Clinical efficacy of different therapeutic strategies in patients with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic strategy for patients with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus includes surgical repair, endoscopic therapy, supportive care, and others. However, no evidence exists to direct clinical decision-making regarding the choice of operative and nonoperative management. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of different therapeutic strategies in both general and stratified patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 101 patients at nine tertiary referral hospital centers in China. Patients were divided into operative and nonoperative groups based on the initial treatment. Short-term outcomes, including 90-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and postoperative leakage were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed based on treatment timing and Pittsburgh perforation severity score (PSS). RESULTS: Of 101 patients, 60 (58.4%) underwent operative management. A significant difference of 90-day mortality between operative and nonoperative groups was observed (15.0% vs. 34.1%, P=0.031). Operative management tend to yield similar therapeutic benefits in timely (OR, 0.250; 95% CI, 0.05-1.14, P=0.073) and delayed (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.12-1.47, P=0.175) treatment groups. Based on PSS stratification, operative management significantly decreased the risk of 90-day mortality (OR, 0.211; 95% CI, 0.064-0.701; P=0.011) for patients in low- and moderate-risk groups but may be detrimental for patients in high-risk group (OR, 1.333; 95% CI, 0.233-7.626; P=0.746). CONCLUSIONS: Operative management might be superior to nonoperative management for low- and moderate-risk patients with spontaneous rupture of the esophagus. However, for patients at high risks, operative management might not provide additional benefits compared with nonoperative management. Further research involving larger sample sizes is required for accurate patient stratification and conclusive evidence-based guideline.

Substitute or coexistence? mediastinoscopy-assisted versus thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy in esophageal cancer - a meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

BACKGROUND: Currently, mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy (MAE) and thoracoscope-assisted esophagectomy (TAE) represent two prevalent forms of minimally invasive esophagectomy extensively employed in the management of esophageal cancer (EC). The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess and compare these two surgical approaches concerning perioperative outcomes and long-term survival, offering valuable insights for refining surgical strategies and enhancing patient outcomes in this field. METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and CNKI databases until March 1, 2024, for studies comparing MAE and TAE. Outcomes of interest included perioperative outcomes (intraoperative outcomes, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications) and survival rates. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, with heterogeneity dictating the use of fixed or random-effects models. RESULTS: Totally 21 relevant studies were finally included. MAE was associated with significantly shorter operation times ((MD=-59.58 min, 95% CI: -82.90, -36.26) and less intraoperative blood loss (MD=-68.34 mL, 95% CI: -130.45, -6.23). However, MAE resulted in fewer lymph nodes being dissected (MD=-3.50, 95% CI: -6.23, -0.78). Postoperative recovery was enhanced following MAE, as evidenced by reduced hospital stays and tube times. MAE significantly reduced pulmonary complications (OR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81) but increased the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.60). No significant differences were observed in anastomotic leakage, chylothorax, cardiac complications, wound infections, and gastric retention between MAE and TAE. The long-term survival outcomes showed no statistical difference (HR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.71-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: MAE offers advantages in reducing operation time, blood loss, and specific postoperative complications, particularly pulmonary complications, with a shorter recovery period compared to TAE. However, it poses a higher risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and results in fewer lymph nodes being dissected. No difference in long-term survival was observed, indicating that both techniques have distinct benefits and limitations. These findings underscore the need for personalized surgical approaches in EC treatment, considering individual patient characteristics and tumor specifics.

Impact of change in the Naples prognostic score after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical relevance and prognostic value of changes in the Naples prognostic score (NPS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. METHODS: We studied 232 locally advanced ESCC patients who received NACR before undergoing esophagectomy retrospectively. Categorizing individuals into the elevated NPS group and the non-elevated NPS group based on the change in NPS after NACR (ΔNPS > 0 or ∆NPS ≤ 0), we examined and compared the clinicopathological characteristics, survival rates, and postoperative complications between these 2 groups (∆NPS = post-NACR NPS - pre-NACR NPS). RESULTS: Results: Out of the 232 patients enrolled, 105 exhibited elevated NPS levels, while 127 showed non-elevated NPS levels. Survival analyses indicated inferior overall survival (OS) (p=0.024) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p=0.047) in the elevated NPS cohort compared to the non-elevated NPS cohort. Subsequent cox regression analyses identified the post-NACR change in NPS as an independent prognostic indicator for RFS (p=0.029) and OS (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Elevated NPS post-NACR emerged as a significant indicator of worse prognosis for locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent NACR. This finding has great potential to be useful for recognizing high-risk ESCC patients who received NACR before undergoing esophagectomy and making individualized subsequent therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.

Association between plasma circulating tumor DNA and the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The application of liquid biopsy analysis utilizing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gained prominence as a biomarker in specific cancer types. Nevertheless, the correlation between ctDNA and the prognostic outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) remains a subject of controversy. This meta-analysis aims to assess the correlation between ctDNA and the prognosis of EC patients. METHODS: We systematically explored Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database to identify studies reporting on the prognostic value of ctDNA in EC patients before November 2023. The primary outcome involved the determine of associations between ctDNA with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well asprogression-free survival (PFS) among EC patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed a detailed subgroup analysis in the setting of EC, including parameters such as detection time, histological subtypes, treatment modalities, regions, anatomic locations, and detection methods. Publication bias was assessed utilizing Begg's test, Egger's test, and funnel plots. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by systematically excluding individual studies to evaluate the stability of the results. RESULTS: A total of 1203 studies were initially screened, from which 13 studies underwent further analysis, encompassing 604 patients diagnosed with EC. The comprehensive pooled analysis indicated a significant association between the detection of ctDNA and poor OS (HR: 3.65; 95% CI: 1.97-6.75, P<0.001), DFS/RFS (HR: 6.08; 95% CI: 1.21-30.50, P<0.001), and PFS (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.94-4.16, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that ctDNA remained a consistent negative predictor of OS when stratified by different detection time, histological subtypes, regions, anatomic locations, and detection methods. Furthermore, subgroup analysis stratified by regions and study types demonstrated an association between ctDNA detection and poor PFS in EC patients. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate plasma ctDNA may serve as robust prognostic markers for OS, DFS/RFS, and PFS among EC patients. This finding suggests that plasma ctDNA could offer a highly effective approach for risk stratification and personalized medicine.

Impact of Skeletal Muscle Loss and Sarcopenia on Outcomes of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer during Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

BACKGROUND: The impact of changes in skeletal muscle and sarcopenia on outcomes during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) for patients with esophageal cancer remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer who received NACR followed by esophagectomy between June 2013 and December 2021. The images at third lumbar vertebra were analyzed to measure the cross-sectional area and calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI) before and after NACR. SMI less than 52.4 cm2/m2 for men and less than 38.5 cm2/m2 for women were defined as sarcopenia. The nonlinearity of the effect of percent changes in SMI (ΔSMI%) to survival outcomes was assessed by restricted cubic splines. RESULTS: Overall, data of 367 patients were analyzed. The survival outcomes between sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups had no significant differences before NACR. However, patients in post-NACR sarcopenia group showed poor overall survival (OS) benefit (P = 0.016) and poor disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.043). Severe postoperative complication rates were 11.9% in post-NACR sarcopenia group and 5.0% in post-NACR non-sarcopenia group (P = 0.019). There was a significant non-linear relationship between ΔSMI% and survival outcomes (P < 0.05 for non-linear). On the multivariable analysis of OS, ΔSMI% > 12% was the independent prognostic factor (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.03-2.99, P = 0.039) and significant difference was also found on DFS analysis (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy sarcopenia have worse survival and adverse short-term outcomes. Moreover, greater loss in SMI is associated with increased risks of death and disease progression during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with maximum impact noted with SMI loss greater than 12%.

A novel tumor staging system incorporating cN status for stratifying early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after trimodal therapy.

BACKGROUNDS: The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of cN status for early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and construct a new staging model for individual survival prediction. METHODS: Patients with ESCC who underwent nCRT and esophagectomy were included in this study. Both the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were meticulously ascertained to assess the cogency of each oncological staging system. A discernible abatement in the values of AIC and BIC signifies a model endowed with enhanced predictive prowess and exemplary veracity. RESULTS: A new staging model was established based on ypTNM stage and cN status by precisely stratifying ypI ESCC patients. The novel ypTNM-cN staging demonstrated superior overall survival trend alignment over the AJCC 8th ypTNM staging, with a notably lower AIC of 3143.014 versus 3149.950. This superiority was supported by a BIC of 3146.605 against 3153.541. In the context of disease-free survival outcomes, the emergent ypTNM-cN staging, with an AIC value registering at 3196.057 and a BIC value at 3199.648, distinctively eclipsed the AJCC 8th ypTNM staging, which documented values of 3203.853 and 3207.444, respectively. CONCLUSION: We constructed a new staging system based on ypTNM stage and cN status to precisely stratify the patients with ypI stage. Our new ypTNM-cN staging system provides new insights for classifying stage ypI ESCC and shows reliable classification efficacy for all ESCC patients after nCRT and surgery.

Self-Assembled Acid-Responsive Nanosystem for Synergistic Anti-Angiogenic/Photothermal/Ferroptosis Therapy against Esophageal Cancer.

Esophageal cancer (EC) treatment via anti-angiogenic therapy faces challenges due to non-cytotoxicity and non-specific biodistribution of the anti-angiogenic agents. Hence, the quest for a synergistic treatment modality and a targeted delivery approach to effectively address EC has become imperative. In this study, an acid-responsive release nanosystem (Bev-IR820@FeIII TA) that involves the conjugation of bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibody, with TA and Fe3+ to form a metal-phenolic network, followed by loading with the near-infrared photothermal agent (IR820) to achieve combinational therapy, is designed. The construction of Bev-IR820@FeIII TA can be realized through a facile self-assembly process. The Bev-IR820@FeIII TA exhibits tumor-targeting capabilities and synergistic therapeutic effects, encompassing anti-angiogenic therapy, photothermal therapy (PTT), and ferroptosis therapy (FT). Bev-IR820@FeIII TA exhibits remarkable proficiency in delivering drugs to EC tissue through its pH-responsive release properties. Consequently, bevacizumab exerts its therapeutic effects by obstructing tumor angiogenesis, thereby impeding tumor growth. Meanwhile, PTT facilitates localized thermal ablation at the tumor site, directly eradicating EC cells. FT synergistically collaborates with PTT, giving rise to the formation of a reactive oxygen species (ROS) storm, subsequently culminating in the demise of EC cells. In summary, this amalgamated treatment modality carries substantial promise for synergistically impeding EC progression and showcases auspicious prospects for future EC treatment.

DASES: a database of alternative splicing for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Esophageal carcinoma ranks as the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) being particularly prevalent among Asian populations. Alternative splicing (AS) plays a pivotal role in ESCC development and progression by generating diverse transcript isoforms. However, the current landscape lacks a specialized database focusing on alternative splicing events (ASEs) derived from a large number of ESCC cases. Additionally, most existing AS databases overlook the contribution of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in ESCC molecular mechanisms, predominantly focusing on mRNA-based ASE identification. To address these limitations, we deployed DASES (http://www.hxdsjzx.cn/DASES). Employing a combination of publicly available and in-house ESCC RNA-seq datasets, our extensive analysis of 346 samples, with 93% being paired tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues, led to the identification of 257 novel lncRNAs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Leveraging a paired comparison of tumor and adjacent normal tissues, DASES identified 59,094 ASEs that may be associated with ESCC. DASES fills a critical gap by providing comprehensive insights into ASEs in ESCC, encompassing lncRNAs and mRNA, thus facilitating a deeper understanding of ESCC molecular mechanisms and serving as a valuable resource for ESCC research communities.

Causal relationship between lung diseases and risk of esophageal cancer: insights from Mendelian randomization.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of cohort studies have indicated a correlation between lung diseases and esophageal cancer, but the exact causal relationship has not been definitively established. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the causal relationship between lung diseases and esophageal cancer. METHODS: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to lung diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), along with outcomes data on esophageal cancer, were extracted from public genome-wide association studies (GWAS). A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was then performed using publicly available GWAS data to investigate the potential causal relationship. The effect estimates were primarily calculated using the fixed-effects inverse-variance-weighted method. RESULTS: Totally, 81 SNPs related to asthma among 218,792 participants in GWAS. Based on the primary causal effects model using MR analyses with the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, asthma was demonstrated a significantly related to the risk of esophageal cancer (OR 1.0006; 95% CI 1.0003-1.0010, p = 0.001), while COPD (OR 1.0306; 95% CI 0.9504-1.1176, p = 0.466), lung cancer (OR 1.0003, 95% CI 0.9998-1.0008, p = 0.305), as well as IPF (OR 0.9999, 95% CI 0.9998-1.0000, p = 0.147), showed no significant correlation with esophageal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The two-sample MR analysis conducted in this study revealed a positive causal relationship between asthma and esophageal cancer. In contrast, esophageal cancer demonstrated no significant correlation with COPD, lung cancer, or IPF. Further large-sample prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and to provide appropriate recommendations regarding esophageal cancer screening among patients with asthma.

Unraveling the Complexity of Regulated Cell Death in Esophageal Cancer: from Underlying Mechanisms to Targeted Therapeutics.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth most common and the seventh most deadly malignancy of the digestive tract, representing a major global health challenge. Despite the availability of multimodal therapeutic strategies, the existing EC treatments continue to yield unsatisfactory results due to their limited efficacy and severe side effects. Recently, knowledge of the subroutines and molecular mechanisms of regulated cell death (RCD) has progressed rapidly, enhancing the understanding of key pathways related to the occurrence, progression, and treatment of many types of tumors, including EC. In this context, the use of small-molecule compounds to target such RCD subroutines has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with EC. Thus, in this review, we firstly discussed the risk factors and prevention of EC. We then outlined the established treatment regimens for patients with EC. Furthermore, we not only briefly summarized the mechanisms of five best studied subroutines of RCD related to EC, including apoptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, necroptosis and autophagy, but also outlined the recent advances in the development of small-molecule compounds and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) targeting the abovementioned RCD subroutines, which may serve as a new therapeutic strategy for patients with EC in the future.

MTHFD1L confers a poor prognosis and malignant phenotype in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by activating the ERK5 signaling pathway.

MTHFD1L, a key enzyme of folate metabolism, is seldom reported in cancer. In this study, we investigate the role of MTHFD1L in the tumorigenicity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). ESCC tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 177 samples from 109 patients were utilized to evaluate whether MTHFD1L expression, determined using immunohistochemical analysis, is a prognostic indicator for ESCC patients. The function of MTHFD1L in the migration and invasion of ESCC cells was studied with wound healing, Transwell, and three-dimensional spheroid invasion assays in vitro and a lung metastasis mouse model in vivo. The mRNA microarrays and Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) were used to explore the downstream of MTHFD1L. Elevated expression of MTHFD1L in ESCC tissues was significantly associated with poor differentiation and prognosis. These phenotypic assays revealed that MTHFD1L significantly promote the viability and metastasis of ESCC cell in vivo and in vitro. Further detailed analyses of the molecular mechanism demonstrated that the ESCC progression driven by MTHFD1L was through up-regulation ERK5 signaling pathways. These findings reveal that MTHFD1L is positively associated with the aggressive phenotype of ESCC by activating ERK5 signaling pathways, suggesting that MTHFD1L is a new biomarker and a potential molecular therapeutic target for ESCC.

The prognostic value of sarcopenia in oesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The loss of skeletal muscle mass and function is defined as sarcopenia, which might develop in elderly patients with cancers. It has been indicated as a potential negative factor in the survival of patients with malignant tumours. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the associations between sarcopenia and survival outcomes or postoperative complications in patients with oesophageal cancer (EC). Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until 10 May 2022, using keywords: sarcopenia, oesophageal cancer, and prognosis. Studies investigating the prognostic value of sarcopenia on EC survival were included. Forest plots and summary effect models were used to show the result of this meta-analysis. The quality of included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A total of 1436 studies were identified from the initial search of four databases, and 41 studies were included for the final quantitative analysis. This meta-analysis revealed a significant association between sarcopenia and overall survival (OS) [hazard ratios (HR):1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.54-1.83, P = 0.004, I2  = 41.7%] or disease-free survival (DFS) 1.97 (HR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.44-2.69, P = 0.007, I2  = 61.9%) of EC patients. Subgroup analysis showed that sarcopenia remained a consistent negative predictor of survival when stratified by different treatment methods, populations, or sarcopenia measurements. Sarcopenia was also a risk factor for postoperative complications with a pooled odds ratio of 1.47 (95% CI: 1.21-1.77, P = 0.094, I2  = 32.7%). The NOS scores of all included studies were ≥6, and the quality of the evidence was relatively high. The results from the study suggested that sarcopenia was significantly associated with both survival outcomes and postoperative complications in EC patients. Sarcopenia should be appropriately diagnosed and treated for improving short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with EC.

The Prognostic Value of Nodal Skip Metastasis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Nodal skip metastasis (NSM), a common form of lymphatic spread in EC, can be defined as the metastatic involvement of distant lymph nodes (LNs) without prior involvement of adjacent LNs. The results of the previous studies investigating the association between NSM and survival outcomes in patients with EC were inconsistent and even contradictory. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the prognostic value of NSM and to summarize the NSM definitions of EC in previous studies. METHODS: Four databases were used in this meta-analysis. The association between NSM and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by using pooled HRs and their 95% confidence interval (CI). The sensitivity analysis and funnel plot were used to assess the publication bias. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results of meta-analysis indicated that there was no significant association between NSM and OS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75-1.31; P = 0.951). Meanwhile, according to the results of sub-group analysis on the basis of histological feature, method of lymphadenectomy, node staging system, and NSM definitions, no significant association was found between NSM and OS. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of available evidences, NSM could not be used as a prognostic factor for patients with EC. For future studies investigating the prognostic value of NSM, only three-field lymphadenectomy with adequate harvested LNs can be performed. NSM definitions based on lymph node station and anatomical compartment could both be feasible classification for EC.

Lymphovascular and Perineural Invasion After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion are unfavorable prognostic factors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the prevalence and prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in these patients remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed specimens of 321 patients with pathologically diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in our institution from 2017 to 2020. Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were assessed by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Survival was analyzed using the log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were present in 12.5% (n = 40) and 17.8% (n = 57) of resection specimens, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were significantly more common in patients with advanced cancer (both P < .05). In the univariate analyses, lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were associated with shorter overall survival and disease-free survival. Multivariable analysis revealed that lymphovascular invasion after neoadjuvant therapy was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival and disease-free survival. Subgroup analyses showed that lymphovascular invasion could identify cases with worse overall survival or disease-free survival among node-negative patients, indicating the role of lymphovascular invasion in the precise staging of pN0 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion were significantly negatively correlated with overall survival and disease-free survival. Lymphovascular invasion was an independent prognostic predictor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion should be considered in the histopathology workup for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

The impact of geriatric nutritional risk index on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy.

Background: The Geriatric Nutritional Index (GNRI) has been indicated as a nutritional index which is highly associated with complications and mortality in older hospitalized patients. Moreover, early studies had suggested that GNRI is a potential prognostic indicator for some malignances. However, the prognostic value of GNRI in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy remains elusive. Materials and methods: This retrospective study incorporated 373 patients with ESCC who had underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between April 2011 and September 2021. The GNRI formula was: 1.489 × albumin (g/dl) + 41.7 × current weight/ideal weight. Patients were classified as GNRI-low (GNRI < 98.7) or GNRI high (GNRI ≥ 98.7). The association between GNRI and clinical survival status were assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression analysis. Results: Three hundred and seventy three patients were retrospectively included in this study. 80 (21.5%) and 293 (78.5%) patients had been divided into the GNRI-low and GNRI-high groups respectively. Pathological T stage and the rate of nodal metastasis were significantly higher in the GNRI low group than in the GNRI high group (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively) among the examined demographic parameters. Furthermore, GNRI was significantly correlated with postoperative complications, patients with lower GNRI had a higher postoperative complication rate as compared with GNRI high group [Odds ratio: 2.023; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.208-3.389; P = 0.007]. Univariate analysis of 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) found that the rate of survival was considerably lower in the GNRI-low group than in the GNRI-high group (P < 0.001). However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that GNRI was not an independent risk factor. Conclusion: In patients with ESCC, low GNRI exhibited a poor nutritional indicator and related to postoperative complications after neoadjuvant therapy. Intensive follow-up after surgery should be performed for ESCC patients with low GNRI.

Prognostic value of micro-RNA 375, 133, 143, 145 in esophageal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Many studies have confirmed that micro-RNA (mir) is related to the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma (EC), suggesting the mir could be used to guide the therapeutic strategy of EC. Some of mir molecules are considered as favorable prognostic factors for EC. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the prognostic potential of mir-375, 133, 143, 145 in primary EC, we summarized all the results from available studies, aiming delineating the prognostic role of mir in EC. Relevant studies were identified by searching databases including Medline, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library. The studies which explored the prognostic value of mir-375, 133, 143, 145 expressions on survival outcomes in patients with EC were included in this study. The hazard ratios (HR) and their responding 95% confidence interval (CI) were also extracted. A total of 25 studies were collected, including 1260 patients, and the prognostic values of four mirs in EC were analyzed. Survival outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were used as the primary endpoint to evaluate the prognostic value of mir. The pooled analysis results showed that up-regulation of mir-375 indicated favorable OS (HR=0.50; 95%CI: 0.37-0.69; P<0.001). In addition, the up-regulation of mir-133 (HR=0.40, 95%CI: 0.24-0.65, P<0.001), 143 (HR=0.40, 95%CI: 0.21-0.76, P < 0.001) and 145 (HR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.34-0.90, P<0.001) are also proved as protected factors in EC. Therefore, our study demonstrated that these mirs may have the potential to be used as prognostic biomarkers for EC in clinical practice.

Immunotherapy resistance in esophageal cancer: Possible mechanisms and clinical implications.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common malignant gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in adults. Although surgical technology combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has advanced rapidly, patients with EC are often diagnosed at an advanced stage and the five-year survival rate remains unsatisfactory. The poor prognosis and high mortality in patients with EC indicate that effective and validated therapy is of great necessity. Recently, immunotherapy has been successfully used in the clinic as a novel therapy for treating solid tumors, bringing new hope to cancer patients. Several immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and tumor vaccines, have achieved significant breakthroughs in EC treatment. However, the overall response rate (ORR) of immunotherapy in patients with EC is lower than 30%, and most patients initially treated with immunotherapy are likely to develop acquired resistance (AR) over time. Immunosuppression greatly weakens the durability and efficiency of immunotherapy. Because of the heterogeneity within the immune microenvironment and the highly disparate oncological characteristics in different EC individuals, the exact mechanism of immunotherapy resistance in EC remains elusive. In this review, we provide an overview of immunotherapy resistance in EC, mainly focusing on current immunotherapies and potential molecular mechanisms underlying immunosuppression and drug resistance in immunotherapy. Additionally, we discuss prospective biomarkers and novel methods for enhancing the effect of immunotherapy to provide a clear insight into EC immunotherapy.

Overcoming resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in esophageal cancer.

As the predominant treatment option of the immunotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer (EC), the application of programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors brings new hope to clinical practice. However, a considerable portion of patients do not response to this therapy, meanwhile most patients sensitive to PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody initially will develop resistance to the treatment eventually. To break through the limits of clinical effect, it is of critical importance to make a profound understanding of the mechanisms of so called primary resistance and acquired resistance. Subsequently, exploring potent predictors to identify suitable patients for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment and investigating efficient strategies to overcome drug resistance will be helpful to expend the benefit of immunotherapy. In the present view, we summarized the potential predictive factors for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in EC, and demonstrated the plausible mechanisms of resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as well as its feasible solutions.

Trimodal Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Role of Adjuvant Therapy Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the role of adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed 447 ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. Patients were divided into an adjuvant therapy group and no adjuvant therapy group. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the confounding factors. Results: 447 patients with clinical positive lymph nodes and no distant metastasis treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy were eligible for analysis. After propensity score matching, there were 120 patients remaining in each group. Patients receiving adjuvant therapy had a significantly shorter post-resection overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) when compared to patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (log-rank, OS: p = 0.046, DFS: p < 0.001). Receiving adjuvant therapy is not an independently prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR): 1.270, HR: 0.846−1.906, p = 0.249) but a significantly unfavorable independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR: 2.061, HR: 1.436−2.958, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results of our study indicate that adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery could reduce the OS and DFS in patients with ESCC. Therefore, adjuvant therapy is not recommended for ESCC patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy, especially patients without nodal metastases after neoadjuvant therapy.