A Stress Management Program for Higher Risk Medical Students: Preliminary Findings.

Approximately 10 % of first year medical students have clinically relevant anxiety or depression which may affect academic success and quality of life. This study tested the effects of a stress management intervention on indicators of anxiety, depression and self-efficacy in self-selected first year medical students. Forty two medical students volunteered to participate and provided informed consent. An eight session intervention was offered and focused on building relaxation skills, adaptive coping, and basic nutrition. Anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy were assessed pre and post intervention. This group of students had significantly higher baseline values of depression and anxiety but lower self-efficacy compared to a previous study of medical students at the same institution (p < 0.03). After the intervention, statistically significant improvements were observed in anxiety (p < 0.05), and self-efficacy (p < 0.05), but not in depression. The entering levels of anxiety and depression in this group suggested that these students were at risk for later clinical syndromes. Intervention directed to decreasing the effects of stress was associated with improvement in indicators of distress and may modify the longer term risk.

Managing antidepressants in primary care: physicians' treatment modifications.

To examine antidepressant management practices in primary care, patients (N = 148) given an antidepressant for at least one month completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and a demographic survey. Participants' mean age was 50.7 yr. and 80% were women. Patients' charts indicated whether physicians had made changes to prescribed antidepressants or dose either 6 wk. before or 6 wk. after study entry. For the 87% of participants whose depression status could be determined, 10% met dysthymic disorder criteria and only 33% had had a medication change in the previous month. Major depressive disorder occurred in 37% but only 18% had had a medication change. Co-existing dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder were diagnosed in 34%, with 24% receiving a medication change. Participants not receiving a medication change had mean BDI-II scores indicating moderate depression. Lack of antidepressant adjustment suggests physicians may need to monitor depressive symptoms closely using protocols and prompts.

Coherence between physician diagnosis and patient self reports of anxiety and depression in primary care.

Mood and anxiety disorders complicate the care of patients with physical illness and pose challenges for primary care physicians. This study explored the coherence between a screening tool (PRIME-MD), a standardized questionnaire (Eysenck Personality Inventory), and physician diagnoses of anxiety and depression. Of 165 patients, 29% had diagnoses of depression, 21% had anxiety, and 59% had no mental health diagnosis. Patients who were younger, female, divorced/widowed, or unemployed with minimal education had highest prevalence of anxiety or depression. Scores on the self-report inventories were significantly higher in patients with physician-diagnosed anxiety or depression compared with those without these diagnoses. Medical use and chronic illness were highest in patients with anxiety or depression diagnoses. Despite the statistical agreement between the self-report inventories and physician diagnosis, the coherence among these measures was less than optimal. Use of self report tools is recommended to complement physician understanding of patient symptom description and management of anxiety and depression in primary care.

Antidepressant medication adherence: a study of primary care patients.

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to antidepressant medication significantly contributes to the undertreatment of depression in primary care populations. The purpose of this study was to survey primary care patients' adherence to antidepressant medication to better understand factors associated with nonadherence. METHOD: Participants with a history of being prescribed an antidepressant for at least 4 weeks were recruited from a primary care research network. Subjects completed a demographic survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List, the Stages of Change Scale, the Medication Adherence Scale, and the MOS measure of adherence. Differences between adherent and nonadherent patients were compared using chi(2) for discrete variables, independent t tests for continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U tests for rank-ordered data. Data were collected from April 1, 2001 to April 1, 2004. RESULTS: Approximately 80% (N = 148) of individuals approached for this study agreed to participate. The overall sample was primarily white and female. The PHQ diagnoses at study entry were dysthymic disorder (8.8%, n = 13), major depressive disorder (31.8%, n = 47), "double depression" (both dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder, 29.7%, n = 44), and no depression (16.2%, n = 24.) The mean BDI-II score for the total sample was 19.9. Nonadherent patients reported being more careless about taking their medications, were more worried about side effects, were less satisfied with their physicians, were under the age of 40 years, and were more likely to have asked for a specific antidepressant. Nonadherent patients also indicated being at lower stages of change. CONCLUSIONS: Individually tailoring education to patient preference and stage of change is recommended to promote adherence.

Primary care evaluation of mental disorders (PRIME-MD) screening for minor depressive disorder in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: Individuals visiting a primary care practice were screened to determine the prevalence of depressive disorders. The DSM-IV-TR research criteria for minor depressive disorder were used to standardize a definition for subthreshold symptoms. METHOD: Outpatients waiting to see their physicians at 3 community family medicine sites were invited to complete a demographic survey and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Patient Questionnaire (PRIME-MD PQ). Those who screened positive for depression on the PRIME-MD PQ were administered both the PRIME-MD Clinician Evaluation Guide (CEG) mood module and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) by telephone. Data were collected over a 2-year period (1996-1998). RESULTS: 1,752 individuals completed the PRIME-MD PQ with 478 (27.3%) scoring positive for depression. Of these 478 patients, 321 received telephone follow-up using the PRIME-MD CEG mood module and the HDRS. PRIME-MD diagnoses were major depressive disorder (n = 85, 26.5%), dysthymia (n = 31, 9.6%), minor depressive disorder (n = 51, 15.9%), and no depression diagnosis (n = 154, 48.0%). The mean HDRS scores by diagnosis were major depressive disorder (20.3), dysthymia (12.9), minor depressive disorder (11.7), and no depression diagnosis (5.8). Post hoc analyses using Dunnett's C test indicated differences between each of the 4 groups at P ≤ .05, with the exception that dysthymia and minor depressive disorder were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Minor depressive disorder was more prevalent than dysthymia and had similar symptom severity to dysthymia as measured by the HDRS. More research using standardized definitions and longitudinal studies is needed to clarify the natural course and treatment indications for minor depressive disorder.

The patient-physician relationship and medical utilization.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to (1) explore the relationship between medical utilization and characteristics of the patient-physician relationship and (2) evaluate the relationship between physician perception of patient difficulty, chronic medical problems, and patient somatizing tendencies. METHOD: Patients in an academic family practice center were asked to complete a demographic data sheet, the PRIME-MD Patient Questionnaire, and the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory regarding their relationship with their physicians. Their physicians completed the Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire. Patient charts were examined for number of office visits and phone calls in the previous year, as well as number of chronic problems and medications. The study was conducted from September 2000 to November 2001. RESULTS: Forms were completed by 165 patients and 20 physicians. Forty-three patients who were approached refused to participate. Patient ratings on the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory were not related to utilization measures. Physician ratings of difficulty were significantly related to phone calls and visits (p < .05), as well as PRIME-MD Patient Questionnaire somatization tendencies (p < .05) but not to number of chronic problems. Patient and physician ratings were not significantly correlated. Gender (p < .001), marital status (p < .04), education (p < .03), and employment status (p < .002) were all related to utilization measures. CONCLUSION: Medical utilization was associated with somatizing tendencies of patients and the physicians' perception of patient difficulty. Physicians rated patients as difficult if they tended to somatize but not if they had a number of chronic problems.

Recent life changes and medical utilization in an academic family practice.

This study was designed to explore the relationship between life events and medical utilization in an academic family practice. Subjects included 268 patients who completed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) to assess recent life events and the PRIME-MD Patient Questionnaire to quantify somatoform symptoms. Medical charts were reviewed for visits and telephone calls to the practice. Subjects with SRRS scores 300 or higher reported significantly more somatoform symptoms (p = 0.0001). Somatoform symptoms were significantly related to total number of visits (p = 0.0001), visits for acute problems (p = 0.0001), and telephone calls (p = 0.0001). SRRS scores were significantly correlated with total number of visits 6 months following study entry (p = 0.01) and number of visits for acute problems (p = 0.05). Since stress from life changes is a significant contributor to symptoms and medical utilization in some patient groups, routine assessment of this risk factor is suggested.

Patient-Physician Relationship and Service Utilization: Preliminary Findings.

BACKGROUND: Difficult physician-patient encounters pose a challenge in all aspects of health care. Characteristics of both physicians and patients affect the office encounter and utilization of services. The objectives of this study were to explore the impact of patients' characteristics and the patient-physician relationship on service utilization. METHOD: A sample of 22 family practice patients and their physicians completed questionnaires prior to and/or after an office visit. Chart review yielded demographic information and history. The number of office visits and phone calls were obtained from billing records. RESULTS: The number of patient-reported physical problems was correlated with negative affect (r = 0.63, p <.002), the number of phone calls to the office (r = 0.52, p <.02), and the difficulty of the encounter as perceived by the physician (r = 0.58, p <.005). The number of phone calls also correlated with the number of life events (r = 0.43, p <.05) and the patient's perception of the physician's warmth (r = 0.48, p <.03) and understanding (r = 0.44, p <.04). CONCLUSION: Life stress, negative affect, physical complaints, and the patients' perception of their physician impact utilization. Armed with information about patient characteristics prior to the office visit, the physician can increase efficiency and facilitate a more productive encounter.

Managing Suicide Attempts: Guidelines for the Primary Care Physician.

The management of patients who have made suicide attempts is a responsibility that frequently falls to the primary care physician. For this reason, it is important that the physician have a clear strategy for dealing with the suicidal patient in the office, hospital, and emergency room. In the acute situation, the first priority is to stabilize the patient and ensure his or her medical safety. Once this is accomplished, history and circumstances of the attempt can be assessed, along with likelihood of recurrence of the attempt. This article reviews guidelines for evaluating suicide risk. The importance of the patient-physician relationship is noted, particularly in regard to prevention of future suicide attempts. With a focused, thorough approach to the suicidal patient, which incorporates both medical and psychiatric considerations, the primary care physician can ameliorate the patient's acute situation and facilitate the coordination of care with appropriate psychiatric resources.

Somatization in Family Practice: Comparing 5 Methods of Classification.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that patients with somatoform disorders are high utilizers of medical care, yet interpretation of studies has been difficult because of variant methods of diagnosis. The goal of this study was to compare 5 different methods of classification on the same group of subjects and to examine prevalence rates of somatoform disorders and medical utilization. METHOD: Subjects completed a demographic questionnaire in the physician's office and the somatization section of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) by telephone. Subsequently, their medical charts were examined. Using the 5 methods of diagnosis, somatizers were compared with nonsomatizers for level of utilization of medical services. The setting was a medical school-based family practice residency training center. Participants were 119 patients waiting to see their family doctors. The main outcome measures were prevalence of somatization symptoms and chart information (utilization, number of health problems). RESULTS: One subject met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV)-based DIS criteria for somatization disorder. With the Bucholz modification for scoring the DIS, 10 subjects were diagnosed with somatization disorder. With the abridged Escobar criteria of 6 symptoms, 7 subjects met diagnostic criteria, while 28 met the criteria for multisomatoform disorder of 3 symptoms, as suggested by Kroenke. The diagnosis of undifferentiated somatoform disorder, requiring only 1 unexplained symptom, was obtained by 94 of the subjects. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study revealed widely divergent prevalence rates of somatoform disorders, depending on methods of diagnosis used. Correlation with rates of medical utilization is suggested as an external criterion for validating diagnostic methods.