A Prospective International Multicenter Study of AKI in the Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: AKI is frequent and is associated with poor outcomes. There is limited information on the epidemiology of AKI worldwide. This study compared patients with AKI in emerging and developed countries to determine the association of clinical factors and processes of care with outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This prospective observational study was conducted among intensive care unit patients from nine centers in developed countries and five centers in emerging countries. AKI was defined as an increase in creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dl within 48 hours. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2012, 6647 patients were screened, of whom 1275 (19.2%) developed AKI. A total of 745 (58% of those with AKI) agreed to participate and had complete data. Patients in developed countries had more sepsis (52.1% versus 38.0%) and higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scores (mean±SD, 61.1±27.5 versus 51.1±25.2); those from emerging countries had more CKD (54.3% versus 38.3%), GN (6.3% versus 0.9%), and interstitial nephritis (7.0% versus 0.6%) (all P<0.05). Patients from developed countries were less often treated with dialysis (15.5% versus 30.2%; P<0.001) and started dialysis later after AKI diagnosis (2.0 [interquartile range, 0.75-5.0] days versus 0 [interquartile range, 0-5.0] days; P=0.02). Hospital mortality was 22.0%, and 13.3% of survivors were dialysis dependent at discharge. Independent risk factors associated with hospital mortality included older age, residence in an emerging country, use of vasopressors (emerging countries only), dialysis and mechanical ventilation, and higher APACHE score and cumulative fluid balance (developed countries only). A lower probability of renal recovery was associated with residence in an emerging country, higher APACHE score (emerging countries only) and dialysis, while mechanical ventilation was associated with renal recovery (developed countries only). CONCLUSIONS: This study contrasts the clinical features and management of AKI and demonstrates worse outcomes in emerging than in developed countries. Differences in variations in care may explain these findings and should be considered in future trials.

Predialysis hypernatremia is a prognostic marker in acute kidney injury in need of renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of predialysis dysnatremia in patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: A secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study was performed. Serum sodium (Na) concentrations were categorized immediately before the first RRT as normonatremia (135≤Na ≤145mEq/L), hyponatremia (mild [130≤Na ≤134mEq/L] or severe [Na ≤129mEq/L]), and hypernatremia (mild [146≤Na ≤155mEq/L] or severe [Na ≥156mEq/L]). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the impact of sodium levels categories on hospital mortality. RESULTS: Dysnatremia occurred in 47.3% of 772 included patients. Hypernatremia was more frequent than hyponatremia (33.7% vs 13.6%, P=.001). Intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality rates were 64.6% and 69%, respectively. Hospital mortality was higher in severe hypernatremia (89.1% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 78.7%-95.8%] vs 64.6% [CI, 59.8%-69.2%], P<.001, in normonatremia). Older patients, clinical admission, number of comorbidities, length of ICU stay before the beginning of RRT, and the number of organ dysfunctions were associated with higher hospital mortality. In multivariate analysis, severe hypernatremia (odds ratio, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.2-6.9), poor chronic heath status, severity of illness, sepsis, and lactate were independently associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: Almost 50% of patients with acute kidney injury in need of RRT in the ICU had mild or severe dysnatremia before dialysis initiation. Hypernatremia was the main sodium disturbance and independently associated with poor outcome in the study population.

A20-mediated modulation of inflammatory and immune responses in aortic allografts and development of transplant arteriosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Transplant arteriosclerosis (TA) is the pathognomonic feature of chronic rejection, the primary cause of allograft failure. We have shown that the NF-κB inhibitory protein A20 exerts vasculoprotective effects in endothelial and smooth muscle cells (SMC), and hence is a candidate to prevent TA. We sought direct proof for this hypothesis. METHODS: Fully mismatched, C57BL/6 (H2) into BALB/c (H2), aorta to carotid allografts were preperfused with saline, recombinant A20 adenovirus (rAd.A20) or rAd.ß-galactosidase (ß-gal), implanted, harvested 4 weeks after transplantation, and analyzed by histology, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence staining. We measured indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, interleukin-6, and transforming growth factor-ß mRNA and protein levels in nontransduced, and rAd.A20 or rAd.ß-gal-transduced human SMC cultures after cytokine treatment. RESULTS: Vascular overexpression of A20 significantly reduced TA lesions. This correlated with decreased graft inflammation and increased apoptosis of neointimal SMC. Paradoxically, T-cell infiltrates increased in A20-expressing allografts, including the immunoprivileged media, which related to A20 preventing indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase upregulation in SMC. However, infiltrating T cells were predominantly T-regulatory cells (CD25+/Forkhead Box P3 [FoxP3+]). This agrees with A20 inhibiting interleukin-6 and promoting transforming growth factor-ß production by medial SMC and in SMC cultures exposed to cytokines, which favors differentiation of regulatory over pathogenic T cells. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, A20 prevents immune-mediated remodeling of vascular allografts, therefore reduces TA lesions by affecting apoptotic and inflammatory signals and modifying the local cytokine milieu to promote an immunoregulatory response within the vessel wall. This highlights a novel function for A20 in local immunosurveillance, which added to its vasculoprotective effects, supports its therapeutic promise in TA.

Hepatocyte growth factor preferentially activates the anti-inflammatory arm of NF-κB signaling to induce A20 and protect renal proximal tubular epithelial cells from inflammation.

Inflammation induces the NF-κB dependent protein A20 in human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (RPTEC), which secondarily contains inflammation by shutting down NF-κB activation. We surmised that inducing A20 without engaging the pro-inflammatory arm of NF-κB could improve outcomes in kidney disease. We showed that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) increases A20 mRNA and protein levels in RPTEC without causing inflammation. Upregulation of A20 by HGF was NF-κB/RelA dependent as it was abolished by overexpressing IκBα or silencing p65/RelA. Unlike TNFα, HGF caused minimal IκBα and p65/RelA phosphorylation, with moderate IκBα degradation. Upstream, HGF led to robust and sustained AKT activation, which was required for p65 phosphorylation and A20 upregulation. While HGF treatment of RPTEC significantly increased A20 mRNA, it failed to induce NF-κB dependent, pro-inflammatory MCP-1, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 mRNA. This indicates that HGF preferentially upregulates protective (A20) over pro-inflammatory NF-κB dependent genes. Upregulation of A20 supported the anti-inflammatory effects of HGF in RPTEC. HGF pretreatment significantly attenuated TNFα-mediated increase of ICAM-1, a finding partially reversed by silencing A20. In conclusion, this is the first demonstration that HGF activates an AKT-p65/RelA pathway to preferentially induce A20 but not inflammatory molecules. This could be highly desirable in acute and chronic renal injury where A20-based anti-inflammatory therapies are beneficial.

O-glycosylation regulates ubiquitination and degradation of the anti-inflammatory protein A20 to accelerate atherosclerosis in diabetic ApoE-null mice.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated atherosclerosis is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. Hyperglycemia is a recognized independent risk factor for heightened atherogenesis in diabetes mellitus (DM). However, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying glucose damage to the vasculature remains incomplete. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: High glucose and hyperglycemia reduced upregulation of the NF-κB inhibitory and atheroprotective protein A20 in human coronary endothelial (EC) and smooth muscle cell (SMC) cultures challenged with Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF), aortae of diabetic mice following Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection used as an inflammatory insult and in failed vein-grafts of diabetic patients. Decreased vascular expression of A20 did not relate to defective transcription, as A20 mRNA levels were similar or even higher in EC/SMC cultured in high glucose, in vessels of diabetic C57BL/6 and FBV/N mice, and in failed vein grafts of diabetic patients, when compared to controls. Rather, decreased A20 expression correlated with post-translational O-Glucosamine-N-Acetylation (O-GlcNAcylation) and ubiquitination of A20, targeting it for proteasomal degradation. Restoring A20 levels by inhibiting O-GlcNAcylation, blocking proteasome activity, or overexpressing A20, blocked upregulation of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) and phosphorylation of PKCßII, two prime atherogenic signals triggered by high glucose in EC/SMC. A20 gene transfer to the aortic arch of diabetic ApoE null mice that develop accelerated atherosclerosis, attenuated vascular expression of RAGE and phospho-PKCßII, significantly reducing atherosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: High glucose/hyperglycemia regulate vascular A20 expression via O-GlcNAcylation-dependent ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. This could be key to the pathogenesis of accelerated atherosclerosis in diabetes.

A20 inhibits post-angioplasty restenosis by blocking macrophage trafficking and decreasing adventitial neovascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Neointimal hyperplasia is an inflammatory and proliferative process that occurs as a result of injury to the vessel wall. We have shown that the homeostatic protein A20 prevents neointimal hyperplasia by affecting endothelial cell (EC) and smooth muscle cell (SMC) responses to injury. In this work, we questioned whether A20 impacts other pathogenic effectors of neointimal hyperplasia including homing of monocyte/macrophages and EC/SMC precursors to the site of vascular injury, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion, and adventitial neovascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Carotid balloon angioplasty was performed on rat recipients of a bone marrow transplant from green fluorescent rats. Adenoviral delivery of A20 prevented neointimal hyperplasia and decreased macrophage infiltration. This was associated with decreased ICAM-1 and MCP-1 expression in vitro. Additionally, A20 reduced neovascularization in the adventitia of balloon injured carotid arteries, which correlated with fewer VEGF positive cells. CONCLUSIONS: A20 downregulates adhesion markers, chemokine production, and adventitial angiogenesis, all of which are required for macrophage trafficking to sites of vascular injury. This, in turn, diminishes the inflammatory milieu to prevent neointimal hyperplasia.

Desempenho de seis modelos de predição prognóstica em pacientes críticos que receberam suporte renal extracorpóreo / Performance of six prognostic scores in critically ILL patients receiving renal replacement therapy

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Não existe consenso sobre qual modelo prognóstico deva ser utilizado em pacientes com disfunção renal aguda (DRA). O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o desempenho de seis escores de prognóstico em pacientes que necessitaram de suporte renal. MÉTODO: Coorte prospectiva de pacientes internados nas unidades de terapia intensiva (UTI) de três hospitais terciários que necessitaram de suporte renal por DRA durante 32 meses. Foram excluídos os pacientes crônicos em programa de diálise ou com < 24h de internação na UTI. Os dados das primeiras 24h de UTI foram utilizados no cálculo do SAPS II e do APACHE II, e os dados das primeiras 24h de suporte renal foram utilizados no cálculo dos escores LOD, ODIN, Liaño e Mehta. A discriminação foi avaliada através da área sobre a curva ROC (AUROC) e a calibração através do teste do goodness-of-fit de Hosmer-Lemeshow. A letalidade hospitalar foi o desfecho de interesse. RESULTADOS: Quatrocentos e sesseta e sete pacientes foram incluídos e a letalidade hospitalar foi 75 por cento. Os valores dos escores SAPS II, APACHE II e LOD foram 48,5 ± 11,2, 27,4 ± 6,3, 7 (5-8) pontos, respectivamente. A calibração foi adequada para todos os escores, com exceção do Mehta (p = 0,001). Entretanto, a discriminação foi ruim para todos os modelos, com AUROC variando entre 0,60 para o ODIN e 0,72 para o SAPS II e Mehta. Com exceção do Mehta, todos os modelos subestimaram a letalidade. CONCLUSÕES: Todos os seis modelos estudados foram inadequados na predição prognóstica de pacientes graves com DRA e necessidade de suporte renal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus about prognostic scores for use in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of six prognostic scores in predicting hospital mortality in patients with AKI and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: Prospective cohort of patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) of three tertiary care hospitals that required RRT for AKI over a 32-month period. Patients with end-stage renal disease and those with ICU stay < 24h were excluded. Data from the first 24h of ICU admission were used to calculate SAPS II and APACHE II scores, and data from the first 24h of RRT were used in the calculation of LOD, ODIN, Liaño and Mehta scores. Discrimination was evaluated using the area under ROC curve (AUROC) and calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The hospital mortality was the end-point of interest. RESULTS: 467 patients were evaluated. Hospital mortality rate was 75 percent. Mean SAPS II and APACHE II scores were 48.5 ±11.2 and 27.4 ± 6.3 points, and median LOD score was 7 (5-8) points. Except for Mehta score (p = 0.001), calibration was appropriate in all models. However, discrimination was uniformly unsatisfactory; AUROC ranged from 0.60 for ODIN to 0.72 for SAPS II and Mehta scores. In addition, except for Mehta, all models tended to underestimate hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Organ dysfunction, general and renal-specific severity-of-illness scores were inaccurate in predicting outcome in ICU patients in need for RRT.

Performance of six prognostic scores in critically ILL patients receiving renal replacement therapy. / Desempenho de seis modelos de predição prognóstica em pacientes críticos que receberam suporte renal extracorpóreo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus about prognostic scores for use in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of six prognostic scores in predicting hospital mortality in patients with AKI and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: Prospective cohort of patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) of three tertiary care hospitals that required RRT for AKI over a 32-month period. Patients with end-stage renal disease and those with ICU stay < 24h were excluded. Data from the first 24h of ICU admission were used to calculate SAPS II and APACHE II scores, and data from the first 24h of RRT were used in the calculation of LOD, ODIN, Liaño and Mehta scores. Discrimination was evaluated using the area under ROC curve (AUROC) and calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The hospital mortality was the end-point of interest. RESULTS: 467 patients were evaluated. Hospital mortality rate was 75%. Mean SAPS II and APACHE II scores were 48.5 ±11.2 and 27.4 ± 6.3 points, and median LOD score was 7 (5-8) points. Except for Mehta score (p = 0.001), calibration was appropriate in all models. However, discrimination was uniformly unsatisfactory; AUROC ranged from 0.60 for ODIN to 0.72 for SAPS II and Mehta scores. In addition, except for Mehta, all models tended to underestimate hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Organ dysfunction, general and renal-specific severity-of-illness scores were inaccurate in predicting outcome in ICU patients in need for RRT.