Hospital length of stay and readmission after elective surgery: a comparison of current and former smokers with non-smokers.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences between non-smokers, ex-smokers and current smokers in hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission (seven and 28 days) and cost of readmission for patients admitted for elective surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of administrative inpatient data from 24, 818 patients admitted to seven metropolitan hospitals in Western Australia between 1 July 2016 and 30 June 2019 for multiday elective surgery was conducted. Data included smoking status, LOS, procedure type, age, sex and Indigenous status. LOS for smoking status was compared using multivariable negative binomial regression. Odds of readmission were compared for non-smokers and both ex-smokers and current smokers using separate multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Mean LOS for non-smokers (4.7 days, SD=5.7) was significantly lower than both ex-smokers (6.2 days SD 7.9) and current smokers (6.1 days, SD=8.2). Compared to non-smokers, current smokers and ex-smokers had significantly higher odds of readmission within seven (OR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.47, and OR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.19, 1.59, respectively) and 28 days (OR=1.35; 95% CI: 1.23, 1.49, and OR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.39, 1.69, respectively) of discharge. The cost of readmission for seven and 28-day readmission was significantly higher for current smokers compared to non-smokers (RR=1.52; 95% CI: 1.1.6, 2.0; RR=1.39; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.65, respectively). CONCLUSION: Among patients admitted for elective surgery, hospital LOS, readmission risk and readmission costs were all higher for smokers compared with non-smokers. The findings indicate that provision of smoking cessation treatment for adults undergoing elective surgery is likely to produce multiple benefits.

Multivariable statistical models to predict red cell transfusion in elective surgery.

BACKGROUND: Predicting red cell transfusion may assist in identifying those most likely to benefit from patient blood management strategies. Our objective was to identify a simple statistical model to predict transfusion in elective surgery from routinely available data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our final multicentre cohort consisted of 42,546 patients and contained the following potential predictors of red cell transfusion known prior to admission: patient age, sex, pre-admission hemoglobin, surgical procedure, and comorbidities. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation methods. The outcome measure of interest was administration of a red cell transfusion. We used multivariable logistic regression models to predict transfusion, and evaluated the performance by applying a 10-fold cross-validation. Model accuracy was assessed by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. After applying an optimal probability cut-off we measured model accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: 7.0% (n=2,993) of the study population received a red cell transfusion. Our most simple model predicted red cell transfusion based on admission hemoglobin and surgical procedure with a multiply imputed estimated area under the curve of 0.862 (0.856, 0.864). The estimated accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values at the probability cut-off of 0.4 were 0.934, 0.257, 0.986, 0.573, and 0.946 respectively. DISCUSSION: A small number of variables available prior to admission can predict red cell transfusion with very good accuracy. Our model can be used to flag high-risk patients most likely to benefit from pre-operative patient blood management measures.

Hospital-Acquired Infection, Length of Stay, and Readmission in Elective Surgery Patients Transfused 1 Unit of Red Blood Cells: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Most patients transfused red blood cells in elective surgery receive small volumes of blood, which is likely to be discretionary and avoidable. We investigated the outcomes of patients who received a single unit of packed red blood cells during their hospital admission for an elective surgical procedure when compared to those not transfused. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included elective surgical admissions to 4 hospitals in Western Australia over a 6-year period. Participants were included if they were at least 18 years of age and were admitted for elective surgery between July 2014 and June 2020. We compared outcomes of patients who had received 1 unit of red blood cells to patients who had not been transfused. To balance differences in patient characteristics, we weighted our multivariable regression models using the inverse probability of treatment. In addition to propensity score weighting, our multivariable regression models adjusted for hemoglobin level, surgical procedure, patient age, gender, comorbidities, and the transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma or platelets. Outcomes studied were hospital-acquired infection, hospital length of stay, and all-cause emergency readmissions within 28 days. RESULTS: Overall, 767 (3.2%) patients received a transfusion of 1 unit of red blood cells throughout their admission. In the propensity score weighted analysis, the transfusion of a single unit of red blood cells was associated with higher odds of hospital-acquired infection (odds ratio, 3.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99-5.20; P < .001). Patients who received 1 unit of red blood cells throughout their admission were more likely to have a longer hospital stay (rate ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.51-1.63; P < .001) and had 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20-1.69; P < .001) times higher odds of 28-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that avoidance of even small volumes of packed red blood cells may prevent adverse clinical outcomes. This may encourage hospital administrators to implement strategies to avoid the transfusion of even small volumes of red blood cells by applying patient blood management practices.

Perioperative Pain and Addiction Interdisciplinary Network (PAIN): consensus recommendations for perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoid-based medicine users by a modified Delphi process.

In many countries, liberalisation of the legislation regulating the use of cannabis has outpaced rigorous scientific studies, and a growing number of patients presenting for surgery consume cannabis regularly. Research to date suggests that cannabis can impact perioperative outcomes. We present recommendations obtained using a modified Delphi method for the perioperative care of cannabis-using patients. A steering committee was formed and a review of medical literature with respect to perioperative cannabis use was conducted. This was followed by the recruitment of a panel of 17 experts on the care of cannabis-consuming patients. Panellists were blinded to each other's participation and were provided with rater forms exploring the appropriateness of specific perioperative care elements. The completed rater forms were analysed for consensus. The expert panel was then unblinded and met to discuss the rater form analyses. Draft recommendations were then created and returned to the expert panel for further comment. The draft recommendations were also sent to four independent reviewers (a surgeon, a nurse practitioner, and two patients). The collected feedback was used to finalise the recommendations. The major recommendations obtained included emphasising the importance of eliciting a history of cannabis use, quantifying it, and ensuring contact with a cannabis authoriser (if one exists). Recommendations also included the consideration of perioperative cannabis weaning, additional postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, and additional attention to monitoring and maintaining anaesthetic depth. Postoperative recommendations included anticipating increased postoperative analgesic requirements and maintaining vigilance for cannabis withdrawal syndrome.

Associations of a Preoperative Anemia and Suboptimal Iron Stores Screening and Management Clinic in Colorectal Surgery With Hospital Cost, Reimbursement, and Length of Stay: A Net Cost Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, a preoperative clinic was implemented to screen, evaluate, and manage anemia and suboptimal iron stores at a major tertiary care medical center in Western Australia. Few studies compare the costs and reimbursements associated with preoperative anemia and suboptimal iron stores management. The objective of our study was to conduct a net cost analysis associated with the implementation of this clinic. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study involving elective colorectal surgical admissions over a 3-year period. The baseline year selected was the 2015-2016 financial year, with outcomes in the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 year compared to baseline. The study perspective was the Western Australian Health System. Hospital costs were extracted from the health service clinical costing system, which captures costs at the admission level. The primary outcome was net cost, defined as gross cost minus reimbursement (or funding) received. RESULTS: Our 3-year study included 544 admissions for elective colorectal surgery. After the implementation of the preoperative clinic, 73.4% (n = 257) of admissions were screened for anemia and suboptimal iron stores, and 31.4% (n = 110) received intravenous iron. In our adjusted analysis, when comparing the final year (2017-2018) with baseline (2015-2016), the units of red blood cells transfused per admission decreased 53% (142 vs 303 units per 1000 discharges; P = .006), and mean hospital length of stay decreased 15% (7.7 vs 9.1 days; P = .008). When comparing the final year with baseline, rectal resection admissions were associated with a mean decrease in the net cost of Australian dollar (A$) 7619 (95% confidence interval, 4230-11,008; P < .001) between 2015-2016 and 2017-2018. For small and large bowel procedures, there was a mean decrease of A$6744 (95% confidence interval, 2430-11,057; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a preoperative anemia and suboptimal iron stores screening and management clinic in elective colorectal surgery was associated with reductions in red cell transfusions, length of stay, and net costs.

Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimens in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality which may be influenced by perioperative fluid management. It remains unclear whether liberal and restrictive fluid regimens impact mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies comparing restrictive and liberal perioperative fluids in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Both prospective and retrospective studies in those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were eligible for inclusion where the patient outcomes were stratified to restrictive and liberal perioperative fluid management regimens, with mortality as the primary outcome. Following study identification, a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis was completed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies including five prospective trials and eight retrospective analyses totalling 3062 patients were included. Restrictive fluid regimens were associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared to liberal fluid regimens for the overall cohort (odds ratio 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.94, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in complication profile. Subgroup analysis revealed this result was contributed to significantly by retrospective studies. The results of the trial sequential analysis suggest this mortality benefit may be due to a type I statistical error and that further patient numbers are required for definitive conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive fluid regimens are associated with a reduction in mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy. The clinical relevance of this finding needs to be interpreted pragmatically given the lack of association with significant causes of morbidity and in considering the results of the recently published RELIEF study.

Validity of Thromboelastometry for Rapid Assessment of Fibrinogen Levels in Heparinized Samples During Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective, Single-center, Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of fibrinogen assay of rotational thromboelastometry (FIBTEM)-derived estimates of fibrinogen in samples collected during cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgical patients by comparison to Clauss method fibrinogen concentration. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single university hospital center. PARTICIPANTS: Human participants. INTERVENTIONS: Retrospectively obtained laboratory assays including rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and Clauss fibrinogen assay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A retrospective review was performed of anesthesia records at a single university teaching hospital during a 1-year period. From paired samples taken near the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, fibrinogen concentrations (Clauss method) were compared with FIBTEM-derived measures of maximal clot firmness (MCF) and clot amplitude at 10 minutes (A10) using Spearman's rank correlation, linear regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The study included 1,077 patients. Clauss fibrinogen was correlated strongly with FIBTEM amplitudes (r = 0.78 for MCF and A10; p<0.01). The correlation was related inversely to hemoglobin concentration (p<0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.95; the optimal FIBTEM A10 cutoff for diagnosis of a fibrinogen concentration of<1.5 g/L was ≤8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The FIBTEM was a valid point-of-care method for estimating the fibrinogen concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass and may be used for prediction of hypofibrinogenemia before separation from the extracorporeal circuit.

Reliability of a point-of-care device for international normalized ratio testing during the three surgical phases of orthotopic liver transplantation: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the reliability of a point-of-care device, the HEMOCHRON(®) Jr. Signature, for measuring the international normalized ratio (INR) during the three surgical phases of liver transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing liver transplantation during July to December 2013. Thirty-one patients who had simultaneous laboratory and point-of-care INR readings from each phase of liver transplant surgery (paleohepatic, anhepatic, and neohepatic) were eligible for inclusion. Bland-Altman analysis, Spearman's rank correlation, and four quadrant plots were used to compare INR results from the point-of-care device (pocINR) with those from the laboratory (labINR). RESULTS: Based on the Bland-Altman analysis, mean biases (95% prediction interval) were 0.10 (0.03 to 0.17), 0.19 (0.12 to 0.27), and 0.21 (0.01 to 0.43) for the paleohepatic, anhepatic, and neohepatic phases, respectively. The pocINR device showed a systematic underestimation of the labINR. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval [CI]) were: Ρ = 0.90 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.95); Ρ = 0.92 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.93); and Ρ = 0.71 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.85), respectively. Direction-of-change analysis between the paleohepatic to anhepatic and the anhepatic to neohepatic phases showed strong concordance of 84% and, also considering the small bias between the measurements, supports the use of the pocINR device in the clinical management of liver transplant surgery. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care INR was accurate prior to hepatic reperfusion, but reliability decreased in the neohepatic phase.

Anesthetic management of a patient with arginase deficiency undergoing liver transplantation.

A 20-year-old female underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for arginase deficiency, a urea cycle disorder. A hyperammonemic state was prevented by the administration of lipid and carbohydrate substrate and avoidance of protein loading (including human albumin) and prolonged fasting. Caval cross-clamping may have been tolerated poorly owing to the potential interaction between hyperargininemia (a nitric oxide precursor) and the lack of collateral venous drainage. Ammonia and arginine levels improved in parallel with hepatic function after reperfusion of the hepatic graft.