Not all that glitters is COVID-19: a case series demonstrating the need for histopathology when skin findings accompany SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Descriptions of cutaneous findings associated with COVID-19 have not been consistently accompanied by histopathology or confirmatory testing for SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: To describe and classify the cutaneous findings with supporting histopathology of confirmed COVID-19 inpatients. METHODS: We included consecutive inpatients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 for whom a dermatology consult was requested. A skin biopsy was performed in all cases. Skin findings were classified as being compatible with a cutaneous manifestation of COVID-19 or as representing a distinct clinical entity. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were studied in whom thirty-one dermatologic diagnoses were made. Twenty-two of the dermatoses were compatible with a cutaneous manifestation of COVID-19; nine entities were not associated with infection by SARS-CoV-2. The most common COVID-19-associated pattern was an exanthematous presentation. In four patients, a new pattern was observed, characterized by discrete papules with varied histopathological findings including a case of neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis. No cases of pernio-like lesions were identified. Skin findings not associated with COVID-19 represented 29% of diagnoses and included Malassezia folliculitis, tinea, miliaria and contact dermatitis. LIMITATIONS: There is no gold-standard test to distinguish between viral exanthems and drug reactions. CONCLUSION: A histopathological study is critical before attributing skin findings to a manifestation of COVID-19.

Effect of ezetimibe plus pravastatin on endothelial dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), not fully explained by the conventional risk factors. These patients have endothelial dysfunction (ED) as an early process of atherosclerosis, which can be reversed with therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of ezetimibe plus pravastatin on endothelial function in patients with SLE after 12 months of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open study, before and after, which assessed the effect of ezetimibe plus pravastatin treatment, was performed. Twenty two patients (21 women and one man) with diagnosis of SLE were studied, with a mean age 40 ± 5 years. Endothelial dysfunction was evaluated using vascular ultrasound of the brachial artery in order to measure the flow-mediated vasodilation (FMV) basal and after 12 months of treatment with pravastatin 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day. In addition, a lipid profile: total cholesterol (TC), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and serum C-reactive protein (CRP), was done. RESULTS: We found a basal FMV of 7.58% and 18.22% after 12 months of treatment, with an improvement of 10.64 points 95% CI (7.58-13.58), p < 0.001. TC decreased from 201.3 ± 58.9 mg/dL to 158.06 ± 50.13 mg/dL (p < 0.01); LDL-C from 125.78 ± 44.4 mg/dL to 78.8 ± 32.9 mg/dL (p < 0.001); HDL-C increased from 49.0 ± 16.8 mg/dL to 52.2 ± 13.8 mg/dL (p = 0.077). The basal and final concentrations of CRP were 4.49 and 2.8, respectively, with a mean decrease of 2.11 mg/dL, 95% CI (0.908-3.32), p < 0.002. Both drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe plus pravastatin significantly improved FMV in patients with SLE, decreasing ED and the lipid profile. This treatment ameliorated an early process of atherosclerosis and a risk factor for CVD.