Platelet function and soluble P-selectin in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: The bleeding phenotype in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is heterogeneous, but usually mild and only partly dependent on the severity of thrombocytopenia. Platelet reactivity has previously been suggested to underly the mild phenotype. METHODS: Platelet function was assessed as basal and agonist-induced surface expression of P-selectin and activation of GPIIb/IIIa via flow cytometry, and soluble (s)P-selectin levels were assessed in plasma of 77 patients with primary ITP, 19 hemato-oncologic thrombocytopenic controls (TC) and 20 healthy controls (HC). The association of platelet function with laboratory and clinical parameters such as bleeding manifestations at inclusion and previous thrombosis was analyzed. RESULTS: ITP patients showed tendency towards increased surface P-selectin and elevated levels of activated GPIIb/IIIa. Platelet activation after stimulation with all agonists including TRAP-6, ADP, arachidonic acid and CRP was decreased compared to HC. Compared to TC, only GPIIb/IIIa activation but not surface P-selectin was higher in ITP. Levels of soluble (s)P-selectin were significantly higher in ITP patients compared to TC, but similar to HC. Higher sP-selectin levels were associated with blood group O and current therapy, with highest levels in TPO-RA treated patients. Platelet reactivity was not associated with platelet count or size, platelet antibodies, treatment regime, or blood group. No correlation between platelet activation with the bleeding phenotype or previous thrombotic events could be observed. CONCLUSION: ITP patients did not have hyper-reactive platelets compared to HC, but partly higher reactivity compared to TC. Further studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanism behind the bleeding and pro-thrombotic phenotype in ITP. 250/250.

Impact of Elimination or Reduction of Dietary Animal Proteins on Cancer Progression and Survival: Protocol of an Online Pilot Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Current evidence suggests that the incidence of cancer is low in vegan populations, and experimental studies have revealed a significant role of dietary proteins in cancer development and progression. However, little data currently exists regarding the effect of a plant-based diet on the progression of diagnosed cancer. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study is to determine if a reduction or total elimination of animal protein from the diet can positively influence the outcome of an existing cancer and, in addition to standard oncological therapies, increase remission rates. METHODS: The primary aim of this online study is to test the effect on remission rates in cancer patients (primary outcome) with distinct self-selected dietary patterns (omnivore, lacto-ovo-vegetarian, vegan), and allow for an estimation of the effect size. Secondary outcomes are tumor behavior, relapse-free interval, therapies, therapy tolerability and side-effects, comorbidities, medication, quality of life, acceptance, and feasibility of the selected diet. Safety concerns exist for vegan diets (especially in cancer patients) and the study will carefully monitor for deterioration of health, tumor progression, or malnutrition. Furthermore, the study will evaluate the online portal as a study platform (technical and safety aspects, and sequence of displayed questionnaires) as well as the validity of self-reported and online-generated data. RESULTS: The study was performed between April, 2015 and June, 2016, and a preliminary evaluation of safety aspects was undertaken after June, 2016. Primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated when the final patients complete the study in December, 2016. CONCLUSIONS: This study will reveal information about the effects of dietary patterns on cancer disease and progression. The methodology of the study addresses several aspects and limitations of nutrition studies in cancer patients, such as precision of nutrition data, acceptance criteria, online methodology, and safety aspects. CLINICALTRIAL: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02437474; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02437474 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6jL7UUCVq).