Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using the Unitary Manifold Device.

OBJECTIVE: To present a single-center prospective study of 126 consecutively treated patients who underwent endovascular repair of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with the physician-modified, nonanatomic-based Unitary Manifold (UM) device. METHODS: Data were collected from 126 consecutive all-comer patients treated with the physician-modified, nonanatomic-based UM from 2015 to 2023. Treatment was performed at a single center by a single physician under a Physician Sponsored Investigation Exemption G140207. RESULTS: The UM was indicated for repair of all Crawford extents including juxtarenal, pararenal, and short-neck infrarenal aneurysms (<10 mm) in 126 consecutive patients. Patients were not excluded from the study based on presentation, extent of aneurysm or dissection, or history of a spinal cord event. Patients with a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm were categorized by Crawford classification: types I and V (3.3%, n = 4), type II (3.3%, n = 4), type III (1%, n = 1), and type IV (93.3%, n = 117). The type IV classification patients were further categorized with 33 (28.2%) true type IV, 68 (58.1%) pararenal or infrarenal, and 16 (13.7%) with dissection. Technical success was 99.2% (n = 125). The most common major adverse event within both 30 days and 365 days of all patients was respiratory failure (11.9%, n = 15, and 13.5%, n = 17, respectively). One patient (0.8%) experienced persistent paraplegia at 365 days. Reintervention for patients at 365 days was 5.6% (n = 7). Of the 444 branches stented, the primary patency rate was remarkably high as only three patients (2.4%) required reintervention due to loss of limb patency within 365 days. Aneurysm enlargement (≥5 mm) occurred in 1.6% (n = 2) patients, and no patients experienced aneurysm rupture. No patients underwent conversion to open repair. The aneurysm-related mortality at 365 days for all patients was 4.0% (n = 5), whereas all-cause mortality was 16.7% (n = 21). Physician-modified endograft device integrity failure was not observed in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The UM device demonstrated remarkable technical surgical success, treatment success, and device patency rates with very reasonable major adverse events and reintervention rates. This study is the most representative example of the general population in comparison with other studies of off-the-shelf devices, with 126 consecutive all-comer patients with diverse pathologies.

Single-Site Review of Spinal Cord Protection Protocols Including the Utilization of Spinal Drains versus Medical Management with Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) continues to be a devastating complication after repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The objective of this review is to present our single-center outcomes after the implementation of a standardized neuroprotective protocol following branched endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: A standardized neuroprotective protocol including preoperative steroids, acetazolamide, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative treatment goals was initiated in November 2019. Physician-modified branched endovascular repairs were completed at a single center from 2012 to 2021 with outcomes reviewed both before (n = 107) and after (n = 67) the implementation of the neuroprotective protocol. The primary end point was the incidence of any SCI event at 30 days. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and renal failure at 30 days. Patients with Crawford extents I-III, renal failure, or necessitating emergent repair were deemed high risk for SCI events and underwent a subset analysis. Survivability after SCI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier tables. RESULTS: Of the 174 consecutive patients treated, the 67 patients treated following implementation of the neuroprotective protocol were more likely to have experienced a prior myocardial infarction (26.9% vs. 14%; P = 0.0466) and have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (64.3% vs. 45.8%; P = 0.02). This group was more likely to be treated for paravisceral aneurysms (53.7% vs. 24.3%; P = 0.0002). Postprotocol implementation, spinal drain use was lower (6% vs. 38.3%; P = <0.0001) with 100% of these drains placed in urgent or unstaged thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs as a part of the protocol. Rates of any SCI event among all patients before and after implementation of the protocol were 9.3% (n = 10 of 107) and 6% (n = 4 of 67; P = 0.57), respectively. In comparison, the protocol significantly reduced SCI rates to 0 (0% vs. 17.1%; P = 0.0407) in high-risk patients. Frequency of renal failure was reduced (3% vs. 14%; P = 0.018) after initiation of the protocol. Patients in the postprotocol group had significantly improved 1-year mortality rate (9% vs. 27.1%; P = 0.0035) and renal failure rates (2% vs. 15%; P = 0.018). Regression models indicated that patients in the postprotocol group had lower likelihood of mortality and renal failure than patients in preprotocol group (P < 0.05) and that spinal drain reduced mortality (P < 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a standardized neuroprotective protocol that focuses on medical management and fluid dynamics may significantly reduce risk of SCI after branched endovascular repairs, with the most significant improvement of SCI outcomes involving those at greatest risk for developing SCI. Also noteworthy, there was significant improvement to 1-year survivability after the implementation of this neuroprotective protocol.

Fourth-Year Medical Students' Perceptions of Vascular Surgery: Can We Improve the Pipeline?

BACKGROUND: Since their inception, Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency (IVSR) programs have expanded widely and attracted highly competitive medical students by offering a more focused approach to learning both open surgical and endovascular techniques. However, despite substantial modifications to the training paradigm, a shortage of vascular surgeons is still projected through 2050. We aimed to gather and analyze fourth-year medical students' knowledge and perceptions of vascular surgery (VS) to further inform strategies for recruiting future vascular surgeons. METHODS: We sent anonymous electronic questionnaires to fourth-year medical students at 7 allopathic and 3 osteopathic medical schools, with questions detailing demographics, specialty preferences, and exposure to and perceptions of VS. Descriptive statistics were obtained, and responses were compared between students applying to surgical specialties (SS) and nonsurgical specialties (NSS). RESULTS: Two hundred eleven of 1,764 (12%) participants responded (56% female). 56% reported VS exposure, most commonly during the third year. 64 (30%) planned to apply to SS. 57% of respondents reported knowledge of the management of vascular disease, and 56% understood procedures performed by vascular surgeons. Ranking the importance of factors in choosing specialties, SS selected "experiences gained during medical school rotations" (P < 0.05), "types and/or variety of treatment modalities used in this field" (P < 0.001), and "interest in the pathology or disease processes treated" (P < 0.05) as highest priorities. NSS preferred "lifestyle (work-life balance) as an attending" (P < 0.001). Only 7% of all respondents believed vascular surgeons have a good work-life balance, with a larger percentage of SS (P < 0.001) agreeing. Stratified by gender, female students rated "limited ability of childbirth during residency and/or postponement of family plans" (P < 0.05), "gender-related concerns, such as discrimination at work or unfair career possibilities" (P < 0.001), and "fear of unfair competition" (P < 0.05) as potential negative aspects of VS careers. 55% of respondents believed the IVSR makes VS more appealing. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students perceive poor quality of life and work-life balance as deterring factors to a career in VS. Opportunities exist to educate students on the pathologies treated, procedures performed, and attainable quality of life available in our field. We should also continue to develop recruitment strategies to stimulate student interest and increase early exposure in VS.

Comparative outcomes of physician-modified fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the setting of prior failed endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms involving renal-mesenteric arteries, especially in the setting of prior failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) typically requires fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) with a custom-made device (CMD). CMDs are limited to select centers, and physician-modified endografts are an alternative treatment platform. Currently, there is no data on the outcomes of physician-modified F/BEVAR (PM-F/BEVAR) in the setting of failed prior EVAR. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of PM-F/BEVAR in patients with prior failed EVAR. METHODS: A prospective database of consecutive patients treated at a single center with PM-F/BEVAR between March 2021 and November 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. The cohort was stratified by presence of a failed EVAR (type Ia endoleak or aneurysm development proximal to a prior EVAR) prior to PM-F/BEVAR. Demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups using univariate analysis. One-year survival and freedom from reintervention were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients underwent PM-F/BEVAR during the study period; 27 (26%) were in the setting of prior EVAR. Patients with prior failed EVAR had similar age (75.2 ± 7.7 vs 71.5 ± 8.8 years; P = .058), male gender (n = 24 ; 89% vs n = 57 ; 75%; P = .130), and comorbid conditions except higher incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 7 ; 26% vs n = 7 ; 9%; P = .047). Overall, aneurysm diameter was 65.5 ± 13.9 mm with aneurysms categorized as juxta-/pararenal in 43% and thoracoabdominal in 57%, with no differences between the groups. Twelve patients (14%) presented with symptomatic/ruptured aneurysms. The average number of target arteries incorporated per patient was 3.8. Four different aortic devices were modified with a greater proportion of Terumo TREO devices used in the failed EVAR group (P = .03). There was no difference in procedure time, radiation dose, or iodinated contrast use between groups. Overall technical success was 99%. Rates of 30-day mortality (n = 0 ; 0% vs n = 3 ; 4%; P = .565) and major adverse events (n = 6 ; 22% vs n = 16 ; 21%; P = 1.0) were similar between groups. For the overall cohort, rates of type 1 or 3 endoleak, branch vessel stenosis/occlusion, and reintervention were 2%, 1%, and 8%, respectively, with no difference between groups. One-year survival (failed EVAR 94% vs no EVAR 82%; P = .756) was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: PM-F/BEVAR is a safe and effective treatment for patients with aneurysms involving the renal-mesenteric arteries in the setting of prior failed EVAR where additional technical challenges may be present. Additional follow-up is warranted to demonstrate long-term efficacy, but early results are encouraging and similar to those using CMDs.

Accidental central venous catheter cannulation into aberrant arterial anatomy requiring endovascular intervention.

Central venous catheter placement continues to be an extremely common procedure throughout hospital systems. Although ultrasound guidance can mitigate some placement risks, misplacement of lines into neighboring structures, such as arteries, remains an unfortunate complication. In this report, we will discuss an 83-year-old female with aberrant left subclavian artery and right sided arch, which provided for successful stent graft coverage of arterial injury secondary to accidental subclavian artery cannulation with a central venous catheter with preservation of the right common carotid artery and avoidance of a potentially morbid sternotomy.

Case Report of Hemosuccus Pancreaticus as a Result of Endovascular Coil Erosion.

BACKGROUND: Hemosuccus pancreaticus (HP) remains one of the rarest causes of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Due to its rarity, diagnostic and treatment strategies for this condition remain poorly defined. Endoscopy is commonly inconclusive as the hemorrhaging from the papilla of Vater is intermittent. CASE SUMMARY: We describe a 36-year-old female with a remote history of alcoholic pancreatitis who presented with a two year history of recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhages requiring frequent admission to the intensive care unit and frequent blood transfusion. She had undergone eight endoscopies in two years. Despite undergoing four endovascular procedures including coiling of the left gastric artery and microvascular plugging of the gastroduodenal and supraduodenal artery, her symptoms failed to resolve. She subsequently underwent surgical pancreatectomy which resulted in complete resolution of her bleeding. CONCLUSION: GI bleeds resulting from hemosuccus pancreaticus can often go undiagnosed following multiple negative workups. Diagnosis of HP is often through endoscopic imaging along with radiological evidence. Endovascular procedures are useful treatments in certain populations. Pancreatectomies are recommended after all other therapeutics fail to resolve the bleeding.

Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysmal Degeneration Following Aortic Dissections at a Single Surgical Center Using a Physician-Assembled Branched Endovascular Stent Graft.

BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal degeneration of aortic dissection portends significant morbidity and mortality consequences in the subacute and chronic phases of aortic dissection. This article describes the use of a multibranched stent graft system for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysmal degeneration of dissections with visceral segment involvement and reports upon the 30-day and 1-year outcomes for the first 18 patients treated with this design configuration. METHODS: The in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year morbidity and mortality outcomes of 18 consecutive patients treated with the physician-assembled visceral manifold or unitary manifold stent graft systems between 2013 and 2022 were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were treated for aneurysmal changes after aortic dissection. A total of 71 visceral vessels were successfully stented. There were no acute procedural failures. There were no episodes of paraplegia, reinterventions for type I or III endoleaks, patency-related events or mortalities reported in the first 30 days following treatment. One-year, all-cause mortality demonstrated 2/11 (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The aneurysmal degeneration of aortic dissection poses significant risks to patients with medically managed aortic dissections and those under surveillance. When these aneurysms develop in the thoracoabdominal region, treatment becomes even more challenging given the problem of visceral vessel patency, as these vessels can originate off the true or false lumens. The physician-designed endovascular stent graft system reported upon here has been successfully deployed in 18 patients with no acute procedural failures and promising clinical results. This treatment modality may offer utility to vascular surgeons whose patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysmal degeneration following aortic dissection have historically had limited endovascular repair prospects.