Revision Surgery for Vestibular Schwannomas.

Objectives To describe clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for vestibular schwannomas. Design Retrospective case series. Setting Tertiary private neurotologic practice. Participants Patients who underwent revision surgeries for recurrent/residual vestibular schwannomas between 1985 and 2015. Main Outcome Measures Degree of resection, facial nerve function, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Results A total of 234 patients underwent 250 revision surgeries for recurrent/residual vestibular schwannomas. Of these, 86 carried a diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). The mean number of prior surgeries was 1.26, and 197 (85%) prior surgeries had been performed elsewhere. The average age at surgery was 43. The most common approach employed at the time of revision surgery was translabyrinthine (87%), followed by transcochlear (6%), middle fossa (5%), and retrosigmoid (2%). Gross total resection was achieved in 212 revision surgeries (85%). Preoperative House-Brackmann facial nerve function was similar in non-NF2 and NF2 groups (mean: 2.7). Mean postoperative facial nerve function at last follow-up was 3.8 in the non-NF2 group and 3.9 in the NF2 group. History of radiation and the extent of resection were not associated with differences in facial nerve function preoperatively or postoperatively. CSF leaks occurred after 21 surgeries (8%), and six (2%) patients required reoperation. Conclusions This is the largest series of revision surgery for vestibular schwannomas to date. Our preferred approach is the translabyrinthine craniotomy, which can be readily modified to include the transcochlear approach for improved access. CSF leak rate slightly exceeds that of primary surgery, and gross total resection is achievable in the vast majority of patients.

Cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation in neurofibromatosis type 2.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To report a series of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), where each patient underwent both cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation for hearing rehabilitation, and to discuss factors influencing respective implant success. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Ten NF2 patients with both cochlear implantations and auditory brainstem implantations were retrospectively reviewed. Speech testing for auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) and cochlear implants (CIs) was performed separately. Scores at last follow-up were obtained for Iowa vowels and consonants, Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech (NU-CHIPS), and City University of New York (CUNY) sentences. RESULTS: Mean age at time of implant was 37 years for cochlear implantation and 40 years for auditory brainstem implantation (P = .790, t test). Nine of 10 patients had a CI and ABI on contralateral sides, and one had both devices on the same side. Mean duration of deafness in the implanted ear was 4.3 years for both cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation (P = .491, t test). Follow-up range was 1 to 28 years. CI performance on NU-CHIPS was 32% to 100%, and sound + lip-reading CUNY was 56% to 100%. Four patients experienced an eventual decline in CI function to unusable levels. ABI performance on NU-CHIPS was 40% to 80%, and sound + lip-reading CUNY was 38% to 94%. There was no notable decline in ABI function over time. CONCLUSIONS: If the cochlear nerve is intact, cochlear implantation can be an effective strategy for hearing rehabilitation in NF2. However, a significant proportion experience a decline in CI performance related to growing vestibular schwannoma or tumor treatment. Auditory brainstem implantation remains the standard option for surgical hearing rehabilitation in NF2, but peak performance is generally lower than that achievable with cochlear implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2163-2169, 2018.

Transmastoid labyrinthectomy for disabling vertigo in a patient with internal auditory canal pathology.

OBJECTIVE: Document the use of transmastoid labyrinthectomy to treat disabling vertigo secondary to a lesion in the internal auditory canal. PATIENT: A 69-year-old man with nonserviceable left hearing experienced disabling attacks of vertigo refractory to medical measures. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a small left intracanalicular lesion with an irregular configuration and modest enhancement, suggesting either an unusual acoustic neuroma or a cavernoma. Tumor size remained stable on serial imaging, and the patient declined microsurgical resection, stereotactic radiation, or intratympanic gentamicin therapy. INTERVENTION: Transmastoid labyrinthectomy followed by a customized vestibular rehabilitation program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Comparison of patient symptoms preoperatively and at 5 and 8 months after surgery. RESULTS: Complete relief of vertigo was achieved, but the patient has moderate imbalance postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Transmastoid labyrinthectomy alone may be a viable treatment option in patients with an internal auditory canal neoplasm causing disabling attacks of vertigo.