Transitions between care settings in dementia: are they relevant in economic terms?

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to assess the economic effect of interventions affecting transitions between dementia care settings in Germany. METHODS: A Markov-model that models the course of dementia with respect to typical care setting transitions was derived. Model data and parameters were retrieved by literature reviews. A deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: In the base case, the expected present value of remaining lifetime costs is €25,326 for each cohort member. As a function of effectiveness, pharmaceutical interventions may reduce the costs by 2% to 13% and psychosocial interventions come with savings of 1% to 10%. A structural intervention-promoting group living as a substitute for nursing home care increases costs by 2% to 8%. Sensitivity analyses indicate high variance and variability of results, as well as valuation of informal care being a crucial parameter. CONCLUSIONS: There are economic benefits of delayed transitions to institutional settings, especially from the viewpoint of statutory care insurances, but these do unlikely exceed intervention costs. Thus, further intervention effects should be considered. Ultimately, concentrating research on preventive and protective factors of dementia could lead to an efficient intervention from every perspective.

Life- and person-centred help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany (DelpHi): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The provision of appropriate medical and nursing care for people with dementia is a major challenge for the healthcare system in Germany. New models of healthcare provision need to be developed, tested and implemented on the population level. Trials in which collaborative care for dementia in the primary care setting were studied have demonstrated its effectiveness. These studies have been conducted in different healthcare systems, however, so it is unclear whether these results extend to the specific context of the German healthcare system.The objective of this population-based intervention trial in the primary care setting is to test the efficacy and efficiency of implementing a subsidiary support system on a population level for persons with dementia who live at home. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: The study was designed to assemble a general physician-based epidemiological cohort of people above the age of 70 who live at home (DelpHi cohort). These people are screened for eligibility to participate in a trial of dementia care management (DelpHi trial). The trial is a cluster-randomised, controlled intervention trial with two arms (intervention and control) designed to test the efficacy and efficiency of implementing a subsidiary support system for persons with dementia who live at home. This subsidiary support system is initiated and coordinated by a dementia care manager: a nurse with dementia-specific qualifications who delivers the intervention according to a systematic, detailed protocol. The primary outcome is quality of life and healthcare for patients with dementia and their caregivers. This is a multidimensional outcome with a focus on four dimensions: (1) quality of life, (2) caregiver burden, (3) behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and (4) pharmacotherapy with an antidementia drug and prevention or suspension of potentially inappropriate medication. Secondary outcomes include the assessment of dementia syndromes, activities of daily living, social support health status, utilisation of health care resources and medication. DISCUSSION: The results will provide evidence for specific needs in ambulatory care for persons with dementia and will show effective ways to meet those needs. Qualification requirements will be evaluated, and the results will help to modify existing guidelines and treatment paths. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01401582.