Phase I study of doxil-cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: Our first objective was to evaluate the feasibility of administering a combination of Doxil, a pegylated liposome formulation of doxorubicin, and cisplatin and to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. A secondary objective was to examine Doxil peak and 7-day postinjection plasma levels at the various dose levels tested. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were treated every 4 weeks with cisplatin on day 1 and Doxil on day 2. In the first three dose levels, the dose of Doxil was fixed at 40 mg/m(2), whereas the dose of cisplatin was escalated from 40 to 50 and 60 mg/m(2). At the fourth and fifth dose levels, the dose of cisplatin was fixed at 60 mg/m(2), whereas the dose of Doxil was escalated to 50 and to 60 mg/m(2). Plasma Doxil (doxorubicin-equivalent) levels were measured by a high-performance liquid chromatography assay with fluorescence detection at 1 h and 7 days after infusion of Doxil. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients entered the study. Twenty-four patients completed a minimum of 2 courses and were fully assessable for toxicity and efficacy. Eighteen patients had received prior chemotherapy, 11 of them with anthracycline-containing regimens. A total of 177 courses were administered within the study. In 12 patients, cisplatin was discontinued after 1 to 13 courses, and Doxil was continued alone for 1-22 courses. All other patients received both drugs until discontinuation of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and mucositis. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 3 patients (one with neutropenic fever) at dose levels 4 and 5. Grade 3 mucositis was observed in 4 patients at dose levels 3, 4, and 5. In contrast, the most severe palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia manifestation was grade 2 seen in 1 patient only. Tumor responses included seven partial responses, of which three were in ovarian cancer patients. In four of seven responders, the time to disease progression exceeded 1 year. Doxil 1-h (C(max) equivalent) levels were assessed in 20 patients. The mean Doxil C(max) (mg/l plasma) increased gradually with dose escalation from 14.7 +/- 1.9 for 40 mg/m(2), to 17.3 +/- 3.0 for 50 mg/m(2), and 23.3 +/- 5.5 for 60 mg/m(2). The 60 mg/m(2) C(max) was similar to data obtained in parallel clinical studies at our institution with single-agent Doxil at 60 mg/m(2). However, the 7-day Doxil postinfusion levels were significantly lower in patients receiving the Doxil-cisplatin combination than in those receiving single-agent Doxil. CONCLUSION: Doxil can be administered at full maximum tolerated dose (50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks) in combination with 60 mg/m(2) cisplatin, with no evidence of major overlapping toxicities. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia incidence and severity appears to be diminished, in comparison with data available for single-agent Doxil. Plasma concentration data point to an accelerated clearance of Doxil when administered after cisplatin.

Skin toxic effects of polyethylene glycol-coated liposomal doxorubicin.

OBJECTIVES: To record the profile of toxic effects of polyethylene glycol-coated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (Doxil) to the skin, and to evaluate whether the long circulation pattern and enhanced accumulation of liposomes in specific skin sites will result in any unique presentations. DESIGN: Patients were accrued in the frame of dose-range-finding studies that examine the toxic effects and antitumor activity of Doxil therapy in metastatic breast and prostate cancers. All patients receiving Doxil were instructed to report any skin eruption or discomfort. Skin examination was performed on a regular basis at every cycle of Doxil therapy and after specific complaints. SETTING: Outpatient day care unit of the oncology institute of a secondary-referral medical center. PATIENTS: Sixty patients (45 women and 15 men). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A basic severity scale of I through IV was adopted for toxic effects to the skin, based on National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. RESULTS: The following 4 patterns of skin eruptions were encountered: hand-foot syndrome (n = 24), diffuse follicular rash (n = 6), intertrigolike eruption (n = 5), and new formation of melanotic macules (n = 3). Another major toxic effect of Doxil was stomatitis, which was found to be the dose-limiting factor for the maximal single dose. Alopecia and extravasation injuries did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: The profile of toxic effects of Doxil to the skin reflects its unique pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution. These skin reactions vary significantly from those associated with doxorubicin in non-liposome-encapsulated form.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil): reduced clinical cardiotoxicity in patients reaching or exceeding cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2.

BACKGROUND: The indications for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil) are expanding. We, therefore, wished to assess the safety of delivering doses exceeding 500 mg/m2 of doxil to patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects accrued to eight phase I and II protocol studies conducted at two institutions, were assessed for cardiac function at baseline and at specified intervals by MUGA scans. In this retrospective analysis, the findings of 42 patients, from the total of 237 entered, who had reached or exceeded cumulative doses of 500 mg/m2 (range 500-1500 mg/m2) were reviewed. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and in clinical cardiac status were analyzed. Six patients, three who had received prior doxorubicin, also underwent endomyocardial biopsies after cumulative doses of 490-1320 mg/m2. RESULTS: None of the 42 patients had clinical congestive heart failure (CHF) secondary to cardiomyopathy. Post doxil MUGA scans were available for 41 of the 42 patients. Five had a drop of 10% or more in LVEF; three of these had received prior doxorubicin. Billingham endomyocardial biopsy scores ranged from 0-1 in five patients, while the sixth had a score of 1.5 after both 900 mg/m2 and 1320 mg/m2 doxil. Of a remaining 195 patients, 1 episode of CHF was recorded in a patient who had received 312 mg/m2 doxil over 120 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone and chest radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative doses in excess of 500 mg/m2 of doxil appear to carry a considerably lesser risk of cardiomyopathy as judged by serial LVEF's and clinical follow-up, than is generally associated with free doxorubicin. Heart biopsies have provided reassuring data in a small number of patients, even if pretreated with doxorubicin. However, since three doxorubicin pretreated patients were among the five experiencing drops in LVEF, more data are warranted on such patients.

Correlation of toxicity with pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Doxil (ALZA Corp., Mountain View, CA) is a formulation of doxorubicin in polyethylene-glycol coated liposomes with a prolonged circulation time and unique toxicity profile. As yet, the effect of the dose schedule on toxicity and the correlation of toxicity with pharmacokinetics have not been directly addressed. METHODS: The objectives of this study were to examine the toxicity profile and pharmacokinetics of various dose schedules of Doxil in a group of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Forty-five patients received a total of 268 courses of Doxil (median per patient, 5; range, 1-19). Six dose schedules were investigated: 35 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (11 patients), 45 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (5 patients), 50 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks (5 patients), 60 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks (6 patients), 65 mg/m(2) every 5 weeks (6 patients), and 70 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks (12 patients). Doxil pharmacokinetics was examined in 24 of these patients at the dose levels of 35, 45, 60, and 70 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Stomatitis was dose related, with higher incidence and severity at doses of 60-70 mg/m(2). Skin toxicity in the form of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) developed usually after two or more courses of treatment and was schedule dependent with shorter dosing intervals leading to increased frequency and severity of skin manifestations. Myelosuppression, mainly as leukopenia/neutropenia, was dose dependent but mild and uncomplicated in most cases. Hair loss was infrequent (< 7%) and always of limited extent. Despite high cumulative doses up to 1500 mg/m(2), cardiac toxicity was observed in only 1 patient who received prior mitoxantrone and mediastinal radiotherapy. Objective responses, improvements, and durable stabilizations were observed in 9, 6, and 14 patients, respectively, indicating significant antitumor activity of Doxil in previously treated MBC patients. Doxil pharmacokinetics was well described by a monoexponential elimination curve with a long T(1/2) (median, 79 hours), a slow clearance (median, 40 mL/hour), and a small volume of distribution (median, 3.9 L). Cmax (peak plasma concentration) and AUC (area under the concentration*time curve) increased linearly with dose with a statistically significant correlation. Correlation analysis of dose and pharmacokinetic parameters with Doxil toxicites revealed that stomatitis grade and leukocyte nadir were correlated strongly with dose and Cmax, and weakly with AUC, whereas PPE grade was correlated significantly with only 1 parameter, T(1/2). CONCLUSIONS: The toxicity of Doxil is dose and schedule dependent and well correlated with pharmacokinetic parameters. Pharmacokinetic guidance of Doxil dosing may be a useful tool.

Doxil (Caelyx): an exploratory study with pharmacokinetics in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Doxil, a doxorubicin formulation of polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes, has anti-tumor activity against Kaposi's sarcoma and other solid tumors with mild myelosuppression, minimal hair loss and a low risk of cardiotoxicity. Non-liposomal doxorubicin has modest activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) with considerable toxicity. A pilot study of Doxil was conducted in 15 patients with HRPC. Doxil was administered i.v. using two regimes of equal dose intensity, either 45 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 60 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Plasma levels of doxorubicin were analyzed in 10 patients. The most common side effect was stomatitis with a higher incidence at the 60 mg/m2 dose level. In contrast, hand-foot syndrome was more frequent and severe in patients treated with the 3 week schedule of 45 mg/m2. Three patients responded to treatment (based on objective response in one patient and reduction of PSA level greater than 50% in the other two) and two patients had stable disease, all of them receiving 60 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic analysis shows a proportional increase of plasma drug levels with dose and the characteristic long circulation time of Doxil with half-lives in the range of 3 days, somewhat longer than previously reported. In conclusion, Doxil at 60 mg/m2 every 4 weeks appears to be active against HRPC, but severe mucocutaneous toxicities prevented further investigation of this regime.

Selective delivery of doxorubicin to patients with breast carcinoma metastases by stealth liposomes.

BACKGROUND: Stealth liposomes hold promise as a mode of delivering cytotoxic agents selectively to tumors in cancer patients. The objective of this study was to determine whether stealth liposomal doxorubicin accumulates selectively in bone metastases based on clinical material obtained from two patients with breast carcinoma. METHODS: Tumor tissue was obtained from two women (ages 33 years and 41 years, respectively) with metastatic breast carcinoma who responded to treatment with stealth liposomal doxorubicin and later underwent a surgical fixation procedure to treat a pathologic fracture of the femur. Drug levels in the tumor and adjacent muscle were examined by high performance liquid chromatography analysis in both patients and by fluorescence microscopy in one of the patients. RESULTS: Bone tumor fragments obtained during surgery performed 6 days after the administration of the 12th course of stealth liposomal doxorubicin in 1 patient and 12 days after the administration of the 16th course of stealth liposomal doxorubicin in the second patient had a 10-fold greater concentration of liposomal doxorubicin than tumor free muscle. Doxorubicin fluorescence and specific nuclear staining showed good colocalization, thus confirming the presence of the liposome-delivered drug in the nuclei of tumor cells. CONCLUSIONS: Using skeletal muscle as a comparator, stealth liposomal doxorubicin accumulates selectively in metastatic breast carcinoma cells within bone.

Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the extent and predictors for prostatic motion in a large number of patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during radiotherapy, and evaluate the implications of these data on the design of appropriate treatment margins for patients receiving high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent four serial computerized tomography (CT) scans, consisting of an initial planning scan and subsequent scans at the beginning, middle, and end of the treatment course. Each scan was performed with the patient in the prone treatment position within an immobilization device used during therapy. Contours of the prostate and seminal vesicles were drawn on the axial CT slices of each scan, and the scans were matched by alignment of the pelvic bones with a chamfer matching algorithm. Using the contour information, distributions of the displacement of the organ center of mass and organ border from the planning position were determined separately for the prostate and seminal vesicles in each of the three principle directions: anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI) and left-right (LR). Each distribution was fitted to a normal (Gaussian) distribution to determine confidence limits in the center of mass and border displacements and thereby evaluate for the optimal margins needed to contain target motion. RESULTS: The most common directions of displacement of the prostate center of mass (COM) were in the AP and SI directions and were significantly larger than any LR movement. The mean prostate COM displacement (+/- 1 standard deviation, SD) for the entire population was -1.2 +/- 2.9 mm, -0.5 +/- 3.3 mm and -0.6 +/- 0.8 mm in the, AP and SI and LR directions respectively (negative values indicate posterior, inferior or left displacement). The mean (+/- 1 SD) seminal vesicle COM displacement for the entire population was - 1.4 +/- 4.9 mm, 1.3 +/- 5.5 mm and -0.8 +/- 3.1 mm in the AP and SI and LR directions, respectively. The data indicate a tendency for the population towards posterior displacements of the prostate from the planning position and both posterior and superior displacements of the seminal vesicles. AP movement of both the prostate and seminal vesicles were correlated with changes in rectal volume (P = 0.0014 and < 0.0001, respectively) more than with changes in bladder volume (P = 0.030 for seminal vesicles and 0.19 for prostate). A logistic regression analysis identified the combination of rectal volume > 60 cm3 and bladder volumes > 40 cm3 as the only predictor of large ( > 3 mm) systematic deviations for the prostate and seminal vesicles (P = 0.05) defined for each patient as the difference between organ position in the planning scan and mean position as calculated from the three subsequent scans. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatic displacement during a course of radiotherapy is more pronounced among patients with initial planning scans with large rectal and bladder volumes. Such patients may require more generous margins around the CTV to assure its enclosure within the prescription dose region. Identification and correction of patients with large systematic errors will minimize the extent of the margin required and decrease the volume of normal tissue exposed to higher radiation doses.

Prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1, TPS and CEA in different histologic types of non-small cell lung cancer.

The prognostic value of the tumor markers CYFRA 21-1, tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was investigated in three histologic subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer. Pretreatment serum marker levels were measured in 38 patients with adenocarcinoma (AC), in 43 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) and in 35 patients with large cell carcinoma (LCC). Univariate analysis in AC showed significant lower survival of patients with elevated levels of TPS, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA. In LCC, elevated levels of TPS and CEA were found to predict lower survival, while in SQC--only TPS was a predictor. A multivariate analysis of survival identified CEA (Relative Risk-5.5; p = 0.004), CYFRA 21-1 (RR-3.4; p = 0.008) and TPS (RR-3.0; p = 0.02) as independent prognostic factors in AC. In SQC, only TPS (RR-2.3; p = 0.03) was such a factor whereas in LC--none of the markers studied retained statistical significance. Thereafter, the combinations of the two strongest prognostic factors in the AC group--CEA and CYFRA 21-1 were explored to divide this group into subsets with different prognosis. In cases where both markers were positive, the relative risk of death was 10.5 times higher as compared to cases where both markers were negative (p = 0.002).

Predictors of improved outcome for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen ablation therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic variables that predict for improved biochemical and local control outcome in patients with localized prostatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 1995, 213 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with a 3-month course of NAAD that consisted of leuprolide acetate and flutamide before 3D-CRT. The purpose of NAAD in these patients was to reduce the preradiotherapy target volume so as to decrease the dose delivered to adjacent normal tissues and thereby minimize the risk of morbidity from high-dose radiotherapy. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 15.3 ng/mL (range, 1 to 560 ng/mL). The median 3D-CRT dose was 75.6 Gy (range, 64.8 to 81 Gy), and the median follow-up time was 3 years (range, 1 to 7 years). RESULTS: The significant predictors for improved outcome as identified in a multivariate analysis included pretreatment PSA level < or = 10.0 ng/mL(P < .00), NAAD-induced preradiotherapy PSA nadir < or = 0.5 ng/mL (P < .001), and clinical stage < or = T2c (P < .04). The 5-year PSA relapse-free survival rates were 93%, 60%, and 40% for patients with pretreatment PSA levels < or = 10 ng/mL, 10 to 20 ng/mL, and greater than 20 ng/mL, respectively (P < .001). Patients with preradiotherapy nadir levels < or = 0.5 ng/mL after 3 months of NAAD experienced a 5-year PSA relapse-free survival rate of 74%, as compared with 40% for patients with higher nadir levels (P < .001). The incidence of a positive biopsy among 34 patients pretreated with androgen ablation was 12%, as compared with 39% for 117 patients treated with 3D-CRT alone who underwent a biopsy (P < .001). CONCLUSION: For patients treated with NAAD and high-dose 3D-CRT, pretreatment PSA, preradiotherapy PSA nadir response, and clinical stage are important predictors of biochemical outcome. Patients with NAAD-induced PSA nadir levels greater than 0.5 ng/mL before radiotherapy are more likely to develop biochemical failure and may benefit from more aggressive therapies.

Evaluation of tissue polypeptide specific antigen, CYFRA 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: does the combined use of cytokeratin markers give any additional information?

BACKGROUND: Recently developed tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) and CYFRA 21-1 assays determine the soluble cytokeratin 18 and 19 fragments, respectively, in serum. The authors compared the value of TPS, CYFRA 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: The study included 85 patients with benign lung diseases and 94 patients with NSCLC. TPS, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA serum levels were measured with commercial kits. RESULTS: The following were demonstrated: 1) CYFRA 21-1 and TPS levels, but not CEA levels, differed significantly between NSCLC patients with operable disease (Stages I-IIIA) and those with inoperable disease (Stages IIIB-IV). 2) The correlation coefficient between CYFRA 21-1 and TPS increased with the progression of NSCLC from Stages I-IIIA (r = 0.41, P = 0.04) to Stages IIIB-IV (r = 0.70, P < 0.001). 3) Multivariate analysis identified TPS and CYFRA 21-1 as significant predictors of survival, with relative risks of 2.57 (P = 0.001) and 2.05 (P = 0.01), respectively. For cases in which both cytokeratin markers were positive, the relative risk was 6.4 (P < 0.0001) compared with cases in which both were negative. 4) For the group with inoperable disease, the combined use of TPS and CYFRA 21-1 allowed for the definition of 3 sets of patients with significantly different median survival times (14.3 months vs. 7.4 months vs. 2.6 months). 5) The percentages of marker evaluations concordant with results of clinical assessments of response to therapy were 75.0%, 72.2%, and 61.1% for CYFRA 21-1, TPS, and CEA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that, for NSCLC patients, CYFRA 21-1 and TPS are significant prognostic factors and effective monitors of therapy. The combined use of these cytokeratin markers may provide additional information for prognosis.

Cisplatin-induced non-convulsive encephalopathy.

Cisplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent implicated in a range of adverse effects affecting the nervous system. Among the others, convulsive encephalopathy is rare and its pathogenesis is unknown. We report an 84-year-old woman with adenocarcinoma of the ovary who developed two fully reversible episodes of non-convulsive encephalopathy, each following a course of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and thus confirming a causal relationship to the agent. The patient presented 7 and 10 days after treatment with acute confusional state, a partial left homonymous hemianopia and a left extinction hemihypesthesia. Brain MRI showed old-standing cerebral microvascular changes and EEG revealed right parieto-occipital periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges over a generalized background activity slowing. This case adds further to the clinical diversity of cisplatin toxicity and, in view of the similarity to a recently defined disorder of posterior leukoencephalopathy, suggests regional endovascular injury rather than a direct cerebral toxicity as the initial event in the evolution of encephalopathy.

Multiple parenchymal liver metastases as the first site of recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature.

The incidence of clinically detectable parenchymal liver metastases in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma has been infrequently reported, but autopsy findings indicate that they are the second most common site of distant metastases in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The case of a 58-year-old patient who developed parenchymal liver metastases as the first site of recurrent ovarian carcinoma is presented. The different spreading routes of this malignancy, as well as a review of the incidence of liver metastases are discussed.

Hepatic arterial bolus chemotherapy for colorectal metastases using an implantable port.

Twenty-one patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases underwent hepatic artery infusion (HAI) port implantation for regional chemotherapy with bolus injections of 5-FU, LV and fast drip of cisplatin. Ten of the 21 patients had previously failed systemic chemotherapy before HAI. Toxicity was moderate and no need for modulation of the chemotherapeutic dose was required. The objective response rate of the whole group was 52.4%. The patients, who had not previously received systemic chemotherapy, had a significantly higher response rate of 81.8% compared to patients treated previously by systemic chemotherapy, who had a response rate of 20% (p=0.0089). In addition, there was a difference in cumulative survival between these two groups. The HAI combined chemotherapy with 5-FU, LV and cisplatin given by bolus injection through an implantable port is effective therapy with similar response rate but considerable reduced toxicity compared to continuous HAI with FUdR. We assume that this therapy might prolong survival significantly especially in patients not treated before by systemic chemotherapy.