Reducing Pediatric Posttonsillectomy Opioid Prescribing: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pain is the most common morbidity associated with tonsillectomy. Opioids are frequently used in multimodal posttonsillectomy analgesia regimens; however, concerns regarding respiratory depression, drug-drug interactions, and medication misuse necessitate responsible opioid stewardship among prescribing surgeons. It is unclear if intentionally reducing opioid prescription doses negatively affects the patient experience. METHODS: A quality improvement team reviewed all posttonsillectomy opioid prescriptions at a pediatric ambulatory surgery center between January and June 2021 (preintervention, 163 patients). Following this review, we performed an opioid education session for surgeons and studied opioid prescribing habits between July and December 2021 (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] 1, 152 patients). We then implemented a standardized prescription protocol of 7 doses of oxycodone per patient and again reviewed prescriptions between January and June 2022 (PDSA 2, 178 patients). The following measures were evaluated: initial number of opioid doses prescribed, need for refills, 7-day emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions. RESULTS: Each intervention reduced the average number of initial oxycodone doses per patient (12.2 vs 9.2 vs 6.9 doses, P < .001). There were no changes in the rate of refill requests, 7-day ED visits, and readmissions, by descriptive or Statistical Process Control analyses. DISCUSSION: In 2 PDSA cycles, we achieved a 43% reduction in the number of doses of oxycodone prescribed following tonsillectomy. We did not observe any increased rates in balancing measures, which are surrogates for unintentional effects of PDSA changes, including refills, ED presentations, and readmission rates. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Directed provider education and standardized posttonsillectomy prescription protocols can safely decrease postoperative opioid prescribing. Further PDSA cycles are required to consider even fewer opioid prescription doses.

Impact of Eliminating Local Anesthesia on Immediate Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Ambulatory Adenotonsillectomy.

Our goal was to standardize intraoperative analgesic regimens for pediatric ambulatory tonsillectomy by eliminating local anesthetic use and to determine its impact on postoperative pain measures, while controlling for other factors. METHODS: We assembled a quality improvement team at an ambulatory surgery center. They introduced a standardized anesthetic protocol, involving American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification 1 and 2 patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Local anesthesia elimination was the project's single intervention. We collected pre-intervention data (79 cases) from July 5 to September 17, 2019 and post-intervention data (59 cases) from September 25 to December 17, 2019. The intervention requested that surgeons eliminate the use of local anesthetics. The following outcomes measures were evaluated using statistical process control charts and Shewhart's theory of variation: (1) maximum pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit, (2) total post-anesthesia care unit minutes, and (3) postoperative opioid rescue rate. RESULTS: No special cause variation signal was detected in any of the measures following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that eliminating intraoperative local anesthetic use does not worsen postoperative pain control at our facility. The intervention eliminated the added expenses and possible risks associated with local anesthetic use. This series is unique in its standardization of anesthetic regimen in a high-volume ambulatory surgery center with the exception of local anesthesia practices. The study results may impact the standardized clinical protocol for pediatric ambulatory adenotonsillectomy at our institution and may hold relevance for other centers.

Assessing the Impact of the Anesthesia Medication Template on Medication Errors During Anesthesia: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors continue to be a significant source of patient harm in the operating room with few concrete countermeasures. The organization and identification of medication syringes may have an impact on the commission of medication errors in anesthesia, so a team of physicians and designers at the University of Washington created the Anesthesia Medication Template (AMT) to define a formal way of organizing the anesthesia workspace. The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of the AMT to reduce perioperative medication errors by anesthesia providers. METHODS: This study evaluated the AMT in 2 phases: (1) 41 anesthesia providers administered medications in 2 prospective, randomized operating room simulations with or without the AMT, while medication errors were directly observed; and (2) around 200 providers prospectively self-reported medication errors from all anesthetizing locations during a 2-year period at Seattle Children's Hospital, an academic, pediatric medical center. RESULTS: In simulated emergencies, the odds of medication dosing errors using the AMT were 0.21 times the odds of medication dosing errors without AMT (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07, 0.66), controlling for scenario, session, training level, and years at training level. During the year after implementation of the AMT, the mean monthly error rate for all reported medication errors that reached patients decreased from 1.24 (95% CI, 0.85-1.79) to 0.65 (95% CI, 0.39-1.09) errors per 1000 anesthetics. The mean monthly error rate of reported swap, preparation, miscalculation, and timing errors decreased from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.64-1.48) to 0.35 (95% CI, 0.17-0.70) errors per 1000 anesthetics. Medication errors that resulted in patient harm did not change after implementation of the AMT. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing medication organization with the AMT is an intuitive, low-cost strategy with the potential to improve patient safety through reducing medication errors by anesthesia providers.