Preferred language and diagnostic errors in the pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between language and diagnostic errors (DxE) in the pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: Electronic trigger identified ED encounters resulting in unplanned hospital admission that occurred within 10 days of an index visit from January 2018 through February 2022. Manual screening of each triggered encounter identified cases where the index visit diagnosis and hospitalization discharge diagnosis differed, and these were screened in for review using the Revised Safer Dx instrument to determine if a diagnostic error (DxE) occurred. Non-English primary language (NEPL) and English-proficient (EP) groups were established based on caregiver language. The primary outcome was the proportion of DxE each group. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of DxE. RESULTS: Electronic trigger identified 3,551 patients, of which 806 (22.7 %) screened in for Safer Dx review. 172 (21.3 %) experienced DxE. The proportion of DxE was similar between EP and NEPL groups (21.5 vs. 21.7 %; p=0.97). Age≥12 years and fewer prior admissions in the preceding 6 months predicted higher odds of DxE. NEPL did not predict higher odds of DxE. CONCLUSIONS: NEPL was not associated with increased odds DxE resulting in unplanned admission.

Disparities in Pediatric Emergency Department Length of Stay and Utilization Associated With Primary Language.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the association between primary language and length of stay (LOS) in the pediatric emergency department (ED) within the context of known disparities impacting healthcare experiences and outcomes for patients with language barriers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive encounters of patients presenting to, and discharged from, an urban pediatric ED from May 2015 through April 2018. Encounters were grouped into English primary language (EPL), Spanish (SPL), and other (OPL). Mean LOS comparisons were stratified by Emergency Severity Index (ESI). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the relationship between LOS and variables, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, and time of presentation. RESULTS: A total of 139,163 encounters were included. A higher proportion of SPL and OPL encounters were characterized as lower ESI acuity compared with EPL. Significantly longer LOS for SPL and OPL encounters was observed in the 2 lower acuity strata. The ESI 4-5 stratum demonstrated the greatest LOS disparity between EPL, SPL, and OPL (94 vs 103 vs 103 minutes, respectively, P < 0.001). In the highest acuity stratum, ESI 1-2, there was a nonsignificant trend toward longer LOS among EPL encounters (P = 0.08). The multivariate model accounted for 24% of LOS variance, but effect sizes were small for all variables except for ESI and age. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Spanish or other non-EPL who were triaged to lower acuity ESI levels experienced longer LOS in the pediatric ED than English-speaking counterparts. They also used the ED more frequently for low acuity issues, possibly reflecting disparities in access to primary care.

The characteristics of patients who quit smoking in the year following a cancer diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Continued tobacco smoking following a cancer diagnosis is associated with adverse outcomes. Our study aims to identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of survivors who quit smoking within a year of diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Measuring Your Health (MY-Health) study, a community-based survey cohort of 5506 cancer patients registered across four Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Using surveys completed 6-13 months after diagnosis, we identified 868 participants who reported smoking around the time of cancer diagnosis and compared their current smoking status. We employed logistic regression models to predict current smoking status, adjusting for clinical and demographic variables. RESULTS: The overall smoking cessation rate was 35% (n = 306). Survivors with non-small cell lung cancer were three times more likely to quit smoking compared to patients with non-smoking-related cancers (aOR = 3.23, 95% CI = 2.20-4.74). Participants with advanced stage cancer reported higher odds of quitting compared to those with localized cancer (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.02-1.96). Other characteristics that predicted quitting included being married, higher education level, and female sex (aOR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.46-2.77; aOR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.27-2.39; aOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.11-2.13, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies to examine smoking cessation trends in a community-based, US cancer cohort during the year after diagnosis. Survivors with lung cancer and advanced cancer were significantly more likely to quit smoking. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Practitioners may use this knowledge to target interventions and address substantial disparities in cessation rates among survivors with early stage and non-lung cancers.

Operative duration-based learning period analysis for reverse and total shoulder arthroplasty: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: A surgical learning period may be quantified after which operative duration is significantly reduced. We sought to retrospectively quantify and compare surgeon's learning experience for total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: We reviewed 2055 shoulder arthroplasty cases from 2011 to 2015 for four early-career and four later-career fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons from four institutions. We plotted consecutive case number versus operative time for each surgeon separately for total shoulder arthroplasty or reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Two-step regression approach was used to determine a plateau point or end of the learning period. Additionally, the mean annual volume of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for each surgeon was plotted against mean surgery duration. Early- and later-career surgeons were compared with regression analysis. RESULTS: Early-career surgeons demonstrated a significant decrease in operative time with increasing annual case volume for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (p = 0.01; m = -1.1) and total shoulder arthroplasty (p = 0.02; m = -0.8). Three of four early-career surgeons reached a plateau point for either reverse shoulder arthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty between 12 and 86 cases. CONCLUSION: For only early-career surgeons, higher case volume yields decreased operative duration, with improvement more pronounced for reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to total shoulder arthroplasty. Though the learning period varies, it may be fewer than 90 cases.

Lateralization of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty decreases arm lengthening and demonstrates comparable risk of nerve injury compared with anatomic arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

HYPOTHESIS: Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has an increased risk of nerve injury compared with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) due to arm lengthening. We hypothesized that an RSA with a lateralized glenosphere and 135° neck-shaft angle would reduce humeral lengthening and decrease the risk of nerve injury to the level of a TSA. METHODS: The study prospectively enrolled 50 consecutive patients undergoing RSA (n = 30) or TSA (n = 20) as determined by a power analysis based on previous research for our institution. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was used to detect nerve alerts during 4 distinct stages of the procedure. Preoperative and postoperative arm lengths were measured on scaled radiographs. Patients were examined immediately postoperatively and at follow-up visits for neurologic complications. RESULTS: Mean motor and sensory nerve alerts per case were similar for TSA and RSA (motor: TSA, 1.5 ± 2; RSA, 1.5 ± 2; P = .96; sensory: TSA, 0.6 ± 0.9; RSA, 0.2 ± 0.6; P = .06). The mean change in arm length was 3 ± 7 mm in the TSA cohort vs. 14 ± 7 mm in the RSA cohort (P = .0001). Temporary neurologic changes postoperatively were noted in 1 TSA and 1 RSA patient, amounting to a 4% incidence of nerve injury. CONCLUSIONS: An RSA design with a lateralized glenosphere and a lower neck-shaft angle decreases arm lengthening compared with the Grammont design. The reduction in lengthening appears to eliminate the historically increased risk of neurologic injury associated with RSA relative to TSA.

Lateralized Center of Rotation and Lower Neck-Shaft Angle Are Associated With Lower Rates of Scapular Notching and Heterotopic Ossification and Improved Pain for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at 1 Year.

Heterotopic ossification and scapular notching are common following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Compared with the original Grammont-style prosthesis with a medialized center of rotation (COR) and a 155° neck-shaft angle, lateralization of COR and reduction of neck-shaft angle have been associated with decreased incidence of scapular notching. The authors hypothesized that these design features may also be effective in reducing heterotopic ossification after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Ninety-seven consecutive patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon were included in the study. Forty-eight patients received a Grammont-style prosthesis, and 49 received a prosthesis with either 6 mm or 10 mm of lateral COR offset and a 135° neck-shaft angle. Radiographs at 1-year follow-up were reviewed by 2 surgeons for notching and heterotopic ossification. Patient-reported outcome scores and range of motion were also compared between the groups. More patients in the Grammont-style group showed scapular notching (Grammont, 35.4%; lateral COR, 12.2%; P=.018) and heterotopic ossification (Grammont, 47.9%; lateral COR, 22.4%; P=.009). The lateralized COR group reported lower pain on the visual analog scale (Grammont mean, 1.1; lateral COR mean, 0.5; P=.01) and trended toward better American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (Grammont mean, 77.2; lateral COR mean, 83.4; P=.05). However, range of motion was similar between the 2 groups. Compared with the Grammont-style prosthesis, the lateralized COR prosthesis with a decreased neck-shaft angle resulted in a lower incidence of both scapular notching and heterotopic ossification as well as better pain scores and a trend toward improved function at 1 year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):230-236.].

Computed tomography underestimates rotator cuff pathology in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is the standard assessment of glenoid morphology before shoulder arthroplasty and is commonly used to evaluate rotator cuff pathology in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely used in this setting but has higher sensitivity in diagnosing full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCT) and is considered the gold standard. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CT in diagnosing full-thickness RCTs and compare the evaluation of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy on CT vs. MRI in the setting of GHOA. METHODS: In this retrospective case-controlled study, we identified 49 patients from a prospectively maintained 2-surgeon registry who received preoperative CT and MRI scans for the evaluation of GHOA between 2011 and 2016. Three fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons assessed rotator cuff integrity, fatty infiltration, and muscle atrophy in the CT and MRI scans. RESULTS: CT sensitivity and specificity were 20% and 95.5%, respectively. Fatty infiltration was significantly lower on CT for the supraspinatus (P = .003), infraspinatus (P < .001), and subscapularis (P = .0182), whereas muscle atrophy was significantly lower on CT for only the supraspinatus (P = .0023). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CT underestimates the frequency of full-thickness RCTs and the severity of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy in the setting of GHOA before total shoulder arthroplasty.

Critical shoulder angle is associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tears in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Higher critical shoulder angle (CSA) is correlated with rotator cuff tears (RCTs), whereas lower CSA is associated with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). Our goal was to investigate whether patients with concurrent glenohumeral OA and full-thickness RCTs demonstrate a higher CSA than patients with OA alone. METHODS: Using a 2-surgeon shoulder arthroplasty registry, we identified 31 patients with glenohumeral OA and full-thickness RCTs confirmed by plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. Sixty-two age- and gender-matched controls (1:2 ratio) with glenohumeral OA and an intact rotator cuff were identified from the same registry. Two independent observers evaluated the radiographs for CSA and acromiohumeral index. RESULTS: The average CSA was 30° in the OA control group and 35° in the concurrent RCT and OA group (P < .0001). Acromiohumeral index was comparable between the groups (P = .13). Interobserver reliability of the independent reviewers was excellent (κ = 0.89; Ρ = 0.95). The receiver operating characteristic curve for CSA demonstrated that a value >35° was 90% specific and 52% sensitive for a full-thickness RCT in the setting of OA (area under curve = 0.84). CONCLUSION: Concurrent glenohumeral OA and full-thickness RCT are associated with greater CSA values compared with patients with glenohumeral OA alone. The CSA measurement may be useful in determining the need for magnetic resonance imaging to assess rotator cuff integrity in the arthritic population.

Patients recall worse preoperative pain after shoulder arthroplasty than originally reported: a study of recall accuracy using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools for quantifying outcomes of orthopedic surgery. However, when baseline scores are not obtained, there is considerable controversy about whether PROMs can be administered retrospectively for patients to recall their preoperative state. We investigated the accuracy of patient recall after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment score. METHODS: Recalled ASES scores were collected postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months from 169 patients who previously completed baseline scores before TSA. The ASES total score was divided into its two subcomponents: functional ability and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. We compared preoperative and recalled scores for each subcomponent and the total ASES score. RESULTS: Recalled ASES function scores were comparable to corresponding preoperative scores across all time points (analysis of variance, P = .21), but recalled VAS pain was significantly higher at all time points beyond 6 weeks after surgery (P = .0001 at 3 months; P = .005 at 6 months; and P = .001 at 12 months). As a result, the ASES total score was only comparable at 6 weeks after surgery (P = .39) and differed at all time points thereafter. CONCLUSION: Patients are able to recall preoperative function with considerable accuracy for up to 12 months after TSA. However, beyond 6 weeks postoperatively, patients recall having worse pain than they originally reported, and recalled ASES total scores are unreliable as a result.

Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) scan is the standard for the preoperative assessment of glenoid version and morphology before total shoulder arthroplasty. However, the capacity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize bone morphology has improved with advancing technology. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI to CT for assessment of glenoid version and Walch classification. METHODS: Three fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons assessed glenoid version and Walch classification of 30 patients with primary shoulder osteoarthritis who received both CT and MRI scans before total shoulder arthroplasty. Version measurements, Walch classification, and observer agreement were compared. RESULTS: Mean glenoid version was -15.5° and -18.6° by CT and MRI, respectively (P = .17). Interobserver reliability coefficients were good for both imaging modalities (CT, 0.73; MRI, 0.62). Intraobserver coefficients were good to excellent for CT (range, 0.76-0.87) and good for MRI (range, 0.75-0.79). For Walch classification, interobserver reliability for both modalities was merely fair, whereas intraobserver reliability was moderate to good. Although identification of type A1, A2, and B1 was nearly identical between CT and MRI, there was observer disagreement on type B2 (P = .001) and C glenoids (P = .03). Specifically, MRI underidentified type B2 and overidentified type C compared with CT. CONCLUSIONS: MRI is largely comparable to CT scan for evaluation of the glenoid, with similar measurements of version and identification of less extreme Walch glenoids. However, MRI is less accurate at distinguishing between type B2 and C glenoids.