Physician Perceptions and Beliefs Regarding End-of-Life Care in a Central California Health System.

Objective: We sought to describe the preparedness, beliefs, and experience regarding end-of-life (EOL) care for in-training and attending physicians. We hoped to clarify how medical training impacts views about EOL, and topics where physicians desire more EOL training. Methods: An online anonymous survey was sent to 766 physicians who worked at Community Medical Centers in Fresno, California from October to December 2016. Descriptive statistics of the population were compiled. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests comparing differences in personal experience, and preparedness and confidence with palliative care topics by training level were performed. Results: 195 physicians responded to the survey (25%). Respondents were 42% in-training, 55% male, 57% Caucasian, and 38% Christian. Compared to attendings those in-training were younger, more often female, and more likely to have a DO degree. The 2 groups did not differ in ethnicity, specialty, or religion. Attendings were more likely than those in-training (46% vs 14%, P < .001) to have an advance directive, reported a higher level of formal training in discussing prognosis (P = .037), and had higher confidence with palliative care topics like delivering bad news (P = .002), discussing resuscitation status (P = .015), and discussing the new California EOL Option Act (P < .001). Thirty-two percent of respondents believed patients often starve at EOL. Otherwise, knowledge was 90% correct. Conclusions: Physicians in-training are less prepared to discuss EOL topics. Physicians in-training and attendings desire more education in pain management at EOL.

Earlier Palliative Care Referrals Associated with Reduced Length of Stay and Hospital Charges.

Background: Inpatient palliative care consultation services have been shown to have a dramatic impact on the time cancer patients spend in the hospital, which directly affects overall health care charges and expenditures. Objective: Our study looks at early palliative care consults in patients with a variety of chronic medical conditions as well as cancer. Design: This is a retrospective case-control study of patients referred to the palliative care department from April 2014 to June 2016. Setting/Subjects: This study took place at a university-affiliated community-based urban tertiary care hospital. Cases were patients with a referral placed for a palliative care consult <24 hours after registration into the hospital. Controls were chosen on a one-to-one basis from all other patients referred 24 or more hours after registration. Participants were matched on underlying disease, Charlson comorbidity index, and date of referral. Measurements: Primary outcomes were hospital length of stay and total hospital charges. Results: The median (interquartile range) length of stay was 4.2 days (2.0-7.2) for cases and 9.7 days (6.0-18.3) for the control group; p < 0.001. Total hospital charges in U.S. dollars for cases and controls was $38,600 ($22,700-$66,900) and $95,300 ($55,200-$192,700), respectively; p < 0.001. Similar differences were seen for cancer and chronic disease cases and controls. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a significant association between reduced length of stay and hospital charges when consults for palliative care were initiated within 24 hours of hospital admission regardless of underlying disease.