Hydrazinonaphthalene and azonaphthalene thrombopoietin mimics are nonpeptidyl promoters of megakaryocytopoiesis.

High-throughput screening for the induction of a luciferase reporter gene in a thrombopoietin (TPO)-responsive cell line resulted in the identification of 4-diazo-3-hydroxy-1-naphthalenesulfonic acids as TPO mimics. Modification of the core structure and adjustment of unwanted functionality resulted in the development of (5-oxo-1,5-dihydropyrazol-4-ylidene)hydrazines which exhibited efficacies equivalent to those of TPO in several cell-based assays designed to measure thrombopoietic activity. Furthermore, these compounds elicited biochemical responses in TPO-receptor-expressing cells similar to those in TPO itself, including kinase activation and protein phosphorylation. Potencies for the best compounds were high for such low molecular weight compounds (MW < 500) with EC(50) values in the region of 1-20 nM.

A small, nonpeptidyl mimic of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [see commetns].

A nonpeptidyl small molecule SB 247464, capable of activating granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) signal transduction pathways, was identified in a high-throughput assay in cultured cells. Like G-CSF, SB 247464 induced tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple signaling proteins and stimulated primary murine bone marrow cells to form granulocytic colonies in vitro. It also elevated peripheral blood neutrophil counts in mice. The extracellular domain of the murine G-CSF receptor was required for the activity of SB 247464, suggesting that the compound acts by oligomerizing receptor chains. The results indicate that a small molecule can activate a receptor that normally binds a relatively large protein ligand.

Plasma- and cerebrospinal fluid-immunoreactive endothelin-1: effects of nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonists with diverse affinity profiles for endothelin-A and endothelin-B receptors.

Some endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists have been reported to elevate plasma immunoreactive endothelin-1 (irET-1). However, there is no information regarding the effects of ET receptor antagonists on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels. To better understand the regulation of circulating and CSF ET-1, the effects of several nonpeptide antagonists with high, intermediate, or low affinity at the ETB receptor, as well as the potent ETB selective agonist sarafotoxin 6c (S6c), were characterized and compared. The effects of SB209670 (Ki ETA = 0.2 nM; Ki ETB = 12 nM), SB217242 (Ki ETA = 1.1 nM; Ki ETB = 111 nM), SB234551 (Ki ETA = 0.1 nM; Ki ETB = 500 nM), SB247083 (Ki ETA = 0.4 nM; Ki ETB = 467 nM), and S6c (Ki ETA = 950 nM; Ki ETB = 1 nM) on plasma irET-1 were determined by ELISA in the anesthetized dog after i.v. administration. Systemic administration of equivalent doses of the nonpeptide ET receptor antagonists produced dose-related elevations in plasma irET-1 which were correlated (p = 0.019) with affinity at the ETB receptor. There was no significant correlation with affinity at the ETA receptor. In addition, the plasma irET-1 and ET antagonist concentrations were linearly correlated (r = 0.98) throughout the time course after antagonist administration. There was no evidence of densensitization after three bolus administrations performed at 2-h intervals (SB209670, 1 and 3 mg/kg i.v.). Elevations in plasma irET-1 (four- to fivefold) were also observed after systemic administration of S6c (1 nmol/kg i.v.). The administration of L-NAME (200 micrograms/kg/min for 30 min), an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, increased blood pressure (33%) but did not alter plasma irET-1. In contrast, systemic administration of the ET receptor antagonists had little or no effect on the on irET-1 in the CSF. However, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of SB209670 produced a dose-related (3-100 micrograms) increase in cisternal CSF levels of irET-1 without altering plasma irET-1. Systemic administration of ETB receptor antagonists and agonists rapidly increased plasma irET-1. These ETB receptor antagonist effects correlate linearly with affinity at the cloned human ETB receptor, do not exhibit desensitization, and do not appear to reflect inhibition of ETB-mediated NO production. The endothelial ETB receptor may represent a high-capacity storage/clearance site for circulating ET-1. ET receptor antagonists may also act extravascularly/abluminally to increase irET-1 in the CNS.

Pharmacologic characterization of the novel, orally available endothelin-A--selective antagonist SB 247083.

Competition radioligand binding with [125I]ET-1 at human cloned ETA and ETB receptors demonstrated ET-A selective affinity by SB 247083 (Ki 0.41 and 467 nM, respectively). Accordingly, similar competitive, functional ETA receptor antagonism was observed. In vitro, SB 247083 exhibited a Kb of 3.5 +/- 0.3 nM (ET-1--induced rat aortic contraction). SB 247083 was significantly less potent as a functional ETB antagonist (Kb 0.34 +/- 0.01 microM; S6c-induced rabbit pulmonary artery contraction). In contrast to ETB-selective and mixed ETA/B antagonists, and consistent with its ETA-selective profile, in vivo administration of SB 247083 was not associated with an elevation in plasma ET-1 levels. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies revealed that SB 247083 was effectively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. A single bolus dose inhibited the hemodynamic actions of ET-1 for up to 8 h, consistent with a molecule shown to be 46% bioavailable. Therefore, the present study demonstrates that SB 247083, a unique chemical entity, represents a potent class of nonpeptide, orally active ETA-selective antagonists.

Structure-activity studies of rapamycin analogs: evidence that the C-7 methoxy group is part of the effector domain and positioned at the FKBP12-FRAP interface.

BACKGROUND: Rapamycin is an immunosuppressant natural product, which blocks T-cell mitogenesis and yeast proliferation. In the cytoplasm, rapamycin binds to the immunophilin FKBP12 and the complex of these two molecules binds to a recently discovered protein, FRAP. The rapamycin molecule has two functional domains, defined by their interaction with FKBP12 (binding domain) or with FRAP (effector domain). We previously showed that the allylic methoxy group at C-7 of rapamycin could be replaced by a variety of different substituents. We set out to examine the effects of such substitutions on FKBP12 binding and on biological activity. RESULTS: Rapamycin C-7-modified analogs of both R and S configurations were shown to have high affinities for FKBP12, yet these congeners displayed a wide range of potencies in splenocyte and yeast proliferation assays. The X-ray crystal structures of four rapamycin analogs in complexes with FKBP12 were determined and revealed that protein and ligand backbone conformations were essentially the same as those observed for the parent rapamycin-FKBP12 complex and that the C-7 group remained exposed to solvent. We then prepared a rapamycin analog with a photoreactive functionality as part of the C-7 substituent. This compound specifically labeled, in an FKBP12-dependent manner, a protein of approximately 250 kDa, which comigrates with recombinant FRAP. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the C-7 methoxy group of rapamycin is part of the effector domain. In the ternary complex, this group is situated in close proximity to FRAP, at the interface between FRAP and FKBP12.