A Mixed-Methods Study of Clinician Adaptations to Parent-Child Interaction Therapy - What about Culture?

Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is an evidence-based practice (EBP) for young children with challenging behaviors. PCIT has been adapted to treat varying presentations and culturally diverse families. Although efforts have been made to disseminate PCIT into community settings, which often serve clinically complex, socio-culturally diverse, and marginalized communities, barriers to disseminating adapted models remain. An alternative strategy to understanding how to increase access to appropriately adapted PCIT is to learn from community clinicians' practice-based adaptations to meet their clients' diverse needs related to clinical presentation, culture, and language. This mixed-method study investigated community clinician adaptations of PCIT. Clinicians (N = 314) were recruited via PCIT listservs to complete a survey collecting background information, and adaptations to PCIT. Most clinicians had a master's degree (72.1%), were licensed (74.2%), and were PCIT-certified (70.7%). Qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 23 community clinicians, who were 39% Spanish-speaking, were 30% Latinx, and 30% reported serving a ≥50% Latinx clientele. Clinicians reported engaging in adaptations aimed at augmenting PCIT more extensively than adaptations involving removing core components. Themes from qualitative interviews converged with quantitative findings, with clinicians most frequently describing augmenting adaptations, and highlighted reasons for adapting PCIT. Clinicians primarily augmented treatment to address clients' clinical presentations. Clinicians rarely adapted treatment specifically for culture, but when mentioned, clinicians discussed tailoring idioms and phrases to match clients' culture for Spanish-speaking clients. Implications for training PCIT clinicians in intervention adaptations will be discussed.

Improving the Quality of Children's Mental Health Care with Progress Measures: A Mixed-Methods Study of PCIT Therapist Attitudes.

Progress measures are an evidence-based technique for improving the quality of mental health care, however, clinicians rarely incorporate them into treatment. Research into how measure type impacts clinician preference has been recommended to help improve measure implementation. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is an assessment-driven treatment that serves as an ideal intervention through which to investigate measure preferences given its routine use of two types of assessments, a behavioral observation (the Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System) and a parent-report measure (the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory). This study investigated PCIT therapist attitudes towards progress measures used within PCIT and children's mental health treatment generally. A mixed-method (QUAN + QUAL) study design examined PCIT therapist attitudes towards two types of progress measures and measures used in two contexts (PCIT and general practice). Multi-level modeling of a survey distributed to 324 PCIT therapists identified predictors of therapist attitudes towards measures, while qualitative interviews with 23 therapists expanded and clarified the rationale for differing perceptions. PCIT therapists reported more positive attitudes towards a behavioral observation measure, the DPICS, than a parent-report measure, the ECBI, and towards measures used in PCIT than in general practice. Clinician race/ethnicity was significantly related to measure-specific attitudes. Qualitative interviews highlighted how perceptions of measure reliability, type of data offered, ease of use, utility in guiding sessions and motivating clients, and embeddedness in treatment protocol impact therapist preferences. Efforts to implement progress monitoring should consider preferences for particular types of measures, as well as how therapists are trained to embed measures in treatment.

Future Directions in Lay Health Worker Involvement in Children's Mental Health Services in the U.S.

Nearly half of children meeting criteria for a mental health disorder in the United States (U.S.) do not receive the treatment they need. Unfortunately, lack of access to and engagement in mental health services can be seen at even higher rates for historically marginalized groups, including low-income, racial, and ethnic minority youth. Lay Health Workers (LHWs) represent a valuable workforce that has been identified as a promising solution to address mental health disparities. LHWs are individuals without formal mental health training who oftentimes share lived experiences with the communities that they serve. A growing body of research has supported the mobilization of LHWs to address service disparities around the globe; however, challenges persist in how to scale-up and sustain LHW models of care, with specific barriers in the U.S. In this paper, we describe LHWs' different roles and involvement in the mental health field as well as the current state of the literature around LHW implementation. We integrate the RE-AIM Framework with a conceptual model of how LHWs address disparities to outline future directions in research and practice to enhance equity in the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of LHW models of care and evidence-based practices for historically marginalized communities within the U.S.

Sociocultural stressors across the perinatal period and risk for postpartum depressive symptoms in women of Mexican descent.

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, women of Mexican descent are affected by postpartum depression at disproportionate rates, often two to three times higher than the general population. Sociocultural stressors may contribute to this disparity. Traditionally, these stressors are measured at a single time point, and it is unknown if sociocultural stressors change from pregnancy to the postnatal period and if they are related to postpartum depressive symptoms. METHOD: Pregnant women of Mexican descent (N = 159) were assessed for acculturation (Mexican and Anglo orientation), perceived discrimination, acculturative stress, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms during the first trimester and postpartum period. RESULTS: Women reported increases in Mexican orientation, t(126) = -3.503, p = .01, and decreases in acculturative stress, t(159) = -3.503, p < .001, and perceived stress, t(159) = 6.332, p < .001, from pregnancy to postpartum. Only increases in Mexican orientation were associated with less postpartum depressive symptoms (R² = 0.050, B = -2.210, SE = 0.996, t = -2.120, p = .028), even when controlling for covariates. In addition, postnatal measurements of elevated acculturative stress and less Mexican orientation (R² = 0.127, B = 0.133, SE = 0.036, t = 3.721, p < .001; B = -2.194, SE = 0.769, t = -2.853, p < .001, respectively) were associated with more postpartum depressive symptoms; however, only Mexican orientation remained significant after covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Sociocultural stressors change across the perinatal period and contribute to postpartum depressive symptoms. Findings implicate a need for consideration of sociocultural stressors in postpartum depression prevention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).