Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 50
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(6): 1571-1579, 2024 Jun 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38279939

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Estimated hepatitis C prevalence within the Veterans Health Administration is higher than the general population and is a risk factor for advanced liver disease and subsequent complications. We describe the hepatitis C care continuum within the Veterans Health Administration 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2022. METHODS: We included individuals in Veterans Health Administration care 2021-2022 who were eligible for direct-acting antiviral treatment 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2022. We evaluated the proportion of Veterans who progressed through each step of the hepatitis C care continuum, and identified factors associated with initiating direct-acting antivirals, achieving sustained virologic response, and repeat hepatitis C viremia. RESULTS: We identified 133 732 Veterans with hepatitis C viremia. Hepatitis C treatment was initiated in 107 134 (80.1%), with sustained virologic response achieved in 98 136 (91.6%). In those who achieved sustained virologic response, 1097 (1.1%) had repeat viremia and 579 (52.8%) were retreated for hepatitis C. Veterans of younger ages were less likely to initiate treatment and achieve sustained virologic response, and more likely to have repeat viremia. Stimulant use and unstable housing were negatively associated with each step of the hepatitis C care continuum. CONCLUSIONS: The Veterans Health Administration has treated 80% of Veterans with hepatitis C in care 2021-2022 and achieved sustained virologic response in more than 90% of those treated. Repeat viremia is rare and is associated with younger age, unstable housing, opioid use, and stimulant use. Ongoing efforts are needed to reach younger Veterans, and Veterans with unstable housing or substance use disorders.


Assuntos
Antivirais , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Hepatite C , Resposta Viral Sustentada , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Idoso , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Viremia/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Saúde dos Veteranos
2.
J Addict Med ; 17(4): 387-393, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37579093

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about national patterns of sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and infections among people with substance use disorders (SUDs). METHODS: This study used a national retrospective analysis of people with SUDs receiving healthcare in the Veterans Health Administration in 2019 (N = 485,869). We describe testing rates, test positivity, and case rates for gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, and HIV among individuals with alcohol, opioid, cocaine, and noncocaine stimulant use disorders in a national cohort of Veterans Health Administration patients. RESULTS: Test and case rates for all STIs were highest among people with noncocaine stimulant use. People with alcohol use disorder had the lowest testing rates but intermediate incidence for all STIs. People with multiple SUDs had higher incidence of all STIs than those with single SUDs. Mental health diagnoses and houselessness were common. The HIV test positivity was 0.14% to 0.36% across SUD groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sexually transmitted infection testing rates between SUD groups were discordant with their respective case rates. High STI rates in people with SUDs suggest a need for more comprehensive testing, particularly for those with noncocaine stimulant use and those with comorbid houselessness or mental health diagnoses.


Assuntos
Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por HIV , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Sífilis , Humanos , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Saúde dos Veteranos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia
3.
Diabet Epidemiol Manag ; 11: 100151, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37333508

RESUMO

Aims: To examine associations of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 with insulin treatment in new-onset diabetes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Veterans Health Administration data (March 1, 2020-June 1, 2022). Individuals with ≥1 positive nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 6,706) comprised the exposed group, and individuals with no positive swab and ≥1 laboratory test of any type (n = 20,518) the unexposed group. For exposed, the index date was the date of first positive swab, and for unexposed a random date during the month of the qualifying laboratory test. Among Veterans with new-onset diabetes after the index date, we modeled associations of SARS-CoV-2 with most recent A1c prior to insulin treatment or end of follow-up and receipt of >1 outpatient insulin prescription starting within 120 days. Results: SARS-CoV-2 was associated with a 40% higher odds of insulin treatment compared to no positive test (95%CI 1.2-1.8) but not with most recent A1c (ß 0.00, 95%CI -0.04-0.04). Among Veterans with SARS-CoV-2, ≥2 vaccine doses prior to the index date was marginally associated with lower odds of insulin treatment (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.3-1.0). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 is associated with higher odds of insulin treatment but not with higher A1c. Vaccination may be protective.

5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(12): ofac433, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36514443

RESUMO

Background: We performed a retrospective study of chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) during 2019-2021. Methods: We determined the annual number of chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV tests from 2019 through 2021 using electronic health record data. We calculated rates by age, birth sex, race, census region, rurality, HIV status, and use of preexposure prophylaxis. Results: The VHA system experienced a 24% drop in chlamydia/gonorrhea testing, a 25% drop in syphilis testing, and a 29% drop in HIV testing in 2020 versus 2019. By the conclusion of 2021, testing rates had recovered to 90% of baseline for chlamydia/gonorrhea, 91% for syphilis, and 88% for HIV. Declines and subsequent improvements in sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing occurred unequally across age, sex, race, and geographic groups. Testing for all 4 STIs in 2021 remained below baseline in rural Veterans. Excluding those aged <25 years, women experienced a steeper decline and slower recovery in chlamydia/gonorrhea testing relative to men, but quicker recovery in HIV testing. Asian Americans and Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders had a steeper decline and a slower recovery in testing for chlamydia/gonorrhea. Black and White Veterans had slower recovery in HIV testing compared with other race groups. People living with HIV experienced a smaller drop in testing for syphilis compared with people without HIV, followed by a near-total recovery of testing by 2021. Conclusions: After dramatic reductions from 2019 to 2020, STI testing rates returned to near-baseline in 2021. Testing recovery lagged in rural, female, Asian American, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and Black Veterans.

6.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(Suppl 3): 706-713, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36042092

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: United States (US) rates of sexually transmitted infection (STI) in women, especially gonorrhea and chlamydia, have increased over the past decade. Women Veterans may be at increased risk for STIs due to high rates of sexual trauma. Despite the availability of effective diagnostic tests and evidence-based guidelines for annual screening among sexually active women under age 25, screening rates for gonorrhea and chlamydia remain low in the US and among Veterans. OBJECTIVE: To examine patient characteristics and health system factors associated with gonorrhea and chlamydia testing and case rates among women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in 2019. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all women Veterans in VHA care between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Women Veteran patients were identified as receiving VHA care if they had at least one inpatient admission or outpatient visit in 2019 or the preceding calendar year. KEY RESULTS: Among women under age 25, 21.3% were tested for gonorrhea or chlamydia in 2019. After adjusting for demographic and other health factors, correlates of testing in women under age 25 included Black race (aOR: 2.11, CI: 1.89, 2.36), rural residence (aOR: 0.84, CI: 0.74, 0.95), and cervical cancer screening (aOR: 5.05, CI: 4.59, 5.56). Women under age 25 had the highest infection rates, with an incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhea of 1,950 and 267 cases/100,000, respectively. Incidence of gonorrhea and chlamydia was higher for women with a history of military sexual trauma (MST) (chlamydia case rate: 265, gonorrhea case rate: 97/100,000) and those with mental health diagnoses (chlamydia case rate: 263, gonorrhea case rate: 72/100,000.) CONCLUSIONS: Gonorrhea and chlamydia testing remains underutilized among women in VHA care, and infection rates are high among younger women. Patient-centered, system-level interventions are urgently needed to address low testing rates.


Assuntos
Gonorreia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Veteranos , Adulto , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Veteranos/psicologia , Saúde dos Veteranos
8.
Am J Public Health ; 112(7): 990-994, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35617651

RESUMO

We assessed hepatitis A (HepA) vaccine receipt among susceptible individuals in outbreak and matched nonoutbreak states. Difference-in-differences models and multivariable logistic regression were used to compare HepA vaccination rates in these states. In the postoutbreak year, there was a 112% increase in HepA vaccinations in outbreak states versus a 6% decrease in nonoutbreak states. Differences persisted in our multivariable model (adjusted odds ratio = 2.53; 95% confidence interval = 2.45, 2.61). HepA vaccination rates increased dramatically in outbreak states, but many individuals susceptible to hepatitis A virus remain unvaccinated. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(7):990-994. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306845).


Assuntos
Hepatite A , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Hepatite A/epidemiologia , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Hepatite A , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação , Saúde dos Veteranos
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(9): 1529-1536, 2022 10 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35349635

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Guideline-adherent hepatitis B virus (HBV) care is critical for patients with HBV, particularly patients with HBV-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) given increased risks of liver-related complications. However, a comprehensive assessment of HBV-related care in patients with HBV-HIV is lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed adherence to HBV-related care guidelines in all patients with HBV-HIV and HBV monoinfection (HBV-M) in the national Veterans Health Administration healthcare system in 2019. RESULTS: We identified 1021 patients with HBV-HIV among 8323 veterans with chronic HBV. Adherence to HBV guidelines was similar or better in HBV-HIV versus HBV-M, including HBV treatment (97% vs 71%), biannual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance (55% vs 55%) for patients with cirrhosis, hepatitis A virus screening (69% vs 56%), hepatitis C virus screening (100% vs 99%), and on-therapy alanine aminotransferase monitoring (95% vs 96%). Compared with those seeing gastroenterology (GI) or infectious diseases (ID) providers, patients without specialty care were less likely to receive antiviral treatment (none, 39%; GI, 80%; ID, 84%) or HCC surveillance (none, 16%; GI, 66%; ID, 47%). These findings persisted in multivariable analysis. Compared with ID care alone, a higher proportion of patients with HBV-HIV seen dually by GI and ID received HCC surveillance (GI + ID 73% vs ID 31%) and on-therapy HBV-DNA monitoring (GI + ID, 82%; ID, 68%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HBV-HIV received similar or higher rates of guideline-adherent HBV-related care than patients with HBV-M. Patients with HBV-HIV under dual GI and ID care achieved higher quality care compared with ID care alone. Specialty care was independently associated with higher quality HBV care in patients with HBV-HIV and HBV-M.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Coinfecção , Infecções por HIV , Hepatite B Crônica , Hepatite B , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Vírus da Hepatite B/genética , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/complicações , Hepatite B/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Hepatite B Crônica/complicações , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite B Crônica/epidemiologia , HIV
10.
BMJ Open ; 12(3): e058363, 2022 03 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35304400

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate associations of statin use with hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality at 30 days among individuals with and without a positive test for SARS-CoV-2. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: US Veterans Health Administration (VHA). PARTICIPANTS: All veterans receiving VHA healthcare with ≥1 positive nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2 between 1 March 2020 and 10 March 2021 (cases; n=231 154) and a comparator group of controls comprising all veterans who did not have a positive nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2 but who did have ≥1 clinical lab test performed during the same time period (n=4 570 252). MAIN OUTCOMES: Associations of: (1) any statin use, (2) use of specific statins or (3) low-intensity/moderate-intensity versus high-intensity statin use at the time of positive nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2 (cases) or result of clinical lab test (controls) assessed from pharmacy records with hospitalisation, ICU admission and death at 30 days. We also examined whether associations differed between individuals with and without a positive test for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Among individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, statin use was associated with lower odds of death at 30 days (OR 0.81 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.85)) but not with hospitalisation or ICU admission. Associations were similar comparing use of each specific statin to no statin. Compared with low-/moderate intensity statin use, high-intensity statin use was not associated with lower odds of ICU admission or death. Over the same period, associations of statin use with 30-day outcomes were significantly stronger among individuals without a positive test for SARS-CoV-2: hospitalisation OR 0.79 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.80), ICU admission OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.90) and death 0.60 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.62; p for interaction all <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Associations of statin use with lower adverse 30-day outcomes are weaker among individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared with individuals without a positive test, indicating that statins do not exert SARS-CoV-2 specific effects.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Veteranos , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Diabetes Care ; 45(4): 782-788, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085391

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection/coronavirus disease 2019 with incident diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Veterans Health Administration data. We defined all patients without preexisting diabetes with one or more nasal swabs positive for SARS-CoV-2 (1 March 2020-10 March 2021; n = 126,710) as exposed and those with no positive swab and one or more laboratory tests (1 March 2020-31 March 2021; n = 2,651,058) as unexposed. The index date for patients exposed was the date of first positive swab and for patients unexposed a random date during the month of the qualifying laboratory test. We fit sex-stratified logistic regression models examining associations of SARS-CoV-2 with incident diabetes within 120 days and all follow-up time through 1 June 2021. A subgroup analysis was performed among hospitalized subjects only to help equalize laboratory surveillance. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 was associated with higher risk of incident diabetes, compared with no positive tests, among men (120 days, odds ratio [OR] 2.56 [95% CI 2.32-2.83]; all time, 1.95 [1.80-2.12]) but not women (120 days, 1.21 [0.88-1.68]; all time, 1.04 [0.82-1.31]). Among hospitalized participants, SARS-CoV-2 was associated with higher risk of diabetes at 120 days and at the end of follow-up in men (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.22-1.65] and 1.32 [1.16-1.50], respectively) but not women (0.72 [0.34-1.52] and 0.80 [0.44-1.45]). Sex ∗ SARS-CoV-2 interaction P values were all <0.1. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 is associated with higher risk of incident diabetes in men but not in women even after greater surveillance related to hospitalization is accounted for.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Veteranos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Diabetes Care ; 44(12): 2708-2713, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34615690

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify preinfection risk factors for adverse outcomes among veterans with diabetes and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified all Veterans Health Administration patients with diabetes and one or more positive nasal swab(s) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (1 March 2020-10 March 2021) (n = 64,892). We examined associations of HbA1c and glucose-lowering medication use with hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality at 30 days using logistic regression models and during 4.4 months of follow-up (range <1-13.1) using proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Compared with HbA1c <7.0%, HbA1c ≥9.0% was associated with higher odds of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death at 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.27 [95% CI 1.19-1.35], 1.28 [95% CI 1.15-1.42], 1.30 [95% CI 1.17-1.44], respectively) as well as higher risk of death over 4.4 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22 [95% CI 1.12-1.32]). Insulin use was associated with higher odds of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death (OR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.18], 1.12 [95% CI 1.04-1.22], and 1.18 [95% CI 1.09-1.27], respectively) and higher risk of death (HR 1.12 [95% CI 1.07-1.18]). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA), or angiotensin receptor blocker use were associated with lower odds of hospitalization (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.85-0.99], 0.88 [95% CI 0.81-0.96], and 0.94 [95% CI 0.89-0.99], respectively). Metformin and SGLT2i use were associated with lower odds (OR 0.84 [95% CI 0.78-0.91], 0.82 [95% CI 0.72-0.94], respectively) and risk of death (HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.79-0.89], 0.82 [95% CI 0.74-0.92], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among veterans with diabetes and COVID-19, higher HbA1c and insulin use were directly associated with adverse outcomes, while use of a GLP1-RA, metformin, and SGLT2i was inversely associated.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Veteranos , Glucose , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34083248

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors and mediators of associations of diabetes with COVID-19 outcomes are unclear. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified all veterans receiving Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare with ≥1 positive nasal swab for SARS-CoV-2 (28 February-31 July 2020; n=35 879). We assessed associations of diabetes (with and without insulin use) with hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or death at 30 days, and with hazard of death until the censoring date. Among participants with diabetes (n=13 863), we examined associations of hemoglobin A1c and antihyperglycemic medication use with COVID-19 outcomes. We estimated mediation between diabetes and outcomes by comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease), statin or ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use, and cardiac biomarkers (brain natriuretic peptide and troponin). RESULTS: Diabetes with and without insulin use was associated with greater odds of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death at 30 days, and with greater hazard of death compared with no diabetes (OR 1.73, 1.76 and 1.63, and HR 1.61; and OR 1.39, 1.49 and 1.33, and HR 1.37, respectively, all p<0.0001). Prior sulfonylurea use was associated with greater odds of hospitalization and prior insulin use with hospitalization and death among patients with diabetes; among all participants, statin use was associated with lower mortality and ARB use with lower odds of hospitalization. Cardiovascular disease-related factors mediated <20% of associations between diabetes and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is independently associated with adverse outcomes from COVID-19. Associations are only partially mediated by common comorbidities.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Veteranos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(2): ofab030, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33604407

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To measure the incidence of syphilis diagnoses among people with HIV vs those without HIV in a national multiyear retrospective cohort. METHODS: Treponemal and nontreponemal tests, HIV status, and demographic data were identified among all individuals receiving Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. Syphilis testing rates and incident syphilis diagnoses as defined by a laboratory algorithm were stratified by HIV status. RESULTS: Syphilis was diagnosed in 1.2% (n = 2283) of 194 322 tested individuals in VHA care in 2019. Among individuals with HIV tested for syphilis, 6.1% met criteria for syphilis compared with 0.7% without HIV. Syphilis incidence in 2019 was 35/100 000, a 17% increase from 2009 (30/100 000). In 2019, syphilis incidence was 3381 per 100 000 persons among individuals with HIV and 19 per 100 000 in those without HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Using a laboratory-based diagnostic algorithm, a 178-fold difference in syphilis incidence was observed between individuals with and without HIV in 2019. US syphilis incidence data that incorporate HIV status are needed. Interventions to monitor and prevent sexually transmitted infections should address the role of HIV status.

16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): e3235-e3243, 2021 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975293

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae cases reached a record high in the United States in 2018. Although active-duty military service members have high rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection, trends in chlamydia and gonorrhea in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system have not been previously described, including among patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and young women. METHODS: We identified all veterans in VHA care from 2009 through 2019. Tests and cases of chlamydia and gonorrhea were defined based on laboratory results in the electronic health record. Chlamydia and gonorrhea incidence rates were calculated each year by demographic group and HIV status. RESULTS: In 2019, testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea occurred in 2.3% of patients, 22.6% of women aged 18-24 years, and 34.1% of persons living with HIV. The 2019 incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhea was 100.8 and 56.3 cases per 100 000 VHA users, an increase of 267% and 294%, respectively, since 2009. Veterans aged ≤34 years accounted for 9.5% of the VHA population but 66.9% of chlamydia and 42.9% of gonorrhea cases. Chlamydia and gonorrhea incidence rates in persons living with HIV were 1432 and 1687 per 100 000, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhea rose dramatically from 2009 to 2019. Among tested persons, those living with HIV had a 15.2-fold higher unadjusted incidence of chlamydia and 34.9-fold higher unadjusted incidence of gonorrhea compared with those not living with HIV. VHA-wide adherence to chlamydia and gonorrhea testing in high-risk groups merits improvement.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Chlamydia trachomatis , Feminino , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Saúde dos Veteranos
17.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 144(6): 748-754, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31697169

RESUMO

CONTEXT.­: Disease guidelines specify universal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) thresholds for clinical decision-making, yet the effect of variability among ALT analyzers remains unclear. OBJECTIVE.­: To compare ALT results from different analyzers from 2012-2017. DESIGN.­: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) laboratories perform external ALT proficiency testing using standardized College of American Pathologists (CAP) samples in analyzers by 5 manufacturers. In this operational analysis, we evaluated 22 950 ALT values from 80 independent CAP samples tested at 223 laboratories. Using mixed effects modeling, we estimated the association between analyzer manufacturer and CAP outcome, adjusting for manufacturer, facility, and calendar year. We performed subgroup analyses on CAP samples with overall means near clinical guideline-specified thresholds, including less than 50 U/L (n = 10) and less than 35 U/L (n = 5). RESULTS.­: The VHA used Abbott Laboratories (n = 3175; 14%), Beckman Coulter Diagnostics (n = 8723; 38%), Roche Diagnostics (n = 2595; 11%), Siemens Healthineers USA (n = 5713; 25%), and Vitros/Ortho Clinical Diagnostics (n = 2744; 12%) analyzers. The CAP samples (n = 80 samples, n = 22 950 tests) covered a wide range of mean ALT values (21-268 U/L). The average difference in mean ALT value per sample between the highest-reading and lowest-reading manufacturers was 15.4 U/L (SD = 1.8) for the 10 samples with mean ALT less than 50 U/L, and it was 10.4 U/L (SD = 3.6) overall (n = 80). In linear mixed effects modeling, we found statistically significant differences in ALT values between the different manufacturers in each year. CONCLUSIONS.­: We found statistically and clinically meaningful differences between analyzers across the ALT spectrum in each year, including at ALT levels lower than 50 U/L and lower than 35 U/L. Universal ALT thresholds should be avoided as a trigger for clinical action until differences between analyzers can be resolved.


Assuntos
Alanina Transaminase/sangue , Análise Química do Sangue/instrumentação , Ensaio de Proficiência Laboratorial , Humanos , Laboratórios/normas
19.
AIDS Behav ; 23(7): 1803-1811, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30547331

RESUMO

To quantify health care facility-level variation in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use in the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA); to identify facility characteristics associated with PrEP use. Retrospective analysis of the health care facility-level rate of PrEP initiation in VHA through June 30, 2017. Standardized PrEP initiation rates were used to rank facilities. Characteristics of facilities, prescribers, and PrEP recipients were examined within quartiles. Multiple linear regression was used to identify associations between facility characteristics and PrEP use. We identified 1600 PrEP recipients. Mean PrEP initiation rate was 20.0/100,000 (SD 22.8), ranging from 3.0/100,000 (SD 2.0) in the lowest quartile to 48.1/100,000 (SD 29.1) in the highest. PrEP prescribing was positively associated with proportions of urban dwellers and individuals < 45, tertiary care status, and location. Variability in PrEP uptake across a national health care system highlights opportunities to expand access in non-tertiary care facilities and underserved areas.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Saúde dos Veteranos , Adulto , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
20.
Hepatol Commun ; 2(9): 1136-1146, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30202826

RESUMO

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation may occur with high risk immunosuppression, such as anti-cluster of differentiation (CD)20 antibodies (Abs). Appropriate HBV prophylaxis during anti-CD20 Ab therapy averts hepatitis, chemotherapy disruption, and death. Serologic evidence of prior HBV exposure is present in one in nine veterans in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). In 2014, most (61%-73%) patients in the VHA who were receiving anti-CD20 Ab treatment underwent HBV testing, yet <20% of eligible patients received HBV antiviral prophylaxis. We aimed to prevent HBV reactivation by increasing HBV testing and antiviral treatment rates among anti-CD20 Ab recipients through prospective interventions. A multidisciplinary team of clinicians, pharmacists, and public health professionals developed comprehensive prevention systems, including national seminars/newsletters/websites; pharmacy criteria for HBV screening/treatment prior to anti-CD20 Ab use; changes to national formulary restrictions to expand HBV prophylaxis prescribing authority; Medication Use Evaluation Tracker to identify omissions; national e-mail alert to all VHA oncology providers detailing specific testing and HBV antiviral treatment needs; and a voluntary electronic medical record "order check" used at interested facilities (n = 11) to automatically assess pretreatment HBV testing and antiviral treatment and only generate a reminder to address deficiencies. Analysis of monthly data from June 2016 through September 2017 among anti-CD20 Ab recipients revealed pre-anti-CD20 Ab treatment HBV testing increased to 91%-96% and appropriate HBV antiviral prophylaxis to 76%-85% nationally following implementation of the intervention. Medical centers using the voluntary electronic medical record order check increased HBV testing rates to 93%-98% and HBV antiviral prophylaxis rates to 99%. Conclusion: Multimodal intervention systems to prevent HBV reactivation among VHA patients receiving anti-CD20 Ab therapies increased national rates of HBV testing to >90% and antiviral prophylaxis to >80%.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA