Prevalence and clinical significance of totally occluded infarct-related arteries in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Background Seemingly conflicting findings exist regarding the prognostic impact of totally occluded infarct-related arteries (oIRA) in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Methods Retrospective analysis of prospective multicenter registry data comprising a single-center NSTE-ACS cohort, aimed at assessing the impact of occluded (TIMI flow 0/1) versus patent culprit vessels (pIRA, TIMI flow 2/3) on the composite endpoint of all-cause death and cardiogenic shock events at 30 days. Results Of 568 patients, 183 (32.5%) had oIRA. Male sex, refractory angina, ECG suggestive of multivessel or left main disease, and larger infarct sizes with inferior/posterolateral wall involvement, were identified as highly specific markers of oIRA. Successful culprit-lesion revascularization occurred more frequently in patent than in oIRA (90% vs. 96%; P = 0.013). Conversely, patients with oIRA more frequently achieved successful revascularization of concurrent non-IRAs including chronic total occlusions than did those with pIRA (28% vs. 3%; P = 0.0005). Multivariate analysis revealed neutral effects of oIRA on outcomes and identified incomplete revascularization as a powerful predictor of mortality. Moderation analysis revealed a significant interaction between completeness of revascularization and IRA patency, whereby among the incompletely revascularized patients, those with oIRA enjoyed a significant survival advantage over their counterparts with pIRA (11.8% vs. 28%, adjusted OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.10-0.73; Pinteraction = 0.012). Conclusions Approximately one third of NSTE-ACS patients in this cohort had oIRA. However, compared with pIRA, the occurrence of oIRA did not portend poor outcomes, likely resulting from the higher rate of incomplete revascularization and increased risk of subsequent mortality in patients with pIRA. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation.

Elevation of ST-segment in aVR is predictive of cardiogenic shock but not of multivessel disease in inferior myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Some studies suggest that ST elevation in aVR (aVR-STE) can predict the presence of left main or multivessel disease (MVD) and relates to prognosis. Our purpose was to analyze the relationship of aVR-STE to MVD disease or cardiogenic shock (CS) in patients with inferior myocardial infarction (inferior STEMI). METHODS: We analyzed two cohorts of consecutive patients admitted for inferior STEMI in the Coronary Unit of two university hospitals. ST elevation and ST depression in each derivation were compared between patients with and without MVD and with and without CS. RESULTS: We included 342 patients-19.6% women and 80.4% men-with a median age of 60 (52, 70); 18 patients (5.2%) had MVD, and 25 (7.3%) patients presented CS. There was no relationship between ST elevation or ST depression in either derivation and MVD. In contrast, CS was associated with aVR-STE, ST-segment depression in lead aVL, and the sum of ST-segment depression. aVR-STE of 0.25 mm had a sensitivity of 24.0% and a specificity of 95.9% for CS. After multivariate analysis including clinical variables, aVR-STE was independently associated with CS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with inferior STEMI, ST-segment analysis was not useful in predicting multivessel disease. aVR-STE was an independent predictor of CS, with high specificity but low sensitivity.