Do diabetes-related foot ulcer wound fluid measures have clinical utility as biomarkers for healing? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers reported in wound fluid of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DRFUs), and their ability to reflect current and prospective wound healing. METHOD: A systematic search was executed following the PRISMA methodology across five chosen databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Clinical Trials and Cochrane Systematic Reviews. Using keywords and phrases, it yielded 5022 results. RESULTS: Based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 19 papers were included in the final analysis, among which: seven reported serial temporal biomarker changes in wounds; six reported measures from baseline and related them to healing rate and/or final healing outcome; four papers reported both end-points, and two papers reported solely on baseline biomarker levels in a generalised diabetic foot ulcer group. Across the studies, a total of 46 distinct markers were described from the wound fluid of n=1141 participants. Biomarkers examined included proteases, protease inhibitors, growth factors, chemokines and cytokines, with proteases being the largest subcategory making up 16 (34.8%) of the markers investigated (n=7). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) was the most frequently investigated protease and it currently holds the most biomarker promise (n=5). Wound bacterial profiles variably related to wound healing outcome (n=5). One study reported biophysical markers rather than biomarkers, including measurement of wound fluid pH. Study quality was generally good. Drawing quantitative comparisons between papers was not possible due to variability in experimental design including sampling and assessment methods. CONCLUSION: These studies collectively indicate several wound fluid measures that could identify DRFU status and outcomes, and that methodological standardisation in the field is needed to determine reliable predictive thresholds for healing.

Assessment of the anti-hyperalgesic efficacy of J-2156, relative to clinically available analgesic/adjuvant agents in a rat model of mild to moderate chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP).

Chronic mechanical low back pain (cLBP) is a leading cause of disability and a major socio-economic burden internationally. The lifetime prevalence of non-specific LBP is approximately 84%, with the prevalence of cLBP at about 23%. Clinically available analgesic/adjuvant medications often provide inadequate pain relief in patients experiencing cLBP. Hence, the urgency for discovery of effective and better tolerated medications. Fourteen days after the induction of five shallow annular punctures (5X) in the lumbar intervertebral discs at L4/L5 and L5/L6 in male Sprague-Dawley rats, mechanical hyperalgesia was fully developed in the lumbar axial deep tissues at L4/L5 (primary) and L1 (secondary). Importantly, mechanical allodynia in the hindpaws was absent. From day 28, we assessed the face validity of our mild to moderate LBP-5X rat model using four clinically available analgesic/adjuvant drugs, namely gabapentin, morphine, meloxicam and amitriptyline relative to vehicle. Additionally, the anti-hyperalgesic effects of J-2156, a highly selective small molecule somatostatin type 4 receptor agonist was assessed. Single i.p. bolus doses of gabapentin and meloxicam at the highest doses tested (100 and 30 mg/kg, respectively) alleviated secondary hyperalgesia (L1) but not primary hyperalgesia (L4/5). Morphine at 1 mg/kg alleviated both primary and secondary hyperalgesia in these tissues, whereas amitriptyline at the doses tested, lacked efficacy. These findings attest to the face validity of our model. J-2156 at 10 and 30 mg/kg alleviated secondary hyperalgesia in the lumbar axial deep tissues at L1 with a non-significant trend for relief of primary hyperalgesia in the corresponding tissues at L4/L5 in these animals.

Comparison of Burrowing and Stimuli-Evoked Pain Behaviors as End-Points in Rat Models of Inflammatory Pain and Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

Establishment and validation of ethologically-relevant, non-evoked behavioral end-points as surrogate measures of spontaneous pain in rodent pain models has been proposed as a means to improve preclinical to clinical research translation in the pain field. Here, we compared the utility of burrowing behavior with hypersensitivity to applied mechanical stimuli for pain assessment in rat models of chronic inflammatory and peripheral neuropathic pain. Briefly, groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were habituated to the burrowing environment and trained over a 5-day period. Rats that burrowed ≤ 450 g of gravel on any 2 days of the individual training phase were excluded from the study. The remaining rats received either a unilateral intraplantar injection of Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) or saline, or underwent unilateral chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve- or sham-surgery. Baseline burrowing behavior and evoked pain behaviors were assessed prior to model induction, and twice-weekly until study completion on day 14. For FCA- and CCI-rats, but not the corresponding groups of sham-rats, evoked mechanical hypersensitivity developed in a temporal manner in the ipsilateral hindpaws. Although burrowing behavior also decreased in a temporal manner for both FCA-and CCI- rats, there was considerable inter-animal variability. By contrast, mechanical hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia in the ipsilateral hindpaws of FCA- and CCI-rats respectively, exhibited minimal inter-animal variability. Our data collectively show that burrowing behavior is altered in rodent models of chronic inflammatory pain and peripheral neuropathic pain. However, large group sizes are needed to ensure studies are adequately powered due to considerable inter-animal variability.