Analytical performance validation of aPROMISE platform for prostate tumor burden, index and dominant tumor assessment with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. A pilot study.

To validate the performance of automated Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (aPROMISE) in quantifying total prostate disease burden with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and to evaluate the interobserver and histopathologic concordance in the establishment of dominant and index tumor. Patients with a recent diagnosis of intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer underwent 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT for staging purpose. In positive-18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT scans, automated prostate tumor segmentation was performed using aPROMISE software and compared to an in-house semiautomatic-manual guided segmentation procedure. SUV and volume related variables were obtained with two softwares. A blinded evaluation of dominant tumor (DT) and index tumor (IT) location was assessed by both groups of observers. In histopathological analysis, Gleason, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) group, DT and IT location were obtained. We compared all the obtained variables by both software packages using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) for the concordance analysis. Fifty-four patients with a positive 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were evaluated. The ICC for the SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, tumor volume (TV) and total lesion activity (TLA) was: 1, 0.833, 0.615, 0.494 and 0.950, respectively (p < 0.001 in all cases). For DT and IT detection, a high agreement was observed between both softwares (k = 0.733; p < 0.001 and k = 0.812; p < 0.001, respectively) although the concordances with histopathology were moderate (p < 0001). The analytical validation of aPROMISE showed a good performance for the SUVmax, TLA, DT and IT definition in comparison to our in-house method, although the concordance was moderate with histopathology for DT and IT.

Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL versus 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer: a pilot study.

AIM: To assess the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with recent diagnosis of intermediate-/high-risk PCa without androgen deprivation therapy and previous 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT (negative for extraprostatic disease or with oligometastatic disease) were referred to 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Patients' disease characteristic as grade group, D'Amico risk category (intermediate/high), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) closest to PET/CTs and its kinetics were obtained. The overall detection rate (DR) and molecular imaging TNM (miTNM) stage according to the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE) criteria were assessed for both radiotracers, and their concordance (Kappa coefficient) was analyzed. The diagnostic and therapeutic impact of 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine was evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were analyzed (84.5% high-risk). 18F-Fluorocholine showed a higher DR than 18F-DCFPyL of prostate gland involvement (100% versus 93.1%) and pelvic node disease (37.9% versus 31%; k = 0.436, p = 0.001). On the other hand, 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT showed a higher DR of metastatic disease than 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT, 9/58 patients (15.5%): 3 M1a, 5 M1b and 1 M1c) versus 5/58 (8.6%) patients: 1 M1a and 4 M1b), k = 0.426; p = 0.001. No significant association was found between clinical characteristics (grade group, risk category, PSA level and kinetic) and 18F-Fluorocholine or 18F-DCFPyL results. The results of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT modified the previously planned treatment compared to 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT in 13 patients (22.4%). CONCLUSIONS: 18F-Fluorocholine and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a similar DR of prostate gland and lymph node involvement, although with moderate concordance for the latter. 18F-DCFPyL was superior to 18F-Fluorocholine in detecting regional and distant metastasis with a therapeutic impact in one of every five patients.

Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]F-choline and Imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, Using [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT, in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyse diagnostic and therapeutic impact of molecular imaging TNM (miTNM) stage obtained with [18F]DCFPyL versus [18F]F-choline in head-to-head comparison in biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with BCR of PCa after radical treatment with previous [18F]F-choline-PET/CT (negative or oligometastatic disease) were recruited to [18F]DCFPyL-PET/CT. Patients were classified according to: grade group, European Association of Urology classification, PSA, PSA doubling time (PSAdt) and PSA velocity (PSAvel). The overall detection rate (DR) and miTNM stage according to PROMISE criteria were assessed for both radiotracers and also correlated (Kappa). The influence of PSA and kinetics on both PET/CT (DR and miTNM) and predictive value of unfavourable kinetics on miTNM were determined. Cut-off PSA, PSAdt and PSAvel values able to predict PET/CT results were determined. Change in miTNM and treatment derived from [18F]DCFPyL information compared with [18F]F-choline were also evaluated. RESULTS: We studied 138 patients. [18F]DCFPyL showed a higher DR than [18F]F-choline (64.5% versus 33.3%) with a fair agreement. [18F]DCFPyL and [18F]F-choline detected T in 33.3% versus 19.6%, N in 27.5% versus 13.8%, and M in 30.4% versus 8.7%. Both tracers' DR showed significant associations with PSA and PSAvel. Significant association was only found between miTNM and PSA on [18F]F-choline-PET/CT (p = 0.033). For [18F]F-choline and [18F]DCFPyL-PET/CT, a PSAdt cut-off of 4.09 and 5.59 months, respectively, were able to predict M stage. [18F]DCFPyL changed therapeutic management in 40/138 patients. CONCLUSIONS: [18F]DCFPyL provides a higher DR and superior miTNM staging than [18F]F-choline in restaging BCR, especially with high PSA and unfavourable PSA kinetics, showing a fair agreement to [18F]F-choline.