Urgencias dermatológicas: estudio descriptivo en un hospital terciario / Dermatological emergencies: A descriptive study in a tertiary hospital

INTRODUCCIÓN: El número de pacientes que acude a los servicios de Urgencias para consultar enfermedades dermatológicas está incrementándose. Sin embargo, se desconoce hasta qué punto una enfermedad cutánea es lo suficientemente urgente como para requerir atención especializada de forma inmediata. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron determinar la prevalencia y el tipo de enfermedades dermatológicas atendidas en una consulta de Urgencias de Dermatología de un hospital terciario, conocer el perfil epidemiológico del paciente demandante de la consulta urgente y determinar la vía de acceso. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo prospectivo de los pacientes que acudieron al servicio de Urgencias de un hospital con afección dermatológica durante 5 meses. Se recogieron la filiación del paciente, las características epidemiológicas básicas, la procedencia, el diagnóstico dermatológico y el destino. RESULTADOS: Se atendió a 242 pacientes (49% mujeres, 51% hombres). La edad media fue de 49,2 años. Se realizaron 78 diagnósticos distintos, los cuales se clasificaron en 12 grupos, destacando en primer lugar los eccemas (17,8%), seguidos de miscelánea (17,4%), tumores y quistes (16,2%) y dermatosis infecciosas (15%). Se realizaron 7 ingresos (2,9%). CONCLUSIONES: Las entidades dermatológicas atendidas fueron muy variadas. Las 3enfermedades más frecuentes fueron la psoriasis, los eccemas y las toxicodermias. El paciente demandante de la consulta urgente fue una persona de edad media, sin predominio sexual. La mayoría de los pacientes acudieron por iniciativa propia. El motivo más frecuente de ingreso fue la eritrodermia psoriásica

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, there is an increasing number of patients who seek emergency treatment for their dermatology complaints. However, it is unknown to what extent a skin disease is urgent enough to require immediate specialised care. Our aims were to assess the type and prevalence of the dermatological diseases treated in the division of Dermatology of a tertiary hospital, as well as to determine the main features of the patients with these disorders and the means of access to the Dermatology Department. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A descriptive and prospective study was conducted on patients with dermatological conditions diagnosed in the Dermatology outpatient clinic of a hospital during a 5-month period. For this purpose, the information corresponding to health cover, basic epidemiological characteristics, origin, diagnosis, and destiny of each patient was entered into a database. RESULTS: The dermatologist attended 242 patients, of whom 49% were women and 51% men. The mean age was 49.2 years. The 78 different diagnoses made were grouped into 12 categories to facilitate analysis. According to this classification, most patients had eccemas (17.8%), followed by miscellaneous (17.4%), tumours and cysts (16.2%), and infectious dermatoses (15%). In 7 (2.9%) cases, the patient was admitted to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatological diseases attended to in the Dermatology Department were varied. The most common diagnoses were psoriasis, eccemas, and toxicoderma. The profile of the patient seeking emergency dermatological care is a person between the fourth and fifth decade of the life, who arrives directly to the Emergency Department without requesting previous assessment by a Primary Care physician. The most common reason for admission was erythrodermic psoriasis

[Dermatological emergencies: A descriptive study in a tertiary hospital]. / Urgencias dermatológicas: estudio descriptivo en un hospital terciario.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, there is an increasing number of patients who seek emergency treatment for their dermatology complaints. However, it is unknown to what extent a skin disease is urgent enough to require immediate specialised care. Our aims were to assess the type and prevalence of the dermatological diseases treated in the division of Dermatology of a tertiary hospital, as well as to determine the main features of the patients with these disorders and the means of access to the Dermatology Department. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A descriptive and prospective study was conducted on patients with dermatological conditions diagnosed in the Dermatology outpatient clinic of a hospital during a 5 month period. For this purpose, the information corresponding to health cover, basic epidemiological characteristics, origin, diagnosis, and destiny of each patient was entered into a database. RESULTS: The dermatologist attended 242 patients, of whom 49% were women and 51% men. The mean age was 49.2 years. The 78 different diagnoses made were grouped into 12 categories to facilitate analysis. According to this classification, most patients had eccemas (17.8%), followed by miscellaneous (17.4%), tumours and cysts (16.2%), and infectious dermatoses (15%). In 7 (2.9%) cases, the patient was admitted to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatological diseases attended to in the Dermatology Department were varied. The most common diagnoses were psoriasis, eccemas, and toxicoderma. The profile of the patient seeking emergency dermatological care is a person between the fourth and fifth decade of the life, who arrives directly to the Emergency Department without requesting previous assessment by a Primary Care physician. The most common reason for admission was erythrodermic psoriasis.

Use of positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis / Utilización de la tomografía por emisión de positrones (PET) para el diagnóstico de vasculitis de vaso grande

The term vasculitis encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases that share the presence of inflammatory infiltrates in the vascular wall. The diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis is often a challenge because the presenting clinical features are nonspecific in many cases and they are often shared by different types of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases including other systemic vasculitides. Moreover, the pathogenesis of large-vessel vasculitis is not fully understood. Nevertheless, the advent of new imaging techniques has constituted a major breakthrough to establish an early diagnosis and a promising tool to monitor the follow-up of patients with largevessel vasculitis. This is the case of the molecular imaging with the combination of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) using different radiotracers, especially the 18F-fluordeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). In this review we have focused on the contribution of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis (AU)

El término vasculitis engloba un heterogéneo grupo de enfermedades que tienen en común la presencia de un infiltrado inflamatorio en la pared vascular. El diagnóstico de las vasculitis de vaso grande es a menudo dificultoso debido a que pueden comenzar con una sintomatología inespecífica que también puede aparecer en otros tipos de enfermedades autoinmunes e inflamatorias, incluyendo otras vasculitis sistémicas. Además, la patogenia de las vasculitis de vaso grande no se conoce en su totalidad. Sin embargo, el desarrollo de nuevas técnicas de imagen constituye un gran avance para establecer un diagnóstico precoz y son una herramienta prometedora para el seguimiento de las vasculitis de vaso grande. Este es el caso de la imagen molecular obtenida de la combinación de la tomografía por emisión de positrones con la tomografía computarizada (PET/TAC) utilizando diferentes radiotrazadores, especialmente la 18F- fluordeoxiglucosa (18F-FDG). En esta revisión nos hemos centrado en la contribución del 18F-FDG PET en el diagnóstico de las vasculitis de vaso grande (AU)

Use of positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis.

The term vasculitis encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases that share the presence of inflammatory infiltrates in the vascular wall. The diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis is often a challenge because the presenting clinical features are nonspecific in many cases and they are often shared by different types of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases including other systemic vasculitides. Moreover, the pathogenesis of large-vessel vasculitis is not fully understood. Nevertheless, the advent of new imaging techniques has constituted a major breakthrough to establish an early diagnosis and a promising tool to monitor the follow-up of patients with largevessel vasculitis. This is the case of the molecular imaging with the combination of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) using different radiotracers, especially the (18)F-fluordeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG). In this review we have focused on the contribution of (18)F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis.

Cutaneous vasculitis associated with severe bacterial infections. A study of 27 patients from a series of 766 cutaneous vasculitis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical spectrum of severe bacterial infections presenting as cutaneous vasculitis (CV) in a defined population. METHODS: Unselected series of 766 patients with CV diagnosed at a single university referral center. RESULTS: An underlying severe bacterial infection was diagnosed in 27 (22 men/5 women; mean age ± standard deviation [SD]: 53 ± 18 years) of 766 cases presenting with CV (3.5%). These infections were: pneumonia (n=8), endocarditis (n=6), meningitis (n=4), intra-abdominal infections (n=3), septic arthritis (n=2), septicaemia (n=2), septic bursitis (n=1), and urinary tract infection (n=1). All the patients were admitted for suspected CV. The median delay from admission to the diagnosis of infection was 4 days. A typical palpable purpura without relevant visceral vasculitic involvement was the main clinical manifestation. Patients with severe bacterial infections were older, with male predominance, had more frequently fever, constitutional symptoms, focal infectious features, and leukocytosis with left shift and anaemia than the remaining patients with CV. Although antibiotics were prescribed in all the patients, seven also required the use of low-dose corticosteroids to achieve complete resolution of the cutaneous lesions. Most patients experienced full recovery but two of them underwent prosthetic cardiac valve replacement, and another two died due to infection-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: CV may be the presenting manifestation of a severe underlying bacterial infection. Physicians should keep in mind this fact to make an early diagnosis of infection and, consequently, prevent life-threatening complications.

Applicability of the 2006 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria for the classification of Henoch-Schönlein purpura. An analysis based on 766 patients with cutaneous vasculitis.

OBJECTIVES: In 2006 the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) proposed new classification criteria for Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP). We aimed to establish the applicability of these criteria in patients with primary cutaneous vasculitis (CV). We also compared these criteria with previously established classification criteria for HSP. METHODS: A series of 766 (346 women/420 men; mean age 34 years) consecutive unselected patients with CV was assessed. One hundred and twenty-four of them with secondary CV or with CV associated with other well defined entities were excluded from the analysis. The 2006 EULAR criteria for HSP were tested in the remaining 642 patients with primary CV. Two sets of criteria for HSP were used for comparisons: a) the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR-1990), and b) the ACR modified criteria proposed by Michel et al. in 1992 (Michel-1992). RESULTS: 451 (70.2%) of 642 patients were classified as having HSP according to the EULAR-2006 criteria, 405 (63.1%) using the ACR-1990 criteria, and 392 (61.1%) by the Michel-1992 criteria. However, only 336 patients (52.3%) met at the same time the EULAR-2006 and the ACR-1990 criteria, and only 229 patients (35.7%) fulfilled both the EULAR-2006 and Michel-1992 criteria. It is noteworthy that only 276 (43%) patients met the three set of criteria. Children fulfilled all the sets of criteria more commonly than adults (215 [66.6%] of 323 vs. 61 [19%] of 319, respectively; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the EULAR-2006 criteria show low concordance with previous sets of classification criteria used for HSP.

Non-infectious aortitis: a report of 32 cases from a single tertiary centre in a 4-year period and literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Non-infectious aortitis often presents with non-specific symptoms leading to inappropriate diagnostic delay. We intend to describe the clinical spectrum and outcome of patients with aortitis diagnosed at a single centre. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical charts of patients diagnosed with non-infectious aortitis between January 2010 and December 2013 at the Rheumatology Division from a 1.000-bed tertiary teaching hospital from Northern Spain. The diagnosis of aortitis was usually based on FDG-PET-CT scan, and also occasionally on CT or MRI angiography or helical CT-scan. RESULTS: During the period of assessment 32 patients (22 women and 10 men; mean age 68 years [range, 45-87]) were diagnosed with aortitis. The median interval from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis was 21 months. FDG-PET CT scan was the most common tool used for the diagnosis of aortitis. The underlying conditions were the following: giant cell arteritis (n=13 cases); isolated polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) (n=11); Sjögren's syndrome (n=2), Takayasu arteritis (n= 1); sarcoidosis (n=1), ulcerative colitis (n=1), psoriatic arthritis (n=1), and large-vessel vasculitis that also involved the aorta (n=2). The most common clinical manifestations at diagnosis were: PMR features, often with atypical clinical presentation (n=23 patients, 72%); diffuse lower limb pain (n=16 patients, 50%); constitutional symptoms (n=12 patients, 37%), inflammatory low back pain (n=9 patients, 28%) and fever (n=7 patients, 22%). Acute phase reactants were increased in most cases (median erythrocyte sedimentation rate 46 mm/1st hour, and a median serum C-reactive protein 1.5 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS: Aortitis is not an uncommon condition. The diagnosis is often delayed. Atypical PMR features, unexplained low back or limb pain, constitutional symptoms along with increased acute phase reactants should be considered 'red flags' to suspect the presence of aortitis.

Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis and IgA nephropathy: a comparative clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) and IgA nephropathy (IgAN) are related syndromes. In the present study we aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcome of a large and unselected series of patients diagnosed as having HSPN and IgAN. METHODS: Comparative study of a wide and unselected population of HSPN (142 patient) and IgAN (61 patients) from a teaching hospital of Northern Spain. RESULTS: All of the following comparisons were expressed between HSPN vs. IgAN, respectively. HSPN patients were younger (30.6±26.4 vs. 37.1±16.5 years, p<0.001). Precipitating events, usually an upper respiratory tract infection and/or drug intake, were more frequently observed in HSPN (38% vs. 23%, p=0.03). Extra-renal manifestations were also more common in HSPN than in IgAN; skin lesions (100% vs. 1.8%; p<0.001), gastrointestinal (62% vs. 7.4%; p<0.001), and joint involvement (61.3% vs. 3.6%; p<0.001). However, nephritis was less severe in HSPN, renal insufficiency (25% in HSPN vs. 63.4% in IgAN; p<0.001), nephrotic syndrome (12.5%, vs. 43.7%; p<0.001), and nephritic syndrome (6.8% vs. 10.7%; NS). Leukocytosis was more frequent in HSPN (22.5% vs. 8.2%; p=0.015) and anaemia in IgAN (12.7% in HSPN vs. 36% in IgAN, p<0.001). The frequency of corticosteroid (79.6% vs. 69%; NS) and cytotoxic drug (19% vs. 16.5%, NS) use was similar. The frequency of relapses was similar (38.6% in HSPN vs. 36.3% in IgAN). After a median follow-up of 120.8 (IQR; 110-132) months in HSPN and 138.6 (IQR; 117-156) in IgAN, requirement for dialysis (2.9% vs. 43.5%; p<0.001), renal transplant (0% vs. 36%, p<0.001) and residual chronic renal insufficiency (4.9% vs. 63.8%; p<0.001) was more frequently observed in patients with in IgAN. CONCLUSIONS: HSPN and IgAN represent different syndromes. IgAN has more severe renal involvement while HSPN is associated with more extra-renal manifestations.