Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the first choice operation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a ten-year experience.

BACKGROUND: The choice between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in the treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis remains controversial. The aims of this study were to assess our 10-year experience with proctocolectomy, endoanal mucosectomy, construction of an ileal reservoir pouch, and IPAA in a series of 171 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and to compare the functional results after IPAA with those after IRA. METHODS: Data from patients treated by IPAA at one institution were prospectively accumulated from October 1983 to October 1993. Medical records of 171 consecutive patients were studied regarding morbidity and functional results. These functional results were compared with those of a series of 23 patients who underwent IRA at the same institution. RESULTS: One patient (0.6%) died after operation. Sixty-two patients (36%) had concomitant colorectal carcinoma, 36 of which tumors were invasive (15 stage A, 13 stage B, and 8 stage C). Forty-six patients (27%) had at least one postoperative complication, with 14 patients requiring reoperation (8%). Twenty-six patients (15%) had obstruction. Seven patients (4%) had pelvic sepsis, and one had transient impotence (0.6%). Only two patients (1%) had a typical episode of pouchitis. The mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 3 to 100 months); 101 patients were monitored for more than 1 year. Little difference was noted between bowel function after IRA and that after IPAA. The mean daytime stool frequency after IPAA was 4.2 with 26% of patients having an average of 1 bowel movement at nighttime, compared with a stool frequency of 3.0 and 13% of patients having night evacuation after IRA. Daytime continence was normal for 98% of patients after IPAA and for all the patients after IRA. Nighttime continence was normal in 96% and 98% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and functional results after IPAA for familial adenomatous polyposis do not differ from those reported after IRA. For this reason and because of the risk of rectal cancer after ileorectal anastomosis, IPAA with endoanal mucosectomy is our first choice in the treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

[Total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in Crohn's colitis. Functional results and recurrence factors (83 cases)]. / Colectomie totale et anastomose iléo-rectale dans la colite de Crohn. Résultats fonctionnels et facteurs de récidive (83 cas).

Eighty-three consecutive patients (38 men, 45 women) underwent colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) for Crohn's colitis between 1960 and 1988. The mean age at the time of IRA was 28.5 years after a mean interval of four years from diagnosis. At the time of IRA, 31 patients had proctitis, while 25 had perianal disease. Two patients died postoperatively. Postoperative complications appeared in 21 cases (25.3%) including 7 anastomotic leaks (13.2%). Leakage did not imply IRA compromise and the diverting ileostomy did not decrease the risk of preservation of the ileorectal anastomosis. With a mean follow-up of 8 years after IRA, among the 81 surviving patients, it was necessary to retain the stomy in five, 24 required exclusion or excision of their IRA (10 defunctioning ileostomies, 14 proctectomies) and 52 still had a functioning IRA at follow-up (64.2%). Among the 43 recurrences (53%), 21 underwent reoperation. The mean interval between IRA and recurrence was 2.2 years. The cumulative rate of recurrence reached 47% at 5 years and 57% at 10 years. Fifty percent of the patients still had a functioning IRA and were satisfied. Preoperative ileal lesions affected the functional results of the IRA and the recurrence rate. Development of ileal, rectal or anal disease after IRA significantly increased the risk of exclusion of the rectum but did not require suppression of anal function. Patients under 30 years of age or patients suffering for more than 5 years had poorer functional results and more frequent reoperations at 5 years. Rectal preservation after IRA may be proposed with success to patients with a healthy rectum or with minimal or moderate proctitis, even if there is perianal disease that could be safely treated before IRA. In this last setting, the patient has to be informed of the risk of rectal preservation and the possible risk of requiring ulterior proctectomy.

Preoperative radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Final results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).

A randomized clinical trial was conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) Gastrointestinal Cancer Cooperative Group to study the effectiveness of irradiation therapy administered in a dosage of 34.5 Gy, divided into 15 daily doses of 2.3 Gy each before radical surgery for rectal cancer (T2, T3, T4, NX, MO). Four hundred sixty-six patients were entered in the clinical trial between June 1976 and September 1981. Tolerance and side effects of preoperative irradiation were acceptable. The overall 5-year survival rates were similar in both groups. When considering only the 341 patients treated by surgery with a curative aim, the 5-year survival rates were 59.1% and 69.1% in the control group and in the combined modality group, respectively (p = 0.08). The local recurrence rates at 5 years were 30% and 15% in the control group and the adjuvant radiotherapy group, respectively (p = 0.003). Although this study did not show preoperative radiotherapy to have a statistically significant benefit on overall survival, it does have a clear effect on local control of rectal cancer. Therefore, before performing radical surgery, this adjuvant therapy should be administered to patients who have locally extended rectal cancer.

Single-layer anastomosis in surgery of the large bowel. A prospective study on 316 cases in a university hospital.

A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the results of a single layer appositional technique for large bowel anastomoses used in a University Hospital. 316 patients were entered during an 18-month period. Anastomoses were situated within the peritoneal cavity in 277 patients and below the peritoneal reflection in 39. No covering stoma was made. The incidence of clinical leakage was 1.6% and of wound infection 1.9%. These results compare favourably with those obtained by stapling. For intraperitoneal anastomoses and high anterior resection manual suture remains the standard technique and is less expensive than stapling. For low rectal tumours, there is still debate on the relative merits of stapling and various manual techniques of colo-anal anastomosis in terms of morbidity, tumour clearance and functional results.

[Results of choledoco-duodenostomy for common bile duct lithiasis]. / Résultats de la cholédoco-duodénostomie pour lithiase de la voie biliaire principale.

One hundred and sixty-seven choledoco-duodenostomies for lithiasis of the common bile duct (CBD) were performed. The mean age of the patients was 74 +/- 1 years. Sixty p. 100 of the patients presented with at least one operative risk factor, usually related to their general condition. An anastomosis of at least 20 mm in diameter was possible as the diameter of the CBC was always larger than 10 mm. Immediate postoperative complications (within one month) were observed in 29 cases (17 p. 100). In 14 cases (8 p. 100), these complications were directly related to the operative procedure and, in 15 cases (9 p. 100), bronchopulmonary or cardiovascular complications occurred. Operative mortality was 4 p. 100 (7 cases); in 2 cases, death was directly related to the operative procedure, and in 5 cases, death was not directly due to surgery. Operative complications were significantly higher in the case of emergency procedures, impaction of the CBD by multiple stones, and associated acute cholecystitis. One hundred and thirty-four of the 160 survivors (84 p. 100) have been followed for a mean duration of 5 years (63 +/- 7 months); 115 (86 p. 100) have remained asymptomatic. Eleven patients had non specific findings; 8 (6 p. 100) had cholangitis, half of them having suffered from only one episode. The first (or only) episode occurred during the first postoperative year in 7 out of 8 patients. No cholangitis developed after the second postoperative year in patients still asymptomatic. No anastomotic stenosis was found in any of these cases. One case of stump syndrome was observed. These results suggest that choledocoduodenostomy is a reliable procedure for treatment of choledocolithiasis and related late complications are rare.

Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma.

Sphincter-saving operations are now generally accepted for the treatment of mid-rectal cancers. Many techniques have been described: low colorectal anastomosis, pull-through procedures, and colo-anal anastomosis. The functional results following these operations are impaired by loss of the reservoir function of the rectum. In order to improve these results, a modification of Parks' colo-anal anastomosis is proposed. A J-shaped colic reservoir is constructed and its end is anastomosed to the anal canal. We have operated upon 31 patients using this technique. Mortality was 3.3 per cent. Functional results were evaluated in 24 patients having a follow-up of more than 3 months. All were continent; mean number of bowel movements was 1.1 per day. Defaecation was spontaneous in 75 per cent of cases; in the remaining 25 per cent, evacuation of the reservoir was elicited by a small enema each two days. This technique, creating a neo-rectum, can achieve an important place among the sphincter-saving operations.