio examina el efecto de la pandemia en la salud mental del personal sanitario de primera línea a los 6 meses de seguimiento.Material y métodosSe evaluó psicológicamente a 141 trabajadores sanitarios de primera línea de 2 hospitales terciarios al inicio del estudio (julio-noviembre, 2020) y a los 6 meses (enero-mayo, 2021) mediante pruebas psicométricas para el estrés agudo (VASS, PSS-10, PCL-5), la ansiedad (STAI) y la depresión (PHQ-2).ResultadosEn general, se observó un empeoramiento de la salud mental entre las 2 evaluaciones psicológicas, especialmente en depresión y predisposición a percibir las situaciones como una amenaza. La salud mental del personal de enfermería empeoró con el tiempo, mientras que los médicos mejoraron. La reducción de la jornada laboral y el aumento del ejercicio físico mejoraron la salud mental. Las mujeres y el personal de enfermería fueron los más afectados por el malestar psicológico al inicio y a los 6 meses de seguimiento.ConclusiónJornadas laborales reducidas, períodos de descanso adecuados, ejercicio físico y estrategias de intervención eficientes son de suma importancia para prevenir, controlar y reducir el malestar psicológico entre el personal sanitario ante escenarios críticos como la pandemia actual. (AU)

Análisis individualizado por sexo de los factores asociados a la clasificación inicial errónea en urgencias del dolor torácico como no coronario / Factors associated with erroneous emergency department noncardiac chest pain classifications in men and women

Introducción. Analizar de forma independiente en mujeres y hombres la frecuencia y las características clínicas asociadas a una clasificación inicial errónea (CIE) en urgencias del dolor torácico (DT) como no coronario. Método. Se analizan todas las consultas por DT atendidas en urgencias entre 2008 y 2017 clasificadas inicialmente (historia clínica y ECG) como DT no coronario. Se consideró como CIE si el diagnóstico final fue síndrome coronario agudo (SCA). Se crearon dos modelos multivariable, uno con 10 factores de riesgo, y otro con 10 características clínicas del DT, en los que se investigó la asociación de estas variables con una CIE. Se analizaron independientemente mujeres y hombres. Resultados. Se analizaron 8.093 mujeres con DT clasificado inicialmente como no coronario (edad mediana: 54 años, RIC: 38-73), 72 con CIE (0,9%). Los factores de riesgo asociados independientemente a CIE fueron obesidad (OR = 0,40; IC 95% = 0,17-0,97) y consumo de cocaína (5,18; 1,16-23,2), y las características clínicas fueron relación con el esfuerzo (2,01; 1,21-3,33), existencia de irradiación (2,05; 1,23-3,41) y síntomas vegetativos acompañantes (1,86; 1,02-3,41). Se analizaron 9.979 hombres (edad mediana: 47 años, RIC: 33-64), 83 con CIE (0,8%). Los factores de riesgo asociados a CIE fueron edad > 40 años (1,74; 1,04-2,91) e hipertensión (0,45; 0,24-0,84). No hubo características clínicas del DT asociadas a CIE. Conclusión. En las mujeres con dolor torácico, se identifican más características asociadas al error de clasificación que en los hombres. Este estudio remarca la necesidad de análisis independiente por sexo en el SCA, en el que clásica- mente se ha considerado la clínica en las mujeres como atípica. (AU)

Objective. To analyze the frequency and clinical characteristics associated with erroneous initial classifications of noncardiac chest pain (NCP) in men and women. Methods. We analyzed all case records in which chest pain was initially classified as noncardiac in origin according to clinical signs and electrocardiograms evaluated in our emergency department between 2008 and 2017. We considered the initial evaluation of NCP to be in error if the final diagnosis was acute coronary syndrome. A risk model for an erroneous initial classification of NCP was developed based on multivariable analysis of our patient data. We also used multivariable analysis to explore associations between 10 clinical signs of chest pain and an erroneous initial NCP classification. The data for men and women were analyzed separately. Results. NCP was the initial classification for 8093 women; their median (interquartile range) age was 54 (38-73) years. The classification was in error for 72 women (0.9%). Odds ratios (ORs) showed that patient risk factors associated with an erroneous NCP classification in the women in our series were obesity (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17- 0.97) and cocaine consumption (OR, 5.18; 95% CI, 1.16-23.2). Clinical risk factors associated with erroneous NCP classification in women were recent physical exertion (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.21-3.33), radiation exposure (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.23-3.41), and vegetative symptoms (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.02-3.41). For 9979 men with a median age of 47 (33-64) years, NCP was the initial classification; in 83 of the men (0.8%) the classification was erroneous. Patient factors associated with erroneous NCP classification in men were age over 40 years (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04-2.91) and hypertension (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.84). No clinical signs of chest pain in men were associated with error. Conclusions. More clinical characteristics are associated with an erroneous classification of NCP in women. [...] (AU)

Factors associated with erroneous emergency department noncardiac chest pain classifications in men and women. / Análisis individualizado por sexo de los factores asociados a la clasificación inicial errónea en urgencias del dolor torácico como no coronario.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the frequency and clinical characteristics associated with erroneous initial classifications of noncardiac chest pain (NCP) in men and women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed all case records in which chest pain was initially classified as noncardiac in origin according to clinical signs and electrocardiograms evaluated in our emergency department between 2008 and 2017. We considered the initial evaluation of NCP to be in error if the final diagnosis was acute coronary syndrome. A risk model for an erroneous initial classification of NCP was developed based on multivariable analysis of our patient data. We also used multivariable analysis to explore associations between 10 clinical signs of chest pain and an erroneous initial NCP classification. The data for men and women were analyzed separately. RESULTS: NCP was the initial classification for 8093 women; their median (interquartile range) age was 54 (38-73) years. The classification was in error for 72 women (0.9%). Odds ratios (ORs) showed that patient risk factors associated with an erroneous NCP classification in the women in our series were obesity (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17- 0.97) and cocaine consumption (OR, 5.18; 95% CI, 1.16-23.2). Clinical risk factors associated with erroneous NCP classification in women were recent physical exertion (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.21-3.33), radiation exposure (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.23-3.41), and vegetative symptoms (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.02-3.41). For 9979 men with a median age of 47 (33-64) years, NCP was the initial classification; in 83 of the men (0.8%) the classification was erroneous. Patient factors associated with erroneous NCP classification in men were age over 40 years (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04-2.91) and hypertension (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.84). No clinical signs of chest pain in men were associated with error. CONCLUSION: More clinical characteristics are associated with an erroneous classification of NCP in women. Our findings underline the need to assess the possibility of acute coronary syndrome differently in women, in whom the signs have usually been considered to be atypical.

OBJETIVO: Analizar de forma independiente en mujeres y hombres la frecuencia y las características clínicas asociadas a una clasificación inicial errónea (CIE) en urgencias del dolor torácico (DT) como no coronario. METODO: Se analizan todas las consultas por DT atendidas en urgencias entre 2008 y 2017 clasificadas inicialmente (historia clínica y ECG) como DT no coronario. Se consideró como CIE si el diagnóstico final fue síndrome coronario agudo (SCA). Se crearon dos modelos multivariable, uno con 10 factores de riesgo, y otro con 10 características clínicas del DT, en los que se investigó la asociación de estas variables con una CIE. Se analizaron independientemente mujeres y hombres. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 8.093 mujeres con DT clasificado inicialmente como no coronario (edad mediana: 54 años, RIC: 38-73), 72 con CIE (0,9%). Los factores de riesgo asociados independientemente a CIE fueron obesidad (OR = 0,40; IC 95% = 0,17-0,97) y consumo de cocaína (5,18; 1,16-23,2), y las características clínicas fueron relación con el esfuerzo (2,01; 1,21-3,33), existencia de irradiación (2,05; 1,23-3,41) y síntomas vegetativos acompañantes (1,86; 1,02-3,41). Se analizaron 9.979 hombres (edad mediana: 47 años, RIC: 33-64), 83 con CIE (0,8%). Los factores de riesgo asociados a CIE fueron edad > 40 años (1,74; 1,04-2,91) e hipertensión (0,45; 0,24-0,84). No hubo características clínicas del DT asociadas a CIE. CONCLUSIONES: En las mujeres con dolor torácico, se idenfitican más características asociadas al error de clasificación que en los hombres. Este estudio remarca la necesidad de análisis independiente por sexo en el SCA, en el que clásicamente se ha considerado la clínica en las mujeres como atípica.

Association between troponin and outcome in patients with chest pain and rapid atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study of a single-center 10-year cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The prognosis of myocardial infarction in patients with rapid atrial fibrillation (RAF) is poorly known. We sought to ascertain if troponin concentrations are associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with RAF and chest discomfort suggestive of coronary origin. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients attending an emergency department of a single-center (2008-2017) with chest pain suggestive of coronary origin who had RAF and at least one troponin determination. Patients were classified as having normal/increased troponin. They were followed until December 2019 to detect MACE (primary outcome), which included acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization, stroke, or all-cause death. In addition to cardiovascular death and type I myocardial infarction, these were considered secondary outcomes. The adjusted risk was determined by Cox regression, and sensitivity analysis were run. Relationship between troponin as a continuous variable and outcomes was also evaluated, as well as interaction by sex. RESULTS: We included 574 patients (median = 76.5 years, IQR = 14, women 56.8%, increased troponin 34.1%) followed by a median of 3.8 years (IQR = 4.8). MACE occurred in 200 patients (34.8%). Increased troponin was independently associated with MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.502, 95% CI, 1.130-1.998), ACS (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.488, 95% CI, 1.256-4.928), type I myocardial infarction (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.771, 95% CI, 1.212-6.333) and stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.580, 95% CI, 1.888-6.787) but not with death, cardiovascular death or revascularization. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with these results. There was no interaction by sex. When assessed continuously, an increase in troponin concentrations was lineally associated with a steady increase in the risk of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RAF who complain of chest pain, increased troponin levels are related to adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Mental health assessment of Spanish healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak is posing unprecedented care scenarios, increasing the psychological distress among healthcare workers while reducing the efficiency of health systems. This work evaluated the psychological impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on Spanish frontline healthcare workers of two tertiary hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Healthcare workers were recruited from the medical units designated for the care of Covid-19 patients. The psychological assessment consisted of an individual, face-to-face session where gold-standard psychometric tests were administered to assess stress (VASS & PSS-10), anxiety (STAI), depression (PHQ-2) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PCL-5). Regression models were also fitted to identify predictors of psychological distress. RESULTS: Overall, almost 13% of healthcare workers showed severe anxiety, while more than 26% had high levels of perceived stress. More than 23% presented severe posttraumatic stress symptoms, and another 13% had PHQ-2 scores equal to or above 3, compatible with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) diagnosis, respectively. Women, stress-related medication, overworking, performing in Covid-19 wards, and substance abuse were risk factors for increased psychological distress. Instead, practising exercise reduced the burden. CONCLUSION: This study outlines the severe psychological impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on Spanish frontline healthcare workers. The stress, depression and anxiety levels found were similar to those reported in similar works but much higher than in Wuhan healthcare workers. Knowledge of risk factors for increased psychological distress may help to develop comprehensive intervention strategies to prevent, control and reduce the mental health exacerbation of healthcare workers, thereby maintaining the effectiveness of health systems in critical scenarios.

Factors associated with late presentation to the emergency department in patients complaining of chest pain.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated which factors predict late presentation (LP) to the emergency department (ED) in patients with non-traumatic chest pain (CP). METHODS: All CP cases attended at a single ED (2008-2017) were included. LP was considered if time from CP onset to ED arrival was>6 h. We analyzed associations between 42 patient/CP-related characteristics and LP in the whole cohort and in patients with CP due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). RESULTS: The cohort included 25,693 cases (LP=50.6%; ACS=19.0%). Twenty factors were associated with LP, and 8 were also found in patients with ACS: CP of short-duration, aggravated by exertion or breathing/movement, undulating or recurrent CP increased the risk of LP, whereas CP accompanied by diaphoresis, irradiated to the throat, and chronic treatment with nitrates decreased the risk of LP. Exertional and recurrent CP were associated with both, LP and ACS. CONCLUSION: Some characteristics, mainly CP-related, may lead to LP to the ED. CP aggravated by exercise and recurrent CP were associated with both LP and a final diagnosis of ACS. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patient educational initiatives should consider these two features as potential warnings for ACS and thereby encourage patients to seek early medical consultation.

Incidence, clinical presentation, management, and outcome of acute pericarditis and myopericarditis.

AIMS: Little is known about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, management, and outcome of acute pericarditis and myopericarditis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The final diagnoses of acute pericarditis, myopericarditis, and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) of patients presenting to seven emergency departments in Switzerland with acute chest pain were centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists using all information including serial measurements of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. The overall incidence of pericarditis and myopericarditis was estimated relative to the established incidence of NSTEMI. Current management and long-term outcome of both conditions were also assessed. Among 2533 chest pain patients, the incidence of pericarditis, myopericarditis, and NSTEMI were 1.9% (n = 48), 1.1% (n = 29), and 21.6% (n = 548), respectively. Accordingly, the estimated incidence of pericarditis and myopericarditis in Switzerland was 10.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 9.3-10.9] and 6.1 (95% CI 5.6-6.7) cases per 100 000 population per year, respectively, vs. 115.0 (95% CI 112.3-117.6) cases per 100 000 population per year for NSTEMI. Pericarditis (85% male, median age 46 years) and myopericarditis (62% male, median age 56 years) had male predominance, and commonly (50% and 97%, respectively) resulted in hospitalization. No patient with pericarditis or myopericarditis died or had life-threatening arrhythmias within 30 days [incidence 0% (95% CI 0.0-4.8%)]. Compared with NSTEMI, the 2-year all-cause mortality adjusted hazard ratio of pericarditis and myopericarditis was 0.40 (95% CI 0.05-2.96), being 0.59 (95% CI 0.40-0.88) for non-cardiac causes of chest pain. CONCLUSION: Pericarditis and myopericarditis are substantially less common than NSTEMI and have an excellent short- and long-term outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov, number NCT00470587, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00470587.

Novel Criteria for the Observe-Zone of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: The non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend a 3h cardiac troponin determination in patients triaged to the observe-zone of the ESC 0/1h-algorithm; however, no specific cutoff for further triage is endorsed. Recently, a specific cutoff for 0/3h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) change (7 ng/L) was proposed, warranting external validation. METHODS: Patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled into an international multicenter diagnostic study. Final diagnoses were centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists applying the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction, on the basis of complete cardiac workup, cardiac imaging, and serial hs-cTnT. Hs-cTnT concentrations were measured at presentation, after 1 hour, and after 3 hours. The objective was to externally validate the proposed cutoff, and if necessary, derive and internally as well as externally validate novel 0/3h-criteria for the observe-zone of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT-algorithm in an independent multicenter cohort. RESULTS: Among 2076 eligible patients, application of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT-algorithm triaged 1512 patients (72.8%) to either rule out or rule in NSTEMI, leaving 564 patients (27.2%) in the observe-zone (adjudicated NSTEMI prevalence, 120/564 patients, 21.3%). The suggested 0/3h-hs-cTnT-change of <7 ng/L triaged 517 patients (91.7%) toward rule-out, resulting in a sensitivity of 33.3% (95% CI, 25.5-42.2), missing 80 patients with NSTEMI, and ≥7 ng/L triaged 47 patients toward rule-in (8.3%), resulting in a specificity of 98.4% (95% CI, 96.8-99.2). Novel derived 0/3h-criteria for the observe-zone patients ruled out NSTEMI with a 3h hs-cTnT concentration <15 ng/L and a 0/3h-hs-cTnT absolute change <4 ng/L, triaging 138 patients (25%) toward rule-out, resulting in a sensitivity of 99.2% (95% CI, 96.0-99.9), missing 1 patient with NSTEMI. A 0/3h-hs-cTnT absolute change ≥6 ng/L triaged 63 patients (11.2%) toward rule-in, resulting in a specificity of 98% (95% CI, 96.2-98.9) Thereby, the novel 0/3h-criteria reduced the number of patients in the observe zone by 36%s and the number of type 1 myocardial infarction by 50%. Findings were confirmed in both internal and external validation. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of a 3h-hs-cTnT concentration (<15 ng/L) and a 0/3h absolute change (<4 ng/L) is necessary to safely rule out NSTEMI in patients remaining in the observe-zone of the ESC 0/1h-hs-cTnT-algorithm. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00470587.

Análisis de mortalidad de los pacientes atendidos por COVID-19 en el servicio de urgencias de un hospital de tercer nivel en la fase incial de la pandemia. Derivación de un modelo de riesgo para urgencias / Mortality in patients treated for COVID-19 in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital during the first phase of the pandemic: Derivation of a risk model for emergency departments

Objetivo. Derivar un modelo de riesgo para estimar la probabilidad de mortalidad a los 30 días de la visita a urgencias de pacientes con COVID-19. Método. Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo de 2.511 pacientes con COVID-19 atendidos en el servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) del 1 de marzo al 30 de abril de 2020. Se realizó análisis de supervivencia mediante Kaplan Meier y regresión de Cox. Resultados. La mortalidad por cualquier causa a los 30 días fue de un 8%. Los factores asociados de forma independiente a mayor mortalidad fueron: edad $ 50 años, índice de Barthel < 90 puntos, alteración del nivel de consciencia, índice de SaO2/FIO2 < 400, auscultación respiratoria anómala, cifra de plaquetas < 100.000/mm3, PCR $ 5 mg/dL y filtrado glomerular < 45 mL/min. A estos factores se les asignó una puntuación de 1, excepto a la edad, que se le asignó un valor de 2 puntos. Se dividió el modelo de riesgo en 3 categorías: riesgo bajo (menor o igual a 4 puntos), riesgo intermedio (5-6 puntos) y riesgo alto (igual o superior a 7 puntos). Para los pacientes clasificados como de bajo riesgo la probabilidad de mortalidad a los 30 días fue del 1,7%, en los casos de riesgo intermedio fue del 28,2% y para los de alto riesgo fue del 67,3%. Conclusión. Disponer de una herramienta para estratificar el riesgo de mortalidad de los pacientes con COVID-19 que consultan a un SUH podría ser de utilidad para la gestión de los recursos sanitarios disponibles. (AU)

Objectives: To develop a risk model to predict 30-day mortality after emergency department treatment for COVID-19. Material and methods: Observational retrospective cohort study including 2511 patients with COVID-19 who came to our emergency department between March 1 and April 30, 2020. We analyzed variables with Kaplan Meier survival and Cox regression analyses. Results: All-cause mortality was 8% at 30 days. Independent variables associated with higher risk of mortality were age over 50 years, a Barthel index score less than 90, altered mental status, the ratio of arterial oxygen saturation to the fraction of inspired oxygen (SaO2/FIO2), abnormal lung sounds, platelet concentration less than 100 000/mm3, a C-reactive protein concentration of 5 mg/dL or higher, and a glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min. Each independent predictor was assigned 1 point in the score except age, which was assigned 2 points. Risk was distributed in 3 levels: low risk (score of 4 points or less), intermediate risk (5 to 6 points), and high risk (7 points or above). Thirty-day risk of mortality was 1.7% for patients who scored in the low-risk category, 28.2% for patients with an intermediate risk score, and 67.3% for those with a high risk score. Conclusion: This mortality risk stratification tool for patients with COVID-19 could be useful for managing the course of disease and assigning health care resources in the emergency department. (AU)

Mortality in patients treated for COVID-19 in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital during the first phase of the pandemic: Derivation of a risk model for emergency departments. / Análisis de mortalidad de los pacientes atendidos por COVID-19 en el servicio de urgencias de un hospital de tercer nivel en la fase incial de la pandemia. Derivación de un modelo de riesgo para urgencias.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a risk model to predict 30-day mortality after emergency department treatment for COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational retrospective cohort study including 2511 patients with COVID-19 who came to our emergency department between March 1 and April 30, 2020. We analyzed variables with Kaplan Meier survival and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was 8% at 30 days. Independent variables associated with higher risk of mortality were age over 50 years, a Barthel index score less than 90, altered mental status, the ratio of arterial oxygen saturation to the fraction of inspired oxygen (SaO2/FIO2), abnormal lung sounds, platelet concentration less than 100 000/mm3, a C-reactive protein concentration of 5 mg/dL or higher, and a glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min. Each independent predictor was assigned 1 point in the score except age, which was assigned 2 points. Risk was distributed in 3 levels: low risk (score of 4 points or less), intermediate risk (5 to 6 points), and high risk (7 points or above). Thirty-day risk of mortality was 1.7% for patients who scored in the low-risk category, 28.2% for patients with an intermediate risk score, and 67.3% for those with a high risk score. CONCLUSION: This mortality risk stratification tool for patients with COVID-19 could be useful for managing the course of disease and assigning health care resources in the emergency department.

OBJETIVO: Derivar un modelo de riesgo para estimar la probabilidad de mortalidad a los 30 días de la visita a urgencias de pacientes con COVID-19. METODO: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo de 2.511 pacientes con COVID-19 atendidos en el servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) del 1 de marzo al 30 de abril de 2020. Se realizó análisis de supervivencia mediante Kaplan Meier y regresión de Cox. RESULTADOS: La mortalidad por cualquier causa a los 30 días fue de un 8%. Los factores asociados de forma independiente a mayor mortalidad fueron: edad 50 años, índice de Barthel 90 puntos, alteración del nivel de consciencia, índice de SaO2/FIO2 400, auscultación respiratoria anómala, cifra de plaquetas 100.000/mm3, PCR 5 mg/dL y filtrado glomerular 45 mL/min. A estos factores se les asignó una puntuación de 1, excepto a la edad, que se le asignó un valor de 2 puntos. Se dividió el modelo de riesgo en 3 categorías: riesgo bajo (menor o igual a 4 puntos), riesgo intermedio (5-6 puntos) y riesgo alto (igual o superior a 7 puntos). Para los pacientes clasificados como de bajo riesgo la probabilidad de mortalidad a los 30 días fue del 1,7%, en los casos de riesgo intermedio fue del 28,2% y para los de alto riesgo fue del 67,3%. CONCLUSIONES: Disponer de una herramienta para estratificar el riesgo de mortalidad de los pacientes con COVID-19 que consultan a un SUH podría ser de utilidad para la gestión de los recursos sanitarios disponibles.

Influence of previous coronary artery bypass grafting in the difficulty of acute coronary syndrome diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients with chest pain (CP) is more difficult based on the initial clinical and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings. METHODS: We included consecutive CP patients attended at a single emergency department (ED) during a 10-year period. CABG status and the final diagnosis of ACS were considered as stated in the ED discharge report. We evaluated the frequency of 21 CP characteristics (CPC) and four ECG signatures, their individual and collective association with ACS, and ED length of stay (LOS) in CABG and non-CABG patients. RESULTS: We included 34 429 patients [median age: 61 years; female: 41.8%; CABG: 2204 patients (6.4%)], and ACS was diagnosed in 6727 (19.5%; CABG/non-CABG 37.2%/18.3%; P < 0.001). CABG patients more frequently had CPC and ECG findings typically associated with ACS, but their final association with ACS was weaker than in non-CABG patients (only significant after adjustment for attendant diaphoresis, throat irradiation, ST-segment elevation and T-wave inversion). The collective discriminative capacity was significantly lower in CABG patients (area under the curve 0.710 vs. 0.793; P < 0.001), even after adjustment (0.708 vs. 0.790; P < 0.001). ED LOS was longer for CABG patients, overall (P < 0.001) and for patients diagnosed with ACS (P = 0.008) and non-ACS (P < 0.001), but these differences disappeared after adjustment. CONCLUSION: CABG substantially reduces the diagnostic performance of CPC and ECG findings to suggest ACS. A longer LOS in the ED in CABG patients is more related to their baseline characteristics than to CABG itself.

Design and validation of an electrophysiological based tool to assess chronic stress. Case study: burnout syndrome in caregivers.

Caregiver burnout syndrome is an increasingly seen condition, although the subjective nature of self-administered psychometric tests and the lack of a consensual diagnostic tool might hinder a proper diagnosis. The availability of objective psychosomatic measures of stress might facilitate the early diagnosis and clinical management of these patients. For this reason, the aim of this work was to develop a quantitative tool to evaluate the stress level of caregivers in a noninvasive and repeatable manner. An observational, controlled, matched study was designed including a group of 38 principal caregivers of chronic patients and a control group of 38 non-caregivers. Psychometric, biochemical, and electrophysiological data were analyzed along with sociodemographic data. A quantitative chronic stress reference scale (CSRs) was constructed based on the weighted contribution of several psychometric and biochemical variables and afterwards, a predictive psychosomatic model (ESBSm) correlated with CSRs was elaborated from extracted variables of several electrophysiological signals monitored for 10 min. The resulting CSR scale shows a high power to discriminate caregivers from the control group while the ESBSm shows a 79% correlation with the CSR scale validated through a 5-fold process. Therefore, the results demonstrate that the ESBS model is an objective and validated tool to diagnose the degree of stress linked to burnout in caregivers of chronic patients from a 10-min session of noninvasive monitoring with a reliability equivalent to the questionnaires currently used to quantify stress in caregivers.

Factors associated with revisits by patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection discharged from a hospital emergency department. / Factores asociados a revisita en pacientes con diagnóstico de infección por SARS-CoV-2 dados de alta de un servicio de urgencias hospitalario.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze emergency department (ED) revisits from patients discharged with possible coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients who came to the ED over a period of 2 months and were diagnosed with possible COVID-19. We analyzed clinical and epidemiologic variables, treatments given in the ED, discharge destination, need to revisit, and reasons for revisits. Patients who did or did not revisit were compared, and factors associated with revisits were explored. RESULTS: The 2378 patients included had a mean age of 57 years; 49% were women. Of the 925 patients (39%) discharged, 170 (20.5%) revisited the ED, mainly for persistence or progression of symptoms. Sixty-six (38.8%) were hospitalized. Odds ratios (ORs) for the following factors showed an association with revisits: history of rheumatologic disease (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.10-7.99; P = .03), digestive symptoms (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.14-2.63; P = .01), respiratory rate over 20 breaths per minute (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.0-1.06; P = .05), and corticosteroid therapy given in the ED (OR, 7.78; 95% CI, 1.77-14.21, P = .01). Factors associated with hospitalization after revisits were age over 48 years (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1 42-4.67; P = .002) and fever (OR, 4.73; 95% CI, 1.99-11.27; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Patients under the age of 48 years without comorbidity and with normal vitals can be discharged from the ED without fear of complications. A history of rheumatologic disease, fever, digestive symptoms, and a respiratory rate over 20 breaths per minute, or a need for corticosteroid therapy were independently associated with revisits. Fever and age over 48 years were associated with a need for hospitalization.

OBJETIVO: Analizar las revisitas y los factores asociados a la misma en pacientes con diagnóstico de posible COVID-19 dados de alta de un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH). METODO: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo que incluyó pacientes consecutivos que consultaron al SUH en un periodo de 2 meses y fueron diagnosticados de posible de COVID-19. Se analizaron variables clínico-epidemiológicas, tratamiento administrado en urgencias, destino final, revisita al SUH y motivo de esta. Se hizo un análisis comparativo entre ambos grupos (revisita sí/no) y se identificaron factores asociados a la revisita. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 2.378 pacientes (edad media 57 años; 49% mujeres). De los pacientes dados de alta (39% del total; n = 925), 170 (20,5%) reconsultaron al SUH, principalmente por persistencia o progresión de síntomas, y 66 (38,8%) precisaron ingreso. Los factores relacionados con la revisita fueron: antecedentes de enfermedad reumatológica [OR: 2,97 (IC 95%: 1,10-7,99, p = 0,03)], síntomas digestivos [OR: 1,73 (IC 95%: 1,14-2,63, p = 0,01)], frecuencia respiratoria $ 20 [OR: 1,03 (IC 95%: 1,0-1,06, p = 0,05)] y haber recibido tratamiento con esteroides en urgencias [OR: 7,78 (IC 95%: 1,77-14,21, p = 0,01)]. Los factores asociados al ingreso en la revisita fueron la edad $ 48 años [OR: 2,57 (IC 95%: 1,42-4,67, p = 0,002)] y presentar fiebre [OR: 4,73 (IC 95%: 1,99-11,27, p = 0,001)]. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes con posible COVID-19 menores de 48 años, sin comorbilidad y con signos vitales normales podrían ser dados de alta desde urgencias sin temor a sufrir complicaciones. Los antecedentes de enfermedad reumatológica, fiebre, sintomas digestivos, frecuencia respiratoria $ 20/min o necesidad de tratamiento con esteroides fueron factores independientes de revisita, y la fiebre y edad $ 48 años de necesidad de ingreso.

Factores asociados a revisita en pacientes con diagnóstico de infección por SARS-CoV-2 dados de alta de un servicio de urgencias hospitalario / Factors associated with revisits by patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection discharged from a hospital emergency department

OBJETIVO: Analizar las revisitas y los factores asociados a la misma en pacientes con diagnóstico de posible COVID-19 dados de alta de un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH). MÉTODO: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo que incluyó pacientes consecutivos que consultaron al SUH en un periodo de 2 meses y fueron diagnosticados de posible de COVID-19. Se analizaron variables clínico-epidemiológicas, tratamiento administrado en urgencias, destino final, revisita al SUH y motivo de esta. Se hizo un análisis comparativo entre ambos grupos (revisita sí/no) y se identificaron factores asociados a la revisita. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 2.378 pacientes (edad media 57 años; 49% mujeres). De los pacientes dados de alta (39% del total; n = 925), 170 (20,5%) reconsultaron al SUH, principalmente por persistencia o progresión de síntomas, y 66(38,8%) precisaron ingreso. Los factores relacionados con la revisita fueron: antecedentes de enfermedad reumatológica [OR: 2,97 (IC 95%: 1,10-7,99, p = 0,03)], síntomas digestivos [OR: 1,73 (IC 95%: 1,14-2,63, p = 0,01)], frecuencia respiratoria>=20 [OR: 1,03 (IC 95%: 1,0-1,06, p = 0,05)] y haber recibido tratamiento con esteroides en urgencias[OR: 7,78 (IC 95%: 1,77-14,21, p = 0,01)]. Los factores asociados al ingreso en la revisita fueron la edad>=48 años[OR: 2,57 (IC 95%: 1,42-4,67, p = 0,002)] y presentar fiebre [OR: 4,73 (IC 95%: 1,99-11,27, p = 0,001)]. CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes con posible COVID-19 menores de 48 años, sin comorbilidad y con signos vitales normales podrían ser dados de alta desde urgencias sin temor a sufrir complicaciones. Los antecedentes de enfermedad reumatológica, fiebre, sintomas digestivos, frecuencia respiratoria>=20/min o necesidad de tratamiento con esteroides fueron factores independientes de revisita, y la fiebre y edad>=48 años de necesidad de ingreso

OBJECTIVE: To analyze emergency department (ED) revisits from patients discharged with possible coronavirus disease2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: Retrospective observational study of consecutive patients who came to the ED over a period of 2 monthsand were diagnosed with possible COVID-19. We analyzed clinical and epidemiologic variables, treatments given inthe ED, discharge destination, need to revisit, and reasons for revisits. Patients who did or did not revisit werecompared, and factors associated with revisits were explored. RESULTS: The 2378 patients included had a mean age of 57 years; 49% were women. Of the 925 patients (39%) discharged, 170 (20.5%) revisited the ED, mainly for persistence or progression of symptoms. Sixty-six (38.8%) were hospitalized. Odds ratios (ORs) for the following factors showed an association with revisits: history of rheumatologic disease (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.10-7.99;P= .03), digestive symptoms (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.14-2.63;P= .01), respiratory rate over 20 breaths per minute (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.0-1.06;P = .05), and corticosteroid therapy given in the ED (OR, 7.78; 95% CI, 1.77-14.21,P= .01). Factors associated with hospitalization after revisits were age over 48 years (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1 42-4.67;P= .002) and fever (OR, 4.73; 95% CI, 1.99-11.27;P= .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients under the age of 48 years without comorbidity and with normal vitals can be discharged from the ED without fear of complications. A history of rheumatologic disease, fever, digestive symptoms, and a respiratory rate over 20 breaths per minute, or a need for corticosteroid therapy were independently associated with revisits. Fever and age over 48 years were associated with a need for hospitalization

External validation of an emergency department triage algorithm for chest pain patients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to externally validate an emergency department triage algorithm including five hierarchical clinical variables developed to identify chest pain patients at low risk of having an acute coronary syndrome justifying delayed rather than immediate evaluation. METHODS: In a single-centre cohort enrolling 29,269 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain, the performance of the algorithm was compared against the emergency department discharge diagnosis. In an international multicentre study enrolling 4069 patients, central adjudication by two independent cardiologists using all data derived from cardiac work-up including follow-up served as the reference. Triage towards 'low-risk' required absence of all five clinical 'high-risk' variables: history of coronary artery disease, diabetes, pressure-like chest pain, retrosternal chest pain and age above 40 years. Safety (sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV)) and efficacy (percentage of patients classified as low risk) was tested in this initial proposal (Model A) and in two additional models: omitting age criteria (Model B) and allowing up to one (any) of the five high-risk variables (Model C). RESULTS: The prevalence of acute coronary syndrome was 9.4% in the single-centre and 28.4% in the multicentre study. The triage algorithm had very high sensitivity/NPV in both cohorts (99.4%/99.1% and 99.9%/99.1%, respectively), but very low efficacy (6.2% and 2.7%, respectively). Model B resulted in sensitivity/NPV of 97.5%/98.3% and 96.1%/89.4%, while efficacy increased to 14.2% and 10.4%, respectively. Model C resulted in sensitivity/NPV of 96.7%/98.6% and 95.2%/91.3%, with a further increase in efficacy to 23.1% and 15.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A triage algorithm for the identification of low-risk chest pain patients exclusively based on simple clinical variables provided reasonable performance characteristics possibly justifying delayed rather than immediate evaluation in the emergency department.

Características clínicas de las pericarditis y miopericarditis diagnosticadas en urgencias y factores asociados con la necesidad de hospitalización / Clinical features of pericarditis with and without myocardial involvement diagnosed in the emergency department and factors associated with need for hospitalization

Objetivo: Analizar los episodios de pericarditis aguda (PA) diagnosticados en urgencias en función de la edad y de la afectación miocárdica (miopericarditis, MioP), y determinar los factores asociados a hospitalización. Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, unicéntrico de casos consecutivos, con análisis retrospectivo de todos los casos diagnosticados de PA en urgencias durante 10 años (2008-2017), y revisión de las características clínicas, ECG, analíticas y ecográficas (en MioP). Se compararon características clínicas según la edad (< 50 y $ 50 años) y existencia de MioP. Los factores asociados a hospitalización (PA y MioP) se identificaron de forma cruda y ajustada por las diferencias clínicas entre grupos. Resultados: Se diagnosticaron 983 PA (34% mujeres, mediana de edad: 42 años). Los pacientes más jóvenes referían con mayor frecuencia dolor torácico (DT) punzante y modificable con la respiración o cambios posturales, y los más mayores tenían más comorbilidades cardiovasculares, refirieron más frecuentemente DT opresivo y generaron mayor sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo. Las alteraciones en el ECG (OR = 4,26; IC95% = 1,89-9,59) se asociaron a MioP (72 casos, 7%). Ingresaron 62 PA (6%), hecho asociado a antecedente de insuficiencia renal (OR = 4,83; IC95% = 1,66-14,05), DT que se modifica con movimientos respiratorios/posturales (OR = 0,54, IC95% = 0,29-0,99), taquicardia (OR = 2,29, IC95% = 1,15-4,55) y MioP (OR = 8,73, IC95% = 4,65-16,38). Ingresaron 24 MioP (33%), hecho asociado a alteraciones en la ecoscopia dirigida (protocolo FOCUS; OR = 13,72, IC95% = 1,80-104). Conclusiones: La edad puede condicionar la presentación clínica en los pacientes con PA. Las alteraciones en el segmento ST en el ECG son sugestivos de implicación miocárdica. La insuficiencia renal, la taquicardia y la MioP son factores que incrementan la decisión de hospitalización en las PA; mientras que en las MioP, las alteraciones ecográficas

Objectives: To analyze the clinical features of acute pericarditis diagnosed in the emergency department according to patient age and myocardial involvement (myopericarditis) and to determine factors associated with hospitalization. Methods: Retrospective, descriptive, observational, single-center study of consecutive patients. We analyzed all cases of pericarditis diagnosed in the emergency department over a period of 10 years (2008-2017), reviewing clinical, electrocardiographic, and laboratory findings as well as ultrasound imaging for myocardial involvement. Characteristics were analyzed by age (under 50 years or 50 or older) and presence or not of myocardial involvement. Factors associated with hospitalization for both pericarditis and myopericarditis were identified by crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs). Results: A total of 983 patients were diagnosed with pericarditis (34% women, mean age, 42 years). The younger patients more often reported sharp chest pain modified by breathing or posture changes. Older patients had more concurrent cardiovascular disease and described chest pain as pressure (oppressive); acute coronary syndrome was suspected more often in the older patients. The only independent predictor of myopericarditis was a finding of electrocardiographic abnormalities, recorded in 72 cases (7%) (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.89-9.59). Sixty-two patients (6%) were admitted for pericarditis. Associated factors were renal insufficiency (OR, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.66-14.05), pain modified by breathing or posture changes (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29-0.99), tachycardia (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.15-4.55), and myopericarditis (OR, 8.73; 95% CI, 4.65-16.38). Admission of 24 patients (33%) for myocarditis was related to focused cardiac ultrasound findings (OR, 13.72; 95% CI, 1.80-104). Conclusions: Age may affect the presentation of pericarditis. ST segment abnormalities on an electrocardiogram suggest myocardial involvement. Renal insufficiency, tachycardia, and myocardial involvement are the factors associated with a decision to admit patients with pericarditis. Ultrasound findings are associated with admission for myopericarditis

Clinical features of pericarditis with and without myocardial involvement diagnosed in the emergency department and factors associated with need for hospitalization. / Características clínicas de las pericarditis y miopericarditis diagnosticadas en urgencias y factores asociados con la necesidad de hospitalización.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the clinical features of acute pericarditis diagnosed in the emergency department according to patient age and myocardial involvement (myopericarditis) and to determine factors associated with hospitalization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, observational, single-center study of consecutive patients. We analyzed all cases of pericarditis diagnosed in the emergency department over a period of 10 years (2008-2017), reviewing clinical, electrocardiographic, and laboratory findings as well as ultrasound imaging for myocardial involvement. Characteristics were analyzed by age (under 50 years or 50 or older) and presence or not of myocardial involvement. Factors associated with hospitalization for both pericarditis and myopericarditis were identified by crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: A total of 983 patients were diagnosed with pericarditis (34% women, mean age, 42 years). The younger patients more often reported sharp chest pain modified by breathing or posture changes. Older patients had more concurrent cardiovascular disease and described chest pain as pressure (oppressive); acute coronary syndrome was suspected more often in the older patients. The only independent predictor of myopericarditis was a finding of electrocardiographic abnormalities, recorded in 72 cases (7%) (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.89-9.59). Sixty-two patients (6%) were admitted for pericarditis. Associated factors were renal insufficiency (OR, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.66-14.05), pain modified by breathing or posture changes (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29-0.99), tachycardia (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.15- 4.55), and myopericarditis (OR, 8.73; 95% CI, 4.65-16.38). Admission of 24 patients (33%) for myocarditis was related to focused cardiac ultrasound findings (OR, 13.72; 95% CI, 1.80-104). CONCLUSION: Age may affect the presentation of pericarditis. ST segment abnormalities on an electrocardiogram suggest myocardial involvement. Renal insufficiency, tachycardia, and myocardial involvement are the factors associated with a decision to admit patients with pericarditis. Ultrasound findings are associated with admission for myopericarditis.

OBJETIVO: Analizar los episodios de pericarditis aguda (PA) diagnosticados en urgencias en función de la edad y de la afectación miocárdica (miopericarditis, MioP), y determinar los factores asociados a hospitalización. METODO: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, unicéntrico de casos consecutivos, con análisis retrospectivo de todos los casos diagnosticados de PA en urgencias durante 10 años (2008-2017), y revisión de las características clínicas, ECG, analíticas y ecográficas (en MioP). Se compararon características clínicas según la edad (< 50 y $ 50 años) y existencia de MioP. Los factores asociados a hospitalización (PA y MioP) se identificaron de forma cruda y ajustada por las diferencias clínicas entre grupos. RESULTADOS: Se diagnosticaron 983 PA (34% mujeres, mediana de edad: 42 años). Los pacientes más jóvenes referían con mayor frecuencia dolor torácico (DT) punzante y modificable con la respiración o cambios posturales, y los más mayores tenían más comorbilidades cardiovasculares, refirieron más frecuentemente DT opresivo y generaron mayor sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo. Las alteraciones en el ECG (OR = 4,26; IC95% = 1,89-9,59) se asociaron a MioP (72 casos, 7%). Ingresaron 62 PA (6%), hecho asociado a antecedente de insuficiencia renal (OR = 4,83; IC95% = 1,66-14,05), DT que se modifica con movimientos respiratorios/posturales (OR = 0,54, IC95% = 0,29-0,99), taquicardia (OR = 2,29, IC95% = 1,15-4,55) y MioP (OR = 8,73, IC95% = 4,65-16,38). Ingresaron 24 MioP (33%), hecho asociado a alteraciones en la ecoscopia dirigida (protocolo FOCUS; OR = 13,72, IC95% = 1,80-104). CONCLUSIONES: La edad puede condicionar la presentación clínica en los pacientes con PA. Las alteraciones en el segmento ST en el ECG son sugestivos de implicación miocárdica. La insuficiencia renal, la taquicardia y la MioP son factores que incrementan la decisión de hospitalización en las PA; mientras que en las MioP, las alteraciones ecográficas.