Extended treatment with oral alitretinoin for patients with chronic hand eczema not fully responding to initial treatment.

BACKGROUND: In a previous large trial (Benefit of Alitretinoin in Chronic Hand Eczema; BACH), 47.7% of patients with severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) who received alitretinoin 30 mg achieved 'clear' or 'almost clear' hands during the initial 24-week treatment course. OBJECTIVES: The current open-label trial was designed to study extended treatment with a further 12- to 24-week course of oral alitretinoin 30 mg in patients who did not fully respond to initial treatment in the BACH study. METHODS: At the end of the BACH study, patients whose eczema was rated 'mild', 'moderate' or 'severe' according to the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) were eligible for a 24-week, open-label, multicentre study. Patients (n=243) received 30 mg of alitretinoin once daily, irrespective of previous treatment in BACH; either alitretinoin 30 mg, alitretinoin 10 mg or placebo. RESULTS: By the end of the follow-on study, the PGA response rate to the subsequent course of alitretinoin 30 mg was 50% and 39% in patients treated previously in BACH with 10 or 30 mg per day, respectively, and 51% in patients who previously received placebo in BACH. Alitretinoin was well tolerated, and no significant late-arising toxicities were seen. CONCLUSIONS: For a considerable number of patients with CHE who did not fully respond after an initial 24-week treatment period, a switch from either placebo to the active compound at 30 mg or from the lower to the higher dose, or treatment prolongation at the higher dose could be beneficial. Alitretinoin remains well tolerated for overall treatment durations of up to 48 weeks.

Influence of alitretinoin on the pharmacokinetics of the oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate.

BACKGROUND: Alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) is currently registered in many European countries and in Canada as the only licensed treatment for severe chronic hand eczema unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids. Alitretinoin, like all retinoids, is teratogenic, and women of child-bearing potential must strictly adhere to pregnancy-prevention measures. AIM: To investigate the influence of alitretinoin on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate (Ortho Tri-Cyclen 28(®)), a commonly prescribed combination oral contraceptive. METHODS: In total, 16 healthy premenopausal women received three consecutive cycles of the triphasic contraceptive ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate together with concomitant oral alitretinoin 40 mg once daily during cycle 2. Steady-state PK (noncompartmental analysis) of ethinyl estradiol, 17-deacetyl norgestimate, alitretinoin and its main metabolite 4-oxo-alitretinoin were assessed alone and in combination. RESULTS: The PK profiles of ethinyl estradiol and 17-deacetyl norgestimate were similar when contraceptives were given alone or with alitretinoin, and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve and the maximum concentration met the conventional criteria for PK equivalence. Similarly, the influence of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate on systemic exposure to alitretinoin and 4-oxo-alitretinoin was not clinically relevant. Alitretinoin was well tolerated when given either alone or with ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clinically relevant influence of alitretinoin on the PK of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate, and no influence of ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate on systemic exposure to alitretinoin and 4-oxo-alitretinoin. Consequently, oral contraception with ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate is an appropriate primary method of birth control during alitretinoin treatment for women of childbearing potential.

Low levels of alitretinoin in seminal fluids after repeated oral doses in healthy men.

BACKGROUND: Alitretinoin, like all retinoids, is teratogenic, and can only be given to women of childbearing potential if pregnancy is excluded and a strict contraceptive programme is followed. AIM: This study was designed to determine whether alitretinoin in the semen of men treated with alitretinoin poses a teratogenic risk to their female partners. METHODS: In total, 24 healthy men aged 18-45 years received alitretinoin 20 mg (n = 12) or 40 mg (n = 12), once daily for 14 days. Subjects in the 40 mg dose group provided ejaculate at baseline, on day 1, before and approximately 4 h after dosing on day 2, and at follow-up on study day 21 (± 2). RESULTS: Alitretinoin and 4-oxo-alitretinoin were detected in 11 of the 12 semen samples. The highest level of alitretinoin in semen was 7.92 ng/mL. Assuming an ejaculate volume of 10 mL, the amount of drug transferred in semen would be about 80 ng, 1/375,000 of a single 30 mg capsule. Complete absorption of 80 ng of alitretinoin from semen, presuming a volume of distribution confined to 5 L of circulating blood in the partner, would lead to an increase in plasma alitretinoin concentration of 0.016 ng/mL, which appears to be negligible compared with measured endogenous plasma levels. Increases in plasma levels of related retinoids are also negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Alitretinoin in the semen of men receiving up to 40 mg of oral alitretinoin per day is unlikely to be associated with teratogenic risk in their female partners. Barrier contraception is therefore not required for men taking alitretinoin.

Influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid).

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that concomitant administration of food may enhance the bioavailability of oral retinoids. AIM: To assess the influence of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of alitretinoin after a single oral dose. METHODS: This was a single-dose, open-label, randomized, crossover study, which enrolled 30 healthy men, aged 18-44 years. Subjects received sequential doses of alitretinoin 40 mg either after fasting (treatment A) or 5 min after completion of a standard breakfast (treatment B), with the dosing sequence randomized (A/B or B/A). The washout period between the two doses was 1 week. Plasma concentrations over time were plotted and standard PK variables [area under the curve (AUC) of plasma concentration vs. time, maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) and elimination half-life (t(1/2)] were determined. RESULTS: Drug exposure was markedly increased when alitretinoin was taken with food compared with fasting, and there were significant increases in mean C(max) (82.8 vs.25.4 ng/mL, respectively) and AUC (220.2 vs. 55.7 ng · h/mL). The delaying effect of food on t(max) was less marked (median of 3.0 vs. 2.0 h). Administration with food also increased exposure to drug metabolites. Variability in exposure was markedly reduced if alitretinoin was taken with vs. without food (percentage coefficient of variation 40% vs. 74% for AUC; 49% vs. 85% for C(max)). Alitretinoin was generally well tolerated, with typical retinoid adverse reactions, mostly comprising headache. CONCLUSIONS: Intake of alitretinoin with food substantially increased the bioavailability of alitretinoin, but variability in exposure was reduced. Consequently, oral alitretinoin should be taken with food as outlined in the manufacturer's summary of product characteristics.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between alitretinoin and ketoconazole or simvastatin or ciclosporin A.

BACKGROUND: Based on in vitro data with isolated cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes, alitretinoin interacts only with CYP3A4, and the potential for drug-drug interactions is considered negligible. AIM: To confirm in humans the lack of potential interactions between CYP3A4 and alitretinoin in vivo. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose, open-label, parallel-group, single-centre study, which enrolled 54 healthy male volunteers aged 18-45 years. Subjects were divided into three groups, with 18 in each group: group 1 received either alitretinoin 30 mg and ketoconazole 200 mg, group 2 alitretinoin 30 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, and group 3 alitretinoin 30 mg and ciclosporin A 300-mg. RESULTS: At the highest therapeutic dose of 30 mg, alitretinoin had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ketoconazole and ciclosporin A. There was a significant but not clinically relevant effect of simvastatin on the area under the curve (AUC) of plasma concentration vs. time and on maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) after repeated administration of alitretinoin. Exposure to simvastatin concomitantly with alitretinoin was decreased by 16% for AUC and 23% for C(max). The CYP3A4 ± PgP substrates of simvastatin and ciclosporin A did not affect the single or repeated dose PK of alitretinoin. The strong CYP3A4/PgP inhibitor ketoconazole led to significant increases in both AUC and C(max) values for alitretinoin. CONCLUSIONS: Single and repeated doses of alitretinoin do not alter the PK of ciclosporin A and ketoconazole. Simvastatin levels were slightly but significantly reduced by co-administration of alitretinoin. Substrates of CYP3A4 did not affect the PK of alitretinoin. However, ketoconazole significantly increased the plasma levels of alitretinoin, therefore, co-administration with CYP3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole may require a dose reduction of alitretinoin.

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of alitretinoin in moderate or severe chronic hand eczema.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have found that alitretinoin can induce clinically significant responses in subjects with severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) unresponsive to topical corticosteroids. AIMS: To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of alitretinoin 10 or 30 mg once daily. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind study, which enrolled 32 subjects aged 18-75 years with CHE unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids. Subjects received alitretinoin 10 mg (n = 16) or 30 mg (n = 16) once daily for 12 or 24 weeks. Standard PK variables [area under the curve (AUC) of plasma concentration vs. time, maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to maximum plasma concentration (t(max)), elimination half-life (t(1/2)), total systemic clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vd/F)] were determined for alitretinoin and metabolites. Efficacy was assessed using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scale. RESULTS: Chronic administration of alitretinoin for up to 24 weeks did not result in accumulation or time-dependent changes in the disposition of alitretinoin. Exposure was found to be proportional to dose. Systemic exposure (AUC) to alitretinoin was proportional to dose for 10 and 30 mg alitretinoin; 62.8% of subjects achieved clear/almost clear hands in the 30 mg group and 12.5% in the 10 mg group. Alitretinoin was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic administration of alitretinoin for 12-24 weeks did not lead to accumulation or time-dependent changes in drug exposure. Alitretinoin was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of subjects with moderate or severe CHE unresponsive to potent topical corticosteroids.

An open-label study assessing the safety and efficacy of alitretinoin in patients with severe chronic hand eczema unresponsive to topical corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Blinded, controlled studies have found that oral alitretinoin is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema (CHE). AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of oral alitretinoin in patients with severe CHE in an open-label study using flexible dosing and a new measurement of patient-relevant benefits. METHODS: In total, 249 patients aged 18-75 years with severe CHE unresponsive to treatment with topical corticosteroids received alitretinoin 30 mg once daily for up to 24 weeks. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests. Efficacy assessments included Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), the Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score, Patient's Global Assessment and extent of disease, as well as intensity of pain and pruritus as determined by visual analogue scale (VAS) and a categorical scale for pruritus. RESULTS: Alitretinoin was well tolerated when given for up to 24 weeks. Dose reduction occurred in 16.5% of patients. Dose interruption was required for 15.7% of patients, most commonly for headache. AEs and laboratory changes comprised effects typical of the retinoid class. A PGA response of 'clear' or 'almost clear' hands was reported for 46.6% of patients, similar to the response rate seen in blinded trials. Results of VAS and categorical assessments of pruritus provided supporting evidence of efficacy, and treatment was assessed as providing meaningful benefits to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oral alitretinoin 30 mg was well tolerated and effective, and provided distinct therapeutic benefits in severe CHE, as assessed by patients.

Successful retreatment with alitretinoin in patients with relapsed chronic hand eczema.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) often respond to therapy with oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid). However, the efficacy of alitretinoin after disease relapse has not been demonstrated. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of a second course of oral alitretinoin in patients with severe CHE who relapsed after achieving 'clear' or 'almost clear' hands following a previous course of alitretinoin. METHODS: The double-blind study included 117 patients with CHE who had responded to therapy in an earlier clinical trial and subsequently relapsed. Patients were randomized to receive their previous treatment or placebo. Treatment was alitretinoin 30 mg or 10 mg or placebo given once daily for 12-24 weeks. Response was defined as an overall Physician's Global Assessment rating of 'clear' or 'almost clear' hands at the end of therapy. RESULTS: Response rates were 80% in patients retreated with 30 mg alitretinoin compared with 8% for placebo (P < 0.001). In patients retreated with 10 mg alitretinoin response rates were 48%, compared with 10% in the placebo group. Alitretinoin was well tolerated. Adverse reactions comprised typical retinoid class effects, and no late-arising side-effects were observed during this second course of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with CHE who previously achieved 'clear' or 'almost clear' hands following treatment with alitretinoin 30 mg per day also responded to a second course of treatment. Retreatment was well tolerated. Intermittent treatment with alitretinoin is suitable for the long-term management of CHE.

Efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) in patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to topical corticosteroids: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) refractory to topical corticosteroids currently have limited treatment options suited for chronic use, and few controlled clinical studies have investigated new therapies in this setting. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin (9-cis retinoic acid) taken at 10 mg or 30 mg once daily for up to 24 weeks, compared with placebo control, in the treatment of severe CHE refractory to topical corticosteroids. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective, multicentre trial was conducted in 111 dermatology outpatient clinics in Europe and Canada. A total of 1032 patients with severe refractory CHE were randomized in a 1 : 2 : 2 ratio to placebo, or 10 mg or 30 mg of oral alitretinoin once daily for up to 24 weeks. Safety was assessed for all patients during a follow-up period of 4 weeks, and responders were observed for relapse for 24 weeks after the end of therapy. The primary efficacy parameter was Physician Global Assessment of overall CHE severity, with response defined as clear or almost clear hands. RESULTS: Responses, defined as clear or almost clear hands, were achieved in up to 48% of patients treated with alitretinoin, compared with 17% for placebo (P < 0.001), with up to 75% median reduction in disease signs and symptoms. Treatment was well tolerated, with dose-dependent adverse effects comprising headache, mucocutaneous events, hyperlipidaemia, and decreased free thyroxine and thyroid-stimulating hormone. The median time to relapse, defined as recurrence of 75% of initial signs and symptoms, was 5.5-6.2 months in the absence of anti-eczema medication. CONCLUSIONS: Alitretinoin given at well-tolerated doses induced clearing of CHE in a substantial proportion of patients with severe disease refractory to standard therapy.

Ibuprofen sodium dihydrate, an ibuprofen formulation with improved absorption characteristics, provides faster and greater pain relief than ibuprofen acid.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this 6-hour study was to compare rate of pain relief, analgesic efficacy and tolerability of a novel ibuprofen formulation, ibuprofen sodium dihydrate, with that of ibuprofen acid in subjects with postoperative dental pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The test formulation of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate (256 mg sodium salt) and the reference product both contain 200 mg ibuprofen. Subjects with moderate-to-severe pain after extraction of third molars were randomized to receive two tablets of either ibuprofen sodium dihydrate (198 subjects) or ibuprofen (198 subjects) in this double-blind, multicenter trial. Pain was measured using traditional descriptor scales and onset of analgesia assessed using the stop-watch method. RESULTS: Median time to substantial pain relief occurred 14 minutes earlier in the ibuprofen sodium dihydrate group (p < 0.001). The first sign of pain relief, an increase in relief and time until the pain was half gone occurred significantly earlier and faster in the ibuprofen sodium dihydrate-treated patients (p < 0.02-0.00003). Corresponding numbers needed to treat were in the range 11. Reduction in pain intensity was evident within 5 minutes (p < 0.01) in the ibuprofen sodium dihydrate group compared to 15 minutes in the ibuprofen group. Pain intensity was reduced to half after 30 and 57 minutes in the ibuprofen sodium dihydrate and ibuprofen groups, respectively (p < 0.025). The overall analgesic efficacy in terms of summed pain intensity differences (SPID), total pain relief (TOTPAR) and remedication times in the two groups were similar. Both treatments were well tolerated and no serious events occurred. CONCLUSION: Ibuprofen sodium dihydrate provides faster and more efficacious pain relief during the first hour after intake when compared to a conventional ibuprofen acid formulation. The tolerability profiles are similar.

Pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate and gastrointestinal tolerability of short-term treatment with a novel, rapidly absorbed formulation.

OBJECTIVE: This paper describes four studies investigating the dissolution, plasma pharmacokinetics and safety of a novel, fast-acting ibuprofen formulation, ibuprofen sodium dihydrate. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Four separate studies investigated: the in vitro dissolution rates of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate (at pH 1.2, 3.5 and 7.2); the bioavailability of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate (in two pharmacokinetic studies; combined n = 38) compared with conventional ibuprofen, ibuprofen lysinate, ibuprofen arginate and ibuprofen liquagels (all 2 x 200 mg ibuprofen); and the gastroduodenal tolerance of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate and ibuprofen arginate (both 2 x 200 mg ibuprofen t.i.d.) in an endoscopy safety study, where endoscopy was performed at baseline and at the end of each treatment period using a five-point scale to assess the integrity of the gastric and duodenal mucosa. RESULTS: Ibuprofen sodium dihydrate dissolved significantly more rapidly at pH 1.2, 3.5 and 7.2 than conventional ibuprofen, ibuprofen lysinate and ibuprofen liquagels. Ibuprofen sodium dihydrate had similar C(max) to ibuprofen lysinate and ibuprofen liquagels and significantly higher Cmax than conventional ibuprofen (p = 0.002). The mean plasma concentration for ibuprofen sodium dihydrate was significantly higher than for conventional ibuprofen (p = 0.028) 10 minutes post-dose and the t(max) for ibuprofen sodium dihydrate was reached significantly earlier than for conventional ibuprofen (p = 0.018). All three formulations were bioequivalent according to the acceptable boundaries (90% confidence intervals). No statistically significant difference was observed between the ibuprofen formulations in terms of adverse events and specifically with respect to hemorrhagic scores; 41 (46.0%) adverse events (AEs) occurred after administration of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate, and 46 (52.9%) after ibuprofen arginate. One occurrence of an invasive ulcer was observed after administration of ibuprofen arginate. CONCLUSIONS: The new formulation of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate dissolves quickly in vitro, has the same extent of absorption as other fast-acting ibuprofen formulations, and is absorbed into plasma more rapidly than conventional ibuprofen. In addition, the present studies suggest that the tolerability and safety profile of ibuprofen sodium dihydrate is comparable to existing ibuprofen formulations.