Medical Students Learn Professionalism in Near-Peer Led, Discussion-Based Small Groups.

Problem: Medical educators recognize that professionalism is difficult to teach to students in lecture-based or faculty-led settings. An underused but potentially valuable alternative is to enroll near-peers to teach professionalism. Intervention: We describe a novel near-peer curriculum on professionalism developed at Queen's University School of Medicine. Senior medical students considered role models by their classmates were nominated to facilitate small-group seminars with junior students on topics in professionalism. Each session was preceded by brief pre-readings or prompts and engaged students in semistructured, open-ended discussion. Three 2-hour sessions have occurred annually. Context: The near-peer sessions are a required component (6 hours; 20%) of the 1st-year professionalism course at Queen's University (30 hours), which otherwise includes faculty-led seminars, lectures, and online modules. Senior facilitators are selected through a peer nomination process during their 3rd year of medical school. This format was chosen to create a highly regarded position to which students could aspire by demonstrating positive professionalism. Outcome: We performed a qualitative descriptive evaluation of the near-peer curriculum. Fifty-six medical students participated in 11 focus group interviews, which were coded and analyzed for themes inductively and deductively. Quantitative reviews of student feedback forms and a third-party thematic analysis were performed to triangulate results. Medical students preferred the near-peer-led discussion-based curriculum to faculty-led seminars and didactic or online formats. Junior students could describe specific examples of how the curriculum had influenced their behavior in academic, clinical, and personal settings. They cited senior near-peer facilitators as the strongest aspect of the curriculum for their social and cognitive congruence. Senior students who had facilitated sessions regarded the peer teaching experience as formative to their own understanding of professionalism. Lessons Learned: Formal medical curricula on professionalism should emphasize near-peer-led small-group discussion as it fosters a nuanced understanding of professionalism for both early level students and senior students acting as teachers.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term risk of hypertension: what do Ontario prenatal care providers know, and what do they communicate?

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to ascertain the knowledge base of Ontario maternity care providers (family physicians, obstetrician-gynaecologists, and midwives) regarding the future health risks of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia and the practices with respect to communication of these risks. METHODS: In 2004, all obstetricians (639) and midwives (249) in Ontario and a random sample of 600 Ontario family physicians were mailed a survey and a reminder. Non-responders were also sent a second, and in some cases, a third copy of the survey. The survey addressed areas of knowledge, reported practices, and both patient and interprofessional communication. Descriptive analysis was used for the responses. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 42%. The majority of respondents were familiar with the long-term risks of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Although maternity care providers stated that they inform women with these conditions about their subsequent risks and recommend follow-up, only 36% usually inform the women's primary care providers about that subsequent risk. Only 58% of family physicians reported that they are usually informed by the maternity care providers about their patients who developed hypertension in pregnancy, compared with the 83% of maternity care providers who reported that they usually communicate this information to family physicians. CONCLUSION: We have identified weaknesses in knowledge base and communication amongst Ontario maternity care providers that suggest that the identification and follow-up of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is not occurring. These deficiencies would be amenable to directed educational activities, including reviews, presentations, and the development and implementation of guidelines.

Randomised equivalence trial comparing three month and six month follow up of patients with hypertension by family practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To compare blood pressure control, satisfaction, and adherence to drug treatment in patients with treated hypertension followed up by their family physicians either every three months or every six months for three years. DESIGN: Randomised equivalence clinical trial. Settings 50 family practices in south eastern Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 609 patients aged 30-74 years with essential hypertension receiving drug treatment whose hypertension had been controlled for at least three months before entry into the study. RESULTS: 302 patients were randomly assigned to follow up every three months and 307 to follow up every six months. Baseline variables in the two groups were similar. As expected, patients in the six month group had significantly fewer visits, but patients in both groups visited their doctor more frequently than their assigned interval. Mean blood pressure was similar in the groups, as was control of hypertension. Patient satisfaction and adherence to treatment were similar in the groups. About 20% of patients in each group had blood pressures that were out of control during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Follow up of patients with treated essential hypertension every six months is equivalent to follow up every three months. Patient satisfaction and adherence to treatment are the same for these follow up intervals. As about 20% of patients' hypertension was out of control at any time during the study in both groups, the frequency of follow up may not the most important factor in the control of patients' hypertension by family practitioners.

The influence of prevalence and policy on the likelihood that a physician will offer HIV screening in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which provincial recommendations, reported regional prevalence rates and perceived local prevalence rates of HIV in pregnancy influence a physician's decision to routinely offer prenatal screening for HIV. DESIGN AND METHODS: A random sample of 5,052 family physicians and obstetricians were surveyed by mail. Logistic regression was used to explore the relationships among the variables of interest. RESULTS: The response rate was 61%. Of these, 69.2% provided prenatal care and were included in the analysis. Physicians were more likely to routinely offer HIV testing if they practiced in provinces with recommendations that supported the universal offer of a test (O.R. = 5.80), independent of living in a region with an estimated prevalence rate exceeding 5/10,000 (O.R. = 1.76), or the perception that the infection rate in their practice justified universal counselling of pregnant women (O.R. = 10.41). CONCLUSIONS: Provincial recommendations supporting universal HIV testing in pregnancy are reflected in physician practice.