Extended use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52 mg: A population pharmacokinetic approach to estimate in vivo levonorgestrel release rates and systemic exposure including comparison with two other LNG-IUSs.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize performance of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52mg (Mirena) over 8 years of use and facilitate comparisons with LNG-IUS 19.5mg and LNG-IUS 13.5mg. STUDY DESIGN: We estimated in vivo levonorgestrel (LNG) release rates and LNG plasma/serum concentrations for LNG-IUS 52mg up to 8 years of use with a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) approach using data from the Mirena Extension Trial (MET) and earlier clinical trials. We compared these with previously published release rates and exposure data for LNG-IUS 19.5mg and 13.5mg. Our 8-year popPK and release models were developed based on measured plasma/serum LNG and sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations and residual LNG content from removed LNG-IUS 52mg devices. RESULTS: Model-based estimated LNG release rates for LNG-IUS 52mg decreased from ∼21 µg/d after insertion to ∼7.0 µg/d after 8 years, similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg after 5 years (7.6 µg/d) and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg after 3 years (5.5 µg/d). Model-based estimated and measured plasma/serum LNG concentrations showed satisfactory agreement. Average model-based estimated LNG concentrations after 8 years of LNG-IUS 52mg use (100 ng/L [coefficient of variance 39.9%]) were similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg after 5 years (84.8 ng/L [39.9%]) and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg after 3 years (58.1 ng/L [40.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: The 8-year release and popPK models provide reliable in vivo LNG release rates and concentration estimates, respectively, facilitating direct comparisons between the 3 studied LNG-IUSs. LNG release rates from LNG-IUS 52mg at 8 years are similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg at 5 years and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg at 3 years. IMPLICATIONS: Levonorgestrel release from intrauterine system reservoirs declines with duration of use in a predictable way, and in relation to the initial load. As release rates and plasma concentrations of levonorgestrel may influence endometrial and systemic side effects, these data may assist clinical decision-making.

The effect of a combined indomethacin and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on short-term postplacement bleeding profile: a randomized proof-of-concept trial.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraceptives, including hormonal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems, are the most effective methods of reversible contraception. However, unfavorable bleeding, particularly during the first months of use, is one of the most important reasons for discontinuation or avoidance. Minimizing this as early as possible would be highly beneficial. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis are known to reduce bleeding and pain at time of menses. A levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system has been developed with an additional reservoir containing indomethacin, designed to be released during the initial postplacement period. OBJECTIVE: This proof-of-concept study aimed to establish whether the addition of indomethacin to the currently available levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (average in vivo levonorgestrel release rate of 8 µg/24 h during the first year of use) reduces the number of bleeding and spotting days during the first 90 days of use compared with the unmodified system. The dose-finding analysis included 3 doses of indomethacin-low (6.5 mg), middle (12.5 mg), and high (15.4 mg)-to determine the ideal dose of indomethacin to reduce bleeding and spotting days with minimal side-effects. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, controlled phase II trial conducted between June 2018 and June 2019 at 6 centers in Europe. Three indomethacin dose-ranging treatment groups (low-, middle-, and high-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) were compared with the unmodified levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system group, with participants randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the number of uterine bleeding and spotting days over a 90-day reference (treatment) period. Secondary outcomes were the number of women showing endometrial histology expected for intrauterine levonorgestrel application and the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events. Point estimates and 2-sided 90% credible intervals were calculated for mean and median differences between treatment groups and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin. Point and interval estimates were determined using a Bayesian analysis. RESULTS: A total of 174 healthy, premenopausal women, aged 18 to 45 years, were randomized, with 160 women eligible for the per-protocol analysis set. Fewer bleeding and spotting days were observed in the 90-day reference period for the 3 indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system dose groups than for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin group. The largest reduction in bleeding and spotting days was achieved with low-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, which demonstrated a point estimate difference of -32% (90% credible interval, -45% to -19%) compared with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin. Differences for high- and middle-dose indomethacin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system groups relative to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system without indomethacin were -19% and -16%, respectively. Overall, 97 women (58.1%) experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event considered related to the study drug, with similar incidence across all treatment groups including the unmodified levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. These were all mild or moderate in intensity, with 6 leading to discontinuation. Endometrial biopsy findings were consistent with effects expected for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. CONCLUSION: All 3 doses of indomethacin substantially reduced the number of bleeding and spotting days in the first 90 days after placement of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, thus providing proof of concept. Adding indomethacin to the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system can reduce the number of bleeding and spotting days in the initial 90 days postplacement, without affecting the safety profile, and potentially improving patient acceptability and satisfaction.

Contraceptive efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 8 years: findings from the Mirena Extension Trial.

BACKGROUND: The 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is an established, long-acting contraceptive option with approved use for up to 7 years. OBJECTIVE: The Mirena Extension Trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system during extended use beyond 5 and up to 8 years. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, single-arm study in the United States, enrolling existing users of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, aged 18 to 35 years, who have had the system for 4.5 to 5 years. We assessed the contraceptive efficacy (Pearl Index) and cumulative failure rate (using the Kaplan-Meier method) of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system during extended use. We also evaluated bleeding outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 362 participants starting year 6, 243 entered and 223 completed 8 years of 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use. Just more than half the participants were parous. The mean (standard deviation) age was 29.2 (±2.9) years, and all participants were aged ≤36 years at the end of year 8. Two pregnancies occurred, both with the device in situ. The year 6 pregnancy was of undetermined location and resolved spontaneously. The pregnancy in year 7 was ectopic and resolved with methotrexate treatment. In both cases, the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was removed and the participants left the trial. For years 6 to 8, the 3-year Pearl Index (95% confidence interval) was 0.28 (0.03-1.00) with a 3-year cumulative failure rate of 0.68% (0.17-2.71). Pearl Indexes for years 6, 7, and 8 were 0.34 (0.01-1.88), 0.40 (0.01-2.25), and 0.00 (0.00-1.90), respectively. The 3-year (years 6-8) ectopic pregnancy Pearl Index was 0.14 (0.00-0.77). We found treatment-emergent adverse events in 249 of 362 participants (68.8%), with 65 (18.0%) events considered to be related to the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. The discontinuation rate was 38.4% (139/362), most commonly because of desire for pregnancy (12.2%, 44/362). During extended use beyond 5 years and up to 8 years, participants reported a decrease in the mean number of bleeding or spotting days with approximately half of the women experiencing amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding. We did not enroll a sufficient number of women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for contraception and heavy menstrual bleeding to assess extended use for that indication. At the end of year 8, most (98.7%, 220/223) of the participants who completed the study remained satisfied with the continued use of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Of the 31 women who discontinued early because of desire for pregnancy with evaluable data for return-to-fertility analysis, 24 reported a posttreatment pregnancy within 1 year, giving a 12-month return-to-fertility rate of 77.4%. CONCLUSION: The 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, initially approved for 5 years, maintains high contraceptive efficacy, user satisfaction, and a favorable safety profile through 8 years of use. Participants reported 26 posttreatment pregnancies in total, of which 24 occurred in women who had discontinued the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system because of a desire for pregnancy. Of note, among women who elected to continue use through 8 years, bleeding patterns remained highly favorable. These findings support continued 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use for up to 8 years in women who wish to continue treatment.

Thirty years of mirena: A story of innovation and change in women's healthcare.

Since its introduction in 1990, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has played a key role in shaping the healthcare landscape of women. Here we explore the development of the first LNG-IUS (Mirena®) and the early clinical trials that demonstrated its potential. We highlight the contraceptive and therapeutic benefits of Mirena®, and discuss how clinical practice has been changed since the introduction of LNG-IUS and other long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. The history of Mirena® is rich in innovation and has also paved the way to the development of smaller intrauterine systems with lower hormone doses. Along with Mirena®, these newer LNG-IUS contribute to improving contraceptive choices for women, allowing them to select the option that is right for them and that meets their needs no matter their age, parity or circumstances.

More than just contraception: the impact of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on public health over 30 years.

Universal access to sexual and reproductive health services is essential to facilitate the empowerment of women and achievement of gender equality. Increasing access to modern methods of contraception can reduce the incidence of unplanned pregnancy and decrease maternal mortality. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) offer high contraceptive efficacy as well as cost-efficacy, providing benefits for both women and healthcare systems. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) first became available in 1990 with the introduction of Mirena (LNG-IUS 20), a highly effective contraceptive which can reduce menstrual blood loss and provide other therapeutic benefits. The impact of the LNG-IUS on society has been wide ranging, including decreasing the need for abortion, reducing the number of surgical sterilisation procedures performed, as well as reducing the number of hysterectomies carried out for issues such as heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Mirena can provide a treatment option for women with gynaecological issues such as HMB without organic pathology, minimising exposure to the hospital environment and reducing waiting times for surgical appointments. Looking to the future, research and development in the field of the LNG-IUS continues to expand our understanding of these contraceptives in clinical practice and offers the potential to further expand the choices available to women, allowing them to select the option that best meets their needs.

Bleeding patterns with the 19.5 mg LNG-IUS, with special focus on the first year of use: implications for counselling.

Objective: The aim of the study was to provide an additional, detailed description of early bleeding patterns with the 19.5 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of the bleeding diaries of participants in a previously reported phase II randomised controlled study (n = 741) and a phase III study (n = 2904), with 2-year extension phase (n = 707), of the 19.5 mg LNG-IUS. Main outcome measures were the median number of bleeding and/or spotting days per 30-day reference period for 12 months and the influence of the previous contraceptive method and levonorgestrel dose on bleeding patterns. Results: The pooled analysis comprised 1697 women. There was a progressive decline in the number of bleeding and/or spotting days from month 1: the proportion of women with ≤4 bleeding and/or spotting days per month increased from 6.2% in month 1 to 15.8% in month 2, 26.0% in month 3, 39.3% in month 6 and 54.1% in month 12. The median number of bleeding and/or spotting days in month 1 was lowest in women who had previously been using an LNG-IUS. Conclusion: Analysis of bleeding diaries using 30-day reference periods provides detailed insight into bleeding changes in the first months following placement of the 19.5 mg LNG-IUS. This insight may prove useful when counselling women about contraceptive choice and method continuation.

Overcoming barriers to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system placement: an evaluation of placement of LNG-IUS 8 using the modified EvoInserter® in a majority nulliparous population.

OBJECTIVES: To report placement success rate, and ease and pain associated with placement, of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 8 using the modified EvoInserter® placement device. STUDY DESIGN: This was a pooled analysis using data from three previously reported Phase III studies in nulliparous (83.3%) or parous (16.7%) women aged 12-35 years (N=965). LNG-IUS 8 was placed using the modified Evolnserter®. The main outcomes assessed were placement success, ease of placement as reported by healthcare professionals (HCPs), pain at placement as reported by participants, and assessment of the EvoInserter® placement device by HCPs. RESULTS: LNG-IUS 8 placement using the modified EvoInserter® with an insertion tube diameter of 3.8 mm was successful in 99.5% of subjects. HCPs rated the placement procedure as "easy" in 91.6% of cases. Placement pain was reported as absent by 19.1% of participants, as mild by 39.3%, as moderate by 31.6%, and as severe by 10.0%. Overall 89.2% of HCPs completely agreed that the device was easy to prepare and 85.7% completely agreed that placement of an LNG-IUS was easy/simple with the EvoInserter®. Post hoc exploratory analyses indicated a significant association between ease/pain of placement and patient age and between pain of placement and parity. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Evolnserter® was associated with a high placement success rate, ease of placement, and manageable pain, and was assessed to have a user-friendly design. These findings suggest that the EvoInserter® may remove some concerns among HCPs about difficult placement of LNG-IUSs, thereby encouraging increased uptake of an effective contraceptive. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Results reported in this study further strengthen evidence of the high placement success rate, ease of deployment, and manageable pain associated with the modified EvoInserter® placement device. These findings might reduce concerns among HCPs about placement of LNG-IUSs, meaning uptake of such contraceptives is increased.

A single-arm phase III study exploring the efficacy and safety of LNG-IUS 8, a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive system (total content 13.5 mg), in an Asia-Pacific population.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system with total content 13.5 mg (average approximately 8 µg/24 h over the first year; LNG-IUS 8; Jaydess®) in an Asia-Pacific population. STUDY DESIGN: An open-label, single-arm phase III study conducted at 25 centers in China, Australia and Korea assessed LNG-IUS 8 use over 3 years in nulliparous and parous women (N=1114) aged 18-40 years with regular menstrual cycles (21-35 days). Primary outcome was pregnancy rate, expressed as the Pearl Index. Secondary outcomes included 3-year cumulative failure rate, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), discontinuation rate, bleeding profile and placement pain. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 925 women (mean age 31.6 years, 6.4% nulliparous). Overall unadjusted Pearl Index was 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.70); the 3-year cumulative failure rate was 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.4-1.9). TEAEs and study drug-related TEAEs were reported in 70.1% and 31.2% of women, respectively. Overall, 27.9% of women discontinued the study, 16.9% due to adverse events. Frequent or prolonged bleeding (World Health Organization criteria) decreased from the first to the twelfth 90-day reference intervals (from 5.0% to 0.7% and from 44.1% to 3.0%, respectively), and the percentage of women with amenorrhea increased over time (from 0.4% to 10.8%). Pain on placement was reported as "none" or "mild" in 91.9% of women. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUS 8 was an effective and well-tolerated contraceptive method, providing another option for women in the Asia-Pacific region. IMPLICATIONS: In this phase III study, LNG-IUS 8 was shown to be highly effective and well tolerated in an Asia-Pacific population and was not associated with any new or unexpected safety events. LNG-IUS 8 provides another contraceptive option for women in the Asia-Pacific region.

A 12-month multicenter, randomized study comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system with the etonogestrel subdermal implant.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS 8), which has an average levonorgestrel release rate of ∼8 µg/24 hours during the first year (total levonorgestrel content 13.5 mg; Jaydess/Skyla), with the etonogestrel (ENG) subdermal implant (total content, 68 mg) with regard to the 12-month discontinuation rate (primary outcome). DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, phase III study. SETTING: Thirty-eight centers in six European countries. PATIENT(S): Study population of 766 healthy nulliparous and parous women aged 18-35 years. INTERVENTION(S): The LNG-IUS 8 or the ENG implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Discontinuation rate, by treatment group, at Month 12. RESULT(S): The 12-month discontinuation rates were 19.6% and 26.8% in the LNG-IUS 8 and ENG implant groups, respectively. The -7.2% difference was statistically significant (95% confidence interval -13.2%, -1.2%). Fewer women in the LNG-IUS 8 group than in the ENG implant group discontinued because of increased bleeding (3.2% vs. 11.3%) or adverse events (14.3% vs. 21.8%). At 12 months, more women in the LNG-IUS 8 group than in the ENG implant group were "very/somewhat satisfied" with their bleeding pattern (60.9% vs. 33.6%) and reported a preference to use their study treatment after study completion (70.1% vs. 58.5%). CONCLUSION(S): The LNG-IUS 8 was associated with a significantly lower 12-month discontinuation rate compared with the ENG implant; mainly because ENG implant users frequently discontinued due to increased bleeding. More LNG-IUS 8 users than ENG implant users reported being "very/somewhat satisfied" with their bleeding pattern, and reported a preference to continue using their study treatment after the study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01397097.

A Phase III, single-arm study of LNG-IUS 8, a low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive system (total content 13.5mg) in postmenarcheal adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety profile of the low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) total content 13.5mg (average approximate release rate 8µg/24h over the first year; LNG-IUS 8; Jaydess®) in adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: In a Phase III study in 36 European centers, 304 healthy nulliparous or parous postmenarcheal adolescents (12-17years) received LNG-IUS 8 for 12months. The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary outcomes included: serious TEAEs, adverse events of special interest, overall user satisfaction, discontinuation rate at 12months, and Pearl Index. RESULTS: LNG-IUS 8 placement was successful in 303/304 participants (99.7%). Overall, 82.6% of participants reported TEAEs, and serious TEAEs and serious study drug-related TEAEs were reported by 7.6% and 1.0% of participants, respectively. No cases of pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, or uterine perforation were reported. No pregnancies were reported during the 12-month study. At Month 12/study end, the overall user satisfaction rate was 83.9%. Overall, 51 participants (16.8%) prematurely discontinued the study before 12months; 13.8% of participants discontinued owing to TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS: No new or unexpected safety events were associated with the low-dose LNG-IUS 8. The safety profile of LNG-IUS 8 in adolescents was consistent with that previously reported in adults. The high overall user-satisfaction rate at study end and the low discontinuation rate over 12months demonstrate that LNG-IUS 8 is a highly acceptable contraceptive method among adolescents. IMPLICATIONS: This study is the first to assess the low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine system LNG-IUS 8 (average approximate release rate 8µg/24h over the first year and total content 13.5mg) specifically in females<18years of age and confirms the safety and efficacy of LNG-IUS 8 in an adolescent population.

Bleeding patterns with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system when used for heavy menstrual bleeding in women without structural pelvic pathology: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to characterize the changes in bleeding pattern over time in women receiving the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). The reduction in menstrual blood loss volume has been well documented elsewhere. STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc pooled analysis of the impact of the LNG-IUS on bleeding patterns in four comparator studies of medical and surgical treatment options for HMB. We enrolled women aged ≥18 years with HMB without organic pathology. The change in the number of bleeding and spotting (B/S) days and bleeding patterns was assessed over the duration of the studies pooled. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-three women received the LNG-IUS in randomized trials. Relative to pretreatment baseline, there was a transient increase in the mean number of bleeding days in the first month of treatment, which returned to baseline by the second month and declined thereafter. Although the number of spotting days also increased during the first month of treatment, these declined with continued use but remained elevated relative to baseline during the first year of treatment. CONCLUSION: In women with HMB, the LNG-IUS is associated with an initial increase in number of B/S days that improve over time.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for heavy menstrual bleeding improves hemoglobin and ferritin levels.

BACKGROUND: We compared the effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with cyclic oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, randomized study assessing the efficacy of the LNG-IUS and oral MPA (10 mg/day for 10 days) in women with confirmed HMB over 6 cycles of treatment. We previously reported that treatment with the LNG-IUS resulted in greater menstrual blood loss reduction than MPA. In this analysis, hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels were assessed at baseline, Cycle 3, and at Cycle 6, and the relative improvement on treatment was subjectively rated by investigators and women. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five women were randomized (82 LNG-IUS/83 MPA). Increases in median hemoglobin levels from baseline to Cycle 6 (7.5% vs. 1.9%; p<.001) and median serum ferritin levels (68.8% vs. 14.3%; p<.001) were greater in the LNG-IUS group than in the oral MPA group. Baseline median hemoglobin and ferritin levels were 12.4 g/dL and 19.0 mcg/L with the LNG-IUS and 12.2 g/dL and 19.0 mcg/L with oral MPA, respectively. At Cycle 6, the corresponding medians were 13.4 g/dL and 34.0 mcg/L with the LNG-IUS and 12.6 g/dL and 21.0 mcg/L with oral MPA. At Cycle 6, the proportion of women who rated their bleeding as 'improved' was higher with the LNG-IUS than with oral MPA, both according to investigator assessment (93.6% vs. 61.0%) and self-assessment (93.6% vs. 67.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Women treated with the LNG-IUS had greater increases in median hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels, and higher rates of subjective improvement than women treated with oral MPA.

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system provides a reliable, long-term treatment option for women with idiopathic menorrhagia.

OBJECTIVES: Idiopathic menorrhagia (IM) is an important clinical challenge. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) provides an effective treatment option as shown by multiple small clinical studies. In this analysis of combined data, we describe the time course of relative change in menstrual blood loss (MBL) from baseline up to 5 years. The results of two different methods to assess MBL were merged. METHODS: We pooled and analyzed five prospective, randomized clinical studies investigating the effect of the LNG IUS on IM in a total of 230 women. Four studies assessed MBL by using the pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) and one study used the alkaline hematin method. We gathered data on percentage change from baseline after 3 and 6 months, and annually up to 5 years. In addition we analyzed results on hemoglobin (Hb) and serum ferritin (S-Fe). RESULTS: MBL data was available after 3 and 6 months from 165 and 152 patients, respectively, and after 1 year from 51 patients. Long-term data up to 3 and 5 years was available for 28 and 10 patients, respectively. Not all studies provided data for all time points. Median (interquartile range) MBL decreased from baseline by -84.5% (-93.3; -63.6%) after 3 months, by -92.9% (-97.6; -81.1%) and by -93.8% (-98.8; -81.1%) after 6 months and 1 year, respectively (P < 0.0001, all time points). After 2 and 5 years the decrease was more than 96%. In parallel, Hb and S-Fe increased significantly. CONCLUSION: The LNG IUS rapidly induced clinically and statistically significant long-term reductions in MBL, paralleled by increases in Hb and S-Fe levels.

A 60-month non-comparative study on bleeding profiles with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system from the late transition period to estrogen supplemented menopause.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to assess the transition from using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS, 20 µg LNG/24 h) for reproductive-age contraception to using it as menopausal-age endometrial protection during estrogen replacement therapy (ERT). The transfer process was evaluated by assessment of the vaginal bleeding pattern. Continuation rates were also recorded. STUDY DESIGN: Open, multicentre, non-comparative study was conducted in 11 menopausal centres in Finland (3), The Netherlands (4), Belgium (2) and UK (2). Three hundred and ninety-four healthy women aged 46-51 years at entry with regular menstrual cycles, but without any climacteric symptoms, and who were willing to start oral or transdermal estrogen treatment for climacteric symptoms. If by 48 months a woman was not menopausal, she was not eligible for the ERT phase. Bleeding patterns were recorded in 90-day reference periods. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-eight women were eligible for the ERT phase. The mean ± SD number of bleeding/spotting days was highest (49 ± 19 days) in the first 90-day reference period in the contraceptive phase. For subjects who switched to ERT this number was 10 ± 13 days in the last contraceptive reference period and decreased to 9 ± 12 days in the first and 6 ± 10 days in the last 90-day reference period of the ERT phase. For both spotting and bleeding days there was no statistically significant difference between the last contraceptive and the first reference period of the ERT phase. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the results indicate that continuing with the LNG IUS from contraception to ERT has no adverse effects on the vaginal bleeding profile, and show a positive effect of the combined estrogen and LNG IUS treatment on the quality of life.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or medroxyprogesterone for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled study, women aged 18 years or older with heavy menstrual bleeding (menstrual blood loss 80 mL or more per cycle) were randomly assigned to six cycles of treatment with either levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg daily for 10 days beginning on day 16 of each cycle). The primary efficacy variables were the absolute change in menstrual blood loss from baseline to end of study and the proportion of women with successful treatment (defined as menstrual blood loss less than 80 mL and a 50% or greater reduction in menstrual blood loss from baseline). RESULTS: Of 807 women screened, 165 were randomly assigned to treatment (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system n=82, oral medroxyprogesterone acetate n=83). At the end of the study, the absolute reduction in median menstrual blood loss was significantly greater in the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system group (-128.8 mL, range -393.6 to +1242.2 mL) than in the medroxyprogesterone acetate arm (-17.8 mL, range -271.5 to +78.6 mL, P < .001), and the proportion of women with successful treatment was significantly higher for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (84.8%) than for medroxyprogesterone acetate (22.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: In women with idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system reduces menstrual blood loss more effectively and has a higher likelihood of treatment success than oral medroxyprogesterone acetate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00360490. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

A Canadian, multicentre study comparing the efficacy of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system to an oral contraceptive in women with idiopathic menorrhagia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) compared with a combined oral contraceptive containing 1 mg norethindrone acetate and 20 mg ethinyl estradiol (OC1/20) in reducing menstrual blood loss (MBL) in women with idiopathic menorrhagia. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted in nine centres in Canada. Healthy women over 30 years of age suffering from idiopathic menorrhagia were treated either with LNG-IUS (n = 20) or with OC1/20 (n = 19) over 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in MBL from baseline to 12 months. Secondary endpoints included treatment success (defined as a MBL score < 100 after 12 months), hemoglobin levels, and the menorrhagia severity score. RESULTS: In both treatment groups, MBL decreased significantly from baseline to 12 months (P < 0.001). For the primary endpoint, the MBL score decreased significantly more in the LNG-IUS group (median from 228 to 13, mean percent change-83%) compared to the OC1/20 group (median from 290 to 72; mean percent change-68%) (P = 0.002) after 12 months. In the LNG-IUS group, 80% of subjects had treatment success compared with 36.8 % in the OC1/20 group (P < 0.009). Both treatments increased hemoglobin concentrations significantly between baseline and 12 months. The menorrhagia severity score was consistently lower in the LNG-IUS group at all study time points and was significantly lower (P = 0.045) at six months. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Both the LNG-IUS and the combined oral contraceptive effectively decreased menstrual blood loss in women with idiopathic menorrhagia. The overall clinical benefit was more pronounced with LNG-IUS than with OC1/20.

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of intravesical formulation of oxybutynin in patients with detrusor overactivity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics of oxybutynin and its main active metabolite, N-desethyloxybutynin, after multiple dosage (5 mg/30 ml three times daily) of intravesical oxybutynin formulation. Furthermore, to determine the efficacy and safety of intravesical oxybutynin in the symptomatic relief of urge incontinence or urgency in adult patients with detrusor hyperreflexia or instability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine patients were randomly allocated to treatment with a special bladder instillation formulation of oxybutynin or placebo for two 14-day treatment periods in a double-blind, cross-over manner. The third, open study period was designed for pharmacokinetic purposes with all patients on the active drug. The pharmacokinetics was depicted by AUC0-24, Cmax, Cmin, and t(max), The efficacy was evaluated from the data collected from urinary voiding diaries and cystometries. The safety was measured by recording adverse events on questionnaires. Patients who were willing to continue with the intravesical oxybutynin treatment entered the 1-year extension part of the study. RESULTS: Oxybutynin was absorbed from the bladder with a geometric mean Cmax of 9.4 ng/ml and AUC0-24 of 92 ng x h/ml. For N-desethyloxybutynin, the geometric mean Cmax was 14.4 ng/ml and AUC0-24 186 ng x h/ml. Elimination of the drug was protracted, as there were detectable serum concentrations of both oxybutynin and N-desethyloxybutynin even 24 hours post-dose. The mean number of toilet visits/day decreased from the baseline value of 6.9 to 5.7 during oxybutynin treatment, whereas during the placebo period the value increased to 7.4 (p = 0.022). It remained at the same decreased level during the one-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Oxybutynin is readily absorbed from the bladder after intravesical administration. The serum concentrations of oxybutynin after single 5 mg intravesical doses are at least as high as those reported after oral drug intake, but the parent drug/metabolite ratio is much higher after intravesical administration. The elimination of oxybutynin as well as its metabolite is prolonged after intravesical administration compared with that reported after oral drug intake. The mean number of daily toilet visits decreased significantly in the oxybutynin group.