Pre-hospital advanced airway management by anaesthetist and nurse anaesthetist critical care teams: a prospective observational study of 2028 pre-hospital tracheal intubations.

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital tracheal intubation success and complication rates vary considerably among provider categories. The purpose of this study was to estimate the success and complication rates of pre-hospital tracheal intubation performed by physician anaesthetist or nurse anaesthetist pre-hospital critical care teams. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from critical care teams staffed with a physician anaesthetist or a nurse anaesthetist according to the Utstein template for pre-hospital advanced airway management. The patients served by six ambulance helicopters and six rapid response vehicles in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden from May 2015 to November 2016 were included. RESULTS: The critical care teams attended to 32 007 patients; 2028 (6.3%) required pre-hospital tracheal intubation. The overall success rate of pre-hospital tracheal intubation was 98.7% with a median intubation time of 25 s and an on-scene time of 25 min. The majority (67.0%) of the patients' tracheas were intubated by providers who had performed >2500 tracheal intubations. The success rate of tracheal intubation on the first attempt was 84.5%, and 95.9% of intubations were completed after two attempts. Complications related to pre-hospital tracheal intubation were recorded in 10.9% of the patients. Intubations after rapid sequence induction had a higher success rate compared with intubations without rapid sequence induction (99.4% vs 98.1%; P=0.02). Physicians had a higher tracheal intubation success rate than nurses (99.0% vs 97.6%; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: When performed by experienced physician anaesthetists and nurse anaesthetists, pre-hospital tracheal intubation was completed rapidly with high success rates and a low incidence of complications. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT 02450071.

The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital basic airway interventions can be ineffective at providing adequate oxygenation and ventilation in some severely ill or injured patients, and advanced airway interventions are then required. Controversy exists regarding the level of provider required to perform successful pre-hospital intubation. A previous meta-analysis reported pre-hospital intubation success rates of 0.849 for non-physicians versus 0.991 for physicians. The evidence base on the topic has expanded significantly in the last 10 years. This study systematically reviewed recent literature and presents comprehensive data on intubation success rates. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed using PRISMA methodology to identify articles on pre-hospital tracheal intubation published between 2006 and 2016. Overall success rates were estimated using random effects meta-analysis. The relationship between intubation success rate and provider type was assessed in weighted linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1838 identified studies, 38 met the study inclusion criteria. Intubation was performed by non-physicians in half of the studies and by physicians in the other half. The crude median (range) reported overall success rate was 0.969 (0.616-1.000). In random effects meta-analysis, the estimated overall intubation success rate was 0.953 (0.938-0.965). The crude median (range) reported intubation success rates for non-physicians were 0.917 (0.616-1.000) and, for physicians, were 0.988 (0.781-1.000) (p = 0.003). DISCUSSION: The reported overall success rate of pre-hospital intubation has improved, yet there is still a significant difference between non-physician and physician providers. The finding that less-experienced personnel perform less well is not unexpected, but since there is considerable evidence that poorly performed intubation carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality careful consideration should be given to the training and experience required to deliver this intervention safely.

Termination of pre-hospital resuscitation by anaesthesiologists - causes and consequences. A retrospective study.

AIM: Differentiating between a newly deceased patient and the lifeless patient in whom immediate resuscitation is required may be facilitated by a pre-hospital anaesthesiologist. The purpose of our study was to investigate to what extent and why the pre-hospital anaesthesiologist pronounced life extinct in situations where an emergency medical technician (EMT) would have been required to resuscitate. METHODS: All lifeless patients seen pre-hospitally by the anaesthesiologist-manned Mobile Emergency Care Unit in Odense, Denmark, from 2010 to 2014 were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: Of 17 035 contacts, 1275 patients were lifeless without reliable signs of death. In 642 of these patients (3.8%) resuscitation was initiated (median age 68 years). The remaining 633 patients (3.7%) were declared dead at the scene without any resuscitation attempt (median age 77 years). These latter patients would have been attempted resuscitated, had the anaesthesiologist not been present. In 54.5% of cases where documentation was available in the patient records, reasons for not resuscitating these patients included time elapsed from incident to contact with physician, 'overall assessment', chronic disease, or do-not-resuscitate order. CONCLUSION: In one patient in 30, the MECU refrained from futile resuscitation in cases where legislation required an EMT to initiate resuscitation. This practice reduced unethical attempts of resuscitation, reduced unnecessary emergency ambulance transports, and reduced the work load of the hospital resuscitation teams for one unnecessary alarm every third day. Differentiating between lifeless patients and dead patients not exhibiting reliable signs of death, however, is a complex task which is only sparsely documented.

Assessment of acute stroke cerebral CT examinations by anaesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is essential to diagnose ischaemic stroke as soon as possible after symptom onset, so that thrombolytic treatment can be initiated as quickly as possible. This might be greatly facilitated if cerebral CT could be carried out in a pre-hospital setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate if anaesthesiologists, who in Norway provide pre-hospital medical care, could be trained to assess cerebral CT scans to exclude radiological contraindications for thrombolytic stroke treatment. METHODS: Thirteen anaesthesiologists attended an 8-h course in acute stroke assessment, including a 2-h introduction to the neuroradiology of acute stroke. Each participant then assessed 12 non-contrast cerebral CT examinations of acute stroke patients with specific regard to radiological contraindications for thrombolytic therapy. Test results were compared with those of three experienced neuroradiologists. Inter-rater agreement between anaesthesiologists and neuroradiologists was calculated using Cohen's Kappa statistics. Robustness of the results was assessed using the non-parametric bootstrap. RESULTS: Among the neuroradiologists, Kappa was 1 for detecting radiological contraindications for thrombolytic therapy. Twelve of the 13 anaesthesiologists showed good or excellent agreement (Kappa > 0.60) with the neuroradiologists. The anaesthesiologists spent a median time of 2 min and 18 s on each CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that anaesthesiologists who are experienced in pre-hospital care may be quickly trained to assess cerebral CT examinations in acute stroke patients with regard to radiological contraindications for thrombolytic therapy.

Pre-hospital anaesthesia: the same but different.

Advanced airway management is one of the most controversial areas of pre-hospital trauma care and is carried out by different providers using different techniques in different Emergency Medical Services systems. Pre-hospital anaesthesia is the standard of care for trauma patients arriving in the emergency department with airway compromise. A small proportion of severely injured patients who cannot be managed with basic airway management require pre-hospital anaesthesia to avoid death or hypoxic brain injury. The evidence base for advanced airway management is inconsistent, contradictory and rarely reports all key data. There is evidence that poorly performed advanced airway management is harmful and that less-experienced providers have higher intubation failure rates and complication rates. International guidelines carry many common messages about the system requirements for the practice of advanced airway management. Pre-hospital rapid sequence induction (RSI) should be practiced to the same standard as emergency department RSI. Many in-hospital standards such as monitoring, equipment, and provider competence can be achieved. Pre-hospital and emergency in-hospital RSI has been modified from standard RSI techniques to improve patient safety, physiological disturbance, and practicality. Examples include the use of opioids and long-acting neuromuscular blocking agents, ventilation before intubation, and the early release of cricoid pressure to improve laryngoscopic view. Pre-hospital RSI is indicated in a small proportion of trauma patients. Where pre-hospital anaesthesia cannot be carried out to a high standard by competent providers, excellent quality basic airway management should be the mainstay of management.

Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity.

INTRODUCTION: Anatomic injury, physiological derangement, age, and injury mechanism are well-founded predictors of trauma outcome. We aimed to develop and validate the first Scandinavian survival prediction model for trauma. METHODS: Eligible were patients admitted to Oslo University Hospital Ullevål within 24 h after injury with Injury Severity Score ≥ 10, proximal penetrating injuries or received by a trauma team. The derivation dataset comprised 5363 patients (August 2000 to July 2006); the validation dataset comprised 2517 patients (August 2006 to July 2008). Exclusion because of missing data was < 1%. Outcome was 30-day mortality. Logistic regression analysis incorporated fractional polynomial modelling and interaction effects. Model validation included a calibration plot, Hosmer-Lemeshow test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The new survival prediction model included the anatomic New Injury Severity Score (NISS), Triage Revised Trauma Score (T-RTS, comprising Glascow Coma Scale score, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure), age, pre-injury co-morbidity scored according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA-PS), and an interaction term. Fractional polynomial analysis supported treating NISS and T-RTS as linear functions and age as cubic. Model discrimination between survivors and non-survivors was excellent. Area (95% confidence interval) under the ROC curve was 0.966 (0.959-0.972) in the derivation and 0.946 (0.930-0.962) in the validation dataset. Overall, low mortality and skewed survival probability distribution invalidated model calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma (NORMIT) is a promising alternative to existing prediction models. External validation of the model in other trauma populations is warranted.

Pre-hospital critical care by anaesthesiologist-staffed pre-hospital services in Scandinavia: a prospective population-based study.

BACKGROUND: All Scandinavian countries provide anaesthesiologist-staffed pre-hospital services. Little is known of the incidence of critical illness or injury attended by these services. We aimed to investigate anaesthesiologist-staffed pre-hospital services in Scandinavia with special emphasis on incidence and severity. METHODS: This population-based, prospective study recorded activity in 16 anaesthesiologist-staffed pre-hospital services in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden serving half of the Scandinavian population. We calculated population incidence of medical conditions, and the proportion of patients with severely deranged vital signs and/or receiving advanced therapy. RESULTS: Four thousand two hundred thirty-six alarm calls were recorded during 4 weeks. Two thousand two hundred fity-six alarms resulted in a patient encounter. The population incidence varied from 74.9 missions per 10,000 person-years (Denmark), followed by Finland with 14.6, Norway with 11, and Sweden with 5. Medical aetiology was most frequent (14.9 missions per 10,000 person-years, 95% CI: 14.2-15.8). Trauma was second (5.6 missions per 10,000 person-years, 95%CI: 5.12-6.09). Twenty-three per cent of patients had severely deranged vital functions, and advanced emergency medical procedures were performed in every four to twelve encounters (Denmark 8%, Sweden 15%, Norway 23%, and Finland 25%). The probability that the patient was physiologically deranged, received advanced medication, or procedure was 35%. Critical illness or injury occured at a rate of 25-30 per 10,000 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pre-hospital anaesthesiologist patient encounters in Scandinavia varies. Medical aetiology is most frequent. Almost one-quarter of patients presents with deranged vital functions requiring emergency measures. The Scandinavian pre-hospital population incidence of critical illness and injury is 25-30 per 10,000 person-years.

Efficacy of a two-tiered trauma team activation protocol in a Norwegian trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: A registry-based analysis revealed imprecise informal one-tiered trauma team activation (TTA) in a primary trauma centre. A two-tiered TTA protocol was introduced and analysed to examine its impact on triage precision and resource utilization. METHODS: Interhospital transfers and patients admitted by non-healthcare personnel were excluded. Undertriage was defined as the fraction of major trauma victims (New Injury Severity Score over 15) admitted without TTA. Overtriage was the fraction of TTA without major trauma. RESULTS: Of 1812 patients, 768 had major trauma. Overall undertriage was reduced from 28·4 to 19·1 per cent (P < 0·001) after system revision. Overall overtriage increased from 61·5 to 71·6 per cent, whereas the mean number of skilled hours spent per overtriaged patient was reduced from 6·5 to 3·5 (P < 0·001) and the number of skilled hours spent per major trauma victim was reduced from 7·4 to 7·1 (P < 0·001). Increasing age increased risk for undertriage and decreased risk for overtriage. Falls increased risk for undertriage and decreased risk for overtriage, whereas motor vehicle-related accidents showed the opposite effects. Patients triaged to a prehospital response involving an anaesthetist had less chance of both undertriage and overtriage. CONCLUSION: A two-tiered TTA protocol was associated with reduced undertriage and increased overtriage, while trauma team resource consumption was reduced. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00876564 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

The effect of a simple checklist on frequent pre-induction deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of anaesthesia-related adverse events are preventable by identification and correction of errors in planning, communication, fatigue, stress, and equipment. The aim of this study was to develop and implement a pre-induction checklist in order to identify and solve problems before induction of anaesthesia. METHODS: The checklist was developed in a stepwise manner using a modified Delphi technique, literature search, expert's opinion, and a pilot version, and then implemented in a clinical environment during a 13-week study period. Each list was registered and analysed using statistical process control. The checklist was mandatory, but emergency cases were excluded. RESULTS: The checklist, containing 26 items, was used in 502 (61%) of a total of 829 inductions. Eighty-five checklists (17%) identified one or more missing items. The number of missing items decreased significantly throughout the study period. The most important missing items were lack of a second laryngoscope available, introducer not having been fitted to the endotracheal tube, the endotracheal tube cuff not having been tested, and no separate ventilation bag being available. It took a median of 88.5 s (range 52-118) to perform the checklist when no items were missing. The pre-induction time was the same before and after the checklist was introduced (25.1 vs. 24.3 min, P50.25). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to develop, introduce, and use a pre-induction checklist even in a hectic and stressful clinical environment. The checklist identified and reduced a surprisingly large number of missing items required in a standard induction protocol.

Feasibility of comparing core data from existing trauma registries in scandinavia. Reaching for a Scandinavian major trauma outcome study (MTOS).

BACKGROUND: The organisation of trauma care in Scandinavia has several similarities, including trauma registries, but so far there are limited amount of research on efficiency and outcome. Data and results from trauma outcome studies like the US MTOS are not fully applicable to the Scandinavian trauma population. AIMS: To reveal the feasibility of using data from existing trauma registries of major hospitals in Scandinavia, for a minimal common dataset, in a joint, prospective Scandinavian MTOS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected data points, data point definitions, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, from the major trauma registries of the Swedish trauma registry standard, three university hospitals in Denmark, one university hospital in Finland, and the Norwegian National Trauma Registry. The collected material was compared to reveal common data points, inclusion criteria, and the compatibility of data point definitions. RESULTS: The median number of data points was 147 (range 71-257; interquartile range = 90-205). Most registries lacked precise data definition catalogues. Only 16 data points could be considered as common, of which just a few were core trauma data. Four data points had the same data category options but were not considered having the same data point definitions. The inclusion criteria were not uniform. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma registries in Scandinavia have few common core data and data point definitions. There were data points for calculating the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) but the inclusion criteria varied too much to ensure a valid comparison. A consensus process for a joint trauma core data set will be initiated by the Scandinavian Networking Group for Trauma and Emergency Management (SCANTEM) to increase research on trauma efficiency and outcome.

Resuscitative emergency thoracotomy in a Scandinavian trauma hospital--is it justified?

OBJECTIVE: Resuscitative emergency thoracotomy (ET) is of value in selected (penetrating) trauma patients. Current survival-estimates and recommended guidelines are based on data from the United States. However, reports from European trauma centres are lacking. We report the current experience from a Scandinavian trauma hospital. METHODS: Identification of all consecutive ETs performed during a 5-year period. Data on demographics, and injury severity score (ISS), mechanism and location were recorded. Physiological status on admission (revised trauma score, RTS) and probability of survival (Ps) were calculated. Signs of life (SOL) and need for closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CC-CPR) were recorded through the post-injury phase. RESULTS: Ten patients underwent ET with no survivors. The annual incidence of ET was 0.7 per 100,000 inhabitants during the study period, with an increasing trend during the last years (r=0.74, p=0.014). ETs were performed in 0.7% of all trauma admissions, and in 2.5% of all severely injured patients (ISS>or=16). Blunt mechanism dominated; only three had penetrating injuries. Most frequent location of major injury was "multiple" (n=4) and "thoracic" (n=4). The male to female ratio was 7:3. Median age was 51 years (range 21-77). Median ISS was 34.5 (range 26-75), indicating severely injured patients, with seriously deranged physiology (median RTS of 0.0, range 0-6.1) with poor chance of survival (median Ps of 4.4%, range 0-89.5%). Males had significantly lower RTS and Ps (p=0.007 and 0.03, respectively) than females. Eight patients had signs of life at some time post-injury, but only four in the emergency room. Six patients had both pre- and in-hospital CC-CPR. Four patients had additional surgery to ET. Two possible preventable deaths were identified (Ps) of 51 and 89%), one in a third trimester pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Emergency thoracotomy is a rarely performed procedure in a rather busy Scandinavian trauma hospital, and outcome is dismal. Reevaluation of our decision-making process concerning the use of emergency thoracotomy is needed. How survival data and clinical experience in Europe compare to current figures from North America deserves further attention.

Rapid implementation of therapeutic hypothermia in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) into daily clinical practice appears to be slow. We present our experiences with rapid implementation of a simple protocol for TH in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. METHODS: From June 2002, we started cooling pre-hospitally with sport ice packs in the groin and over the neck. In the intensive care unit (ICU), we used ice-water soaked towels over the torso. All patients were endotracheally intubated, on mechanical ventilation and sedated and paralysed. The target temperature was 33 +/- 1 degrees C to be maintained for 12-24 h. We used simple inclusion criteria: (i) no response to verbal command during the ambulance transport independent of initial rhythm and cause of CA; (ii) age 18-80 years; and (iii) absence of cardiogenic shock (SBP < 90 mmHg despite vasopressors). We compared the first 27 comatose survivors with a presumed cardiac origin of their OHCA with 34 historic controls treated just before implementation. RESULTS: TH was initiated in all 27 eligible patients. The target temperature was reached in 24 patients (89% success rate). ICU- and hospital- length of stay did not differ significantly before and after implementation of TH. Hypokalemia (P= 0.001) and insulin resistance (P= 0.025) were more common and seizures (P= 0.01) less frequently reported with the use of TH. The implementation of TH was associated with a higher hospital survival rate (16/27; 59% vs. 11/34; 32%, respectively; P< or = 0.05). Our results indicate a population-based need of approximately seven cooling patients per 100,000 person-years served. CONCLUSION: Our simple, external cooling protocol can be implemented overnight in any system already treating post-resuscitation patients. It was well accepted, feasible and safe, but not optimal in terms of cooling rate. Neither safety concerns nor costs should be a barrier for implementation of TH.

Have the implementation of a new specialised emergency medical service influenced the pattern of general practitioners involvement in pre-hospital medical emergencies? A study of geographic variations in alerting, dispatch, and response.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency medical service systems in Norway are based on equity and equality. A toll free number (113) and criteria based dispatch are crucial components. The establishment of an emergency medical system (EMS) manned by an air and ground emergency physician (EP) has challenged the role of the general practitioner (GP) in emergency medical care. We investigated whether there were any geographical differences in the use of 113, alerts to GPs by the emergency medical dispatch centres (EMDCs), and of the presence of GPs on scene in medical emergencies leading to a turnout of the EP manned EMS. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of 385,000 inhabitants covered by the two EMDCs of Rogaland county, Norway, including 1035 on scene missions of the EP manned EMS during the period 1998-99. RESULTS: The proportion of emergency calls routed through 113 was significantly lower, the proportion of alerts to GPs significantly higher, and the proportions of GPs on scene significantly higher in rural than urban areas. CONCLUSION: We found geographical differences in the involvement of GPs in pre-hospital emergency medical situations, probably caused by a specialised emergency medical service system including an EMDC and an air and ground EP manned EMS. There were geographical differences in public use of the toll free 113, and alerts to GPs by the EMDCs, which is likely to result from geographical conditions and proximity to medical resources. Future organisation of the EMS has to reflect this to prevent unplanned and unwanted autonomously emerging EMS systems.

Prehospital advanced life support provided by specially trained physicians: is there a benefit in terms of life years gained?

BACKGROUND: The benefit of prehospital advanced life support (ALS) is disputed, as is the prehospital use of specially trained, hospital-based physicians. The purpose of the study was to assess the health benefit from an anesthesiologist-manned prehospital emergency medical service (EMS), and to separate the benefit of the anesthesiologist from that of rapid transport. METHODS: The anesthesiologist-manned helicopter and rapid response car service at Rogaland Central Hospital assisted 1106 patients at the scene during the 18-month study period. Two expert panels assessed patients with a potential health benefit for life years gained (LYG) using a modified Delphi technique. The probability of survival as a result of the studied EMS was multiplied by the life expectancy of each patient. The benefit was attributed either to the anesthesiologist, the rapid transport or a combination of both. RESULTS: The expert panels estimated a benefit of 504 LYG in 74 patients (7% of the total study population), with a median age of 54 years (range 0-88). The cause of the emergency was cardiac diseases (including cardiac arrest) in 61% of the 74 patients, trauma in 19%, and cardio-respiratory failure as a result of other conditions in 20%. The LYG were equally divided between air and ground missions, and the majority (88%) were attributed solely to ALS by the anesthesiologist. CONCLUSION: The expert panels found LYG in every 14th patient assisted by this anesthesiologist-manned prehospital EMS. There was no difference in LYG between the helicopter and the rapid response car missions. The role of the anesthesiologist was crucial for health benefits.

Reporting data following major trauma and analysing factors associated with outcome using the new Utstein style recommendations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To collect and present retrospectively the recommended core data from the Utstein style, analyse factors associated with outcome in major trauma, and discuss the value of the Utstein style definition of major trauma. DESIGN: A retrospective trauma cohort study. SETTING: A Norwegian trauma system with a 1200 bed combined local and referral trauma hospital without a formal trauma registry, covering a population of approximately 2.0 million. PARTICIPANTS: 3391 injured patients admitted 12 months from January 15, 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recommended core data from the Utstein style, and factors associated with outcome defined as in-hospital death within 30 days. RESULTS: 225 patients had an injury severity score (ISS)>15. In each of the 225 patients, we were able to obtain at least 47% of the recommended core data. Age >70 years, fall as a mechanism of injury, and a Trauma Score (TS)< or =14 were significantly associated with poor outcome. Of 22 with no major trauma (ISS<16), two died in hospital and 20 had an intensive care unit stay of more than 2 days. CONCLUSION: We found it difficult to collect retrospectively the recommended core data of the Utstein style. Age and physiological alterations (TS) were significantly related to outcome. The recommended definition of major trauma (ISS>15) did not cover all life-threatening injuries. The implementation of trauma registries based on the Utstein style recommendations could facilitate system evaluation and comparison, but definitions and categorizations should be further developed. Efforts should be made to reduce the number of core data.

Efficiency of activation of the trauma team in a Norwegian trauma referral centre.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, overtriage, and undertriage) of activation of the trauma team in a Norwegian trauma referral centre. DESIGN: A cohort study with univariate and multivariate analysis. SETTING: A primary trauma hospital and trauma referral centre, Norway. SUBJECTS: 3391 injured patients admitted during a 12 months period, starting January 15th, 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Activation of the trauma team for severely injured patients and factors associated with correct activation. RESULTS: Of the 3383 injured patients admitted, 283 (8%) were classified as severely injured. Of 507 activations of the trauma team, 240 (47%) were for severely injured patients (sensitivity 85%, undertriage 15%, specificity 91%, overtriage 9%, positive predictive value 0.47). The system of activation was significantly more efficient for patients admitted by anaesthetist-manned ambulances than by ordinary ground ambulances (sensitivity 94% compared with 83%, corresponding positive predictive value 0.55 and 0.33, p < 0.05). Female sex and age over 70 years were independent factors associated with significantly less use of the trauma team in severely injured patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The undertriage rate of 15% and a positive predictive value of only 0.47 indicates a need for improvement of our activation system. Female sex and age over 70 years were significantly associated with undertriage in severely injured patients. Our protocol for triage and the initial treatment of severely injured patients has been revised in the light of these findings, and we have established a trauma registry.

[Prehospital thrombolytic therapy of myocardial infarction in Northern Norway. How to improve the service for patients in sparsely-populated areas?]. / Prehospital trombolytisk behandling av hjerteinfarkt i nord-norge. Hvordan forbedre tilbudet til befolkningen i tynt befolkede områder?

Up to now, thrombolytic treatment in myocardial infarction has been restricted to coronary care departments in Norwegian hospitals. Owing to the highly significant impact of the time elapsing between onset of symptoms and thrombolytic treatment, it has been a challenge to offer patients in remote areas early treatment. The rescue helicopter in Northern Norway is manned by an anaesthesiologist. By taking advantage of this, in combination with strict diagnostic criteria, prehospital treatment with streptokinase is now offered in addition to pain relief, oxygen, nitrates and aspirin, and observation against arrhythmia. By these means, patients in remote areas can receive thrombolytic treatment without the delay caused by transportation and in-hospital examination, and a high level of safety is maintained. It still remains, however, to shorten the patients' and the doctors' delay in notifying the helicopter. It is suggested, that all anaesthesiologist-manned air ambulances implement this technique after consulting local general practitioners and cardiologists.