Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 116(6-7): 342-351, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37422421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation are characterized by great clinical heterogeneity and complexity. The usual classifications may not adequately characterize this population. Data-driven cluster analysis reveals different possible patient classifications. AIMS: To identify different clusters of patients with atrial fibrillation who share similar clinical phenotypes, and to evaluate the association between identified clusters and clinical outcomes, using cluster analysis. METHODS: An agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis was performed in non-anticoagulated patients from the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation cohort. Associations between clusters and a composite outcome comprising stroke/systemic embolism/death and all-cause death, stroke and major bleeding were evaluated using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The study included 3434 non-anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (mean age 70.3±17 years; 42.8% female). Three clusters were identified: cluster 1 was composed of younger patients, with a low prevalence of co-morbidities; cluster 2 included old patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, cardiac pathologies and a high burden of cardiovascular co-morbidities; cluster 3 identified old female patients with a high burden of cardiovascular co-morbidities. Compared with cluster 1, clusters 2 and 3 were independently associated with an increased risk of the composite outcome (hazard ratio 2.85, 95% confidence interval 1.32-6.16 and hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.11, respectively) and all-cause death (hazard ratio 3.54, 95% confidence interval 1.49-8.43 and hazard ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.79, respectively). Cluster 3 was independently associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.78). CONCLUSION: Cluster analysis identified three statistically driven groups of patients with atrial fibrillation, with distinct phenotype characteristics and associated with different risks for major clinical adverse events.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Análise por Conglomerados , Fenótipo , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA