Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
SICOT J ; 9: 6, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36853143

RESUMO

Pediatric acetabular dysplasia is common in orthopedic practice. Femoral de-rotational varus osteotomy (FDVO) is one of the surgical options suggested for treatment. In this article, we describe a simplified surgical technique of performing FDVO percutaneously using a pediatric Limb Reconstruction System external fixator, and we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the technique.

2.
Foot Ankle Int ; 42(6): 723-733, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33559484

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Open tibial plafond fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association and AO Foundation [OTA/AO] 43) are associated with severe complications, including deep infection (closed fractures, 20%; open fractures, 30%), amputation (3%-14%), and nonunion (up to 25%). Circular external fixators (CEFs) can minimize soft tissue injury. This study aimed to report the rate of union and occurrence of severe complications in patients with open tibial plafond fractures treated with CEFs. METHODS: A retrospective review of case series was conducted at 3 level I trauma centers. The study included patients older than 18 years with open tibial plafond fractures treated with CEFs. The reported outcomes included union rate, deep infection, operative complications, and limb alignment. The radiographic measurements of anatomic alignment were obtained. Fifty-two patients were included in the study. RESULTS: The primary union rate was 79%. No deep infection occurred in the majority (92%) of patients. No patient required amputation of the affected limb or free flap coverage. CONCLUSION: Definitive fixation of open tibial plafond fractures with CEFs avoided severe soft tissue complications but resulted in variation in final radiographic alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.


Assuntos
Fraturas Expostas , Fraturas da Tíbia , Fixadores Externos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 30(2): 351-358, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31542823

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Closed femoral-shortening osteotomy over an intramedullary nail for the treatment of leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a demanding surgical technique, classically requiring specialized instrumentation (intramedullary saw and chisel). Herein, we describe our experience with shortening osteotomy over a nail, using a percutaneous multiple drill-hole osteotomy technique to perform the bone section with the osteotomized bone smashed and let on-site. METHOD: We operated on six patients with LLD due to: hemihypertrophy syndrome (three patients), congenital short femur, hemiplegic cerebral palsy, and growth plate injury. Mean femoral shortening was 4.2 cm. Osteotomy was performed via a multiple drill-hole technique, and femurs were stabilized using an intramedullary nail. Post-operative clinical and radiological data were recorded. Residual LLD was assessed through long-standing teleroentgenography. RESULTS: Shortening was achieved, with a final LLD of < 1 cm in all patients. All patients were satisfied and considered the lengths of the lower limbs to be equal. Our technique did not require special surgical skill or specialized instrumentation. Moreover, we did not record intraoperative and post-operative complications. DISCUSSION: Percutaneous femoral-shortening osteotomy over a nail using the on-site smashing osteotomy technique was effective and safe in treating LLD in this initial case series.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Fêmur/cirurgia , Desigualdade de Membros Inferiores/cirurgia , Osteotomia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Osteotomia/instrumentação , Radiografia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 10(Suppl 1): S115-S122, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31700208

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Ring external fixation can be a definitive treatment of high energy femoral fractures. A retrospective analysis of outcomes is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 patients with open or comminuted femoral fractures treated with circular external fixators were included. Mean age was 33 (range, 13-81) years. Lesions were classified according to AO/ASIF. 12 fractures were open. Mean follow up period has been 26.3, (range 20-144) months. The results were assessed according to the modified criteria of Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov. Knee functional results were assessed with Hospital for Special Surgery knee scoring system. RESULTS: 22 fractures united primarily, one showed nonunion. Knee stiffness developed in two patients. No patient had deep pin tract infection. Bone results were quoted as excellent, good, fair and poor in 19, 1, 1 and 2. The functional results were excellent, good, and fair in 16, 6, and 1, on the basis of ASAMI criteria. Mean HSS knee score has been 90.1 (range 60-100). CONCLUSION: Circular external fixation can achieve reliable rates of union and good to excellent functional outcome in open or comminuted femoral fractures. A strict rehabilitation protocol was effective in preserving knee joint function.

5.
Foot Ankle Int ; 39(10): 1210-1218, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29862827

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonunions of the distal tibia in close proximity to the ankle joint can be a challenge to treat. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent ankle-sparing bone transport for periarticular distal tibial nonunions. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent ankle-sparing bone transport between January 2006 and July 2016. The mean age of the patients was 48.6 years, and 71% (15/21) were male. Patients were followed for an average of 14.6 months (range, 10.6-17.7 months), with an average of 8.6 months in-frame. Thirteen of 21 patients had infected nonunions. Primary endpoints included time to union and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. RESULTS: All fractures achieved union. Mean time to union was 37.4 weeks. Mean AOFAS score was 86.3 points (range, 37-100). A score of 37 was observed in 1 patient with preexisting Charcot foot. Radiographic evaluation at 6 months revealed a mean lateral distal tibial angle of 89.2 degrees and a mean anterior distal tibial angle of 76 degrees. Leg length discrepancy was less than 1.2 cm in all patients. Superficial pin infection was observed in 7 patients, and operative wound infection at the level of bone resection was observed in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: The ankle-sparing bone transport technique was an effective alternative to bone graft and arthrodesis for the treatment of periarticular nonunions of the distal tibia and was safe for use in patients with infected nonunions in close proximity to the ankle joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.


Assuntos
Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Osteogênese por Distração/métodos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Fixadores Externos , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas não Consolidadas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Knee Surg ; 31(5): 459-466, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28719943

RESUMO

Surgical reconstruction of bicondylar tibial fractures with external fixation relies on indirect fracture reduction that could affect anatomical restoration. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of tibial bicondylar fractures treated with circular external fixation. A total of 20 bicondylar fractures of the proximal tibia in 20 patients treated with circular external fixation were included in the study. Two fractures were open. Mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 37.3 months after frame removal. Angular, translation, and length deformities were assessed on nonweight-bearing anteroposterior, lateral, and two 45 degrees oblique views. The medial proximal tibia (MPTA) and posterior proximal tibia angles (PPTA) were calculated in all cases. The condylar widening was calculated in relation to the width of the femoral condyles. Joint depressions or gaps of the articular surface were identified on the four views of the knee. The modified Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system was used for clinical evaluation. The MPTA was good in 18 (90%) and fair in 2 patients (10%). The PPTA was good in 13 (65%), fair in 6 (30%), and poor in 1 patient (5%). The articular reduction was good in 12 (60%) and fair in 8 patients (40%). The condylar widening was good in 15 (75%) and fair in 5 patients (25%). Mechanical axis deviation was within the normal range in 11/12 patients (91.7%). All fractures consolidated. One deep infection was successfully treated with local debridement, the mean modified HSS knee score at the latest follow-up was 90.5 (range: 67-100). Articular reconstruction and tibia alignment based on radiographic evaluation in the present study, along with functional results compare favorably with those of external and internal fixation presented in the literature.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fixação de Fratura/instrumentação , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Orthop Trauma ; 31(10): 546-553, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28650942

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the Taylor spatial frame (TSF) for primary and definitive fixation of open supracondylar-intracondylar femoral (SIF) fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Subset of 20 SIF open fractures treated with TSF extracted from a consecutive series of 80 SIF fractures treated between 2007 and 2013. INTERVENTION: Eighteen (90%) fractures underwent definitive fixation with the TSF; 2 were treated primarily within 24 hours of injury. Mean time interval between primary treatment and secondary TSF was 5 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and radiological. RESULTS: Complete union was obtained in 17 (85%) fractures without additional surgery at an average of 33 weeks. Three nonunions and 1 malunion occurred. No deep infection occurred. Results based on Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov criteria: 37% excellent, and 63% good for bone outcomes; 5% excellent, 58% good, and 37% fair for functional outcomes. Neer knee scores were 21% excellent, 68% good, and 11% fair. The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle and anatomic posterior distal femoral angle values were within normal range in 80% and 90% of patients, respectively. Abnormal mechanical axis deviation was observed in 4 (20%) cases (2 had associated tibia fractures). CONCLUSIONS: Primary and definitive fixation with the TSF are effective. Advantages include continuity of device until union, reduced risk of infection, early mobilization, restoration of primary defect caused by bone loss, easy and accurate application, convertibility and versatility, and improved union rate and range of motion for SIF open fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas Múltiplas/cirurgia , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Múltiplas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Fixadores Internos , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Centros de Traumatologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ; 11(3): 153-159, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27660248

RESUMO

This retrospective review assesses 55 tibial nonunions with bone loss to compare union achieved with combined Ilizarov and Taylor spatial frames (I-TSF) versus a conventional circular frame with the standard Ilizarov procedure. Seventeen (31 %) of the 55 nonunions were infected. Thirty patients treated with I-TSF were compared with 25 patients treated with a conventional circular frame. In the I-TSF group, an average of 7.6 cm of bone was resected and the lengthening index (treatment time in months divided by lengthening amount in centimeters) was 1.97. In the conventional circular frame group, a mean of 6.5 cm was resected and the lengthening index was 2.1. Consolidation at the docking site and at the regenerate bone occurred in 49 (89 %) of 55 cases after the first procedure. No statistically significant difference was shown between the two groups. Superiority of one modality of treatment over the other cannot be concluded from our data. Application of combined Ilizarov and Taylor spatial frames for bone transport is useful for treatment of tibial nonunion with bone loss. Level of evidence Case series, Level III.

10.
Injury ; 44 Suppl 1: S58-62, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23351874

RESUMO

This retrospective review reports on forty-five tibial non-unions who underwent docking site treatment for non-union using closed versus open and endoscopic strategies. In this cohort of patients, all but twelve were infected non-unions. Sixteen patients initially treated with single compression were compared to twenty-three patients treated with open revision of the docking site, and six endoscopic procedures. In the single compression group, an average of 6.4 cm of bone was resected and index lengthening was 2.01. In the open revision group, a mean of 9.4 cm was resected and the index lengthening was 1.72. In the endoscopic group, an average of 8.6 cm of bone was resected and index lengthening was 1.71. Consolidation at the docking site occurred in 41 cases out of 45 following the first procedure. There was no statistical difference between the three groups. Conclusive evidence of superiority of one modality of treatment over the other cannot be drawn from our data. The simple compression procedure requires less invasive surgery and is probably less demanding and more cost-effective in short transports, although the two cases of failure due to recurrence of sepsis were observed after this procedure. Further studies are desirable to investigate the effectiveness of open docking site grating procedures.


Assuntos
Consolidação da Fratura , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Técnica de Ilizarov , Osteogênese por Distração/métodos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Fraturas não Consolidadas/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Int Orthop ; 36(4): 817-25, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21505801

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This retrospective review follows 31 tibial nonunions to compare union at the docking site using closed versus open strategies. In this cohort of patients, all but five were infected nonunions. METHODS: Thirteen patients initially treated with single compression were compared with 18 patients treated by open revision of the docking site. In the single compression group, an average of 6.5 cm of bone was resected and index lengthening was 2.04. In the open revision group, a mean of 9.4 cm was resected and the index lengthening was 1.73. RESULTS: Consolidation at the docking site occurred in all subjects in both groups. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusive evidence of superiority of one modality of treatment over the other cannot be drawn from our data. CONCLUSIONS: The simple compression procedure requires less invasive surgery and is probably less demanding and more cost-effective in short transports.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/terapia , Manipulação Ortopédica , Osteogênese por Distração/métodos , Fraturas da Tíbia/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Alongamento Ósseo , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/economia , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Osteogênese/fisiologia , Osteogênese por Distração/economia , Osteotomia , Reoperação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Orthop Trauma ; 25(3): 162-8, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21321507

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the results of trifocal (two-level bone lengthening with compression at the nonunion site) and bifocal (one-level bone lengthening with compression at the nonunion site) bone transport using the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF; Smith and Nephew, Inc, Memphis, TN) for postinfectious segmental tibial bone defects. DESIGN: Retrospective study of 12 patients with atrophic tibial nonunions. These patients were treated with resection of the nonunion followed by bone transport using the TSF for the segmental tibial bone defects. All patients were treated by the same surgeon (F.S.). SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twelve consecutive patients treated for postinfectious segmental tibial bone defects between November 2004 and September 2007. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated using the TSF for a trifocal or bifocal technique of bone transport along with associated soft tissue reconstructive surgeries. All patients were additionally treated with 45 days of culture-specific antibiotics. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: All patients were evaluated by the guidelines of the Association for the Study of the Method of Ilizarov. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: All patients achieved complete union and eradication of infection. The results were evaluated according to Association for the Study of the Method of Ilizarov criteria: 83% were excellent and 17% were good in terms of bony outcomes; functional results were excellent in 50%, good in 42%, and fair in 8%. Combined Ilizarov/TSF trifocal and bifocal techniques for the treatment of segmental tibial bone defects achieve union without malalignment of the mechanical axis.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos , Fraturas Mal-Unidas/cirurgia , Técnica de Ilizarov/instrumentação , Osteotomia/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tíbia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
13.
Int Orthop ; 35(1): 121-6, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20177894

RESUMO

Injudicious reaming of the tibial shaft can lead to extreme local hyperthermia, which in turn can result in the rare but catastrophic complication of segmental bone and soft tissue necrosis (osteocutaneous thermal necrosis). This is a retrospective study showing osteocutaneous thermal necrosis occurring after tibial intramedullary reaming salvaged by Ilizarov reconstruction in seven patients from the collective experience of four limb reconstruction centres. All patients were males, with an average age of 51.8 years (range, 30-70 years), who had undergone intramedullary reaming during the treatment of closed tibial fractures. In all patients, circumferential bone and variable contiguous soft tissue necrosis developed a few days after reaming. Bone and soft tissue reconstruction was subsequently performed using a circular external fixator (Ilizarov apparatus or Taylor spatial frame) a mean of four months after injury in six patients; in one case, reconstruction was undertaken four years after the original injury. Two complications (secondary tissue breakdown at a bone transport site; premature consolidation) necessitated cessation of bone transport at one of two bone transport levels in two patients. All patients eventually healed with a good functional result after an average of 11.5 months in the fixator (range, 10-13 months).


Assuntos
Temperatura Alta/efeitos adversos , Técnica de Ilizarov , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Pele/patologia , Tíbia/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Fixadores Externos , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Técnica de Ilizarov/instrumentação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Necrose/etiologia , Necrose/patologia , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Terapia de Salvação/instrumentação , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/complicações , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Injury ; 41(2): 161-8, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19698943

RESUMO

A decision for immediate versus delayed fixation in a polytrauma patient mainly in cases of open femoral fracture depends upon time elapsed since injury, duration of stay in intensive care, soft tissue status, probable intra-operative difficulties and presence of systemic complication. We studied the outcome of the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) as a solution in the role of primary and definitive fixator for patients in whom definitive osteosynthesis with intramedullary nailing (IMN) can be associated with higher rate of complications. In view of damage control orthopaedics (DCO), we found that TSF is an effective technique compared to internal nails and earlier external fixator devices, attributable to its advantages such as continuity of frame till union, preventing any second-hit phenomenon, early mobilisation and restoration of primary defect due to bone loss by differential distraction osteogenesis without additional surgery. According to the Paley and Maar's evaluation criteria, 11 patients had an excellent result with clinical and radiological union; the functional result was excellent in three patients, good in five, fair in two and poor in one.


Assuntos
Fixadores Externos/normas , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fixação de Fratura/instrumentação , Fraturas Expostas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Radiografia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
15.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 466(12): 2940-6, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18825469

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Traditional external fixator techniques do not always correct minor residual malalignment. We asked whether using a one-wire method that corrects minor malalignment with an olive traction wire placed in the plane of the deformity allowed (1) uniform healing, (2) proper alignment, and (3) adequate reduction of fracture gaps. We retrospectively evaluated 72 patients in whom we used closed tibial fracture reduction using a circular external frame. We identified the plane of the residual deformity after alignment on a traction table using a C-arm. In this plane, the final correction was performed with traction through an olive wire. Satisfactory alignment (less than 3 degrees deviation from normal) was obtained in 68 of the 72 patients (94%), and satisfactory reduction (gaps less than 2 mm) attained in 51 (71%). In no case was the fracture site opened surgically. Four patients underwent additional alignment correction with conical washers outside the operating room but no other efforts were needed to obtain further reduction after the initial surgery. Fractures healed in an average of 20 weeks. We observed no major infections. The Ilizarov frame has been a valuable tool to achieve alignment and anatomic or near anatomic reduction of closed tibial fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Alongamento Ósseo/métodos , Técnica de Ilizarov/instrumentação , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Fios Ortopédicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...