A Specific Pattern and Dynamics of Circulating Cytokines Are Associated with the Extension of Lung Injury and Mortality in Colombian Adults with Coronavirus Disease-19.

Increased systemic levels of inflammatory cytokines have been associated with the development of pathophysiologic events during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. To further explore differences in the pattern and dynamics of plasma cytokines in individuals with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), and the relationship with disease mortality, here we evaluated the plasma levels of proinflammatory and regulatory cytokines in Colombian patient survivors and nonsurvivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individuals with confirmed COVID-19, with other respiratory diseases requiring hospitalization, and healthy controls, were included. Plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon-γ, IL-10, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I (sTNFRI), and transforming growth factor-ß1 were measured by a bead-based assay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and clinical, laboratory, and tomographic parameters were registered during hospitalization. The levels of most of the evaluated cytokines were increased in COVID-19 individuals relative to healthy controls. The levels of IL-6, IL-10, and sTNFRI were directly associated with the development of respiratory failure, immune dysregulation, and coagulopathy, as well as with COVID-19 mortality. Particularly, the early, robust, and persistent increase of circulating IL-6 characterized COVID-19 nonsurvivors, while survivors were able to counteract the inflammatory cytokine response. In addition, IL-6 systemic levels positively correlated with the tomographic extension of lung damage in individuals with COVID-19. Thus, an exacerbated inflammatory cytokine response, particularly mediated by IL-6 added to the inefficiency of regulatory cytokines, distinguishes COVID-19-associated tissue disturbances, severity, and mortality in Colombian adults.

Efficacy and Safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Upper limb motor impairment is one of the main complications of stroke, affecting quality of life both for the patient and their family. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the scientific evidence on the safety and efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that have evaluated the efficacy or safety of VNS in stroke patients was performed. The primary outcome was upper limb motor recovery. A search of articles published on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EBSCO and LILACS up to December 2021 was performed, and a meta-analysis was developed to calculate the overall effects. Results: Eight studies evaluating VNS effects on motor function in stroke patients were included, of which 4 used implanted and 4 transcutaneous VNS. It was demonstrated that VNS, together with physical rehabilitation, increased upper limb motor function on average 7.06 points (95%CI 4.96; 9.16) as assessed by the Fugl-Meyer scale. Likewise, this improvement was significantly greater when compared to a control intervention (mean difference 2.48, 95%CI 0.98; 3.98). No deaths or serious adverse events related to the intervention were reported. The most frequent adverse events were dysphonia, dysphagia, nausea, skin redness, dysgeusia and pain related to device implantation. Conclusion: VNS, together with physical rehabilitation, improves upper limb motor function in stroke patients. Additionally, VNS is a safe intervention.