Carboxylated nanodiamonds can be used as negative reference in in vitro nanogenotoxicity studies.

Nanodiamonds (NDs) are promising nanomaterials for biomedical applications. However, a few studies highlighted an in vitro genotoxic activity for detonation NDs, which was not evidenced in one of our previous work quantifying γ-H2Ax after 20 and 100 nm high-pressure high-temperature ND exposures of several cell lines. To confirm these results, in the present work, we investigated the genotoxicity of the same 20 and 100 nm NDs and added intermediate-sized NDs of 50 nm. Conventional in vitro genotoxicity tests were used, i.e., the in vitro micronucleus and comet assays that are recommended by the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety for the toxicological evaluation of nanomedicines. In vitro micronucleus and in vitro comet assays (standard and hOGG1-modified) were therefore performed in two human cell lines, the bronchial epithelial 16HBE14o- cells and the colon carcinoma T84 cells. Our results did not show any genotoxic activity, whatever the test, the cell line or the size of carboxylated NDs. Even though these in vitro results should be confirmed in vivo, they reinforce the potential interest of carboxylated NDs for biomedical applications or even as a negative reference nanoparticle in nanotoxicology. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Standardized cell sources and recommendations for good cell culture practices in genotoxicity testing.

Good cell culture practice and characterization of the cell lines used are of critical importance in in vitro genotoxicity testing. The objective of this initiative was to make continuously available stocks of the characterized isolates of the most frequently used mammalian cell lines in genotoxicity testing anywhere in the world ('IVGT' cell lines). This project was organized under the auspices of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Project Committee on the Relevance and Follow-up of Positive Results in In Vitro Genetic Toxicity (IVGT) Testing. First, cell isolates were identified that are as close as possible to the isolate described in the initial publications reporting their use in genotoxicity testing. The depositors of these cell lines managed their characterization and their expansion for preparing continuously available stocks of these cells that are stored at the European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC, UK) and the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB, Japan). This publication describes how the four 'IVGT' cell lines, i.e. L5178Y TK+/- 3.7.2C, TK6, CHO-WBL and CHL/IU, were prepared for deposit at the ECACC and JCRB cell banks. Recommendations for handling these cell lines and monitoring their characteristics are also described. The growth characteristics of these cell lines (growth rates and cell cycles), their identity (karyotypes and genetic status) and ranges of background frequencies of select endpoints are also reported to help in the routine practice of genotoxicity testing using these cell lines.

Comparison of different methods for an accurate assessment of cytotoxicity in the in vitro micronucleus test. I. Theoretical aspects.

A decrease in the cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI) or replication index (RI) is routinely used to determine cytotoxicity of a test compound and therefore the choice of its appropriate test concentration for the in vitro micronucleus (MN) test conducted in the presence of cytochalasin B. As a number of laboratories prefer to conduct the in vitro MN test in the absence of cytochalasin B, it is important that selected test concentrations, based on cytotoxicity, should be similar to what they would have been if cytochalasin B had been used, and should be relevant of a true cytotoxicity. By using models to analyse the dynamics of the cell cultures with and without cytochalasin B we have compared different methods for evaluation of cytotoxicity, and demonstrate that relative decrease in population doubling or relative increase in cell counts are the most appropriate measures of cytotoxicity to compare with reduction in CBPI or RI.

Report from the In Vitro Micronucleus Assay Working Group.

At the Washington International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures (March 25-26, 1999), the current methodologies and data for the in vitro micronucleus test were reviewed. From this, guidelines for the conduct of specific aspects of the protocol were developed. Because there are a number of important in vitro micronucleus validation studies in progress, it was not possible to design a definitive, internationally harmonized protocol at this time. Agreement was achieved on the following topics: Cells. The choice of cells is flexible, yet the choice of cell type should be justified and take into consideration doubling time, spontaneous frequency of micronuclei, and genetic background. Slide preparation. A fixation method that preserves the cytoplasm and cytoplasmic boundaries, and minimizes clumping should be used. Use of fluorescent DNA-specific dyes is encouraged for better detection of small micronuclei. Analysis. Micronuclei should have a diameter less than one-third of the main nucleus, and should be clearly distinguishable from the main nucleus. In the cytokinesis-block method, binucleated cells selected for analysis should have two clearly distinguishable main nuclei. Cells where the main nucleus(ei) is undergoing apoptosis should not be scored for micronuclei because the assumed micronuclei may have been the result of nuclear fragmentation during the apoptotic process. Toxicity. Cytotoxicity can be measured by various methods including cell growth, cell counts, nucleation (i.e., percent binucleated), division/proliferation index, confluence. A majority of the group recommended that the highest concentration should induce at least 50% cytotoxicity (by whatever measure is selected). Cytochalasin B. There is much debate regarding the use of cytochalasin B. For human lymphocytes, the use of cytochalasin B (6 microg/ml [lymphocytes cultured from whole blood cells] and 3-6 microg/ml [isolated lymphocyte cultures]) is recommended. For cell lines, because there were no definitive data showing a clear advantage or disadvantage of the use of cytochalasin B for a variety of chemicals, the majority opinion of the group was that at this time, the use of cytochalasin B for cell lines is considered optional. Further studies (many chemicals of a variety of potencies, tested both with and without cytochalasin B) are clearly needed to resolve this issue. Number of doses. At least three concentrations should be scored for micronuclei. Treatment/harvest times. At this time, there are not enough data to define the most appropriate treatment/harvest times. Following the principles of the in vitro metaphase assay (with or without metabolic activation), it was agreed that there was a need for a short treatment followed by a recovery time in the absence of test chemical, there was a need for a long treatment (maybe with and without recovery time), and ideally, treatment should cover cells in different cell cycle stages.

Comparative evaluation of the in vitro micronucleus test and the in vitro chromosome aberration test: industrial experience.

Because of its rapidness, simplicity and potential for automation, the measurement of micronucleated cells in vivo is not only equivalent to the analysis of chromosome aberrations, but often even preferred within routine genotoxicity testing. In order to evaluate the correlation between the in vitro micronucleus assay (MNT) and the in vitro chromosome aberration test (CA), we collected data from four pharmaceutical companies obtained either in Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO-K5, CHO-K1, V79) or in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Among the 57 compounds included in this comparison, 45 compounds gave rise to concordant results in both assays (26 compounds negative in both assays; 19 compounds positive in both assays). The high percentage of concordance, i.e. about 79% is very promising and can be even increased to about 88% by omitting the 3 aneugenic compounds and 2 compounds inducing endoreduplicated chromosomes which were found positive only in the in vitro MNT. The results are remarkable in particular considering that most of the compounds evaluated are 'standard' pharmaceutical compounds and thus are at most weak inducers of chromosome damage. Our comparison strongly supports that the in vitro micronucleus test is a suitable alternative to the in vitro chromosome aberration assay. Moreover, the MNT has the potential of not only detecting clastogens but additionally aneuploidy inducing chemicals.