Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Trials ; 19(1): 19, 2018 Jan 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29310711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical pharmaceutical care has long played an important role in the improvement of healthcare safety. Pharmaceutical care is a collaborative care approach, implicating all the actors of the medication circuit in order to prevent and correct drug-related problems that can lead to adverse drug events. The collaborative pharmaceutical care performed during patients' hospitalization requires two mutually reinforcing activities: medication reconciliation and medication review. Until now, the impact of the association of these two activities has not been clearly studied. METHODS: This is a multicentric stepped wedge randomized study involving six care units from six French University Hospitals (each unit corresponding to a cluster) over seven consecutive 14-day periods. Each hospital unit will start with a control period and switch to an experimental period after a randomized number of 14-day periods. Patients aged at least 65 years hospitalized in one of the participating care units and having given their consent to be called for a 30-day and 90-day follow-up can be enrolled. For each 14-day period, 15 patients will be recruited in each care unit to obtain a total of 630 patients enrolled in all centers. Patients with a hospital stay of more than 21 days will be excluded. During the control period, there will be no clinical pharmacist in the care unit, whereas during the experimental period a clinical pharmacist will perform medication reconciliation and review with the healthcare team. The primary outcome will assess the impact of collaborative pharmaceutical care on preventable medication error rate. The secondary outcomes will evaluate the clinical impact of the strategy, the acceptance rate of pharmaceutical interventions, the induced and avoided costs of the strategy (cost-consequence analysis), and the healthcare team's satisfaction. DISCUSSION: This study will assess the impact of collaborative pharmaceutical care associating medication reconciliation and review at patient admission to hospital in terms of preventable medication error rate and costs. This activity will prevent and correct medication errors arising earlier in the hospitalization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02598115 . Registered on 4 November 2015.


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Pacientes Internados , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/organização & administração , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Interações Medicamentosas , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Feminino , França , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Segurança do Paciente , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Eur J Intern Med ; 26(7): 491-7, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26209101

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation is a powerful process to correct medication errors (ME) resulting from miscommunicated information at transitions of care. This study aims to develop and evaluate a scoring method for assessing the severity of potential harm of ME intercepted by medication reconciliation at hospital admission in elderly. METHODS: The development of the scoring method was based on a literature search and the creation of a list of high-risk drugs used in outpatient care. The evaluation of the method was carried out in 7 French hospitals and was based on two criteria: the inter-rater reliability and acceptability. The assessment of the inter-rater reliability was based on intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) calculations. Each hospital prospectively enrolled the 10 first patients aged 65 or older presenting with at least one ME. Seven blocks of 10 patients were formed. After randomization, each block was rated by practitioners from 3 hospitals. The assessment of the acceptability was based on a satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: A clinical algorithm was developed. The inter-rater reliability of the method was validated by the overall agreement of the 7 hospitals ratings. The agreement was at least substantial (ICC>0.60) and in most of cases almost perfect (ICC>0.80). The acceptability of the method was judged as satisfactory. CONCLUSION: This multi-centre project has validated an instrument for assessing the severity of potential harm of ME intercepted by medication reconciliation. This will allow studies to be conducted with large cohorts of patients in order to develop epidemiological databases of ME of potential clinical significance.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/métodos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Masculino , Segurança do Paciente , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...