Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 56(4): 432-41, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22883651

RESUMO

Obesity is a major medical problem both within Australia as well as throughout the developed world. Achievement of weight loss for any individual patient brings an additional desirable benefit of improvement or resolution of a wide range of comorbid conditions. Bariatrics is the branch of medicine that deals with the causes, prevention and treatment of obesity and allied diseases. The term bariatrics was created around 1965, from the Greek root baro ('weight' as in barometer), suffix-iatr (relating to medical treatment) and suffix -ic ('pertaining to'). Besides the pharmacotherapy of obesity, it is concerned with obesity surgery. Bariatric surgery refers to surgical procedures of the gastrointestinal tract that are designed to induce weight loss. The treatment of obesity traditionally relied on non-surgical techniques to modify behaviour in regard to diet and exercise. This has variable and limited success. More recently, bariatric surgery has become the most rapidly growing form of treatment for obesity in recent years. In fact, it is the only current therapy that has been shown to achieve major and durable weight loss. It is important for the radiologist to be familiar with the normal anatomical appearance of the more common bariatric operations and to be able to recognise their potential complications on imaging. The aim of this pictorial essay is to give an insight into some of the more common complications of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding surgery encountered in our centre during the period of 2001-2007.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/cirurgia , Síndromes Pós-Gastrectomia/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndromes Pós-Gastrectomia/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Gastrectomia/instrumentação , Humanos , Obesidade/complicações , Síndromes Pós-Gastrectomia/terapia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios
2.
Case Rep Radiol ; 2011: 193891, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22606540

RESUMO

A case of a 63-year-old man with small bowel ischemia six weeks after transplantation surgery is presented. Plain abdominal radiograph obtained several days after ingestion of barium shows the sign of prolonged barium coating indicating severe mucosal damage. Abdominal CT scan demonstrates small bowel wall thickening as well as pockets of peritoneal fluid collections. Most critically, CT allows visualization of subtle traces of dense barium within the dependent portions of this fluid indicating bowel perforation.

3.
Addict Biol ; 13(3-4): 364-72, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17850414

RESUMO

Ultrasound was used to assess the in vivo biodegradability of a sustained release poly(DL)lactide naltrexone implant in 71 persons previously treated for heroin dependence. We assessed 139 implant sites ranging from 2 to 1808 days post implant. Ultrasound assessment showed that implant tablets were initially well demarcated from each other and from the surrounding tissues. Biodegradation resulted in less demarcated tablets followed by clumping into a single mass-like structure. This mass subsequently dispersed by approximately 1201 days post implant with no implant material visualized by ultrasound. The biodegradation was also assessed by visual clinical examination and palpation of the implant site as well as patient self-report. These measures were generally well correlated with ultrasound results. Clinical assessment of the biodegradation process concluded that the implant changed from 'firm' to 'less firm' and from 'initial square edge' to 'rounded edge' tablets. Collectively, these data provide direct evidence of the in vivo absorption of the Go Medical implant over time, and its biodegradability in humans.


Assuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis , Naltrexona/química , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/química , Poliésteres , Ultrassonografia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Naltrexona/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo
5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 187(3): 706-9, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16928934

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the rate of polyp detection and the quality of air-contrast barium enema (ACBE) procedures performed by technologists differ from those performed by radiologists. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that well-trained certified technologists can perform ACBE similar in overall quality and accuracy to ACBE performed by attending physicians and residents. Training technologists to perform ACBE may help to alleviate the radiology staffing shortage in the United States.


Assuntos
Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico , Enema/métodos , Tecnologia Radiológica , Ar , Sulfato de Bário/administração & dosagem , Competência Clínica , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Recursos Humanos
7.
Radiology ; 239(1): 139-48, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16507754

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the cause of errors in air-contrast barium enema (ACBE) examination for detection of polyps 6 mm or larger. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had institutional review board approval. Informed consent was waived for this HIPAA-compliant study. ABCE findings in 41 subjects with 56 missed polyps were evaluated by two radiologists to determine if the cause of errors was perceptual or technical. A comparison was made between total number of polyps in the proximal and distal colon and those missed at each location (Fisher exact test). The 288 ACBE examinations were assessed on a scale of 0-4 (0, excellent; 4, very poor) for six colonic segments (paired t test). RESULTS: Of 17 polyps 1 cm or larger not detected in 15 subjects, 11 (65%) were missed because of technical errors and six (35%) because of perceptual errors. Eight (72%) technical and four (67%) perceptual errors occurred proximal to the splenic flexure. One 3.5-cm cecal carcinoma was not diagnosed prospectively (perceptual error). Of 39 6-9-mm polyps not detected in 26 subjects, 35 (90%) were missed because of technical errors and four (10%) because of perceptual errors. Eighty percent of technical and 75% of perceptual errors were in the proximal colon. When the proportion of polyps in the proximal and distal colon was compared, 22 (63%) of 35 polyps in the distal colon and 15 (26%) of 58 in the proximal colon were detected (P = .0009). There were no detectable differences in the quality of studies in subjects whose polyps were detected and subjects whose polyps were missed (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Technical errors were more common than perceptual errors. The majority of missed polyps were in the proximal colon. Detection rates of polypoid lesions might increase if the quality of ACBE examination can be improved, especially in the proximal colon.


Assuntos
Sulfato de Bário , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Erros de Diagnóstico , Enema , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA