Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 128(4): 739-45, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27607859

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of timing of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection on medical abortion outcome and risk of repeat pregnancy within the subsequent 6 months. METHODS: In a multinational randomized trial, we assigned women undergoing medical abortion who wanted depot medroxyprogesterone acetate to administration either with mifepristone (Quickstart group) or after the abortion (Afterstart group). We ascertained abortion outcome, pregnancies, and contraception use over 7 months. RESULTS: From August 2013 to March 2015, we enrolled 461 participants with pregnancy durations of 75 days or less. Of participants included in the abortion outcome analyses, 14 of 220 (6.4%) and 12 of 226 (5.3%) in the Quickstart and Afterstart groups, respectively, had surgery to complete the abortion; the upper 90% confidence limit on this difference was 4.9%, within our prestipulated 5% noninferiority margin. Ongoing pregnancy after initial abortion treatment was significantly more common in the Quickstart group (8/220 [3.6%]) than in the Afterstart group (2/226 [0.9%]); the difference was 2.7% (90% confidence interval 0.4-5.6%). By 6 months, 5 of 213 (2.3%) and 7 of 217 (3.2%) in the Quickstart and Afterstart groups, respectively, became pregnant (exact log-rank test, P=.64). Use of highly effective contraceptives was significantly more common in the Quickstart group at 31 days (P<.001), but no difference was apparent at 6 months. The Quickstart group was significantly more satisfied with group assignment. CONCLUSION: Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate administration with mifepristone did not appreciably increase the risk of surgery after medical abortion but did increase the risk of ongoing pregnancy. It enhanced patient satisfaction, but we found no evidence that it decreased 6-month risk of repeat pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01902485.


Assuntos
Abortivos Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Aborto Induzido , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/administração & dosagem , Acetato de Medroxiprogesterona/administração & dosagem , Mifepristona/administração & dosagem , Aborto Induzido/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Preparações de Ação Retardada/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Satisfação do Paciente , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 127(2): 306-12, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26942358

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of insertion of etonogestrel implants with mifepristone compared with after the abortion on the risks of medical abortion failure and repeat pregnancy over the subsequent 6 months. METHODS: In a randomized trial, we assigned patients undergoing medical abortion to receive etonogestrel implants either with the mifepristone (Quickstart group) or after the abortion (Afterstart group). We followed them for 7 months to ascertain abortion outcome, pregnancies, and contraception use. RESULTS: Between September 2013 and August 2014, we enrolled 236 participants in the Quickstart group and 240 in the Afterstart group. To examine abortion failure, we conducted a noninferiority analysis from which we excluded nine participants who had missing outcome data and four with specified protocol violations. Of the rest, 9 of 229 (3.9%) and 9 of 234 (3.8%) in the Quickstart and Afterstart groups, respectively, had surgery to complete the abortion; the difference of 0.08% (90% confidence interval -3.1% to 3.3%) excluded our prestipulated noninferiority margin of 5 percentage points. Among participants with pregnancy follow-up through 6 months, 1 of 213 (0.5%) and 3 of 208 (1.4%) in the Quickstart and Afterstart groups, respectively, became pregnant within that time; 6-month pregnancy rates did not differ significantly by group (exact log-rank test, P=.28). At enrollment, significantly more participants in the Quickstart group than in the Afterstart group were satisfied with their group assignments (187/236 [79%] compared with 129/240 [54%], respectively; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Insertion of etonogestrel implants with mifepristone did not appreciably increase medical abortion failure risk and it enhanced patient satisfaction, but we found no evidence that it decreased repeat pregnancy rates. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01902485.


Assuntos
Aborto Terapêutico/métodos , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/uso terapêutico , Desogestrel/uso terapêutico , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/estatística & dados numéricos , Mifepristona/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalos de Confiança , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez/tendências , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA