Outreach to facilitate return to VA care for veterans with serious mental illness: A mixed-methods evaluation of best practices.

Outreach to people with serious mental illness who are disengaged from treatment can facilitate return to care. However, little is known regarding what outreach strategies are effective. This mixed-methods evaluation assessed best practices for conducting outreach to Veterans with serious mental illness via the national Veterans Health Administration Re-Engaging Veterans with Serious Mental Illness program by comparing the strategies used by high-performing sites and low-performing sites. Quantitative data included the types and number of contact attempts used to reach Veterans. Qualitative data included interviews with clinicians from high- and low-performing sites. Results indicated making at least four contact attempts using methods of phone, certified letter, and next of kin differentiated high from low-performing facilities. Clinicians from high-performing sites also differed from low-performing sites in their expressed philosophy about outreach, demonstrated a broader array of strategies in attempting to contact Veterans, and described greater connections with others at their site, with clinicians around the country, and with national program resources. Implications of evaluation findings for outreach programs and research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Access to timely mental health care treatment initiation among Veterans Health Administration patients with and without serious mental illness.

Timely care initiation is a priority within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Patients with serious mental illnesses (SMI) are a group that benefits from timely care initiation due to elevated risks of negative outcomes with delayed care. However, no evaluation has assessed whether VHA SMI patients disproportionately experience delays in mental health care initiation. VHA administrative care data were used to compare delays in mental health care initiation for VHA patients with and without SMI who had newly identified mental health needs. Analyses assessed rates of delayed initial mental health appointments within five settings (General Mental Health [GMH], Primary Care Mental Health Integration [PC-MHI], Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD], Substance Use Disorder [SUD], and Psychosocial Rehabilitation clinics [PSR]). SMI patients were more likely to receive delayed initial appointments in three of five clinical settings (PTSD, SUD, PSR) and had significantly longer average wait times for an initial appointment when referred to the PTSD clinic for an initial appointment. Overall, SMI patients were equally as likely to receive delayed initial appointments. While VHA SMI patients were not more likely to experience delayed mental health care initiation overall, they were more likely to experience delays within three of the five treatment settings. Findings suggest that the majority of VHA SMI patients experience equivalent timeliness, though those with more complex needs, and particularly those with trauma-related care needs, may be more likely to experience treatment initiation delays. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

A defect in the PINOID serine/threonine kinase affects leaf shape in cucumber.

Leaf shape has important implications for optimizing plant architecture for grain crops and horticultural crops. Examination of the cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) round leaf (rl) mutant by Song et al. (2019) revealed that the PINOID protein kinase affects leaf shape by altering auxin biosynthesis, transport, and signaling.

Enhancing Treatment Reengagement for Veterans With Serious Mental Illness: Evaluating the Effectiveness of SMI Re-Engage.

OBJECTIVE: This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) program Reengaging Veterans With Serious Mental Illness in Treatment (SMI Re-Engage). The program serves veterans with serious mental illness who experience extended gaps in use of VHA care. METHODS: Propensity score-weighted survival analysis that adjusted for demographic, clinical, and utilization factors assessed whether being contacted via SMI Re-Engage predicted return to VHA care within 18 months of when clinicians received patient contact information and, among veterans contacted, whether return to VHA care was associated with mortality risk within the 18-month follow-up period. Among all veterans who returned to care, a post hoc propensity score-weighted logistic regression that adjusted for demographic, clinical, and utilization factors assessed whether being contacted via SMI Re-Engage was associated with returning to outpatient care versus inpatient or emergency care. RESULTS: Of veterans contacted (N=886), 42% returned to care, compared with 27% of veterans whom providers attempted to contact but could not reach (N=2,059). When analyses adjusted for covariates, veterans who were contacted had a higher risk of returning to care (hazard ratio (HR)=3.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.70-4.28). Among veterans contacted, the association between return to VHA care and mortality risk was not significant. Post hoc analyses for veterans who returned to care (N=941) indicated that being contacted (versus not being contacted) was associated with higher odds of returning to outpatient care (versus inpatient or emergency care) (odds ratio=2.42, CI=1.68-3.47). CONCLUSIONS: SMI Re-Engage contact facilitated return to VHA care. SMI Re-Engage exemplifies how population health strategies can address health care discontinuities among people with serious mental illness.