Radiotherapy in the head and neck region influences the chemical and mechanical properties of intraradicular dentin.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the chemical and mechanical properties of intraradicular dentin submitted to radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen mandibular incisors were divided into two groups (n = 8): non-irradiated and irradiated. The irradiated teeth were obtained from head and neck radiotherapy patients, with a total dose ranging from 70.2 to 72 Gy divided into 1.8 Gy daily. After sample preparation, intraradicular dentin slices of each root third were evaluated by Raman spectroscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy and Knoop microhardness test. Data were analyzed by Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In Raman spectroscopy, carbonate and amide III showed a significant difference for irradiation and third (carbonate p = 0.021 and p < 0.001; amide III p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). For amide I, there was a significant difference for third (p < 0.001). For carbonate/mineral ratio, there was a significant difference for irradiation (p = 0.0016) and third (p < 0.001), with the irradiated middle third showing the lowest values. For amide I/amide III ratio, there was a significant difference for irradiation (p = 0.005) in the cervical third. In energy dispersive spectroscopy, carbon (p = 0.004; p = 0.020), phosphorus (p < 0.001; p = 0.009) and calcium (p = 0.008; p = 0.007) showed differences for irradiation and third, with the irradiated groups presenting lower values in cervical and middle thirds. For calcium/phosphorus ratio, there was a significant difference for irradiation (p < 0.001) in cervical and middle thirds. Regarding microhardness, there was a significant difference for irradiation (p < 0.001), with all irradiated groups showing lower microhardness values. CONCLUSIONS: The radiotherapy altered the chemical and mechanical properties of intraradicular dentin, mainly in the cervical and middle root thirds.

Effects of fractionation and ionizing radiation dose on the chemical composition and microhardness of enamel.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the chemical and mechanical properties of enamel submitted to different in vitro radiation protocols. DESIGN: Third molars were divided into seven groups (n = 8): non-irradiated (NI); a single dose of 30 Gy (SD30), 50 Gy (SD50), or 70 Gy (SD70) of radiation; or fractional radiation doses of up to 30 Gy (FD30), 50 Gy (FD50), or 70 Gy (FD70). Hemisections were analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and Knoop microhardness (KHN) test. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test compared the test groups with the NI. Two-way ANOVA was performed for the fractionation and radiation dose, followed by Bonferroni's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: FTIR revealed differences for the amide I band between the NI and FD50 and NI and FD70 groups (p < 0.001). For the organic matrix/mineral ratio, the FD70 group presented a lower ratio compared to NI (p = 0.009). Excluding the NI group, there were differences between the FD30 and FD50 (p = 0.045) and the FD30 and FD70 groups (p < 0.001). For EDS, there were differences for Ca (p = 0.011) and Ca/P (p < 0.001), with the FD70 group presenting lower values compared to NI (p = 0.015; p < 0.001). For KHN, the FD70 group presented lower values than the NI (p = 0.002). Two-way ANOVA showed difference for the dose (p < 0.001), with the 70 Gy group presenting a lower KHN value within the fractionated groups. CONCLUSION: Fractional doses 70 Gy irradiation caused chemical and mechanical changes to enamel. Radiation applied in single or fractional doses produced different effects to enamel.

Head and neck cancer therapy-related oral manifestation management in the COVID-19 pandemic: a critical review.

With the onset of the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the dental treatment of patients at risk of infection has become quite challenging. In view of this, patients with head and neck cancer may present with oral complications due to anticancer therapy, making dental assistance necessary. Thus, the objective of the study was to review the literature and critically discuss important concerns about the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Because dental professionals are in close contact with the main viral transmission routes, this study presents recommendations for management and protection during clinical dental care. The main characteristics and transmission routes of COVID-19 are also discussed. Dental professionals should control pain and the side effects of antineoplastic treatment and use preventive measures for infection control. During this pandemic, patients with head and neck cancer should not undergo elective procedures, even if they do not have symptoms or a history of COVID-19; therefore, in asymptomatic or painless cases, only preventive actions are recommended. In symptomatic or painful cases, precautions for safe interventional treatments must be implemented by following the hygiene measures recommended by health agencies and using personal protective equipment. During health crises, new protocols emerge for cancer treatment, and professionals must act with greater attention toward biosafety and updated knowledge. It is important to offer adequate individualized treatment based on the recommendations of preventative and interventional treatments so that patients can face this difficult period with optimized quality of life.

Head and neck cancer therapy-related oral manifestation management in the COVID-19 pandemic: a critical review

Abstract With the onset of the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the dental treatment of patients at risk of infection has become quite challenging. In view of this, patients with head and neck cancer may present with oral complications due to anticancer therapy, making dental assistance necessary. Thus, the objective of the study was to review the literature and critically discuss important concerns about the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Because dental professionals are in close contact with the main viral transmission routes, this study presents recommendations for management and protection during clinical dental care. The main characteristics and transmission routes of COVID-19 are also discussed. Dental professionals should control pain and the side effects of antineoplastic treatment and use preventive measures for infection control. During this pandemic, patients with head and neck cancer should not undergo elective procedures, even if they do not have symptoms or a history of COVID-19; therefore, in asymptomatic or painless cases, only preventive actions are recommended. In symptomatic or painful cases, precautions for safe interventional treatments must be implemented by following the hygiene measures recommended by health agencies and using personal protective equipment. During health crises, new protocols emerge for cancer treatment, and professionals must act with greater attention toward biosafety and updated knowledge. It is important to offer adequate individualized treatment based on the recommendations of preventative and interventional treatments so that patients can face this difficult period with optimized quality of life.

Degree of conversion and bond strength of resin-cements to feldspathic ceramic using different curing modes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of resin cements when different curing modes are used, by evaluating the degree of conversion and bond strength to a ceramic substrate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three resin cements were evaluated, two dual-cured (Variolink II and RelyX ARC) and one light-cured (Variolink Veneer). The dual-cured resin cements were tested by using the dual activation mode (base and catalyst) and light-activation mode (base paste only). For degree of conversion (DC) (n=5), a 1.0 mm thick feldspathic ceramic disc was placed over the resin cement specimens and the set was light activated with a QTH unit. After 24 h storage, the DC was measured with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). For microshear bond strength testing, five feldspathic ceramic discs were submitted to surface treatment, and three cylindrical resin cement specimens were bonded to each ceramic surface according to the experimental groups. After 24 h, microshear bond testing was performed at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until the failure. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for classifying the failure modes. RESULTS: Higher DC and bond strength values were shown by the resin cements cured by using the dual activation mode. The Variolink II group presented higher DC and bond strength values when using light-activation only when compared with the Variolink Veneer group. CONCLUSION: The base paste of dual-cured resin cements in light-activation mode can be used for bonding translucent ceramic restorations of up to or less than 1.0 mm thick.

Degree of conversion and bond strength of resin-cements to feldspathic ceramic using different curing modes

Abstract Resin cements have led to great advances in dental ceramic restoration techniques because of their ability to bond to both dental structures and restorative materials. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the performance of resin cements when different curing modes are used, by evaluating the degree of conversion and bond strength to a ceramic substrate. Material and Methods Three resin cements were evaluated, two dual-cured (Variolink II and RelyX ARC) and one light-cured (Variolink Veneer). The dual-cured resin cements were tested by using the dual activation mode (base and catalyst) and light-activation mode (base paste only). For degree of conversion (DC) (n=5), a 1.0 mm thick feldspathic ceramic disc was placed over the resin cement specimens and the set was light activated with a QTH unit. After 24 h storage, the DC was measured with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). For microshear bond strength testing, five feldspathic ceramic discs were submitted to surface treatment, and three cylindrical resin cement specimens were bonded to each ceramic surface according to the experimental groups. After 24 h, microshear bond testing was performed at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until the failure. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for classifying the failure modes. Results Higher DC and bond strength values were shown by the resin cements cured by using the dual activation mode. The Variolink II group presented higher DC and bond strength values when using light-activation only when compared with the Variolink Veneer group. Conclusion The base paste of dual-cured resin cements in light-activation mode can be used for bonding translucent ceramic restorations of up to or less than 1.0 mm thick.