Andexanet Alfa for Specific Anticoagulation Reversal in Patients with Acute Bleeding during Treatment with Edoxaban.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is approved for specific anticoagulation reversal in patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding during treatment with rivaroxaban or apixaban. There is limited experience with andexanet in patients with acute bleeding on edoxaban. METHODS: Patients with acute major bleeding within 18 hours of edoxaban intake were prospectively enrolled. Patients received a bolus and 2-hour follow-on infusion of andexanet. The co-primary efficacy outcomes were change in antifactor Xa activity and the percentage of patients achieving excellent or good hemostasis, 12 hours after andexanet treatment. Efficacy was analyzed in patients with confirmed major bleeding and baseline antifactor Xa activity ≥40 ng/mL. Safety was analyzed in all patients. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (mean age: 82 years, 61.1% male and 91.7% with atrial fibrillation) with acute major bleeding on edoxaban received andexanet. The primary site of bleeding was intracranial in 29 patients (80.6%). In the efficacy population (n = 28), median antifactor Xa activity decreased from 121.1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 70.3-202.4) ng/mL at baseline to 24.0 (IQR: 77.7-83.7) ng/mL at the end of andexanet bolus (median decrease: 68.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.1-77.7%). Excellent or good hemostasis at 12 hours was achieved in 78.6% (95% CI: 59.0-91.7%) of patients. Within 30 days, four patients (11.1%) experienced a thrombotic event and four others (11.1%) died. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute major bleeding on edoxaban, andexanet significantly decreased antifactor Xa activity. Hemostatic efficacy was similar to that observed in patients with bleeding on rivaroxaban or apixaban. Thrombotic events occurred at a rate expected in such patients.

Measuring residual anti-Xa activity of direct factor Xa inhibitors after reversal with andexanet alfa.

INTRODUCTION: Andexanet alfa (AnXa) was developed for anticoagulant effect reversal of direct factor Xa inhibitors (DXaI) (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) in emergency situations. Regular anti-Xa assays are not suitable to evaluate anti-Xa activity after AnXa administration because of the high sample dilution resulting in the AnXa-DXaI dissociation which gives inaccurately high DXaI measured concentrations. This study aimed at developing dedicated STA-Liquid anti-Xa test set-ups for accurately measuring DXaI after reversal with AnXa. METHODS: Modified anti-Xa test set-ups, with reduced sample dilution, were developed to overcome regular assays limitations and to improve measured accuracy with results comparable to Portola microplate reference method used in clinical studies. Both regular and optimized assays were used to measure DXaI concentration in AnXa-containing samples. Quality controls, normal pooled plasma spiked with five DXaI and three AnXa concentrations, samples from DXaI-treated patients spiked with AnXa and ex vivo healthy volunteers having received both DXaI and AnXa were used. RESULTS: The lower limit of quantitation of optimized anti-Xa assays was <10 ng/mL with CVs ≤10%. DXaI samples containing 300 ng/mL and 1 µmol/L AnXa resulted in DXaI residual concentrations of 29-72 ng/mL depending on the DXaI (76%-90% reversal), compared to 20-28 ng/mL with reference method (92%-94% reversal) and 135-165 ng/mL with regular assays (about 50% reversal). CONCLUSION: Modified test set-ups are automated alternative to reference method with improved precision and reproducibility. They can be run in all laboratories where regular anti-Xa assays are performed using commercially available reagents.

Andexanet versus prothrombin complex concentrates: Differences in reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in in vitro thrombin generation.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is a modified human factor Xa (FXa) approved for anticoagulation reversal in patients with life-threatening bleeding treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) are approved for reversal of vitamin K antagonist-induced anticoagulation but not FXa inhibitors. The mechanism and effectiveness of 4F-PCCs for FXa inhibitor reversal are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the mechanism and impact of 4F-PCCs on reversal of rivaroxaban and apixaban in vitro compared to andexanet. METHODS: The effect of 4F-PCCs (or individual factors) on tissue factor-initiated thrombin generation (TF-TG) was evaluated in human plasma, with or without rivaroxaban or apixaban, and compared with andexanet under the same conditions. RESULTS: In the TF-TG assay, 4F-PCC completely reversed warfarin anticoagulation. Andexanet normalized TF-TG over a wide range of apixaban and rivaroxaban concentrations tested (19-2000 ng/mL). However, 4F-PCC (or individual factors) was unable to normalize endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) or peak thrombin (Peak) in the presence of apixaban or rivaroxaban (75-500 ng/mL). TF-TG was only normalized by 4F-PCC at inhibitor concentrations <75 ng/mL (ETP) or <37.5 ng/mL (Peak). These data can be explained by the estimated thresholds of FXa activity required to support normal TF-TG based on the inhibitor:FXa ratios and levels of uninhibited FXa. The data are consistent with healthy volunteer studies where TF-TG is not normalized until inhibitor levels are substantially decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Both the theoretical calculations and experimental data demonstrated that 4F-PCCs are only able to normalize TG over a low and narrow range of FXa inhibitor concentrations (<75 ng/mL).

Using engineered 6-O-sulfotransferase to improve the synthesis of anticoagulant heparin.

Heparan sulfate (HS) and heparin are sulfated polysaccharides exhibiting diverse physiological functions. HS 6-O-sulfotransferase (6-OST) is a HS biosynthetic enzyme that transfers a sulfo group to the 6-OH position of glucosamine to synthesize HS with desired biological activities. Chemoenzymatic synthesis is a widely adopted method to obtain HS oligosaccharides to support biological studies. However, this method is unable to synthesize all possible structures due to the specificity of natural enzymes. Here, we report the use of an engineered 6-OST to achieve fine control of the 6-O-sulfation. Unlike wild type enzyme, the engineered 6-OST only sulfates the non-reducing end glucosamine residue. Utilizing the engineered enzyme and wild type enzyme, we successfully completed the synthesis of five hexasaccharides and one octasaccharide differing in 6-O-sulfation patterns. We also identified a hexasaccharide construct as a new anticoagulant drug candidate. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using an engineered HS biosynthetic enzyme to prepare HS-based therapeutics.

A phase 2 PK/PD study of andexanet alfa for reversal of rivaroxaban and edoxaban anticoagulation in healthy volunteers.

As with any anticoagulant, factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors are associated with a risk of major bleeding. Andexanet alfa is a recombinant modified human FXa lacking enzymatic activity, developed for reversal of FXa inhibitor-induced anticoagulation. In two phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center studies, different regimens of andexanet alfa were administered to healthy volunteers after therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or edoxaban, and multiple anticoagulation reversal and safety end points were evaluated. Andexanet alfa rapidly and effectively reversed anticoagulation with both rivaroxaban and edoxaban. Within 2 minutes after bolus, anti-FXa activity decreased significantly, with maximum decreases of ≈93% (P < .05) and ≈82% (P < .05), respectively, compared with placebo. The stoichiometric ratios of andexanet alfa:total anticoagulant at maximum reversal of anti-FXa activity ranged from 1:1 to 1.3:1 for rivaroxaban and 1.41:1 to 2.58:1 for edoxaban. Sustained normalization of thrombin generation for ≈2 hours and sustained decrease in unbound anticoagulant (maximum ≈80%) for up to ≈4 hours following completion of andexanet alfa administration, compared with placebo, were observed when andexanet was administered as a bolus or as a bolus followed by continuous infusion. Andexanet alfa was well tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events or thrombotic events. Andexanet alfa has been approved in the United States and Europe for reversal of anticoagulation in patients treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban who experience life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding. These studies were registered with clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT03578146 and #NCT03551743).

Full Study Report of Andexanet Alfa for Bleeding Associated with Factor Xa Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant inactive form of human factor Xa developed for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors. METHODS: We evaluated 352 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients received a bolus of andexanet, followed by a 2-hour infusion. The coprimary outcomes were the percent change in anti-factor Xa activity after andexanet treatment and the percentage of patients with excellent or good hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours after the end of the infusion, with hemostatic efficacy adjudicated on the basis of prespecified criteria. Efficacy was assessed in the subgroup of patients with confirmed major bleeding and baseline anti-factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.25 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin). RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 77 years, and most had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly intracranial (in 227 patients [64%]) or gastrointestinal (in 90 patients [26%]). In patients who had received apixaban, the median anti-factor Xa activity decreased from 149.7 ng per milliliter at baseline to 11.1 ng per milliliter after the andexanet bolus (92% reduction; 95% confidence interval [CI], 91 to 93); in patients who had received rivaroxaban, the median value decreased from 211.8 ng per milliliter to 14.2 ng per milliliter (92% reduction; 95% CI, 88 to 94). Excellent or good hemostasis occurred in 204 of 249 patients (82%) who could be evaluated. Within 30 days, death occurred in 49 patients (14%) and a thrombotic event in 34 (10%). Reduction in anti-factor Xa activity was not predictive of hemostatic efficacy overall but was modestly predictive in patients with intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute major bleeding associated with the use of a factor Xa inhibitor, treatment with andexanet markedly reduced anti-factor Xa activity, and 82% of patients had excellent or good hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours, as adjudicated according to prespecified criteria. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; ANNEXA-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02329327.).

Comparison of reversal activity and mechanism of action of UHRA, andexanet, and PER977 on heparin and oral FXa inhibitors.

Anticoagulants such as unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) targeting thrombin (IIa) or factor Xa (FXa) are widely used in prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. However, anticoagulant-associated bleeding is a concern that demands monitoring and neutralization. Protamine, the UFH antidote, has limitations, while there is no antidote available for certain direct FXa inhibitors. Improved antidotes in development include UHRA (Universal Heparin Reversal Agent) for all heparin anticoagulants; andexanet alfa (andexanet), a recombinant antidote for both direct FXa inhibitors and LMWHs; and ciraparantag (PER977), a small-molecule antidote for UFH, LMWHs, and certain DOACs. The binding affinities of these antidotes for their presumed anticoagulant targets have not been compared. Here, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was used to determine the affinity of each antidote for its putative targets. Clotting and chromogenic FXa assays were used to characterize neutralization activity, and electron microscopy was used to visualize the effect of each antidote on clot morphology in the absence or presence of anticoagulant. ITC confirmed binding of UHRA to all heparins, and binding of andexanet to edoxaban and rivaroxaban, and to the antithrombin-enoxaparin complex. PER977 was found to bind heparins weakly, but not the direct FXa inhibitors studied. For UHRA and andexanet, an affinity at or below the micromolar level was found to correlate with neutralization activity, while no reversal activity was observed for the PER977/anticoagulant systems. Standard metrics of clot structure were found to correlate weakly with PER977's activity. This is the first study comparing 3 antidotes in development, with each exerting activity through a distinct mechanism.

Andexanet alfa effectively reverses edoxaban anticoagulation effects and associated bleeding in a rabbit acute hemorrhage model.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing use of factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors necessitates effective reversal agents to manage bleeding. Andexanet alfa, a novel modified recombinant human FXa, rapidly reverses the anticoagulation effects of direct and indirect FXa inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of andexanet to reverse anticoagulation in vitro and reduce bleeding in rabbits administered edoxaban. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro studies characterized the interaction of andexanet with edoxaban and its ability to reverse edoxaban-mediated anti-FXa activity. In a rabbit model of surgically induced, acute hemorrhage, animals received edoxaban vehicle+andexanet vehicle (control), edoxaban (1 mg/kg)+andexanet vehicle, edoxaban+andexanet (75 mg, 5-minute infusion, 20 minutes after edoxaban), or edoxaban vehicle+andexanet prior to injury. RESULTS: Andexanet bound edoxaban with high affinity similar to FXa. Andexanet rapidly and dose-dependently reversed the effects of edoxaban on FXa activity and coagulation pharmacodynamic parameters in vitro. In edoxaban-anticoagulated rabbits, andexanet reduced anti-FXa activity by 82% (from 548±87 to 100±41 ng/ml; P<0.0001), mean unbound edoxaban plasma concentration by ~80% (from 100±10 to 21±6 ng/ml; P<0.0001), and blood loss by 80% vs. vehicle (adjusted for control, 2.6 vs. 12.9 g; P = 0.003). The reduction in blood loss correlated with the decrease in anti-FXa activity (r = 0.6993, P<0.0001) and unbound edoxaban (r = 0.5951, P = 0.0035). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that andexanet rapidly reversed the anticoagulant effects of edoxaban, suggesting it could be clinically valuable for the management of acute and surgery-related bleeding. Correlation of blood loss with anti-FXa activity supports the use of anti-FXa activity as a biomarker for assessing anticoagulation reversal in clinical trials.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and reversal of apixaban anticoagulation with andexanet alfa.

Direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors lack a specific reversal agent for emergencies such as major bleeding or urgent surgery. Andexanet alfa, a modified, catalytically inactive, recombinant human FXa derivative, reverses anticoagulant effect by binding and sequestering FXa inhibitors. This original report of safety and dose-finding, phase 1 and 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, investigated various doses of andexanet in healthy volunteers. Phase 1 evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of andexanet (n = 24) or placebo (n = 8). In phase 2, andexanet (n = 36) or placebo (n = 18) was administered following steady-state apixaban dosing (5 mg twice daily for 6 days); safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were assessed. Andexanet plasma concentration increased proportionally with dose, with rapid elimination (terminal elimination half-life, 4.35-7.5 hours). Following apixaban treatment, andexanet rapidly (≤2 minutes) and dose dependently reduced unbound apixaban concentration vs placebo (51% to 89% vs 5% reduction; all P < .05), decreased anti-FXa activity (67.8% to 95.0% vs 7.1% reduction; all P < .05), and restored thrombin generation in 67% to 100% vs 6% of subjects (all P < .01), maintaining these effects during continuous 45- and 120-minute infusions. Andexanet was well tolerated. Nine subjects had mild/moderate infusion reactions not associated with hemodynamic changes or respiratory compromise that generally resolved without intervention or dose reduction. There were no thrombotic events or other serious safety issues. In conclusion, andexanet reversed apixaban-mediated effects on pharmacodynamic markers of anticoagulation in healthy volunteers within minutes after administration and for the duration of infusion. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01758432.

Andexanet Alfa for Acute Major Bleeding Associated with Factor Xa Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is a recombinant modified human factor Xa decoy protein that has been shown to reverse the inhibition of factor Xa in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-group study, we evaluated 67 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after the administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients all received a bolus of andexanet followed by a 2-hour infusion of the drug. Patients were evaluated for changes in measures of anti-factor Xa activity and were assessed for clinical hemostatic efficacy during a 12-hour period. All the patients were subsequently followed for 30 days. The efficacy population of 47 patients had a baseline value for anti-factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.5 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin) and had confirmed bleeding severity at adjudication. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 77 years; most of the patients had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly gastrointestinal or intracranial. The mean (±SD) time from emergency department presentation to the administration of the andexanet bolus was 4.8±1.8 hours. After the bolus administration, the median anti-factor Xa activity decreased by 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58 to 94) from baseline among patients receiving rivaroxaban and by 93% (95% CI, 87 to 94) among patients receiving apixaban. These levels remained similar during the 2-hour infusion. Four hours after the end of the infusion, there was a relative decrease from baseline of 39% in the measure of anti-factor Xa activity among patients receiving rivaroxaban and of 30% among those receiving apixaban. Twelve hours after the andexanet infusion, clinical hemostasis was adjudicated as excellent or good in 37 of 47 patients in the efficacy analysis (79%; 95% CI, 64 to 89). Thrombotic events occurred in 12 of 67 patients (18%) during the 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a descriptive preliminary analysis, an initial bolus and subsequent 2-hour infusion of andexanet substantially reduced anti-factor Xa activity in patients with acute major bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors, with effective hemostasis occurring in 79%. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; ANNEXA-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02329327 .).

Andexanet Alfa for the Reversal of Factor Xa Inhibitor Activity.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a complication of treatment with factor Xa inhibitors, but there are no specific agents for the reversal of the effects of these drugs. Andexanet is designed to reverse the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors. METHODS: Healthy older volunteers were given 5 mg of apixaban twice daily or 20 mg of rivaroxaban daily. For each factor Xa inhibitor, a two-part randomized placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate andexanet administered as a bolus or as a bolus plus a 2-hour infusion. The primary outcome was the mean percent change in anti-factor Xa activity, which is a measure of factor Xa inhibition by the anticoagulant. RESULTS: Among the apixaban-treated participants, anti-factor Xa activity was reduced by 94% among those who received an andexanet bolus (24 participants), as compared with 21% among those who received placebo (9 participants) (P<0.001), and unbound apixaban concentration was reduced by 9.3 ng per milliliter versus 1.9 ng per milliliter (P<0.001); thrombin generation was fully restored in 100% versus 11% of the participants (P<0.001) within 2 to 5 minutes. Among the rivaroxaban-treated participants, anti-factor Xa activity was reduced by 92% among those who received an andexanet bolus (27 participants), as compared with 18% among those who received placebo (14 participants) (P<0.001), and unbound rivaroxaban concentration was reduced by 23.4 ng per milliliter versus 4.2 ng per milliliter (P<0.001); thrombin generation was fully restored in 96% versus 7% of the participants (P<0.001). These effects were sustained when andexanet was administered as a bolus plus an infusion. In a subgroup of participants, transient increases in levels of d-dimer and prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 were observed, which resolved within 24 to 72 hours. No serious adverse or thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Andexanet reversed the anticoagulant activity of apixaban and rivaroxaban in older healthy participants within minutes after administration and for the duration of infusion, without evidence of clinical toxic effects. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals and others; ANNEXA-A and ANNEXA-R ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02207725 and NCT02220725.).

A specific antidote for reversal of anticoagulation by direct and indirect inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa.

Inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa (fXa) have emerged as a new class of antithrombotics but lack effective antidotes for patients experiencing serious bleeding. We designed and expressed a modified form of fXa as an antidote for fXa inhibitors. This recombinant protein (r-Antidote, PRT064445) is catalytically inactive and lacks the membrane-binding γ-carboxyglutamic acid domain of native fXa but retains the ability of native fXa to bind direct fXa inhibitors as well as low molecular weight heparin-activated antithrombin III (ATIII). r-Antidote dose-dependently reversed the inhibition of fXa by direct fXa inhibitors and corrected the prolongation of ex vivo clotting times by such inhibitors. In rabbits treated with the direct fXa inhibitor rivaroxaban, r-Antidote restored hemostasis in a liver laceration model. The effect of r-Antidote was mediated by reducing plasma anti-fXa activity and the non-protein bound fraction of the fXa inhibitor in plasma. In rats, r-Antidote administration dose-dependently and completely corrected increases in blood loss resulting from ATIII-dependent anticoagulation by enoxaparin or fondaparinux. r-Antidote has the potential to be used as a universal antidote for a broad range of fXa inhibitors.

An anticoagulant RNA aptamer that inhibits proteinase-cofactor interactions within prothrombinase.

The interaction of factor Xa with factor Va on membranes to form prothrombinase profoundly increases the rate of the proteolytic conversion of prothrombin to thrombin. We present the characterization of an RNA aptamer (RNA(11F7t)) selected from a combinatorial library based on its ability to bind factor Xa. We show that RNA(11F7t) inhibits thrombin formation catalyzed by prothrombinase without obscuring the active site of Xa within the enzyme complex. Selective inhibition of protein substrate cleavage arises from the ability of the aptamer to bind to factor Xa and exclude interactions between the proteinase and cofactor within prothrombinase. Competition for enzyme complex assembly results from the binding of RNA(11F7t) to factor Xa with nanomolar affinity in a Ca(2+)-dependent interaction. RNA(11F7t) binds equivalently to the zymogen factor X as well as derivatives lacking gamma-carboxyglutamic acid residues. We suggest that the ability of RNA(11F7t) to compete for the Xa-Va interaction with surprisingly high affinity likely reflects a significant contribution from its ability to indirectly impact regions of Xa that participate in the proteinase-cofactor interaction. Thus, despite the complexity of the macromolecular interactions that underlie the assembly of prothrombinase, efficient inhibition of enzyme complex assembly and thrombin formation can be achieved by tight binding ligands that target factor Xa in a discrete manner.

The affinity of protein C for the thrombin.thrombomodulin complex is determined in a primary way by active site-dependent interactions.

The interaction of thrombin (IIa) with thrombomodulin (TM) is essential for the efficient activation of protein C (PC). Interactions between PC and extended surfaces, likely contributed by TM within the IIa.TM complex, have been proposed to play a key role in PC activation. Initial velocities of PC activation at different concentrations of PC and TM could be accounted for by a model that did not require consideration of direct binding interactions between PC and TM. Reversible inhibitors directed toward the active site of IIa within the IIa.TM complex behaved as classic competitive inhibitors of both peptidyl substrate cleavage as well as PC activation. The ability of these small molecule inhibitors to block PC binding to the enzyme points to a principal role for active site-dependent substrate recognition in determining the affinity of IIa.TM for its protein substrate. Selective abrogation of active site docking by mutation of the P1 Arg in PC to Gln yielded an uncleavable derivative (PC(R15Q)). PC(R15Q) was a poor inhibitor (K(i) >or= 30 microm) of PC activation as well as peptidyl substrate cleavage by IIa.TM. Thus, inhibition by PC(R15Q) most likely results from its ability to weakly interfere with active site function rather than by blocking extended interactions with the enzyme complex. The data suggest a primary role for active site-dependent substrate recognition in driving the affinity of the IIa.TM complex for its protein substrate. Interactions between PC and extended surfaces contributed by IIa and/or TM within the IIa.TM complex likely contribute in a secondary or minor way to protein substrate affinity.

Formation of factors IXa and Xa by the extrinsic pathway: differential regulation by tissue factor pathway inhibitor and antithrombin III.

The activation of factor X by VIIa/TF and the Xa-dependent inhibition of the enzyme complex by tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) are considered primary steps in the initiation of coagulation. IX activation by VIIa/TF is considered to contribute catalyst necessary for further Xa production in the ensuing amplification phase. We have investigated Xa and IXabeta production by VIIa-TF in a system reconstituted with both X and IX and the principal physiologic inhibitors of this pathway TFPI and antithrombin III (AT). Kinetic studies without inhibitors established that IX and X functioned as competitive alternate substrates for VIIa/TF with similar kinetic constants. When both IX and X were present, TFPI significantly inhibited the extent of formation of either IXabeta or Xa. In contrast, AT rapidly depleted active Xa with a small effect on IXabeta formation. When both AT and TFPI were present, active IXabeta formation significantly exceeded the formation of active Xa regardless of the VIIa/TF concentration. These findings could be quantitatively accounted for by a model encompassing the kinetics of the individual activation and inhibition steps. Active Xa formation by this pathway is regulated in a principal way by its rapid inactivation by AT. In contrast, the Xa-dependent inhibitory reactions of TFPI play a primary role in limiting zymogen consumption and the formation of active IXabeta. These regulatory phenomena yield active IXabeta as a major rather than secondary product of VIIa/TF. Our findings raise the possibility that IXabeta produced by the extrinsic pathway, and its ability to function within the intrinsic Xase complex to activate X may play a significant role in producing Xa necessary for both the initiation and sustained phases of the procoagulant response following vascular damage.