RESUMO
This case report highlights a rare but significant complication of blunt trauma requiring preperitoneal packing and illustrates the intricate relationship between trauma surgery and urological emergencies. Testicular torsion is an acute urological emergency necessitating prompt surgical intervention to salvage testicular function. While commonly associated with intrinsic factors such as the "bell-clapper" deformity, extrinsic factors such as trauma and postoperative complications can also precipitate this condition. This case underscores the complexity of diagnosing and managing testicular torsion arising after surgical interventions for pelvic fractures, a scenario sparsely documented in medical literature. We present a 27-year-old male who sustained multiple injuries, including a pelvic fracture, from a motorcycle accident and subsequently underwent preperitoneal packing for significant pelvic hemorrhage. Five days post-operation, the patient developed acute right lower quadrant and unilateral testicular pain, leading to the diagnosis of testicular torsion via Doppler ultrasonography. An emergency bilateral orchiopexy was performed, revealing a 180° torsion of the right testis. This case illustrates the need for a heightened awareness of potential genitourinary complications following trauma surgery. The pathophysiological mechanisms possibly include increased intra-abdominal pressure and altered testicular mobility due to surgical interventions. The report emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary care in trauma settings to ensure comprehensive evaluation and management of patients, including the consideration of urological complications. Testicular torsion following preperitoneal packing for pelvic fractures represents a critical intersection between trauma surgery complications and urological emergencies, necessitating vigilant postoperative care and multidisciplinary collaboration for timely diagnosis and intervention. This case contributes to the broader understanding of postoperative complications, advocating for an integrated approach to patient care in high-energy trauma scenarios.
RESUMO
Background: There has been little focus on concussions in youth lacrosse players in the United States. Purpose: To provide a descriptive analysis of the epidemiology and incidence of concussions in youth lacrosse and compare the results with well-documented analyses of concussions in youth American football. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Data on concussions in pediatric patients playing lacrosse from 2006 to 2019 were collected using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). Weighted calculations and combined participation data obtained from membership in USA Lacrosse were used to estimate injury incidence. A comparison dataset was created using the NEISS data on youth football-related concussions. The cause of concussion was categorized into player-to-player, player-to-stick, player-to-ball, or player-to-ground contact. Results: A total of 37,974 concussion injuries related to lacrosse were identified in players with a mean age of 14.5 ± 3.5 years; 70% of concussions occurred in boys. National participation in lacrosse increased from 2006 to 2011 by a mean of 10.3% annually, followed by a lower annual growth rate of 2.5% from 2012 to 2019. The overall incidence of concussion injuries increased over the study period (r = 0.314), with the incidence rate in boys being greater than that of girls from 2009 to 2013. The most common cause of concussion was player-to-ground contact for boys and player-to-ball or player-to-stick contact for girls. The mean annual concussion incidences in youth lacrosse and youth football were 443 and 355 per 100,000 participants, respectively. Conclusion: Over the study period, 16% of lacrosse injuries were diagnosed as concussions, a higher mean annual incidence per 100,000 participants than that of youth football (443 vs 355). The cause of concussion was different based on sex, with higher rates of player-to-ball or player-to-stick contact in female players versus player-to-ground contact in male players.
RESUMO
Background: Rigorous training may lead to increased rates of knee osteoarthritis and arthroplasties in military service members. Given the large numbers of arthritis and the increasing need for total joint replacements, access to appropriate care can be difficult for this population based on insurance restrictions. The aim of this study was to evaluate access to total knee arthroplasty for TRICARE patients in contracted civilian medical facilities. Methods: Orthopedic surgeons contracted to perform total knee replacements in the state of Florida were identified via TRICARE's website. Investigators used a secret shopper methodology with a standardized script to request an appointment for their family member for a total knee arthroplasty using either TRICARE Select or BlueCross preferred provider organization. The appointment acceptance rates, wait times, call duration, and accuracy of the physician listing were collected. Results: A total of 228 offices that perform total knee arthroplasties in Florida were successfully contacted. Overall, 43.1% of the clinics had an inaccurate online listing, and 207 (91%) were able to schedule an appointment with TRICARE, compared to 93% for BlueCross Blue Shield (P = .06). The average wait for TRICARE patients was 24 days and 18 days for BlueCross (P < .01). Call times for TRICARE patients averaged 7.2 minutes, compared to 5.2 minutes for BlueCross (P < .01). Conclusions: TRICARE patients encountered longer waiting periods and inaccurate provider listings when accessing orthopedic care. Our results suggest a disparity in healthcare access for patients using TRICARE, which may result in negative health outcomes from receiving delayed care.