Premature mortality for patients after completely resected early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or stomach.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the life expectancy burden of esophago-gastric cancer by analyzing years of life lost (YLL) for a Western patient population after treatment of early esophageal (EAC) or early gastric (GAC) adenocarcinoma. BACKGROUND: For patients with early EAC or GAC, the short-term prognosis after surgical resection is very good. Little data is available regarding long-term prognosis when compared to the general population. METHODS: Two hundred and fourteen patients with pT1 EAC (n = 112) or GAC (n = 102) were included in the study. Patients with EAC underwent transthoracic en-bloc esophagectomy; those with GAC had total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy. Surviving patients had a median follow-up of approximately 14 years. YLL was calculated using average life expectancy data from Germany. RESULTS: Patients with EAC were younger (median age 61 years) than those with GAC (66 years) (p = 0.031). The male:female ratio was 10:1 for EAC and 3:2 for GAC (p < 0.001). Multivariate survival analysis showed the age of the patients ≥60 years and the existence of lymph node metastasis was associated with poor prognosis. The median YLL for all patients who died over follow-up was 8.0 years. For patients under 60 years, it was approximately 20 years, and for older patients, approximately 5 years (p < 0.001) without difference in tumor stage between these age cohorts. YLL did not differ for GAC vs. EAC. CONCLUSION: After surgical resection, the prognostic burden as measured by YLL is relevant for all patients with early esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas and especially for younger patients. Reasons for YLL need further studies.

Current trends in the management of Gastro-oEsophageal cancers: Updates to the ESSO core curriculum (ESSO-ETC-UGI-WG initiative).

Gastro-oEsophageal Cancers (GECs) are severe diseases whose management is rapidly evolving. The European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) is committed to the generation and spread of knowledge, and promotes the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients through its core curriculum. The present work discusses the approach to GECs, including the management of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancers (OMEC), the diagnosis and management of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer (GC), the management of Siewert Type II tumors, the importance of mesogastric excision, the role of robotic surgery, textbook outcomes, organ preserving options, the use of molecular markers and immune check-point inhibitors in the management of patients with GECs, as well as the improvement of current clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with GECs. The aim of the present review is to provide a concise overview of the state-of-the-art on the management of patients with GECs and, at the same time, to share the latest advancements in the field and to foster the debate between surgical oncologists treating GECs worldwide. We are sure that our work will, at the same time, give an update to the advanced surgical oncologists and help the training surgical oncologists to settle down the foundations for their future practice.

[Esophageal cancer: standards and innovations in multidisciplinary treatment]. / Cancer de l'œsophage : standards et innovations du traitement multidisciplinaire.

Esophageal cancer is a severe disease that requires a combined therapeutic approach to improve the prognosis. Once the initial assessment is completed, the patient's case should be discussed in a multidisciplinary conference in a specialized center to decide on an appropriate therapeutic strategy taking into account the stage of the disease and the patient's general condition. Several advances in treatment, both from a surgical technique standpoint, with the advent of minimally invasive and robotic surgery, and from a medical perspective, with the use of immunotherapy under certain conditions, have dramatically improved mortality rates. In this article, we explore the standards and latest innovations in the multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer.

Le cancer de l'œsophage est une pathologie sévère nécessitant une approche thérapeutique combinée afin d'en améliorer le pronostic. Une fois le bilan initial réalisé, le cas du patient doit être discuté lors d'un colloque multidisciplinaire dans un centre spécialisé, afin de décider d'une stratégie thérapeutique adaptée tenant compte du stade de la maladie et de l'état général du patient. Plusieurs avancées en matière de traitement, tant du point de vue technique chirurgical, par l'avènement de la chirurgie minimalement invasive et robotique, que du point de vue médical, par le recours à l'immunothérapie sous certaines conditions, ont permis d'améliorer drastiquement le taux de mortalité. Dans cet article, nous explorons les standards ainsi que les dernières innovations dans le traitement multimodal du cancer de l'œsophage.

Changes of health-related quality of life 6 months after high-risk oncological upper gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgery: a single-centre prospective observational study (ChangeQol Study).

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an essential outcome in oncological surgery, particularly for elderly patients undergoing high-risk surgery. Previous studies have suggested that, on average, HRQoL returns to premorbid normal levels in the months following major surgery. However, the averaging of effect over a studied cohort may hide the variation of individual HRQoL changes. The proportions of patients who have a varied HRQoL response (stable, improvement, or a deterioration) after major oncological surgery is poorly understood. The study aims to describe the patterns of these HRQoL changes at 6 months after surgery, and to assess the patients and next-of-kin regret regarding the decision to undergo surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective observational cohort study is carried out at the University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland. We include patients over 18 years old undergoing gastrectomy, esophagectomy, pancreas resection or hepatectomy. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in each group with changes in HRQoL (improvement, stability or deterioration) 6 months after surgery, using a validated minimal clinically important difference of 10 points in HRQoL. The secondary outcome is to assess whether patients and their next-of-kin may regret their decision to undergo surgery at 6 months. We measure the HRQoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire before and 6 months after surgery. We assess regret with the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) at 6 months after surgery. Key other perioperative data include preoperative and postoperative place of residence, preoperative anxiety and depression (HADS scale), preoperative disability (WHODAS V.2.0), preoperative frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale), preoperative cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination) and preoperative comorbidities. A follow-up at 12 months is planned. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was first approved by the Geneva Ethical Committee for Research (ID 2020-00536) on 28 April 2020. The results of this study will be presented at national and international scientific meetings, and publications will be submitted to an open-access peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04444544.

Outcome of endoscopic vacuum therapy for duodenal perforation.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal defects are complex clinical situations, and their management is challenging and associated with high mortality. Besides surgery, endoscopic treatment options exist, but the size and location of the perforation can limit their application. We present a retrospective study, demonstrating a successful application of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for duodenal leaks. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent EVT for duodenal perforations between 2016 and 2021 at two tertiary centers. We analyzed demographic and clinical patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, leak characteristics, sponge-related complications, and success rate. RESULTS: Indications for treatment with EVT in the duodenum consisted of leak after duodenal suture of a perforated ulcer (n = 4), iatrogenic perforation after endoscopic resection (n = 2), iatrogenic perforation during surgery (n = 2), and anastomotic leak after upper gastrointestinal surgery (n = 2). EVT was used as a first-line treatment in seven patients and as a second-line treatment in three patients. EVT was successfully applied in all interventions (n = 10, 100%). Overall, EVT lead to definitive closure of the defects in eight out of ten patients (80%). No severe EVT-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: EVT is safe and technically feasible, so it emerges as a promising endoscopic treatment option for duodenal leaks. However, multidisciplinary collaboration and management are important to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, and to improve recovery rates.

Assessment of predictors of early postoperative complications after primary robotically assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) is performed in an increasing number of bariatric centers worldwide. Previous studies have identified a number of demographic and clinical variables as predictors of postoperative complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Some authors have suggested better early postoperative outcomes after RRYGB compared to LRYGB. The objective of the present study was to assess potential predictors of early postoperative complications after RRYGB. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of two prospective databases containing patients who underwent RRYGB between 2006 and 2019 at two high volumes, accredited bariatric centers was performed. Primary outcome was rate of 30 day postoperative complications. Relevant demographic, clinical and biological variables were entered in a multivariate, logistic regression analysis to identify potential predictors. RESULTS: Data of 1276 patients were analyzed, including 958 female and 318 male patients. Rates of overall and severe 30 day complications were 12.5% (160/1276) and 3.9% (50/1276), respectively. Rate of 30 day reoperations was 1.6% (21/1276). The overall gastrointestinal leak rate was 0.2% (3/1276). Among various demographic, clinical and biological variables, male sex and ASA score >2 were significantly correlated with an increased risk of 30 day complication rates on multivariate analysis (OR 1.68 and 1.67, p=0.005 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study identified male sex and ASA score >2 as independent predictors of early postoperative complications after RRYGB. These data suggest a potentially different risk profile in terms of early postoperative complications after RRYGB compared to LYRGB. The robotic approach might have a benefit for patients traditionally considered to be at higher risk of complications after LRYGB, such as those with BMI >50. The present study was however not designed to assess this hypothesis and larger, prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy (MEGA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (DRKS00025765).

INTRODUCTION: The only curative treatment for most gastric cancer is radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD). Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MIG) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity, but its use has not yet been widely established in Western countries. Minimally invasivE versus open total GAstrectomy is the first Western multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare postoperative morbidity following MIG vs open total gastrectomy (OG). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This superiority multicentre RCT compares MIG (intervention) to OG (control) for oncological total gastrectomy with D2 or D2+LAD. Recruitment is expected to last for 2 years. Inclusion criteria comprise age between 18 and 84 years and planned total gastrectomy after initial diagnosis of gastric carcinoma. Exclusion criteria include Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2, tumours requiring extended gastrectomy or less than total gastrectomy, previous abdominal surgery or extensive adhesions seriously complicating MIG, other active oncological disease, advanced stages (T4 or M1), emergency setting and pregnancy.The sample size was calculated at 80 participants per group. The primary endpoint is 30-day postoperative morbidity as measured by the Comprehensive Complications Index. Secondary endpoints include postoperative morbidity and mortality, adherence to a fast-track protocol and patient-reported quality of life (QoL) scores (QoR-15, EUROQOL EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D), EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-STO22, activities of daily living and Body Image Scale). Oncological endpoints include rate of R0 resection, lymph node yield, disease-free survival and overall survival at 60-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received by the independent Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg (S-816/2021) and will be received from each responsible ethics committee for each individual participating centre prior to recruitment. Results will be published open access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00025765.

Implementation and validation of a competency assessment tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Achieving proficiency in a surgical procedure is a milestone in the career of a trainee. We introduced a competency assessment tool for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our residency program. Our aim was to assess the inter-rater reliability of this tool. METHODS: We included all laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by residents under the supervision of board certified surgeons. All residents were assessed at the end of the procedure by the supervising surgeon (live reviewer) using our competency assessment tool. Video records of the same procedure were analyzed by two independent reviewers (reviewer A and B), who were blinded to the performing trainee's. The assessment had three parts: a laparoscopic cholecystectomy-specific assessment tool (LCAT), the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and a 5-item visual analogue scale (VAS) to address the surgeon's autonomy in each part of the cholecystectomy. We compared the assessment scores of the live supervising surgeon and the video reviewers. RESULTS: We included 15 junior residents who performed 42 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Scoring results from live and video reviewer were comparable except for the OSATS and VAS part. The score for OSATS by the live reviewer and reviewer B were 3.68 vs. 4.26 respectively (p = 0.04) and for VAS (5.17 vs. 4.63 respectively (p = 0.03). The same difference was found between reviewers A and B with OSATS score (3.75 vs. 4.26 respectively (p = 0.001)) and VAS (5.56 vs. 4.63 respectively; p = 0.004)). CONCLUSION: Our competency assessment tool for the evaluation of surgical skills specific to laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been shown to be objective and comparable in-between raters during live procedure or on video material.

[Modern Multimodal Concepts for Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer]. / Moderne multimodale Konzepte für fortgeschrittene und metastasierte Ösophaguskarzinome.

Modern Multimodal Concepts for Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Abstract. In case of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma, the clear recommendation for multimodal therapy has been established in the guidelines. This also applies to systemic therapy in the palliative, metastatic situation. Against the background of increasing experience with multimodal concepts and a parallel trend towards more and more personalized tumor therapy, therapy options that go beyond this are increasingly being used. The most recent chapter here is the successful use of antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the adjuvant, additive or palliative setting. Salvage concepts and the salvage operation are also used. These are efficient options to be able to react surgically from a situation of clinical remission and close observation in case of tumor recurrence. The limited radical surgical procedures with reconstruction according to "Merendino" and the "double tract procedure" with limited resection of the distal esophagus and proximal stomach via abdominal approach are options for high-risk patients or very elderly patients. They show great advantages with regard to the operational stress and - especially the "double tract procedure" - with regard to the quality of life. The oligometastatic situation is also the subject of ongoing studies. Under strict clinical observation, it may make sense not to exclude patients with very limited metastases from a curative concept. Numerous cases of long-term survival encourage this. In the palliative setting, in addition to classic chemotherapy and best supportive care, immunotherapy is also playing an increasingly important role, and here, too, a conversion to a curative concept is possible if the response is good. Palliative esophageal resections in the case of disseminated metastases, infiltration of vertebral bodies, aorta or trachea or main bronchi must be strictly avoided and must unfortunately be described as incurable.

[Chemotherapy and Radio-Chemotherapy of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer]. / Chemotherapie und Radio-/Chemotherapie des lokal fortgeschrittenen Ösophaguskarzinoms.

Chemotherapy and Radio-Chemotherapy of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Abstract. Surgical resection alone of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma leads to long-term survival in only about 30% of cases. The multimodal strategy for locally advanced tumors, especially neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and chemotherapy, has significantly improved the long-term prognosis. Multimodal therapy concepts have been developed which improve overall survival. Therapy planning must be performed pretherapeutically in an interdisciplinary tumor board, preferably at a high-volume center. For squamous cell carcinomas, neoadjuvant radio/chemotherapy followed by resection or definitive radio/chemotherapy are currently the therapies of choice. For adenocarcinomas, neoadjuvant radio/chemotherapy followed by resection or perioperative chemotherapy are considered equivalent therapeutic standards. After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, adjuvant immunotherapy is currently recommended in case of only incomplete histopathological response.

Multimodal treatment in oligometastatic gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is generally diagnosed at an advanced stage, especially in countries without screening programs. Previously, the metastatic stage was synonymous with palliative management, and surgical indications were only for symptomatic relief. However, this therapeutic option is associated with poor prognosis. A subgroup of patients with limited metastatic disease could benefit from intensive treatment. A combination of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy could help either maintain a resectable state for oligometastatic disease or diminish the metastasis size to obtain a complete resection configuration. This latter strategy is known as conversion therapy and has growing evidence with favorable outcomes. Oncosurgical approach of metastatic disease could prolong survival in selected patients. The challenge for the surgeon and oncologist is to identify these specific patients to offer the best multimodal management. We review in this article the actual evidence for the treatment of oligometastatic gastric cancer with curative intent.

Definitions and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer according to multidisciplinary tumour boards in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Consensus about the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer across multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) in Europe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: European expert centers (n = 49) were requested to discuss 15 real-life cases in their MDT with at least a medical, surgical, and radiation oncologist present. The cases varied in terms of location and number of metastases, histology, timing of detection (i.e. synchronous versus metachronous), primary tumour treatment status, and response to systemic therapy. The primary outcome was the agreement in the definition of oligometastatic disease at diagnosis and after systemic therapy. The secondary outcome was the agreement in treatment strategies. Treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease were categorised into upfront local treatment (i.e. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy), systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment or systemic therapy alone. The agreement across MDTs was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥75%). RESULTS: A total of 47 MDTs across 16 countries fully discussed the cases (96%). Oligometastatic disease was considered in patients with 1-2 metastases in either the liver, lung, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, adrenal gland, soft tissue or bone (consensus). At follow-up, oligometastatic disease was considered after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy when no progression or progression in size only of the oligometastatic lesion(s) was seen (consensus). If at restaging after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy the number of lesions progressed, this was not considered as oligometastatic disease (fair agreement). There was no consensus on treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease. CONCLUSION: A broad consensus on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer was found among MDTs of oesophagogastric cancer expert centres in Europe. However, high practice variability in treatment strategies exists.

Predictive Value of Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer - Data From a Randomized German Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: The role of EUS before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCTX) in advanced esophagogastric cancer (EGC) is still unclear. The phase II NEOPECX trial evaluated perioperative chemotherapy with or without panitumumab in this setting. The aim of this sub-study was to investigate the prognostic value of EUS-guided preoperative staging before and after nCTX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative yuT/yuN stages by EUS were compared with histopathological ypT/ypN stages after curative resection. Reduction in T-stage from baseline to preoperative EUS was defined as downstaging (DS+) and compared to progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients without downstaging (DS-). In addition, preoperative EUS N-stages (positive N+ or negative N-) were correlated with clinical data. RESULTS: The preoperative yuT-stage correlated with the ypT-stage in 48% of cases (sensitivity 48%, specificity 52%), while the preoperative yuN-stage correlated with the ypN-stage in 64% (sensitivity 76%, specificity 52%). Within DS+ patients who were downstaged by ≥ 2 T-categories, a trend towards improved OS was detected (median OS DS+: not reached (NR), median OS DS-: 38.5 months (M), p=0.21). Patients with yuN+ at preoperative EUS had a worse outcome than yuN- patients (median OS yuN-: NR, median OS yuN+: 38.5 M, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of EUS to predict the response after nCTX in patients with advanced EGC is limited. In the current study the endosonographic detection of lymph node metastasis after nCTX indicates a poor prognosis. In the future, preoperative EUS with sectional imaging procedures may be used to tailor treatment for patients with advanced EGC.

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Internal Hernia After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Multicentric Retrospective Cohort: The Swirl, Weight Excess Loss, Liquid Score.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prediction score for internal hernia (IH) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The clinical diagnosis of IH is challenging. A sensitivity of 63% to 92% was reported for computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for abdominal pain after RYGB and undergoing CT and surgical exploration were included retrospectively. Potential clinical predictors and radiological signs of IH were entered in binary logistic regression analysis to determine a predictive score of surgically confirmed IH in the Geneva training set (January 2006-December 2014), and validated in 3 centers, Geneva (January 2015-December 2017) and Neuchâtel and Strasbourg (January 2012-December 2017). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight patients were included, 80 of whom (35.5%) had surgically confirmed IH, 38 (16.6%) had a negative laparoscopy, and 110 (48.2%) had an alternate diagnosis. In the training set of 61 patients, excess body weight loss >95% (odds ratio [OR] 6.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-39.96), swirl sign (OR 8.93, 95% CI: 2.30-34.70), and free liquid (OR 4.53, 95% CI: 1.08-19.0) were independent predictors of IH. Area under the curve (AUC) of the score was 0.799. In the validation set of 167 patients, AUC was 0.846. A score ≥2 was associated with an IH incidence of 60.7% (34/56), and 5.3% (3/56) had a negative laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The score could be incorporated in the clinical setting. To reduce the risk of delayed IH diagnosis, emergency explorative laparoscopy in patients with a score ≥ 2 should be considered.

Impact of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis on the Outcome of Patients Undergoing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

PURPOSE: It is currently unknown whether NASH (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis), as compared to simple steatosis, is associated with impaired postoperative weight loss and metabolic outcomes after RYGB surgery. To compare the effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on patients with NASH versus those with simple nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved data from 515 patients undergoing RYGB surgery with concomitant liver biopsy. Clinical follow-up and metabolic assessment were performed prior to surgery and 12 months after surgery. We used multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and propensity score matching and we assessed for changes in markers of hepatocellular injury and metabolic outcomes. RESULTS: There were 421 patients with simple NAFL, and 94 with NASH. Baseline alanine and aspartate aminotransferases were significantly higher in patients with NASH (p < 0.01). Twelve months after the RYGB surgery, as determined by both MANOVA and propensity score matching, patients with NASH exhibited a significantly greater reduction in alanine aminotransferase (ß-coefficient - 12 iU/l [- 22 to - 1.83], 95% CI, adjusted p = 0.021) compared to their NAFL counterparts (31 matched patients in each group with no loss to follow-up at 12 months). Excess weight loss was similar in both groups (ß-coefficient 4.54% [- 3.12 to 12.21], 95% CI, adjusted p = 0.244). Change in BMI was comparable in both groups (- 14 (- 16.6 to - 12.5) versus - 14.3 (- 17.3 to - 11.9), p = 0.784). CONCLUSION: After RYGB surgery, patients with NASH experience a greater reduction in markers for hepatocellular injury and similar weight loss compared to patients with simple steatosis.

Preventive HIPEC in combination with perioperative FLOT versus FLOT alone for resectable diffuse type gastric and gastroesophageal junction type II/III adenocarcinoma - the phase III "PREVENT"- (FLOT9) trial of the AIO /CAOGI /ACO.

BACKGROUND: The main reason for treatment failure after curative surgical resection of gastric cancer is intra-abdominal spread, with 40-50% peritoneal seeding as primary localization of recurrence. Peritoneal relapse is seen in 60-70% of tumors of diffuse type, compared to only 20-30% of intestinal type. Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemoperfusion (HIPEC) is an increasingly used therapy method for patients with peritoneal metastases. The preventive use of HIPEC could represent an elegant approach for patients (pts) before macroscopic peritoneal seeding, since pts. with operable disease are fit and may have potential risk of microscopic involvement, thus having a theoretical chance of cure with HIPEC even without the need for cytoreduction. No results from a PCRT from the Western hemisphere have yet been published. METHODS: This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study including a total of 200 pts. with localized and locally advanced diffuse or mixed type (Laurens's classification) adenocarcinoma of the stomach and Type II/III GEJ. All enrolled pts. will have received 3-6 pre-operative cycles of biweekly FLOT (Docetaxel 50 mg/m2; Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; Leucovorin 200 mg/m2; 5-FU 2600 mg/m2, q2wk). Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive surgery only and postoperative FLOT (control arm) or surgery + intraoperative HIPEC (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 solution administered at a temperature of 42 °C for 90 min) and postoperative FLOT (experimental arm). Surgery is carried out as gastrectomy or transhiatal extended gastrectomy. Primary endpoint is PFS/DFS, major secondary endpoints are OS, rate of pts. with peritoneal relapse at 2 and 3 years, perioperative morbidity/mortality and quality of life. The trial starts with a safety run-in phase. After 20 pts. had curatively intended resection in Arm B, an interim safety analysis is performed. Recruitment has already started and first patient in was on January 18th, 2021. DISCUSSION: If the PREVENT concept proves to be effective, this could potentially lead to a new standard of therapy. On the contrary, if the outcome is negative, pts. with gastric cancer and no peritoneal involvement will not be treated with HIPEC during surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered on June 25th, 2020 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04447352 ; EudraCT: 2017-003832-35 .

[Treatment options for oligometastatic gastric cancer]. / Therapieoptionen beim oligometastasierten Magenkarzinom.

BACKGROUND: At the time of diagnosis of gastric cancer approximately one third of patients already have metastases. It is important to differentiate between oligometastasis and the diffuse metastatic situation. For the first time the definition of oligometastasis has been integrated into the German S3 guidelines. OBJECTIVE: Can multimodal treatment with tumor resection and metastasectomy combined with perioperative chemotherapy, increase the chances of survival in oligometastatic patients? MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this review article the data situation of the current literature is discussed. RESULTS: The Dutch D1/D2 trial reported an increased median survival for a subgroup of patients with single metastasis who underwent resection. Multimodal treatment with resection doubled the median survival of oligometastatic patients in the German AIO-FLOT 3 study and as a consequence, the AIO-FLOT 5 (RENAISSANCE) trial was designed. Patients with oligometastatic gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer are randomized after chemotherapy to either undergo resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or to undergo definitive chemotherapy. Further randomized trials investigate the benefit of antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in locoregional and advanced metastatic gastric cancer with promising results. CONCLUSION: The results of the ongoing randomized trials will show if oligometastatic patients benefit from a multimodal treatment with resection. The clear definition of the oligometastatic state, assessment of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and realistic estimation of the R0 resectability will be useful for patient selection.

Esophageal cancer surgery: review of complications and their management.

Esophagectomy, even with the progress in surgical technique and perioperative management, is a highly specialized surgery, associated with a high rate of complications. Early recognition and adequate treatment should be a standard of care for the most common postoperative complications: anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, chylothorax, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Recent progress in endoscopy with vacuum and stent placement, or in radiology with embolization, has changed the management of these complications. The success of nonoperative treatments should be frequently reassessed and reoperation must be proposed in case of failure. We have summarized the clinical signs, diagnostic process, and management of the frequent complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.