Delphi consensus on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma-a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology study endorsed by the European Association of Urology.

The purpose of this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) project, endorsed by the European Association of Urology, is to explore expert opinion on the management of patients with oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma by means of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on extracranial metastases, with the aim of developing consensus recommendations for patient selection, treatment doses, and concurrent systemic therapy. A questionnaire on SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma was prepared by a core group and reviewed by a panel of ten prominent experts in the field. The Delphi consensus methodology was applied, sending three rounds of questionnaires to clinicians identified as key opinion leaders in the field. At the end of the third round, participants were able to find consensus on eight of the 37 questions. Specifically, panellists agreed to apply no restrictions regarding age (25 [100%) of 25) and primary renal cell carcinoma histology (23 [92%] of 25) for SABR candidates, on the upper threshold of three lesions to offer ablative treatment in patients with oligoprogression, and on the concomitant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor. SABR was indicated as the treatment modality of choice for renal cell carcinoma bone oligometatasis (20 [80%] of 25) and for adrenal oligometastases 22 (88%). No consensus or major agreement was reached regarding the appropriate schedule, but the majority of the poll (54%-58%) retained the every-other-day schedule as the optimal choice for all the investigated sites. The current ESTRO Delphi consensus might provide useful direction for the application of SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma and highlight the key areas of ongoing debate, perhaps directing future research efforts to close knowledge gaps.

A population-based analysis of the management of symptoms of depression among patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: Patients with lung cancer can experience significant psychological morbidities including depression. We characterize patterns and factors associated with interventions for symptoms of depression in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using health services administrative data in Ontario, Canada of stage IV NSCLC diagnosed from January 2007 to September 2018. A positive symptom of depression score was defined by reporting at least one ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) depression score ≥ 2 following diagnosis until the end of follow-up (September 2019). Patient factors included age, sex, comorbidity burden, rurality of residence, and neighbourhood income quintile. Interventions included psychiatry assessment, psychology referral, social work referral and anti-depressant medical therapy (for patients ≥ 65 years with universal drug coverage). Multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to examine the association between patient factors and intervention use for patients who reported symptoms of depression. RESULTS: In the cohort of 13,159 patients with stage IV NSCLC lung cancer, symptoms of depression were prevalent (71.4%, n = 9,397). Patients who reported symptoms of depression were more likely to receive psychiatry assessment/psychology referral (7.8% vs 3.5%; SD [standardized difference] 0.19), social work referral (17.4% vs 11.9%; SD 0.16) and anti-depressant prescriptions (23.8% vs 13.8%; SD 0.26) when compared to patients who did not report symptoms of depression respectively. In multivariable analyses, older patients were less likely to receive any intervention. Females were more likely to obtain a psychiatry assessment/psychology referral or social work referral. In addition, patients from non-major urban or rural residences were less likely to receive psychiatry assessment/psychology referral or social work referral, however patients from rural residences were more likely to be prescribed anti-depressants. CONCLUSIONS: There is high prevalence of symptoms of depression in stage IV NSCLC. We identify patient populations, including older patients and rural patients, who are less likely to receive interventions that will help identifying and screening for symptoms of depression.

Stereotactic Radiation for Ultra-Central Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Safety and Efficacy Trial (SUNSET).

PURPOSE: The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors in close proximity to the central mediastinal structures has been associated with a high risk of toxicity. This study (NCT03306680) aimed to determine the maximally tolerated dose of stereotactic body radiation therapy for ultracentral non-small cell lung carcinoma, using a time-to-event continual reassessment methodology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with T1-3N0M0 (≤6 cm) non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. The maximally tolerated dose was defined as the dose of radiation therapy associated with a ≤30% rate of grade (G) 3 to 5 prespecified treatment-related toxicity occurring within 2 years of treatment. The starting dose level was 60 Gy in 8 daily fractions. The dose-maximum hotspot was limited to 120% and within the planning tumor volume; tumors with endobronchial invasion were excluded. This primary analysis occurred 2 years after completion of accrual. RESULTS: Between March 2018 and April 2021, 30 patients were enrolled at 5 institutions. The median age was 73 years (range, 65-87) and 17 (57%) were female. Planning tumor volume was abutting proximal bronchial tree in 19 (63%), esophagus 5 (17%), pulmonary vein 1 (3.3%), and pulmonary artery 14 (47%). All patients received 60 Gy in 8 fractions. The median follow-up was 37 months (range, 8.9-51). Two patients (6.7%) experienced G3-5 adverse events related to treatment: 1 patient with G3 dyspnea and 1 G5 pneumonia. The latter had computed tomography findings consistent with a background of interstitial lung disease. Three-year overall survival was 72.5% (95% CI, 52.3%-85.3%), progression-free survival 66.1% (95% CI, 46.1%-80.2%), local control 89.6% (95% CI, 71.2%-96.5%), regional control 96.4% (95% CI, 77.2%-99.5%), and distant control 85.9% (95% CI, 66.7%-94.5%). Quality-of-life scores declined numerically over time, but the decreases were not clinically or statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty Gy in 8 fractions, planned and delivered with only a moderate hotspot, has a favorable adverse event rate within the prespecified acceptability criteria and results in excellent control for ultracentral tumors.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Ultra-central Thoracic Tumors: A Single Center Retrospective Review.

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for ultracentral thoracic tumors at our institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with ultracentral lung tumors or nodes, defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus, treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All SBRT plans were generated with the goal of creating homogenous dose distributions. The primary endpoint was incidence of SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicity, defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V5.0). Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and identify predictors of severe toxicity and LF, while the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients receiving 162 ultracentral courses of SBRT were included. The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%), with doses ranging from 30 to 55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range, 48-115 Gy). The incidence of severe toxicity was 9.4% at 3 years. The most common severe toxicity was pneumonitis (n = 4). There was 1 possible treatment-related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of severe toxicity included increased PTV size, decreased PTV V95%, lung V5 Gy, and lung V20 Gy. The incidence of LF was 14% at 3 years. Predictors of LF included younger age and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. The median PFS was 8.8 months, while the median overall survival was 44.0 months. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest case series of ultracentral thoracic SBRT to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT was associated with relatively low rates of severe toxicity and LF. Predictors of toxicity should be interpreted in the context of the heterogeneity in toxicities observed.

Utility of molecular markers in predicting local control specific to lung cancer spine metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We report outcomes following spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the significance of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and timing of immune check point inhibitors (ICI) on local failure (LF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 165 patients and 389 spinal segments were retrospectively reviewed from 2009 to 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were abstracted. Primary endpoint was LF and secondary, overall survival (OS) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF). Multivariable analysis (MVA) evaluated factors predictive of LF and VCF. RESULTS: The median follow-up and OS were: 13.0 months (range, 0.5-95.3 months) and 18.4 months (95% CI 11.4-24.6). 52.1% were male and 76.4% had adenocarcinoma. Of the 389 segments, 30.3% harboured an EGFR mutation and 17.0% were PD-L1 ≥ 50%. The 24 months LF rate in PD-L1 ≥ 50% vs PD-L1 < 50% was 10.7% vs. 38.0%, and in EGFR-positive vs. negative was 18.1% vs. 30.0%. On MVA, PD-L1 status of ≥ 50% (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.69, p = 0.004) significantly predicted for lower LF compared to PD-L1 < 50%. Lower LF trend was seen with ICI administration peri and post SBRT (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16-1.05, p = 0.062). On MVA, polymetastatic disease (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.84-5.85, p < 0.0001) and ECOG ≥ 2 (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.16-3.02, p = 0.011) significantly predicted for worse OS and absence of baseline VCF predicted for lower VCF rate (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.39, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We report a significant association of PD-L1 ≥ 50% status on improved LC rates from spine SBRT in NSCLC patients.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Interstitial Lung Disease: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported to be at high risk of toxic effects after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), but for many patients, there are limited alternative treatment options. Objective: To prospectively assess the benefits and toxic effects of SABR in this patient population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted at 6 academic radiation oncology institutions, 5 in Canada and 1 in Scotland, with accrual between March 7, 2019, and January 12, 2022. Patients aged 18 years or older with fibrotic ILD and a diagnosis of T1-2N0 NSCLC who were not candidates for surgical resection were enrolled. Intervention: Patients were treated with SABR to a dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions every other day. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study prespecified that SABR would be considered worthwhile if median overall survival-the primary end point-was longer than 1 year, with a grade 3 to 4 risk of toxic effects less than 35% and a grade 5 risk of toxic effects less than 15%. Secondary end points included toxic effects, progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), quality-of-life outcomes, and changes in pulmonary function. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Results: Thirty-nine patients enrolled and received SABR. Median age was 78 (IQR, 67-83) years and 59% (n = 23) were male. At baseline, 70% (26 of 37) of patients reported dyspnea, median forced expiratory volume in first second of expiration was 80% (IQR, 66%-90%) predicted, median forced vital capacity was 84% (IQR, 69%-94%) predicted, and median diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was 49% (IQR, 38%-61%) predicted. Median follow-up was 19 (IQR, 14-25) months. Overall survival at 1 year was 79% (95%, CI 62%-89%; P < .001 vs the unacceptable rate), and median overall survival was 25 months (95% CI, 14 months to not reached). Median PFS was 19 months (95% CI, 13-28 months), and 2-year LC was 92% (95% CI, 69%-98%). Adverse event rates (highest grade per patient) were grade 1 to 2: n = 12 (31%), grade 3: n = 4 (10%), grade 4: n = 0, and grade 5: n = 3 (7.7%, all due to respiratory deterioration). Conclusions and Relevance: In this trial, use of SABR in patients with fibrotic ILD met the prespecified acceptability thresholds for both toxicity and efficacy, supporting the use of SABR for curative-intent treatment after a careful discussion of risks and benefits. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03485378.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Extracranial Oligometastatic Disease from Head and Neck Primary Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat disease in the oligometastatic (OM) setting due to mounting evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Given the low population representation in prospective studies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of HNC patients with extracranial OM disease treated with SBRT. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with Cochrane, Medline, and Embase databases queried from inception to August 2022 for studies with extracranial OM HNC treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Polymetastatic patients (>five lesions), mixed-primary cohorts failing to report HNC separately, lack of treatment to all lesions, nonquantitative endpoints, and other definitive treatments (surgery, conventional radiotherapy, and radioablation) were excluded. The meta-analysis examined the pooled effects of 12- and 24-month local control (LC) per lesion, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Weighted random-effects were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with heterogeneity evaluated using the I2 statistic and Cochran Qtest. Forest plots were generated for each endpoint. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (639 patients, 831 lesions), with twelve eligible for quantitative synthesis with common endpoints and sufficient reporting. Fourteen studies were retrospective, with a single prospective trial. Studies were small, with a median of 32 patients (range: 6-81) and 63 lesions (range: 6-126). The OM definition varied, with a maximum of two to five metastases, mixed synchronous and metachronous lesions, and a few studies including oligoprogressive lesions. The most common site of metastasis was the lung. Radiation was delivered in 1-10 fractions (20-70 Gy). The one-year LC (LC1), reported in 12 studies, was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.3-91.9%). LC2 was 77.9% (95% CI: 66.4-86.3%), with heterogeneity across studies. PFS was reported in five studies, with a PFS1 of 43.0% (95% CI: 35.0-51.4%) and PFS2 of 23.9% (95% CI: 17.8-31.2%), with homogeneity across studies. OS was analyzed in nine studies, demonstrating an OS1 of 80.1% (95% CI: 74.2-85.0%) and OS2 of 60.7% (95% CI: 51.3-69.4%). Treatment was well tolerated with no reported grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicity rates were uniformly below 5% when reported. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT offers excellent LC and promising OS, with acceptable toxicities in OM HNC. Durable PFS remains rare, highlighting the need for effective local or systemic therapies in this population. Further investigations on concurrent and adjuvant therapies are warranted.

Single vs. multiple fraction non-inferiority trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligo-metastases/progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy delivery regimens can vary between a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) given daily for up to several weeks depending on the location of the cancer or metastases. With limited evidence comparing fractionation regimens for oligometastases, there is support to explore toxicity levels to nearby organs at risk as a primary outcome while using SF and MF stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as well as explore differences in patient-reported quality of life and experience. METHODS: This study will randomize 598 patients in a 1:1 ratio between the standard arm (MF SABR) and the experimental arm (SF SABR). This trial is designed as two randomized controlled trials within one patient population for resource efficiency. The primary objective of the first randomization is to determine if SF SABR is non-inferior to MF SABR, with respect to healthcare provider (HCP)-reported grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) that are related to SABR. Primary endpoint is toxicity while secondary endpoints include lesional control rate (LCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second randomization (BC Cancer sites only) will allocate participants to either complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires only; or QoL questionnaires and a symptom-specific survey with symptom-guided HCP intervention. The primary objective of the second randomization is to determine if radiation-related symptom questionnaire-guided HCP intervention results in improved reported QoL as measured by the EuroQoL-5-dimensions-5levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. The primary endpoint is patient-reported QoL and secondary endpoints include: persistence/resolution of symptom reporting, QoL, intervention cost effectiveness, resource utilization, and overall survival. DISCUSSION: This study will compare SF and MF SABR in the treatment of oligometastases and oligoprogression to determine if there is non-inferior toxicity for SF SABR in selected participants with 1-5 oligometastatic lesions. This study will also compare patient-reported QoL between participants who receive radiation-related symptom-guided HCP intervention and those who complete questionnaires alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05784428. Date of Registration: 23 March 2023.

Referred molecular testing as a barrier to optimal treatment decision making in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Experience at a tertiary academic institution in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Molecular testing is critical to guiding treatment approaches in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), with testing delays adversely impacting the timeliness of treatment decisions. Here, we aimed to evaluate the time from initial mNSCLC diagnosis to treatment decision (TTD) following implementation of in-house EGFR, ALK, and PD-L1 testing at our institution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 165 patients (send-out testing, n = 92; in-house testing, n = 73) with newly diagnosed mNSCLC treated at our institution. Data were compared during the send-out (March 2017-May 2019) and in-house (July 2019-March 2021) testing periods. We performed a detailed workflow analysis to provide insight on the pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic intervals that constituted the total TTD. RESULTS: TTD was significantly shorter with in-house testing (10 days vs. 18 days, p < 0.0001), driven largely by decreased internal handling and specimen transit times (2 days vs. 3 days, p < 0.0001) and laboratory turnaround times (TAT, 3 days vs. 8 days, p < 0.0001), with 96% of in-house cases meeting the international guideline of a ≤ 10-day intra-laboratory TAT (vs. 74% send-out, p < 0.001). Eighty-eight percent of patients with in-house testing had results available at their first oncology consultation (vs. 52% send-out, p < 0.0001), and all patients with in-house testing had results available at the time of treatment decision (vs. 86% send-out, p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the advantages of in-house biomarker testing for mNSCLC at a tertiary oncology center. Incorporation of in-house testing may reduce barriers to offering personalized medicine by improving the time to optimal systemic therapy decision.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and practice guideline from the International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS).

Surgery is the standard of care for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel alternative for patients who are medically inoperable, technically high risk, or who decline surgery. Evidence for using SBRT in the primary renal cell carcinoma setting is growing, including several rigorously conducted prospective clinical trials. This systematic review was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma. Review results then formed the basis for the practice guidelines described, on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society. 3972 publications were screened and 36 studies (822 patients) were included in the analysis. Median local control rate was 94·1% (range 70·0-100), 5-year progression-free survival was 80·5% (95% CI 72-92), and 5-year overall survival was 77·2% (95% CI 65-89). These practice guidelines addressed four key clinical questions. First, the optimal dose fractionation was 25-26 Gy in one fraction, or 42-48 Gy in three fractions for larger tumours. Second, routine post-treatment biopsy is not recommended as it is not predictive of patient outcome. Third, SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma in a solitary kidney is safe and effective. Finally, guidelines for post-treatment follow-up are described, which include cross-axial imaging of the abdomen including both kidneys, adrenals, and surveillance of the chest initially every 6 months. This systematic review and practice guideline support the practice of SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma as a safe and effective standard treatment option. Randomised trials with surgery and invasive ablative therapies are needed to further define best practice.

Enhancing Symptom Screening and Patient Education Among Patients with Metastatic Lung Cancer: a Qualitative Analysis.

We explored perspectives of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) on symptom screening and population-level patient-reported outcome (PRO) data regarding common symptom trajectories in the year after diagnosis. A qualitative study of patients with mNSCLC was conducted at a Canadian tertiary cancer centre. English-speaking patients diagnosed ≥ 6 months prior to study invitation were recruited, and semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted. Patient and treatment characteristics were obtained via chart review. Anonymized interview transcripts underwent deductive-inductive coding and thematic content analysis. Among ten participants (5 (50%) females; median (range) age, 68 (56-77) years; median (range) time since diagnosis, 28.5 (6-72) months; 6 (60%) with smoking histories), six themes were identified in total. Two themes were identified regarding symptom screening: (1) screening is useful for symptom self-monitoring and disclosure to the healthcare team, (2) screening of additional quality-of-life (QOL) domains (smoking-related stigma, sexual dysfunction, and financial toxicity) is desired. Four themes were identified regarding population-level symptom trajectory PRO data: (1) data provide reassurance and motivation to engage in symptom self-management, (2) data should be disclosed after an oncologic treatment plan is developed, (3) data should be communicated via in-person discussion with accompanying patient-education resources, and (4) communication of data should include reassurance about symptom stabilization, acknowledgement of variability in patient experience, and strategies for symptom self-management. The themes and recommendations derived from the patient experience with mNSCLC provide guidance for enhanced symptom screening and utilization of population-level symptom trajectory data for patient education.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines.

This systematic review and meta-analysis reports on outcomes and hepatic toxicity rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and presents consensus guidelines regarding appropriate patient management. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was performed from articles reporting outcomes at ≥5 years published before October 2022 from the Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases with the following search terms: ("stereotactic body radiotherapy" OR "SBRT" OR "SABR" OR "stereotactic ablative radiotherapy") AND ("hepatocellular carcinoma" OR "HCC"). An aggregated data meta-analysis was conducted to assess overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) using weighted random effects models. In addition, individual patient data analyses incorporating data from 6 institutions were conducted as their own subgroup analyses. Seventeen observational studies, comprising 1889 patients with HCC treated with ≤9 SBRT fractions, between 2003 and 2019, were included in the aggregated data meta-analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates after SBRT were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-66%) and 40% (95% CI, 29%-51%), respectively. The 3- and 5-year LC rates after SBRT were 84% (95% CI, 77%-90%) and 82% (95% CI, 74%-88%), respectively. Tumor size was the only prognostic factor for LC. Tumor size and region were significantly associated with OS. Five-year LC and OS rates of 79% (95% CI, 0.74-0.84) and 25% (95% CI, 0.20-0.30), respectively, were observed in the individual patient data analyses. Factors prognostic for improved OS were tumor size <3 cm, Eastern region, Child-Pugh score ≤B7, and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage of 0 and A. The incidence of severe hepatic toxicity varied according to the criteria applied. SBRT is an effective treatment modality for patients with HCC with mature follow-up. Clinical practice guidelines were developed on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).

Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Patients With Unbiopsied Lung Tumors (SABR-DETECT).

For patients with stage I/IIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgical resection is the standard treatment. However, some of these patients are not candidates for surgery or refuse a surgical option. Definitive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a standard approach in these patients. Approximately 15% of patients undergoing SABR for localized NSCLC will experience a recurrence within 2 years. Furthermore, many of these patients are deemed appropriate for SABR without a tissue diagnosis, based on the likelihood of malignancy which can be calculated by validated models. A liquid biopsy, detecting ctDNA, would be useful in early detection of recurrences, and documenting a cancer diagnosis in patients without a biopsy. This is a multi-institutional study enrolling patients with suspected stage I/IIA NSCLC and a pretreatment likelihood of malignancy of ≥60% using the validated models for patients without a tissue diagnosis, in cohort 1 (n = 45). The second cohort will consist of biopsied patients (n = 30-60). SABR will be delivered as per risk-adapted protocol. Plasma will be collected for ctDNA analysis prior to the first fraction of SABR, 24 to 72 hours after first fraction, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24-months. The patients will be followed up with imaging at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24-months. The primary objective is to assess whether a cancer detection liquid biopsy platform can predict recurrence of NSCLC. The secondary objectives are to assess the impact of SABR on detection rates of ctDNA in patients undergoing SABR and to correlate ctDNA positivity and pretreatment probability of malignancy (NCT05921474).

Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on lung cancer symptom burden: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer commonly coexist and have significant symptom overlap. We sought to compare the symptom burden of lung cancer patients with COPD to those without COPD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of stage I-IV lung cancer patients in Ontario, Canada, who completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) within 90 days of diagnosis. COPD was ascertained using a validated algorithm and patients were grouped as: no COPD, previously diagnosed COPD (at least 90 days prior to lung cancer diagnosis), and newly diagnosed COPD (within 90 days of lung cancer diagnosis). The association between COPD status and any moderate to severe symptom (ESAS ≥4) and the number of moderate to severe symptoms was determined using multivariable modified Poisson regression analyses. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to compare total symptom distress scores. Analyses were stratified by limited (I/II) and advanced stage (III/IV). Results: Among 38,898 lung cancer patients, 53% had COPD (previously diagnosed 43%, newly diagnosed 10%). Collectively, those with previously diagnosed COPD had the most severe symptom burden. Across all stages, both COPD groups had a significantly higher risk of experiencing any (relative risk: 1.04 to 1.18) and multiple moderate to severe symptoms (RR 1.05 to 1.24), in addition to higher total symptom distress scores (P<0.0001). Differences in symptom burden between groups were most pronounced among early-stage patients. Conclusions: Lung cancer patients with underlying COPD have worse symptom burden, indicating a need for interventions that effectively alleviate symptoms.

Unanticipated Radiation Replanning for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with unanticipated radiation therapy (RT) replanning in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and Materials: Patients from a single institution with newly diagnosed stage III NSCLC treated with radical RT from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. The frequency and reasons for replanning were determined. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with replanning. Results: Of 144 patients included in this study, 11% (n = 16) required replanning after the start of RT. The reason for replanning in these 16 patients was changes in the target detected by cone beam computed tomography (shift in 10 patients, shrinkage in 5 patients, and growth in 1 patient). Larger planning target volume (primary and nodal) was statistically predictive of replanning (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.4; P = .02). The actuarial median overall survival was 33.3 months (95% CI, 10.3-43.9) for the 16 patients who were replanned and 36.3 months (95% CI, 27.4-66.5) for the remaining 128 patients (P = .96). The median time to local recurrence was 25.0 months (95% CI, 10.3-41.3) for those patients who underwent replanning, which was similar to those patients who did not undergo replanning (19.5 months; 95% CI, 11.8-23.2; P = .28). Conclusions: In this study, 11% of patients treated with radical RT for NSCLC required replanning due to changes in the target detected by cone beam computed tomography. A larger planning target volume predicts a higher likelihood of requiring adaptive RT. Overall survival and local control were similar between patients who were replanned compared with those who were not replanned.

Radiation therapy options in kidney cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, the authors discuss the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). RECENT FINDINGS: For primary RCC treated with SBRT, local control is estimated at >95%, and grade 3-4 toxicity is limited at ≤5%. The difference in glomerular filtration rate pretreatment versus posttreatment was about 7.7 ml/min. For metastatic RCC treated with SBRT, the 1-year local control is ~90%. The incidence of any grade 3-4 toxicity is ~1%. Several ongoing trials are evaluating SBRT in combination or in lieu of systemic therapy. There are many unknowns remaining in the treatment of RCC, including tumor prognostication, treatment selection, and treatment delivery. SUMMARY: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with primary and metastatic RCC.

The role of thoracic consolidative radiotherapy in the setting of immunotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

The improvement in treatment strategies and outcomes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has lagged behind other cancers. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), durvalumab and atezolizumab, to the platinum-based chemotherapy in frontline setting has improved the survival in extensive stage SCLC, (ES-SCLC), albeit modestly, and is now the new standard of care. Prior to advent of immunotherapy into the therapeutic armamentarium in ES-SCLC, consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) was associated with improved thoracic control and survival outcomes. In the era of ICIs, the role of TRT is not well defined, chiefly because TRT was not incorporated in any immunotherapy trials, secondly due to concerns regarding the increased risks of pneumonitis, and finally uncertain magnitude of benefit with this combined approach. In principle, radiation can increase in the immunogenicity of tumor and hence the activity of immune checkpoint blockade, thereby increasing efficacy both locally and distantly. Such an approach has been promising in non-small cell lung cancer with ICIs improving outcomes after concurrent chemoradiation, but remains unanswered in ES-SCLC. It is, thus, possible that the modest improvement in survival by addition of ICIs to chemotherapy in ES-SCLC can be further improved by the incorporation of consolidative TRT in selected patients. Several early phase trials and retrospective studies have suggested that such an approach may be feasible and safe. Prospective trials are ongoing to answer whether adding radiation therapy to chemoimmunotherapy will improve outcomes in ES-SCLC.

Outcomes for oligometastatic head and neck cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: Results from an international multi-institutional consortium.

BACKGROUND: We report the results of an international multi-institutional cohort of oligometastatic (OMD) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with SBRT. METHODS: Patients with OMD HNC (≤5 metastases) treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2016 at six institutions were included. Treated metastasis control (TMC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by multivariable analysis (MVA). RESULTS: Forty-two patients with 84 HNC oligometastases were analyzed. The TMC rate at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 66%, with a median time to recurrence of 10.1 months. The median PFS and OS were 4.7 and 23.3 months. MVA identified a PTV point maximum (BED)10 > 100 Gy as a predictor of improved TMC (HR = 0.31, p = 0.034), and a cumulative PTV > 48 cc as having worse PFS (HR = 2.99, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Favorable TMC and OS was observed in OMD HNCs treated with SBRT.

Palliative Care Among Lung Cancer Patients With and Without COPD: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

CONTEXT: Lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may have greater palliative care needs due to poor prognosis and symptom burden. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the provision of timely palliative care and symptom burden by COPD status. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, population-based cohort study of individuals diagnosed with lung cancer in Ontario, Canada (2009-2019) using health administrative databases and cancer registries. The impact of COPD on the probability of receiving palliative care was determined accounting for dying as a competing event, overall and stratified by stage. The provision of palliative care for patients with severe symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale score ≥ 7), location of the first palliative care visit and symptom severity were compared by COPD status. RESULTS: A total of 74,993 patients were included in the study (48% of patients had available symptom data). At the time of lung cancer diagnosis, 50% of patients had COPD. Stage I-III patients with COPD were more likely to receive palliative care (adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR)s: 1.05-1.31) with no difference for stage IV (1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04). Despite having severe symptoms, very few patients with early-stage disease received palliative care (Stage I: COPD-23% vs. no COPD-18%, SMD = 0.12). Most patients (84%) reported severe symptoms and COPD worsened symptom burden, especially among early-stage patients. CONCLUSION: COPD impacts the receipt of palliative care and symptom burden for patients with early-stage lung cancer. Many patients with severe symptoms did not receive palliative care, suggesting unmet needs among this vulnerable population.