Recovery of the medial gastrocnemius muscle after calcaneus fracture differs between contractile and elastic components.

BACKGROUND: Calcaneal fractures result in severe functional impairments and walking restrictions. Postoperative evaluation mainly focusses on the restoration of calcaneal anatomy while ankle plantar flexor insufficiency remains largely neglected. This study aims to investigate biomechanical and morphologic adaptions of elastic and contractile components of the gastrocnemius medialis after unilateral calcaneal fracture. METHODS: 20 Patients (BMI: 27.6 ± 3.1 kgm-2, Age: 50 ± 12 years) were measured using gait analysis and portable ultrasound over a follow-up of three, six and twelve months after surgery. Data comparison was performed using 20 matched healthy controls (BMI: 26.2 ± 2.9 kgm-2, Age: 48 ± 11 years). Static and dynamic behavior of the gastrocnemius muscle tendon unit, muscle fascicle and the serial-elastic element as well ankle joint kinematics and kinetics were analyzed. FINDINGS: Within patients, a significant (p < 0.05) increase in fascicle length (by 67%) during single support and a decrease of serial elastic element shortening (by 20%) during push off was found between three and twelve months follow-up comparisons. Patients showed differences for fascicle lengthening and pennation angle increase during single support after three and six months compared to healthy controls. A smaller shortening of the serial-elastic element (by 29%) and muscle-tendon unit (by 16%) persisted even for the twelve month comparisons. INTERPRETATION: Patients with calcaneal fracture showed an incomplete restoration of the medial gastrocnemius dynamic morphological behavior. While muscle fascicle contraction almost recovered, the serial elastic component still showed restrictions regarding its shortening behavior. Limited foot mobility and plantarflexor strength as well as lowered responsiveness of elastic tissues to mechanical loading are regarded as key mechanisms.

Effects of assistive insole feedback training on immediate and multi-day partial weight bearing retention during walking: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to partial weight bearing (PWB) plays a crucial role in early rehabilitation and motor control. Dynamic biofeedback insole systems provide a supportive function on immediate PWB adherence, while important long-term retention effects and potential advantages to a conventional static training remain unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is acoustic insole feedback training effective for the retention of prescribed PWB adherence and is there any advantage relative to static training using a conventional bathroom scale? Methods Twenty-four volunteers were randomized into two groups receiving biofeedback training (N = 12) via a mobile insole system (Loadsol®) or conventional training using a bathroom scale (N = 12). After initial PWB training (20 kg) of one randomized leg, the immediate and one-week retention effects were analysed using mean and maximum load (N) and overload rate (%). Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05). RESULTS: A significantly (p < 0.001) improved immediate and long-term PWB adherence was found for the insole feedback group during walking. A significant (p < 0.001) reduction of the overload rate by 86% was found for the insole feedback group when compared to the conventional training group after one week. Significant (p < 0.01) reductions by 51% and 46% was also found for the mean and maximum load in the insole feedback group when compared to the conventional training group. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of insole feedback systems can serve as a viable tool to become familiar with PWB and to provide optimal retention of specified loads. Therefore, such systems serve as an advantageous training intervention to maintain a prescribed PWB during locomotion.

Robot-assisted training after proximal humeral fracture: A randomised controlled multicentre intervention trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether robotic-assisted training as a supplement to usual therapy is safe, acceptable and improves function and patient reported outcome after proximal humeral fractures (PHF). DESIGN: Multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled prospective trial. SETTING: Three different rehabilitation hospitals in Germany. SUBJECTS: In total 928 PHF patients between 35 and 70 years were screened. Forty-eight participants were included in the study (intervention group n = 23; control group n = 25). INTERVENTION: The control group received usual occupational and physiotherapy over three weeks, and the intervention group received additional 12 robot-assisted training sessions at the ARMEO®-Spring. MAIN MEASURES: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), the Wolf Motor Function Test-Orthopaedic, active range of motion and grip strength were determined before and after intervention period. The DASH was additionally obtained postal 6 and 13 months following surgery. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 55 ± 10 years and was similar in both groups (p > 0.05). The change in DASH as the primary endpoint in the intervention group after intervention was -15 (CI = 8-22), at follow-up six month -7 (CI = -2 to 16) at follow up 13 month -9 (CI = 1-16); in control group -14 (CI = 11-18), at follow-up six month -13 (CI = 7-19) at follow up 13 month -6 (CI = -3 to 14). No difference in the change was found between groups (p > 0.05). None of the follow-up time points demonstrated an additional benefit of the robotic therapy. CONCLUSION: The additional robot-assisted therapy was safe, acceptable but showed no improvement in functional shoulder outcome compared to usual therapy only.

Upper Body Posture and Muscle Activation in Recreational Cyclists: Immediate Effects of Variable Cycling Setups.

Purpose: Discomfort during cycling can be counteracted by adjusting the seat position. However, the influence of changes in cycling position regarding quantitative biomechanical adaptions of the upper body in recreational cyclists is unclear. This study aims to investigate the effects of saddle position and reach distance on upper body kinematics and muscle activation. Methods: Twelve recreational cyclists were investigated in four different sitting positions on an adjustable cycle trainer. Trunk, pelvis, shoulder, elbow and spinal kinematics as well as lower back and elbow extensor activity were analyzed for combinations of normal and shortened reach distance including horizontal and 10° downward inclined saddle positions. Results: An inclined saddle increased activation of elbow extensors by almost 23 ± 8% (p < .01) while a shortened reach distance resulted in a more posterior pelvic tilt of up to 18 ± 2% (p < .01) and less trunk forward lean of 10 ± 9% (p < .01). Shoulder flexion reduced by up to 23 ± 16% (p < .05) while elbow flexion increased by 15 ± 22% (p < .05) with a shortened reach distance. No differences between configurations were found for spinal kinematics and lower back muscle activity. Conclusions: Changing the reach distance showed considerable biomechanical effects on upper body kinematics of the pelvis and trunk rather than on the spine or on lower back muscle activity. For reach distance, most compensation of postural changes of the upper body occurred by changes of shoulder and elbow angles while elbow extensor activation was only altered by saddle downward inclination.

Gait characteristics and functional outcomes during early follow-up are comparable in patients with calcaneal fractures treated by either the sinus tarsi or the extended lateral approach.

BACKGROUND: To overcome the substantial functional loss after calcaneal fractures (CF), surgical treatment currently consists of two strategies, namely the commonly used extended lateral approach (ELA) and the less invasive sinus tarsi approach (STA). Despite the comparable anatomical restoration, the biomechanical and functional outcome of these strategies during early rehabilitation has not yet been investigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: To evaluate changes in gait characteristics and functional development in patients with CF treated by either STA or ELA. METHODS: A total of 56 patients with unilateral CF were included in this retrospective study. 26 patients were treated by ELA while 30 patients underwent surgery through the STA. Functional and biomechanical measurements were performed at follow-up periods of three and six months. Foot and ankle kinetics and kinematics were extracted using instrumented gait analysis with a multi segment foot model. Physical and mental components of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and total scoring of the AOFAS hindfoot scale were used for functional evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann Whitney and Student's t-test. Effect sizes of group differences were calculated using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Comparisons between ELA and STA showed no significant difference regarding the biomechanical and functional outcome. Within-group comparisons showed significant (p < 0.05) improvements from three to six month follow-up. Ankle joint and hindfoot kinematics showed increased mobility during walking of up to 34% and 26%, respectively. Maximum ankle joint moment also improved by up to 34% while vertical ground reaction force increased by 8%. Functional outcome only revealed significant changes in the physical component of SF-36. SIGNIFICANCE: ELA and STA treatments revealed comparable functional improvements in patients with unilateral intraarticular calcaneal fractures during early rehabilitation. The less invasive STA provides adequate restoration of dynamic foot function and could serve as a viable alternative to the commonly used ELA.

Effectiveness of robot-assisted training added to conventional rehabilitation in patients with humeral fracture early after surgical treatment: protocol of a randomised, controlled, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of proximal humeral fractures increases with age. The functional recovery of the upper arm after such fractures is slow, and results are often disappointing. Treatment is associated with long immobilisation periods. Evidence-based exercise guidelines are missing. Loss of muscle mass as well as reduced range of motion and motor performance are common consequences. These losses could be partly counteracted by training interventions using robot-assisted arm support of the affected arm derived from neurorehabilitation. Thus, shorter immobilisation could be reached. Thus far, this approach has been tested in only a few small studies. The aim of the present study is to examine whether assistive robotic training augmenting conventional occupational and physical therapy can improve functional shoulder outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients aged between 35 and 66 years with proximal humeral fracture and surgical treatment will be recruited at three different clinics in Germany and randomised into an intervention group and a control group. Participants will be assessed before randomisation and followed after completing an intervention period of 3 weeks and additionally after 3, 6 and 12 months. The baseline assessment will include cognition (Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test); level of pain in the affected arm; ability to work; gait speed (10-m walk); disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure [DASH]); range of motion of the affected arm (goniometer measurement); visual acuity; and motor function of orthopaedic patients (Wolf Motor Function Test-Orthopaedic version [WMFT-O]). Clinical follow-up directly after the intervention will include assessment of disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) as well as range of motion and motor function (WMFT-O). The primary outcome parameter will be the DASH, and the secondary outcome parameter will be the WMFT-O. The long-term results will be assessed prospectively by postal follow-up. All patients will receive conventional occupational and physical therapy. The intervention group will receive additional robot-assisted training using the Armeo®Spring robot for 3 weeks. DISCUSSION: This study protocol describes a phase II, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre intervention study. The results will guide and possibly improve methods of rehabilitation after proximal humeral fracture. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03100201 . Registered on 28 March 2017.

Effects of knee orthosis adjustment on biomechanical performance and clinical outcome in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Valgus bracing in medial knee osteoarthritis aims to improve gait function by reducing the loading of the medial compartment. Orthosis composition and optimal adjustment is essential to achieve biomechanical and clinical effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To investigate biomechanical functionality during gait, pain relief and compliance in patients with knee osteoarthritis using a lightweight adjustable knee unloader orthosis. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical trial. METHODS: Instrumented gait analysis in 22 patients with unilateral medial knee osteoarthritis was performed after a 2-week orthosis acclimatisation period. Kinematics and kinetics during gait as well as force transmission from the orthosis to the knee were analysed. Measurements were performed without, at individualised and at reduced orthosis setting. The assessment was supplemented by patient-related pain sensation and compliance questionnaires. RESULTS: Orthosis wear significantly reduced the knee adduction moment by up to 20% depending on orthosis adjustment, whereas pain sensation was significantly reduced by 16%. A significant positive correlation was found between force transmissions and knee adduction moment as well as for frontal knee angle. Compliance was good with a main daily use of 2-6 h. CONCLUSION: The orthosis provides significant biomechanical improvements, pain relief and good patient compliance. Patients had a biomechanical benefit for the individualised and reduced orthosis adjustments. Clinical relevance In patients with medial knee osteoarthritis, a lightweight medial unloader orthosis effectively reduced external knee adduction moment and pain sensation during daily activities. Thus, use of lightweight orthoses effectively supports conservative treatment in medial knee osteoarthritis.