Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of 320°-Arc Length Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes after implantation of a new 320°-arc length Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segment (320-ICRS) in eyes of patients with keratoconus. METHODS: A multicentric nonrandomized study was conducted in which a new 320-ICRS was placed in 138 eyes of 130 patients with keratoconus. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), keratometry, corneal volume, asphericity, lines of vision gain/loss, and vectorial analysis were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up visit after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 6.2 ± 3.3 (SD) months (range 3-12 months). Mean UDVA improved from 20/250 to 20/60. Mean CDVA improved from 20/100 to 20/40. Mean Q improved from -1.12 ± 0.49 preoperatively to -0.28 ± 0.51 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean corneal volume increased from 56.2 ± 4.28 mm preoperatively to 57.6 ± 4.74 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean Km reduced from 53.3 ± 5.5 D preoperatively to 47.8 ± 4.6 D postoperatively (P < 0.001). The change in UDVA, CDVA, and topographic astigmatism was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The 320-ICRS can efficiently and safely improve visual acuity in keratoconus, modifying the corneal shape to a more physiologic, aspheric shape.

Corneal Biomechanics in Ectatic Diseases: Refractive Surgery Implications.

BACKGROUND: Ectasia development occurs due to a chronic corneal biomechanical decompensation or weakness, resulting in stromal thinning and corneal protrusion. This leads to corneal steepening, increase in astigmatism, and irregularity. In corneal refractive surgery, the detection of mild forms of ectasia pre-operatively is essential to avoid post-operative progressive ectasia, which also depends on the impact of the procedure on the cornea. METHOD: The advent of 3D tomography is proven as a significant advancement to further characterize corneal shape beyond front surface topography, which is still relevant. While screening tests for ectasia had been limited to corneal shape (geometry) assessment, clinical biomechanical assessment has been possible since the introduction of the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, USA) in 2005 and the Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) in 2010. Direct clinical biomechanical evaluation is recognized as paramount, especially in detection of mild ectatic cases and characterization of the susceptibility for ectasia progression for any cornea. CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of this review is to describe the current state of clinical evaluation of corneal biomechanics, focusing on the most recent advances of commercially available instruments and also on future developments, such as Brillouin microscopy.

Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) variables and Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) tomographic parameters in differentiating forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC) from normal corneas, and to assess a combined biomechanical and tomographic parameter to improve outcomes. METHODS: Seventy-six eyes of 76 normal patients and 21 eyes of 21 patients with FFKC were included in the study. Fifteen variables were derived from exported ORA signals to characterize putative indicators of biomechanical behavior and 37 ORA waveform parameters were tested. Sixteen tomographic parameters from Pentacam HR were tested. Logistic regression was used to produce a combined biomechanical and tomography linear model. Differences between groups were assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was used to compare diagnostic performance. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in age, thinnest point, central corneal thickness, and maximum keratometry between groups. Twenty-one parameters showed significant differences between the FFKC and control groups. Among the ORA waveform measurements, the best parameters were those related to the area under the first peak, p1area1 (AUROC, 0.717 ± 0.065). Among the investigator ORA variables, a measure incorporating the pressure-deformation relationship of the entire response cycle was the best predictor (hysteresis loop area, AUROC, 0.688 ± 0.068). Among tomographic parameters, Belin/Ambrósio display showed the highest predictive value (AUROC, 0.91 ± 0.057). A combination of parameters showed the best result (AUROC, 0.953 ± 0.024) outperforming individual parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Tomographic and biomechanical parameters demonstrated the ability to differentiate FFKC from normal eyes. A combination of both types of information further improved predictive value. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(7):479-485.].

Application of corneal tomography before keratorefractive procedure for laser vision correction.

Ectasia after refractive surgery represents a major concern among refractive surgeons. Corneal abnormalities and preexisting corneal ectasia are the most important risk factors. Corneal topography and central corneal thickness are the factors traditionally screening for in refractive surgery candidates. Study of the anterior surface by Placido topography allows for identification of keratoconus before biomicroscopy. However, this is insufficient for the evaluation of pre-operative refractive surgery. There are cases of ectasia after laser in situ keratomilusis (LASIK) without identifiable risk factors such that there is a need to go beyond the corneal surface. A key requirement is quantifying susceptibility to corneal biomechanical instability and progression to ectasia. Tomographic indices derived from elevation maps and pachymetry spatial variation produce a Belin Ambrosio display final D index (BAD-D index), which has shown better results compared to surface curvature indices for detecting very mild forms of ectasia. A logistic regression formula, integrating age, residual stromal bed, and BAD-D (Ectasia Susceptibility Score, ESS) resulted in a significant improvement in accuracy, leading to 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity for detecting susceptible cases. A comprehensive corneal structural analysis based on corneal segmental tomography can detect susceptible corneas, which increases safety for refractive surgery patients.

Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), 37 Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) waveform parameters, and 15 investigator-derived ORA variables in differentiating forme fruste keratoconus (KC) from normal corneas. DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: Seventy-eight eyes of 78 unaffected patients and 21 topographically normal eyes of 21 forme fruste KC patients with topographically manifest KC in the contralateral eye were matched for age, the thinnest point of the cornea, central corneal thickness, and maximum keratometry. Fifteen candidate variables were derived from exported ORA signals to characterize putative indicators of biomechanical behavior, and 37 waveform parameters were tested. Differences between groups were assessed by the Mann-Whitney test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Ten of 54 parameters reached significant differences between the groups (Mann-Whitney test, P < .05). Neither CRF nor CH differed significantly between the groups. Among the ORA waveform measurements, the best parameters were those related to the area under the first peak, p1area, and p1area1 (AUROC, 0.714 ± 0.064 and 0.721 ± 0.065, respectively). Among the investigator ORA variables, a measure incorporating the pressure-deformation relationship of the entire response cycle performed best (hysteresis loop area, AUROC, 0.694 ± 0.067). CONCLUSION: Waveform-derived ORA parameters, including a custom measure incorporating the pressure-deformation relationship of the entire response cycle, performed better than traditional CH and CRF parameters in differentiating forme fruste KC from normal corneas.

Biomecânica da córnea após laser de femtossegundo na cirurgia de catarata / Changes of corneal biomechanical after femtosecond laser–assisted for cataract surgery

Objetivo:Avaliar as alterações da biomecânica da córnea após laser de femtosegundo na cirurgia de catarata e comparar os parâmetros biomecânicos derivados do Corvis ST (Oculus Corvis ST, Scheimpflug Technology; Wetzlar, Germany) entre as técnicas do laser de femtossegundo e a facoemulsificação convencional após a cirurgia de catarata.Métodos:Estudo observacional, prospectivo envolvendo 151 olhos de 127 pacientes com diagnóstico de catarata nuclear. Setenta olhos de 65 pacientes foram submetidos à técnica do laser de femtossegundo (Alcon LenSx, Aliso Viejo,USA) e 76 olhos de 62 pacientes por meio da facoemulsificação convencional (Alcon Infinit, Fort Worth, USA). O sistema de tonometria de não contato integrado com a câmera ultrarrápida de Scheimpflug (Oculus Corvis ST, Scheimpflug Technology; Wetzlar, Germany) foi utilizado para avaliação da biomecânica da córnea antes e após a cirurgia de catarata pelas técnicas do laser de femtossegundo e a facoemulsificação convencional. Os parâmetros biomecânicos utilizados foram: deformidade de amplitude (DA), pressão intraocular, 1st A time, tempo de concavidade máxima, 2nd A time, 1st A Length, 2nd A Length, raio de curvatura de maior alcance, raio de curvatura normal, velocidade de entrada (Vin) e de saída (Vout). A densitometria do cristalino (scattering) através do PNS (Pentacam Nucleus Staging) foi realizado pela tomografia de córnea e segmento anterior (Pentacam® – Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) em todos os pacientes para diagnóstico objetivo da opacidade do cristalino. Os critérios de exclusão foram: doença corneana, doenças da retina e/ou nervo óptico e cirurgia ocular prévia. O teste de Kolmogorov-Smirnov foi utilizado para avaliar a distribuição normal. O teste de Wilcoxon e o test-T foram utilizados para avaliação entre o pré-operatório e o primeiro dia de pós-operatório (D1) nos grupos do laser de femtossegundo (LFS) e do faco convencional (FC), respectivamente. O teste de Mann-Whitney foi realizado para avaliar as diferenças dos parâmetros biomecânicos da córnea derivados do Corvis ST entre os dois grupos (LFS; FC) após a cirurgia de catarata (D1). Foi considerado como estatisticamente significante p ≤ 0,05%.Resultados:A média de idade dos pacientes do grupo do LFS foi de 67,6 anos (± 9,9) e do grupo do FC foi de 68,4 anos (± 11,8).A média do PNS entre todos os pacientes (análise objetiva do cristalino) foi de 0,62 (± 0,67). No grupo do LFS, 9 dos 11 parâmetros foram estatisticamente significativos entre o Pré e D1; e no grupo do FC, 7 dos 11 parâmetros estudados foram estatisticamente significativos entre o Pré e D1. De todos os parâmetros biomecânicos derivados do Corvis ST estudados, somente o tempo de concavidade máxima da córnea (HC-time; p ≤ 0.0387) foi diferente entre os dois grupos (laser de femtossegundo x faco convencional) em D1.Conclusão:O laser de femtossegundo para cirurgia de catarata e a técnica de facoemulsificação convencional induziram alterações nas propriedades biomecânicas da córnea pelo Corvis ST no D1. Apenas 1 dos 11 parâmetros biomecânicos estudados foi diferente estatisticamente entre os grupos do LFS e FC.

Purpose:To evaluate the changes of corneal biomechanical after femtosecond laser – assisted cataract and to compare the parameters derived by Corvis ST between standard phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser – assisted in cataract surgeryMethods:This is a prospective study. 151 eyes of 127 patients were under went cataract surgery. 75 eyes of 65 patients were with femtosecond laser–assisted (FS)(Alcon Len Sx, Aliso Viejo,USA) and 76 eyes of 62 patients with standard phacoemulsification (SP) (Alcon Infinit, Fort Worth, USA). Lens scattering was evaluated using Scheimpflug Anterior Segment Tomography, using the new software PNS. The Scheimpflug images were taken with an ultra - high - speed camera during each measurement by the Corvis ST. The deformation amplitude (DA) and other parameters (e.g., pachyapex, intraocular pressure, 1st A time, highest concavity - time, 2nd A time, 1st A Length, 2nd A Length, curvature radius highest concavity, curvature radius normal, Vin, Vout) measured by the Corvis ST were studied in groups FLS and SP before an dafter cataract surgery. Exclusion criteria: corneal disease, retinal or optic nerves disease or previous ocular surgery. This is study analyzed was Kolmogorov-Smirnov for Normality. The Wilcoxon-test and t-test were utilized to evaluate the differences between pre and day 1in FS and SP, respectively. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the differences of parameters derived by Corvis ST - biomechanical properties between two groups (FS;SP). The p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:The mean age from patients of group FS was 67.6 y (± 9.9) and the group SP was 68.4 y (± 11.8). The mean PNS was 0.62 (±0.67). In group of FS, 9 of 11 parameters derived from Corvis ST were statisticall ysignificant (ss). In group of SP, 7 of 11 parameters derived from Corvis ST were ss. Only the HC - time was statistically significant between two groups (FS;SP) with p d” 0.0387.Conclusions:The use of the femtosecond laser – assisted system for cataract surgery and standard phacoemulsification induzed changes of biomechanical properties of the cornea by Corvis ST. Only 1 of 11 parameters studied was different statistically in two groups.

Ocular biomechanical metrics by CorVis ST in healthy Brazilian patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate ocular biomechanical metrics given by the CorVis ST (Oculus, Inc., Berlin, Germany) in a population of healthy Brazilian patients. METHODS: An observational and cross-sectional study involving 1 eye randomly selected from 90 healthy patients. Studied parameters (including deformation amplitude, first applanation time, highest concavity time, second applanation time, first applanation length, second applanation length, curvature radius highest concavity, curvature radius normal, velocity in, and velocity out) derived from the CorVis ST were correlated to central corneal thickness from the Pentacam (Oculus, Inc.). Differences between data on the basis of gender were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 35.80 ± 12.83 years (range: 21.07 to 78.84 years). Mean central corneal thickness was 547.50 ± 32.00 µm (range: 490 to 647 µm) and mean spherical equivalent refraction was -3.29 ± 3.69 diopters (range: -9.50 to +10.37 diopters). Mean deformation amplitude was 1.05 ± 0.08 mm (range: 0.91 to 1.26 mm). Highest concavity time was 18.38 ± 0.93 ms (range: 16.95 to 21.07 ms). Intraocular pressure was 16.43 ± 2.15 mm Hg (range: 11.50 to 21.0 mm Hg). First applanation time was 8.32 ± 0.33 ms (range: 7.53 to 9.12 ms) and second applanation time was 23.80 ± 0.44 ms (range: 22.76 to 24.95 ms). First applanation length (max) was 2.07 ± 0.38 mm (range: 1.20 to 3.10 mm) and second applanation length (max) was 2.37 ± 0.47 mm (range: 1.33 to 4.12 mm). Curvature radius highest concavity was 11.09 ± 2.06 mm (range: 7.58 to 15.98 mm) and curvature radius normal was 7.59 ± 0.67 mm (range: 6.82 to 11.02 mm). Velocity in was 0.21 ± 0.05 m/s (range: 0.16 to 0.72 m/s) and velocity out was -0.33 ± 0.07 m/s (range: -0.72 to -0.20 m/s). Studied parameters were not associated with gender. CONCLUSIONS: Eight of 11 ocular biomechanical metrics given by the CorVis ST were associated with central corneal thickness, but the influence of central corneal thickness on these measurements was low.

Assessing ectasia susceptibility prior to LASIK: the role of age and residual stromal bed (RSB) in conjunction to Belin-Ambrósio deviation index (BAD-D) / Avaliação de suscetibilidade para ectasia antes de LASIK: o papel da idade e do leito estromal residual em conjunto ao índice Belin-Ambrósio (BAD-D)

Purpose: To compare the ability to detect preoperative ectasia risk among LASIK candidates using classic ERSS (Ectasia Risk Score System) and Pentacam Belin-Ambrósio deviation index (BAD-D), and to test the benefit of a combined approach including BAD-D and clinical data. Methods: A retrospective nonrandomized study involved preoperative LASIK data from 23 post-LASIK ectasia cases and 266 stable-LASIK (follow up > 12 months). Preoperative clinical and Pentacam (Oculus; Wetzlar, Germany) data were obtained from all cases. Mann-Whitney's test was performed to assess differences between groups. Stepwise logistic regression was used for combining parameters.The areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) were calculated for all parameters and combinations, with pairwise comparisons of AUC (DeLong's method). Results: Statistically significant differences were found for age, residual stromal bed (RSB), central corneal thickness and BAD-D (p<0.001), but not for sphere, cylinder or spherical equivalent (p>0.05). ERSS was 3 or more on 12/23 eyes from the ectasia group (sensitivity = 52.17%) and 48/266 eyes from the stable LASIK group (18% false positive). BAD-D had AUC of 0.931 (95% CI: 0.895 to 0.957), with cut-off of 1.29 (sensitivity = 87%; specificity = 92.1%). Formula combining BAD-D, age and RSB provided 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity, with better AUC (0.989; 95% CI: 0.969 to 0.998) than all individual parameters (p>0.001). Conclusion: BAD-D is more accurate than ERSS. Combining clinical data and BAD-D improved ectasia susceptibility screening. Further validation is necessary. Novel combined functions using other topometric and tomographic parameters should be tested to further enhance accuracy. .

Objetivo: Comparar a capacidade de detectar risco de ectasia no pré-operatório de LASIK usando o clássico ERSS (Ectasia Risk Score System) e índice Belin- Ambrósio (BAD- D) do Pentacam; e para testar o benefício de uma abordagem combinada, incluindo BAD-D e dados clínicos. Métodos: Estudo não randomizado retrospectivo envolveu dados pré-operatórios de LASIK de 23 casos que evoluíram para ectasia pós-LASIK e 266 casos estáveis após LASIK com acompanhamento mínimo de 12 meses. Dados préoperatórios clínicos e do Pentacam (Oculus, Wetzlar, Alemanha) foram obtidos para todos os casos. O teste de Mann-Whitney foi realizado para avaliar as diferenças entre grupos. Regressão logística foi utilizada para combinar parâmetros. As áreas sob as curvas Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC; AUC) foram calculadas para todos os parâmetros e as combinações. Comparações de pares das AUC foram realizadas com método de DeLong. Resultados: Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas para a idade, residual leito estromal (RSB), espessura corneana central e BAD- D (p <0,001), mas não para a grau esférico, cilindro ou equivalente esférico (p > 0,05). ERSS foi de três ou mais em 12/23 olhos do grupo ectasia (sensibilidade = 52,17 %) e 48/ 266 olhos do grupo LASIK estável (18% falso positivo). BAD- D teve AUC de 0,931 (IC 95%: 0,895-0,957), com corte de 1,29 (sensibilidade=87%, especificidade=92,1%). A fórmula que combinou BAD-D, idade e RSB, gerou 100% de sensibilidade e especificidade de 94%, com melhor AUC (0,989, IC 95%: 0,969-0,998) do que todos os parâmetros individuais (p>0,001). Conclusão: BAD-D é mais preciso do que ERSS. Combinações de dados clínicos e os BAD-D melhorou a capacidade de identificação ...

Bioestatísticas: conceitos fundamentais e aplicações práticas / Biostatistics: fundamental concepts and practical applications

A bioestatística ganha crescente importância e relevância nos últimos anos, sendo um dos principais pilares da investigação científica. Possui uma série de conceitos e regras que devem ser bem compreendidos para se realizar ou analisar um artigo. Nesta revisão são abordadas algumas das principais ferramentas utilizadas nos trabalhos de interesse da área oftalmológica, suas aplicações e limitações.

The biostatistics has gained significant importance in recent years, being one of the mainstays of current scientific research. It has a series of concepts and rules that must be understood to carry out or analyze an article. In this review we will discuss some of main tools utilized in works of interest in ophthalmology, its applications and limitations.

Técnica para diagnosticar o ceratocone / Best waveform score for diagnosing keratoconus

PURPOSE: To test whether corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) can discriminate between keratoconus and normal eyes and to evaluate whether the averages of two consecutive measurements perform differently from the one with the best waveform score (WS) for diagnosing keratoconus. METHODS: ORA measurements for one eye per individual were selected randomly from 53 normal patients and from 27 patients with keratoconus. Two groups were considered the average (CH-Avg, CRF-Avg) and best waveform score (CH-WS, CRF-WS) groups. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to evaluate whether the variables had similar distributions in the Normal and Keratoconus groups. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were calculated for each parameter to assess the efficacy for diagnosing keratoconus and the same obtained for each variable were compared pairwise using the Hanley–McNeil test. RESULTS: The CH-Avg, CRF-Avg, CH-WS and CRF-WS differed significantly between the normal and keratoconus groups (p<0.001). The areas under the ROC curve (AUROC) for CH-Avg, CRF-Avg, CH-WS, and CRF-WS were 0.824, 0.873, 0.891, and 0.931, respectively. CH-WS and CRF-WS had significantly better AUROCs than CH-Avg and CRF-Avg, respectively (p=0.001 and 0.002). CONCLUSION: The analysis of the biomechanical properties of the cornea through the ORA method has proved to be an important aid in the diagnosis of keratoconus, regardless of the method used. The best waveform score (WS) measurements were superior to the average of consecutive ORA measurements for diagnosing keratoconus.

OBJETIVO: Testar se a histerese corneana (CH) e o fator de resistência corneano (CRF) podem discriminar olhos com ceratocone e avaliar se a média de duas medidas consecutivas apresenta desempenho diferente da medida única com a melhor waveform score para diagnósticar o ceratocone. MÉTODOS: Foram realizadas medidas do ORA de um olho por indivíduo, selecionados aleatoriamente a partir de 53 pacientes normais e de 27 pacientes com ceratocone. Dois grupos foram considerados: a média (CH-médio, o CRF-médio) e melhor waveform score (CH-WS, CRF-WS). O teste de Mann-Whitney U-teste foi utilizado para avaliar se as variáveis apresentaram distribuições semelhantes entre os grupos. As curvas (ROC) foram calculadas para cada parâmetro para avaliar eficácia no diagnóstico e as obtidas para cada variável foram comparadas usando o teste de Hanley-McNeil. RESULTADOS: CH-médio, CRF-médio, CH-WS e CRF-WS diferiram significativamente entre os grupos (p<0,001). Já as áreas sob a curva ROC para CH-médio, CRF-médio, CH-WS, e CRF-WS foram 0,824, 0,873, 0,891, 0,931, respectivamente. CH-WS e CRF-WS obtiveram AUROCs significativamente melhores do que CH-médio e CRF-médio (p=0,001 e 0,002). CONCLUSÃO: A análise das propriedades biomecânicas da córnea através do ORA demonstrou ser um método auxiliar importante no diagnóstico de ceratocone, independente do método utilizado. As melhores medidas waveform score foram superiores à média das medições consecutivas para o diagnóstico de ceratocone.

Analysis of waveform-derived ORA parameters in early forms of keratoconus and normal corneas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY) performance in differentiating grades I and II keratoconus from normal corneas using 41 parameters individually and to assess the effect of analyzing all parameters together. METHODS: This study compared the mean value of 41 ORA parameters in grades I and II keratoconus with healthy age-matched control eyes. Only eyes with a central corneal thickness between 500 and 600 µm were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated for each of the 41 parameters independently and for all of the parameters together. RESULTS: This study included 136 eyes with normal corneas and 68 eyes with grades I and II keratoconus. When analyzed individually, four ORA parameters (p1area, p1area1, p2area, and p2area1) had an area under the curve greater than 0.900 for discriminating between both groups. The p2area was the parameter that achieved the largest area under the curve individually (0.931). The area under the curve increased to 0.978 when analyzing all parameters together. CONCLUSION: Alternative ORA parameters are better for differentiating grades I and II keratoconus from normal corneas than the four parameters originally available for ophthalmologists (corneal hysteresis, Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure, corneal-compensated intraocular pressure, and corneal resistance factor). Although the ORA did not achieve 100% accuracy, the discrimination between these two groups was optimized by combining all parameters.

ORA waveform-derived biomechanical parameters to distinguish normal from keratoconic eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) to distinguish between normal and keratoconic eyes, by comparing pressure and waveform signal-derived parameters. METHODS: This retrospective comparative case series study included 112 patients with normal corneas and 41 patients with bilateral keratoconic eyes. One eye from each subject was randomly selected for analysis. Keratoconus diagnosis was based on clinical examinations, including Placido disk-based corneal topography and rotating Scheimpflug corneal tomography. Data from the ORA best waveform score (WS) measurements were extracted using ORA software. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldman-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), and 37 parameters derived from the waveform signal were analyzed. Differences in the distributions among the groups were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between keratoconic and normal eyes were found in all parameters (p<0.05) except IOPcc and W1. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was greater than 0.85 for 11 parameters, including CH (0.852) and CRF (0.895). The parameters related to the area under the waveform peak during the second and first applanations (p2area and p1area) had the best performances, with AUROCs of 0.939 and 0.929, respectively. The AUROCs for CRF, p2area, and p1area were significantly greater than that for CH. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in biomechanical metrics between normal and keratoconic eyes. Compared with the pressure-derived parameters, corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor, novel waveform-derived ORA parameters provide better identification of keratoconus.

Scheimpflug imaging for laser refractive surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the principles and clinical applications of Scheimpflug corneal and anterior segment imaging with special relevance for laser refractive surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Computerized Scheimpflug imaging has been used for corneal and anterior segment tomography (CASTm) in different commercially available instruments. Such approach computes the three-dimensional image of the cornea and anterior segment, enabling the characterization of elevation and curvature of the front and back surfaces of the cornea, pachymetric mapping, calculation of the total corneal refractive power and anterior segment biometry. CASTm represents a major evolution for corneal and anterior segment analysis, beyond front surface corneal topography and single point central corneal thickness measurements. This approach enhances the diagnostic abilities for screening ectasia risk as well as for planning, evaluating the results, managing complications of refractive procedures, and selecting intraocular lens power, type, and design. In addition, dynamic Scheimpflug imaging has been recently introduced for in-vivo corneal biomechanical measurements and has also been used for anterior segment imaging of femtocataract surgery. SUMMARY: Scheimpflug imaging has an important role for laser refractive surgery with different applications, which continuously improve due to advances in technology.

ORA waveform-derived biomechanical parameters to distinguish normal from keratoconic eyes / Parâmetros biomecânicos derivados da forma da curva do ORA para discriminar olhos normais de ceratocones

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) to distinguish between normal and keratoconic eyes, by comparing pressure and waveform signal-derived parameters. METHODS: This retrospective comparative case series study included 112 patients with normal corneas and 41 patients with bilateral keratoconic eyes. One eye from each subject was randomly selected for analysis. Keratoconus diagnosis was based on clinical examinations, including Placido disk-based corneal topography and rotating Scheimpflug corneal tomography. Data from the ORA best waveform score (WS) measurements were extracted using ORA software. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldman-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), and 37 parameters derived from the waveform signal were analyzed. Differences in the distributions among the groups were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between keratoconic and normal eyes were found in all parameters (p<0.05) except IOPcc and W1. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was greater than 0.85 for 11 parameters, including CH (0.852) and CRF (0.895). The parameters related to the area under the waveform peak during the second and first applanations (p2area and p1area) had the best performances, with AUROCs of 0.939 and 0.929, respectively. The AUROCs for CRF, p2area, and p1area were significantly greater than that for CH. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in biomechanical metrics between normal and keratoconic eyes. Compared with the pressure-derived parameters, corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor, novel waveform-derived ORA parameters provide better identification of keratoconus.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a capacidade do Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) em discriminar olhos com ceratocone de olhos normais e comparar parâmetros derivados da pressão dos parâmetros derivados da forma da curva. MÉTODOS:Estudo comparativo retrospectivo série de casos que incluiu 112 pacientes com olhos normais e 41 pacientes com ceratocone bilateral. Um olho de cada indivíduo foi randomicamente selecionado para análise. O diagnóstico de ceratocone foi baseado em exame clínico, incluindo topografia de Plácido e tomografia Scheimpflug. Informação do melhor waveform score foi extraída do software do ORA. Histerese corneana (CH), fator de resistência corneana (CRF), pressão intraocular correlacionada com Goldman (IOPg), pressão intraocular compensada pela córnea (IOPcc) e 37 novos parâmetros derivados da forma da curva do sinal do ORA foram analisados. Diferenças nas distribuições dos grupos foram avaliadas pelo teste Mann-Whitney. Curvas ROC foram calculadas. RESULTADOS: Diferenças estatisticamente significantes foram encontradas entre os olhos normais e ceratocones em todos os parâmetros (p<0,05) salvo IOPcc e W1. A área sob a curva ROC (AUROC) foi maior que 0.85 em 11 parâmetros, incluindo CH (0,852) a CRF (0,895). Os parâmetros relacionados com a área sob o pico da forma de onda durante a segunda e primeira aplanação (p2area e p1area) obtiveram as melhores performances, com AUROCs de 0,939 e 0,929, respectivamente. Os valores de AUROCs do fator de resistência corneana, p2area e p1area foram significativamente maiores que os valores de histerese corneana. CONCLUSÃO: Existem diferenças significantes nas medidas biomecânicas entre olhos normais e com ceratocone. Comparados com os parâmetros derivados da pressão, histerese corneana e fator de resistência corneana, os parâmetros derivados da forma da curva proporcionaram melhor identificação dos ceratocones.

Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel technique for clinical characterization of corneal biomechanics using non-invasive dynamic imaging. METHODS: Corneal deformation response during non contact tonometry (NCT) is monitored by ultra-high-speed (UHS) photography. The Oculus Corvis ST (Scheimpflug Technology; Wetzlar, Germany) has a UHS Scheimpflug camera, taking over 4,300 frames per second and of a single 8mm horizontal slit, for monitoring corneal deformation response to NCT. The metered collimated air pulse or puff has a symmetrical configuration and fixed maximal internal pump pressure of 25 kPa. The bidirectional movement of the cornea in response to the air puff is monitored. RESULTS: Measurement time is 30ms, with 140 frames acquired. Advanced algorithms for edge detection of the front and back corneal contours are applied for every frame. IOP is calculated based on the first applanation moment. Deformation amplitude (DA) is determined as the highest displacement of the apex in the highest concavity (HC) moment. Applanation length (AL) and corneal velocity (CVel) are recorded during ingoing and outgoing phases. CONCLUSION: Corneal deformation can be monitored during non contact tonometry. The parameters generated provide clinical in vivo characterization of corneal biomechanical properties in two dimensions, which is relevant for different applications in Ophthalmology.

OBJETIVO: Descrever uma nova técnica para caracterização clínica das propriedades biomecânicas da córnea, usando sistema de imagem dinâmica não invasivo. MÉTODOS: A resposta de deformação da córnea é monitorada durante tonometria de não contato com fotografia de Scheimpflug de altíssima velocidade. O Oculus Corvis ST (Scheimpflug Technology; Wetzlar, Germany) apresenta uma câmera UHS Scheimpflug que adquire mais que 4.300 fotos por segundo com cobertura de 8mm horizontais para monitorar a resposta de deformação durante a tonometria de não contato por sopro de ar. O pulso de ar é muito bem controlado, apresentando uma configuração simétrica em sua pressão, com máxima pressão da bomba fixa de 25 kPa. O movimento bidirecional da córnea em resposta ao jato de ar é monitorado. RESULTADOS: A medida dura 30ms, com 140 fotos adquiridas. Algorítmos avançados identificam os limites anterior e posterior da córnea em cada imagem. A pressão intraocular (PIO) é calculada com base no primeiro momento de aplanação. A amplitude de deformação é determinada pelo maior deslocamento do ápice, durante o momento de maior concavidade. A extensão da aplanação e velocidade da córnea são medidos nas fases de entrada e saída. CONCLUSÃO: A deformação da córnea durante a tonometria de sopro por pulso de ar pode ser monitorada em detalhe com sistema de fotografia de altíssima velocidade. Os parâmetros gerados possibilitam caracterização clínica das propriedades biomecâmicas da córnea em duas dimensões. Tais achados têm relavância para diversas áreas da Oftalmologia.

Scheimpflug-based tomography and biomechanical assessment in pressure-induced stromal keratopathy.

PURPOSE: To report the tomographic and biomechanical findings before and after treatment of a case of pressure-induced stromal keratopathy (PISK), which was misdiagnosed as diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK). METHODS: A case report of a referred patient with supposed diagnosis of DLK after LASIK in the right eye. Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessment were provided by the Pentacam HR and CorVis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS: A layer of corneal opacity beneath the flap with a presumably fluid-filled interface area was observed on slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Scheimpflug image from Pentacam revealed a hyperreflective area underneath the flap interface. Goldmann applanation tonometry was 12 mm Hg, whereas CorVis intraocular pressure was 53.5 mm Hg with deformation amplitude of 0.42 mm. Two days after starting oral and topical ocular hypotensive therapy, CorVis intraocular pressure was 14 mm Hg and deformation amplitude was 1.02 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular hypertension in PISK was associated with lower deformation response, along with steepening and thickening of the cornea.

Comparação entre dois sistemas de análise de topografia corneana / Comparison between two analysis systems of corneal topography

OBJETIVO: Comparar os dados topográficos de pacientes com ceratocone entre os sistemas de avaliação: Orbscan IIz® (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) e Wavetek Chroma®. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados em 29 pacientes com diagnóstico clínico e topográfico de ceratocone atendidos no Hospital Oftalmológico de Sorocaba em março de 2010. Para a comparação dos dados foram avaliados os índices dióptricos dos meridianos mais curvo e mais plano (Sim K) a 3 mm e 5 mm centrais da córnea e ceratometria máxima através dos topógrafos Orbscan IIz® e Wavetek Chroma®. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados exames em 58 olhos de 29 pacientes com ceratocone. Na avaliação da ceratometria máxima, o Orbscan IIz® registrou 79,31% olhos e o Wavetek Chroma® conseguiu captura em 100%. Nas áreas mais curvas, mais planas e suas médias a 5 mm do centro corneano, ocorreu diferença estatisticamente significante apenas na primeira variável (intervalo de confiança de 95%: -0,51 a -2,46, p=0,004), sendo que no Orbscan IIz® a ceratometria foi de 46,91 (desvio padrão: 2,92), enquanto que no Wavetek Chroma® foi 48,4 (desvio padrão: 4,48). CONCLUSÃO: O novo aparelho Wavetek Chroma® pode auxiliar na obtenção da imagem topográfica de pacientes com ceratocone quando não for possível com o Orbscan IIz® na medida da ceratometria máxima, meridiano mais plano e média a 5mm do centro corneano.

PURPOSE: To compare topographic features of patients with keratoconus between two systems: Orbscan IIz® (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) and Wavetek Chroma®. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients that were diagnosed with keratoconus based on clinical and topographic characteristics were evaluated on their visit to Ophthalmology Hospital of Sorocaba in March 2010. Topographic variables, like maximum and minimum keratometric readings (Sim K) within 3 and 5 mm of central zone, and maximum keratometry, were analyzed by Orbscan IIz® and Wavetek Chroma®. RESULTS: A total of 58 eyes of 29 patients with keratoconus were enrolled in this study. Considering maximum keratometry, Orbscan IIz® registered 79.31% eyes whrereas Wavetek Chroma® 100%. Analysing maximum and minimum keratometric readings and average at 5mm of central zone occurred a statistically significant difference at the first parameter (95% confidence limits: -0.51 to -2.46, p=0.004), the keratometric reading by Orbscan IIz® was 46.91 (standard deviation: 2.92), whereas Wavetek Chroma® was 48,4 (standard deviation: 4.48). CONCLUSION: The new instrument Wavetek Chroma® could help to map topographically eyes with keratoconus which could not be measured using the Orbscan IIz® at maximum keratometry, minimum keratometric and average reading at 5 mm of central zone.

Hipermetropia após ceratotomia radial: flutuação da refração e da acuidade visual entre manhã e tarde e correlações com a pressão ocular e o estado biomecânico da córnea / Hyperopia after radial keratotomy: fluctuation of refraction and visual acuity from morning to evening and correlations with intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics

OBJETIVO: Verificar as variações entre manhã e tarde da refração, da acuidade visual, das medidas da pressão ocular e dos parâmetros biomecânicos da córnea em pacientes operados de ceratotomia radial e interesse em retratamento refrativo; correlacionar os parâmetros biomecânicos da córnea com a refração, com a acuidade visual e com as suas variações. MÉTODOS: Foram examinados trinta e oito olhos de 19 pacientes pela manhã (9 am) e à tarde (6 pm), obtendo-se refração esfero-cilíndrica dinâmica, acuidade visual (logMAR) sem correção (AVsc) e corrigida (AVcc) e parâmetros do ORA (Ocular Response Analyzer): histerese corneana (corneal hysteresis - CH), fator de resistência da córnea (corneal resistance factor - CRF), pressão intraocular (intraocular pressure &- IOP) calibrada para o padrão Goldmann (IOPg) e pressão compensada da córnea (IOPcc). Considerando a não distribuição normal das variáveis (teste de Kolmogorov-Smirnov), o teste de Wilcoxon signed rank foi utilizado para verificar significância nas diferenças entre as medidas da manhã e as da tarde de cada variável. O teste de Spearman foi utilizado para verificar correlações das medidas do ORA com o estado refracional e com a acuidade visual pela manhã e à tarde, assim como para verificar as correlações entre as medidas do ORA pela manhã e à tarde e as variações da refração e da acuidade visual. RESULTADOS: Grau esférico (E), equivalente esférico (EE), equivalente desfoco (ED), AVsc, IOPcc e IOPg variaram significativamente (Wilcoxon, p<0,05) entre manhã e tarde, havendo maior hipermetropia, pior acuidade visual não corrigida, maior pressão ocular e menor CH pela manhã. Nas medidas pela manhã, observaram-se correlações positivas (Spearman, p<0,05) do EE e do ED com IOPcc (rs=0,39 e 0,34 respectivamente), mas não com IOPg. Nas medidas da tarde, não houve correlações significantes entre os parâmetros refracionais e os pressóricos. Observaram-se correlações negativas (Spearman, p<0,05) entre AVsc (logMAR) e CH pela manhã e à tarde (rs= -0,48 e rs= -0,51), entre E e CH pela manhã e à tarde (rs= -0,66 e -0,76), entre E e CRF pela manhã e à tarde (rs= -0,40 e -0,47), entre EE e CH pela manhã e à tarde (rs= -0,70 e -0,68), entre EE e CRF pela manhã e à tarde (rs= -0,41 e -0,46), entre ED e CH pela manhã e a tarde (rs= -0,64 e -0,54) e entre ED e CRF pela manhã e a tarde (rs= -0,35 e -0,34). Observou-se correlação significante e negativa do CRF pela manhã com a variação do ED (p = 0,05; rs = -0,30) e com a variação da AVsc (p = 0,04; rs = -0,33). CONCLUSÃO: Maior hipermetropia pela manhã foi associada a maior pressão compensada (IOPcc), mas não com IOPg em pacientes operados de ceratotomia radial, o que deve ser considerado no planejamento do retratamento refrativo. Parâmetros biomecânicos (CRF e CH) mais baixos foram associados com maior hipermetropia e pior acuidade visual. Uma tendência de haver maior flutuação relacionada com córneas mais fracas foi encontrada. Novos estudos envolvendo parâmetros biomecânicos derivados do sinal do ORA, além dos parâmetros CH e CRF (derivados das pressões de aplanamento do ORA), juntamente com dados tomográficos da córnea e de aberrometria total são necessários.

PURPOSE: To verify the morning to evening variations of refraction, visual acuity, intraocular pressure and biomechanical parameters on patients operated by radial keratotomy who presented for refractive re-treatments; and to correlate the biomechanical parameters with refraction, visual acuity and their variations among morning and evening. METHODS: 19 patients were examined, respectively thirty-eight eyes in the morning (9 am) and evening (6 pm), recording sphere-cylindrical dynamic refraction, visual acuity (logMAR) without correction (AVsc) and corrected (AVcc) and ORA (Ocular Response Analyzer) parameters: corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), intraocular pressure calibrated for Goldmann (IOPg) e corneal compensated (IOPcc). Variables had no normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), so that the Wilcoxon signed rank was used for testing the significance on the differences for each variable between morning and afternoon. The Spearman test was used for assessing the correlations between the ORA parameters and refraction, visual acuity in the morning and afternoon, as well as to verify the correlations between the ORA parameters and the variations on refraction and visual acuity. RESULTS: Sphere (E), spherical equivalent (EE), defocus equivalent (ED), AVsc, IOPcc e IOPg varied significantly (Wilcoxon, p<0.05) between morning and evening. There was more hyperopia, worse visual acuity, higher pressure and lower CH in the morning measurements. In the morning measurements, there was a positive correlation (Spearman, p<0.05) between EE and ED and IOPcc (rs=0.39 and 0.34 respectively), but not with IOPg. In the evening measurement, there were no correlations between the refractive and pressure measurements. Negative correlations were observed (Spearman, p<0.05) between AVsc (logMAR) and CH in the morning and in the evening (rs= -0.48 e rs= -0,51), between E and CH in the morning and in the evening (rs= -0.66 and -0.76), between E and CRF in the morning and in the evening (rs= -0.40 and -0.47), between EE and CH in the morning and in the evening (rs= -0.70 and -0.68), between EE and CRF in the morning and in the evening (rs= -0.41 and -0.46), between ED and CH in the morning and in the evening (rs= 0.64 and -0.54) and between ED and CRF in the morning and in the evening (rs= -0.35 and -0.34). There was a significant negative correlation between the morning measurement of CRF and the variation of defocus equivalent (p = 0.05; rs = -0.30) and the variation of AVsc (p = 0.04; rs = -0.33). CONCLUSION: More hyperopia was recorded in the morning which was associated with higher compensated pressure (IOPcc) but not with IOPg ten years after RK. Lower biomechanical parameters (CRF e CH) were associated with higher hyperopia and worse visual acuity. A trend was observed for having higher fluctuation on weaker corneas. New studies involving the variables derived from the waveform signals, beyond CH and CRF (derived from the applanation pressures) along with data from corneal tomography and wavefront aberrometry are necessary.