Pediatric oral fluorescein angiography: a retrospective review from a single institution.

PURPOSE: To describe our experience with locally developed evidence-based guidelines for oral fluorescein angiography (FA) for retinal imaging in children. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital Eye Center who underwent oral FA between November 1, 2018, and April 1, 2022, were reviewed retrospectively. Adherence to or deviation from the guidelines was noted at the time of testing. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients aged 3-18 with 79 examinations were included. No patient was excluded from the retrospective case review because of lack of recorded data. The main indications for oral FA included uveitis, retinal vasculopathy, disk pathology, and retinal lesions. Three children had transient side effects, and 1 had delayed urticaria 4 hours after examination. No child had anaphylaxis. One patient had suboptimal imaging due to nonadherence to the guidelines-recommended fasting protocol. All other examinations (78/79), where guidelines were followed, provided images adequate for clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, we recommend that oral FA be considered, especially in children where intravenous access is less well tolerated while awake. Informed consent that includes the possibility of delayed side effects is advisable.

Developing a pediatric ophthalmology telemedicine program in the COVID-19 crisis.

PURPOSE: To describe our methodology for implementing synchronous telemedicine during the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective review of outpatient records at a single children's hospital from March 21 to April 10, 2020, was carried out to determine the outcome of already-scheduled face-to-face outpatient appointments. The week leading up to the March 21, all appointments in the study period were categorized as follows: (1) requiring an in-person visit, (2) face-to-face visit that could be postponed, and (3) consultation required but could be virtual. Teams of administrators, schedulers, and ophthalmic technicians used defined scripts and standardized emails to communicate results of categorization to patients. Flowcharts were devised to schedule and implement telemedicine visits. Informational videos were made accessible on social media to prepare patients for the telemedicine experience. Simultaneously our children's hospital launched a pediatric on-demand e-consult service, the data analytics of which could be used to determine how many visits were eye related. RESULTS: A total of 237 virtual ophthalmology consult visits were offered during the study period: 212 were scheduled, and 206 were completed, of which 43 were with new patients and 163 with returning patients. Following the initial virtual visit, another was required on average in 4 weeks by 21 patients; in-person follow-up was required for 170 patients on average 4.6 months after the initial virtual visit. None needed review within 72 hours. The pediatric on-demand service completed 290 visits, of which 25 had eye complaints. CONCLUSIONS: With proper materials, technology, and staffing, a telemedicine strategy based on three patient categories can be rapidly implemented to provide continued patient care during pandemic conditions. In our study cohort, the scheduled clinic e-visits had a low no-show rate (3%), and 8% of the on-demand virtual access for pediatric care was eye related.