A prospective cohort study evaluating the cost-effectiveness of carbetocin for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage in caesarean sections.

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Prophylaxis with oxytocic medication is recommended by the WHO to prevent its occurrence. Carbetocin is a newer oxytocic, with potential to lower PPH rates, reduce the total use of oxytocic drugs and lead to financial savings. Meta-analyses have confirmed a reduction in the use of additional oxytocic medication with the use of carbetocin compared to oxytocin. However, there are few studies evaluating the costs of carbetocin prophylaxis. We carried out a prospective cohort study evaluating the financial impact of carbetocin, following its introduction at our centre for caesarean section. We collected data for 400 patients in total, making this, to our knowledge, the largest study conducted on this topic. We found a significant reduction in PPH rates and the use of additional oxytocics with projected overall financial savings of £68.93 per patient with the use of carbetocin. Impact statement It is well established that carbetocin reduces the use of secondary oxytocics compared to oxytocin alone in the active management of the third stage of labour. Evidence for reduction of post-partum haemorrhage and its cost effectiveness are more equivocal. Our study demonstrates that carbetocin also reduces post-partum haemorrhage, use of blood and blood products and midwifery recovery time in the setting of caesarean section. We have also demonstrated that despite the increased index cost of carbetocin it delivers an overall substantial cost benefit. The implications of these findings are of reduced morbidity, faster recovery and cost savings in these times of austerity in the UK. It allows more efficient labour distribution of midwives, particularly in the setting of staff shortages across the NHS. A randomised control trial in this area needs to be conducted to determine the cost benefit of carbetocin and with this and post-partum haemorrhage rates as the primary outcome measures.

Frequency and diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in women with vaginal discharge, and to compare different diagnostic tests for its diagnosis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: The Aga Khan University Hospital from June 1998 to May 2000. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women attending the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics at The Aga Khan University Hospital, with the complaints of vaginal discharge, were examined with the help of a speculum. The vaginal pH was measured, samples for bacterial cultures were obtained. A slide was prepared for the gram's stain and Whiff-test was also performed. BV was diagnosed, when the vaginal discharge fulfilled at least three of the composite clinical criteria (Amsel's criteria), a standard method for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: homogenous (pasty) discharge, pH more than 4.5, positive Whiff-test and the presence of clue cells. RESULTS: The frequency of BV was observed to be 16.1% . The culture for Gardnerella vaginalis was compared with the composite clinical criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the culture, calculated for the diagnosis of BV were 93.8%, 70%, 37.7% and 98% respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of laboratory tests in conjunction with clinical findings is necessary for diagnosis of BV. The composite clinical criteria for the diagnosis of BV are rapid, reliable and inexpensive method.