Functional Abdominal Cramping Pain: Expert Practical Guidance.

Functional abdominal cramping pain (FACP) is a common complaint, which may present either on its own or in association with a functional gastrointestinal disorder. It is likely caused by a variety of, probably partly unknown, etiologies. Effective management of FACP can be challenging owing to the lack of usable diagnostic tools and the availability of a diverse range of treatment approaches. Practical guidance for their selection and use is limited. The objective of this article is to present a working definition of FACP based on expert consensus, and to propose practical strategies for the diagnosis and management of this condition for physicians, pharmacists, and patients. A panel of experts on functional gastrointestinal disorders was convened to participate in workshop activities aimed at defining FACP and agreeing upon a recommended sequence of diagnostic criteria and management recommendations. The key principles forming the foundation of the definition of FACP and suggested management algorithms include the primacy of cramping pain as the distinguishing symptom; the importance of recognizing and acting upon alarm signals of potential structural disease; the recognition of known causes that might be addressed through lifestyle adjustment; and the central role of antispasmodics in the treatment of FACP. The proposed algorithm is intended to assist physicians in reaching a meaningful diagnostic endpoint based on patient-reported symptoms of FACP. We also discuss how this algorithm may be adapted for use by pharmacists and patients.

Recognizing and Defining Occasional Constipation: Expert Consensus Recommendations.

Constipation is a common problem, affects 15% of the population, and is often self-diagnosed and self-managed. Over the past 3 decades, there have been significant advances in our understanding and management of chronic constipation, with the emerging recognition that occasional constipation (OC) is another subtype that falls outside current classifications. The purpose of this review was to describe the process of developing and proposing a new definition for OC based on expert consensus and taking into consideration the multifactorial nature of the problem such as alterations in bowel habit that include stool frequency and difficulty with stool passage, perception of the sufferer, duration of symptoms, and potential responsiveness to treatment. Leading gastroenterologists from 5 countries met virtually on multiple occasions through an online digital platform to discuss the problem of OC and recommended a practical, user-friendly definition: "OC can be defined as intermittent or occasional symptomatic alteration(s) in bowel habit. This includes a bothersome reduction in the frequency of bowel movements and/or difficulty with passage of stools but without alarming features. Bowel symptoms may last for a few days or a few weeks, and episodes may require modification of lifestyle, dietary habits and/or use of over-the-counter laxatives or bulking agents to restore a satisfactory bowel habit." Prospective studies are required to validate this definition and determine OC prevalence in the community. This review highlights current knowledge gaps and could provide impetus for future research to facilitate an improved understanding of OC and development of evidence-based management guidelines.

[Constipation - pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment]. / Obstipation ­ Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik, Behandlung.

The most relevant risk factors for the development of chronic constipation are neurologic disorders such as Parkinson's disease, immobility, and some drugs, in particular opioids. A proctologic exam and exclusion of red flags form part of the basic assessment. The currently available laxatives are effective and safe, habituation and tolerance (tachyphylaxis) being an exception. Also long-term intake of laxatives is of no concern when taken in recommended doses (no relevant hypokalemia!). Though the newer compounds (e. g., prucalopride, linaclotide, lubiprostone) are not more effective than the older ones, developing new drugs with alternative mode of action is reasonable since there are patients not satisfied with the currently available substances. Macrogol, Bisacodyl, and sodium picosulfate are the laxatives of first choice. Their selection depends on the individual preference of the patient. Opioids often induce constipation which can be ameliorated by laxatives or PAMORAs (peripherally acting µ-opioid antagonists).

Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: A Clinical Guideline.

OBJECTIVE: To formulate timely evidence-based guidelines for the management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. SETTING: Constipation is a major untoward effect of opioids. Increasing prescription of opioids has correlated to increased incidence of opioid-induced constipation. However, the inhibitory effects of opioids are not confined to the colon, but also affect higher segments of the gastrointestinal tract, leading to the coining of the term "opioid-induced bowel dysfunction." METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Predefined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria were used to identify and categorize relevant papers. A series of statements were formulated and justified by a comment, then labeled with the degree of agreement and their level of evidence as judged by the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) system. RESULTS: From a list of 10,832 potentially relevant studies, 33 citations were identified for review. Screening the reference lists of the pertinent papers identified additional publications. Current definitions, prevalence, and mechanism of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction were reviewed, and a treatment algorithm and statements regarding patient management were developed to provide guidance on clinical best practice in the management of patients with opioid-induced constipation and opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In recent years, more insight has been gained in the pathophysiology of this "entity"; new treatment approaches have been developed, but guidelines on clinical best practice are still lacking. Current knowledge is insufficient regarding management of the opioid side effects on the upper gastrointestinal tract, but recommendations can be derived from what we know at present.

Effect of the probiotic strain Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, BB-12®, on defecation frequency in healthy subjects with low defecation frequency and abdominal discomfort: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, BB-12®, on two primary end points - defecation frequency and gastrointestinal (GI) well-being - in healthy adults with low defecation frequency and abdominal discomfort. A total of 1248 subjects were included in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. After a 2-week run-in period, subjects were randomised to 1 or 10 billion colony-forming units/d of the probiotic strain BB-12® or a matching placebo capsule once daily for 4 weeks. Subjects completed a diary on bowel habits, relief of abdominal discomfort and symptoms. GI well-being, defined as global relief of abdominal discomfort, did not show significant differences. The OR for having a defecation frequency above baseline for ≥50% of the time was 1·31 (95% CI 0·98, 1·75), P=0·071, for probiotic treatment overall. Tightening the criteria for being a responder to an increase of ≥1 d/week for ≥50 % of the time resulted in an OR of 1·55 (95% CI 1·22, 1·96), P=0·0003, for treatment overall. A treatment effect on average defecation frequency was found (P=0·0065), with the frequency being significantly higher compared with placebo at all weeks for probiotic treatment overall (all P<0·05). Effects on defecation frequency were similar for the two doses tested, suggesting that a ceiling effect was reached with the one billion dose. Overall, 4 weeks' supplementation with the probiotic strain BB-12® resulted in a clinically relevant benefit on defecation frequency. The results suggest that consumption of BB-12® improves the GI health of individuals whose symptoms are not sufficiently severe to consult a doctor (ISRCTN18128385).

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for the current chronic constipation treatments.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic constipation is a frequent condition often treated pharmacologically. The laxatives available belong to very different pharmacologic groups. AREAS COVERED: This is a short but comprehensive review of the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of currently available laxatives for chronic constipation. Pertinent publications were retrieved from reference lists of publications and by literature searches via PubMed, lastly performed in November 2012. EXPERT OPINION: The most relevant laxative groups are the older representatives osmotic salts, sugars and sugar alcohols, macrogol, anthraquinones, diphenolic laxatives or diphenyl methanes (bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate) and the newer compounds prucalopride, lubiprostone and linaclotide. For all of these laxatives efficacy has been shown in controlled trials. Electrolyte losses do not occur when laxatives are given in therapeutic doses (rare exceptions with phosphate salts and salinic laxatives). The older laxatives are also safe regarding teratogenicity, abortion and lactation. For the newer compounds no respective data are available as yet. It is questionable whether the newer compounds offer advantages over the older ones. Unfortunately, comparative trials are lacking.

Factors affecting satisfaction with treatment in European women with chronic constipation: An internet survey.

BACKGROUND: Data on factors affecting treatment satisfaction in European women with chronic constipation are limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with treatment satisfaction among European women with chronic constipation. METHODS: A 2011-2012 internet survey was conducted in men and women from 12 European countries. Respondents analysed were female with self-reported chronic constipation (≥1 symptoms for ≥6 months of lumpy/hard stools, feeling of incomplete evacuation, and pain during defecation, as well as <3 bowel movements/week). For laxative users, satisfaction with treatment, factors affecting satisfaction, and interactions with healthcare professionals were collected. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In total, 4805/50,319 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria (female with chronic constipation). Of the laxative users (1575/4805), 57% (n = 896) were satisfied with their treatment, while 26% were neutral, and 17% dissatisfied. Dissatisfied respondents visited their GP less frequently in the past 12 months, were more likely to obtain over-the-counter laxatives, and took a dose higher than recommended more frequently than those satisfied. Respondents were most satisfied with ease of use of treatment and least satisfied with relief from bloating. Newer treatments aimed at alleviating symptoms, particularly bloating, are required for respondents neutral or dissatisfied with their current treatment.

The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of constipation.

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common condition about which there are many widespread notions that have no basis in fact. The purpose of this article is to summarize current scientific knowledge on the subject. METHODS: Selective review of the literature. RESULTS: Diagnostic evaluation usually fails to reveal the cause of constipation. It is due to medications in some patients, while endocrine disorders are the cause in only a small minority. Abnormal defecation may be due to dysfunction of the pelvic floor. Most patients complain of abdominal fullness and of needing to strain to pass stool; low stool frequency is a rare symptom. The symptoms alone determine the indication for treatment. Constipation usually poses no threat to health. Some patients are helped by a diet rich in fiber, others by laxatives. A number of laxatives with different modes of action are available; all are safe and generally well tolerated. In some patients, dysfunctional defecation may be an indication for proctological surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The Rome criteria are useful for establishing a specific diagnosis of constipation. Most patients can be helped with laxatives and patient education.

Treatment of chronic constipation: current pharmacologic approaches and future directions.

Chronic constipation is a common condition that affects up to 27% of the population. Dietary and lifestyle measures are usually the first-line therapy, but if these fail to have an effect then a variety of prescription and consumer laxatives are available. Traditional laxatives include bulking agents, osmotic agents, stool softeners, and stimulants of the gastrointestinal tract. All have been found to be more effective than placebo at relieving symptoms of constipation, but these results have been obtained primarily in short (4-week) trials and no class of laxative has been shown to be superior to another. Traditional laxatives work in many, but not all, patients and some patients cannot cope with the side effects, unpleasant taste, the requirements of the dosing regimen, or the notion of dose increase. New enterokinetic agents that affect peristalsis through selective interaction with 5-hydroxytryptamine-4 receptors and novel agents acting on intestinal secretion could offer an alternative option for patients with chronic constipation who cannot get adequate relief from current laxatives.

The difficult patient with constipation.

Difficult patients with constipation mostly suffer for years, have consulted more than one physician and have had some experience with laxatives. The first step should be sorting out what exactly the patient's problem is. For this purpose technical investigations may be helpful, but the most important measures are a detailed history, symptom analysis and proctological examination. Rarely, an underlying and treatable cause of the constipation can be identified. In disordered defaecation this may be a large rectocele or an intussusception of the rectum amenable to proctosurgery. In most cases, however, some form of laxative treatment will be required. For this purpose, a detailed knowledge of their pharmacology is mandatory. The type of laxative and the schedule of administration often have to be determined on an individual basis over a number of weeks. In some patients, combination treatment with macrogol and a stimulant laxative may be the solution. Psychological features must also be taken into account in difficult patients, in particular if they ask for colectomy. Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is an effective (although not universally successful) treatment of constipation, which is, however, hampered by a high rate of both early and late complications.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tegaserod over 13 months in patients with chronic constipation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term safety and tolerability of tegaserod in patients with chronic constipation (CC). METHODS: This 13-month, uncontrolled extension study enrolled CC patients who completed a 12-wk randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled core study. Patients receiving tegaserod 6 or 2 mg b.i.d. during the core study continued on the same dose; those receiving placebo were switched to tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d (placebo-to-tegaserod). Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), laboratory parameters, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. Symptom evaluations included patient satisfaction with bowel habit and bothersomeness of constipation, abdominal distension/bloating, and abdominal discomfort/pain. RESULTS: A total of 842 patients entered the extension study; 451 (54%) completed. AEs typically occurred within the first month of tegaserod treatment. Long-term treatment neither increased AE incidence nor revealed new safety risks. Headache (11.3%, 14.5%, and 16.1% in the tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d., 2 mg b.i.d., and placebo-to-tegaserod groups, respectively) and abdominal pain (8.8%, 8.8%, 10.9%) were the most common AEs. Diarrhea, the most common drug-related AE (4.9%, 2.5%, 8.0%), rarely led to discontinuation (0.7%, 0.0%, 2.2%). Diarrhea was transient, resolved without treatment interruption or rescue medication, and had no clinically significant consequences. Of 27 serious AEs, none were considered treatment related. No deaths or reports of ischemic colitis occurred in tegaserod-treated patients. No clinically relevant changes occurred in other safety parameters. Safety findings were similar in patients switched from placebo to tegaserod and those maintained on tegaserod. CONCLUSIONS: Tegaserod has a favorable safety profile and is well tolerated during continuous long-term treatment in patients with CC.

"My patients are the sickest".

People with symptoms of the irritable bowel syndrome represent a broad spectrum with respect to severity of symptoms. Only a minority of them seek medical help and thereby become patients. The more severe are the symptoms that are experienced, the lower are the quality of life ratings, but patients will be more prone to participate in enquiries. This makes it very difficult to gain a representative picture of quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome.

Myths and misconceptions about chronic constipation.

There are many strongly held beliefs about constipation that are not evidence based. The purpose of this review is to address these beliefs concerning various aspects of constipation. There is no evidence to support the theory that diseases may arise via "autointoxication," whereby poisonous substances from stools within the colon are absorbed. Dolichocolon, defined as an elongated colon, should not be seen as a cause of constipation. The role of sex hormones altering gut function during the menstrual cycle appears to be minimal. During pregnancy they may play a role in slowing gut transit. Hypothyroidism can cause constipation, but among patients presenting with constipation, hypothyroidism is rare. A diet poor in fiber should not be assumed to be the cause of chronic constipation. Some patients may be helped by a fiber-rich diet but many patients with more severe constipation get worse symptoms when increasing dietary fiber intake. There is no evidence that constipation can successfully be treated by increasing fluid intake unless there is evidence of dehydration. In the elderly constipation may correlate with decreased physical activity, but many cofactors are likely to play a role. Intervention programs to increase physical activity as part of a broad rehabilitation program may help. It is unlikely that stimulant laxatives at recommended doses are harmful to the colon. A proportion of patients with chronic constipation is dependent of laxatives to achieve satisfactory bowel function, but this is not the result of prior laxative intake. Tolerance to stimulant laxatives is uncommon. There is no indication for the occurrence of "rebound constipation" after stopping laxative intake. While laxatives may be misused, there is no potential for addiction.