Bronchodilator Reversibility in the GAN Severe Asthma Cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Positive bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) is a diagnostic criterion for asthma. However, patients with asthma may exhibit a negative BDR response. Aim: To describe the frequency of positive and Negative BDR response in patients with severe asthma and study associations with phenotypic characteristics. METHODS: A positive BDR response was defined as an increase in FEV1 >200 mL and >12% upon testing with a short-acting ß-agonist. RESULTS: BDR data were available for 793 of the 2013 patients included in the German Asthma Net (GAN) severe asthma registry. Of these, 250 (31.5%) had a positive BDR response and 543 (68.5%) a egative BDR response. Comorbidities significantly associated with a negative response were gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (28.0% vs 40.0%, P<.01) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (0.4% vs 3.0%; P<.05), while smoking history (active: 2.8% vs 2.2%; ex: 40.0% vs 41.7%) and comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (5.2% vs 7.2%) were similar in both groups. Patients with a positive BDR response had worse asthma control (median Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 score, 3.4 vs 3.0, P<.05), more frequently reported dyspnea at rest (26.8% vs 16.4%, P<.001) and chest tightness (36.4% vs 26.2%, P<.001), and had more severe airway obstruction at baseline (FEV1% predicted, 56 vs 64, P<.001) and higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels (41 vs 33 ppb, P<0.05). There were no differences in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, single breath (% pred, 70% vs 71%). Multivariate linear regression analysis identified an association between positive BDR response and lower baseline FEV1% (P<.001) and chest tightness (P<.05) and a negative association between BDR and GERD (P<.05). CONCLUSION: In this real-life setting, most patients with severe asthma had a negative BDR response. Interestingly, this was not associated with smoking history or COPD, but with lower FeNO and presence of GERD.

Bronchodilator Reversibility in the GAN Severe Asthma Cohort

Background: Positive bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) is a diagnostic criterion for asthma. However, patients with asthma may exhibit a negative BDR response. Aim: To describe the frequency of positive and negative BDR response in patients with severe asthma and study associations with phenotypic characteristics. Methods: A positive BDR response was defined as an increase in FEV1 >200 mL and >12% upon testing with a short-acting ß-agonist. Results: BDR data were available for 793 of the 2013 patients included in the German Asthma Net (GAN) severe asthma registry. Of these, 250 (31.5%) had a positive BDR response and 543 (68.5%) a negative BDR response. Comorbidities significantly associated with a negative response were gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (28.0% vs 40.0%, P<.01) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (0.4% vs 3.0%; P<.05), while smoking history (active: 2.8% vs 2.2%; ex: 40.0% vs 41.7%) and comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (5.2% vs 7.2%) were similar in both groups. Patients with a positive BDR response had worse asthma control (median Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 score, 3.4 vs 3.0, P<.05), more frequently reported dyspnea at rest (26.8% vs 16.4%, P<.001) and chest tightness (36.4% vs 26.2%, P<.001), and had more severe airway obstruction at baseline (FEV1% predicted, 56 vs 64, P<.001) and higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels (41 vs 33 ppb, P<0.05). There were no differences in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, single breath (% pred, 70% vs 71%). Multivariate linear regression analysis identified an association between positive BDR response and lower baseline FEV1% (P<.001) and chest tightness (P<.05) and a negative association between BDR and GERD (P<.05). Conclusion: In this real-life setting, most patients with severe asthma had a negative BDR response. Interestingly, this was not associated with smoking history or COPD, but with lower FeNO and presence of GERD. (AU)

Antecedentes: La reversibilidad broncodilatadora (RB) positiva es un criterio diagnóstico para el asma. Sin embargo, los pacientes con asma pueden presentar una prueba RB negativa. Objetivos: Describir la frecuencia de RB positivas y negativas en pacientes con asma grave y sus asociaciones con características fenotípicas. Métodos: La RB positiva se definió como un aumento del FEV1 > 200 ml y > 12% tras la inhalación de un agonista beta de acción corta (SABA). Resultados: De 2013 pacientes incluidos en el registro de asma grave del German Asthma Net (GAN), 793 tenían datos sobre RB. De estos, 250 (31,5%) tuvieron una prueba RB positiva y 543 (68,5%) negativa. Las comorbilidades significativamente asociadas con RB negativa fueron el reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) (28,0% frente a 40,0%, p<0,01) y EGPA (0,4% frente a 3,0%; p<0,05), mientras que el antecedente de tabaquismo (activo: 2,8% frente a 2,2%; exfumador: 40,0% vs. 41,7%) y la comorbilidad de la EPOC (5,2% vs. 7,2%) fueron similares en ambos grupos. Los pacientes con RB positiva tenían peor control del asma (mediana ACQ-5 3,4 vs. 3,0, p<0,05), más disnea en reposo (26,8% vs. 16,4%, p<0,001) y mayor opresión torácica (36,4% vs. 26,2%, p<0,001), además presentaban una obstrucción de las vías respiratorias más grave al inicio del estudio (FEV1% pred: 56 frente a 64, p<0,001) y niveles más altos de FeNO (41 frente a 33 ppb, p<0,05), mientras que la capacidad de difusión fue similar (DLCO-SB% pred. 70% vs. 71%). El análisis de regresión lineal multivariable identificó una asociación de FEV1% basal inferior (p<0,001) y opresión torácica (p<0,05) con RB positiva y ERGE (p<0,05) con RB negativa. Conclusión: En este entorno en vida real, la mayoría de los pacientes con asma grave tuvieron una RB negativa. Curiosamente, esto no se asoció con antecedentes de tabaquismo o EPOC, sino con FeNO más bajo y presencia de ERGE. (AU)